/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/5399133/iaconferences2012.0.jpg)
I originally presented this system last year, and I continue to believe it is the best way to restructure college football in this era of big money. Currently, big money is driving every bad decision in college athletics, from the southeastern conference adding a school from a state that was not even in the Confederacy to the Big East adding a team from San Diego to its ranks. (Just think about that last one for a moment and soak in its absurdity.)
My new system is based upon three primary changes. Those changes are:
1) Separate the organization and structure of college football from all other sports (all football conferences are "football-only").
2) Reorganize all football conferences along geographic lines.
3) Implement a system of promotion and relegation within Division I football.
The primary benefits of these changes, all of which are major and sorely needed, in my opinion, are:
1) Allow schools who have top-tier football programs to enjoy the money associated with big-time college football without having to hamstring basketball and non-revenue sports with huge travel budgets.
2) Preserve historic rivalries and natural geographic matchups in all sports.
3) Provide a guaranteed path for "lower-tier" schools to be able to legitimately compete for a national championship based wholly on merit.
None of the current athletic conferences would need to be dissolved. In fact, virtually all of them could keep operating as they are today with their "regular" membership in all sports except football, and with a "football-only" division that is completely separate. (Though I suspect that if this change were passed, a new wave of realignment would occur that would bring many schools' non-revenue sports back into, more or less, their previous historical places.) For that reason, I have used current conference names in the "stacks" I have created below.
For reference purposes, here is the current conference alignment as it looked for the 2012 football season (and it gets even crazier in 2013):
And here is the new conference/stack map for the promotion/relegation system:
Have I piqued your interest? Then, please, read on...
The stack breakdown by state is as follows. (The total number of schools in the stack is in parentheses.) Every Division I school in each state is in the associated stack, with the lone exception of Miami (FL), who is in the ACC stack. I did this both for competitive reasons and because of the fact that Miami has far more in common from a demographics standpoint with the Atlantic seaboard and northern schools than with the schools in the southeast. Miami (FL) is literally the only exception to my geographically-based rule. Here is the state breakdown:
SEC stack (45): GA, FL, AL, MS, SC, TN, KY
ACC stack (57): NC, VA, WV, VA, DC, MD, DE, NJ, CT, RI, MA, PA, NY, NH, VT, ME
Big Ten stack (40): OH, IN, MI, IL, WI, MN, IA, ND, SD
Big XII stack (42): LA, TX, AR, OK, KS, NE, NM, CO, WY
Pac-12 stack (33): CA, AZ, UT, NV, OR, WA, ID, MT, HI
Now, when flaming my conference alignment in the comments below, please remember that I haven't changed the 8-game conference schedule or the 12-game overall schedule, so out-of-conference matchups are always available to teams who are no longer grouped in the same stack or conference.
Also, remember that conference membership will literally change every year, with the best two performers advancing a level and the worst two performers dropping a level.
Here are the promotion/relegation rules:
- Each of the top two tiers is a twelve-team league with two divisions. The third tier (historically the Division I-AA teams) is broken down into two conferences, which are not limited in size.
- At the end of the regular season, the team in each division with the worst conference record is relegated to the league on the next lower tier.
- At the end of the season, the second-tier team who wins their division is promoted to the top-tier league in their stack.
- At the end of the season, the winners of each of the two third-tier conferences is promoted to the second-tier league in their stack. (For the Pac-12 stack, which only has one third-tier conference, the top two finishers from that league are promoted.) For very large third-tier conferences, this might necessitate a playoff due to equivalent conference records (if whatever tiebreakers are in place are tied, as well).
For the first season, each stack breaks down as follows:
SEC |
(Top) |
East | West |
Clemson | Alabama |
Florida | Auburn |
Florida State | Mississippi State |
Georgia | Ole Miss |
Ga. Tech | Tennessee |
South Carolina | Vanderbilt |
Conference USA |
(Second-Tier) |
East | West |
Florida Atlantic | Kentucky |
Florida International | Louisville |
Troy | Memphis |
UAB | Middle Tenn. State |
Central Florida | Southern Miss |
South Florida | Western Kentucky |
Third-Tier Conferences
|
|
Southern Conference (TN, AL, KY, MS) | Big South Conference (GA, FL, SC) |
Austin Peay | Charleston Southern |
Chattanooga | The Citadel |
Eastern Kentucky | Coastal Carolina |
Jacksonville State (AL) | Furman |
Morehead State | Georgia Southern |
Murray State | Georgia State |
Samford | Jacksonville U. (FL) |
South Alabama | Presbyterian |
Tennessee-Martin | Wofford |
Tennessee State | |
Tennessee Tech |
If this system were in place in 2012:
Relegated: Georgia Tech (to Conference USA)Tennessee Auburn (to Conference USA)
Florida Atlantic (to Big South)
Southern Miss (to Southern Conference)
Promoted: Central Florida (to SEC)
Louisville (to SEC)
Eastern Kentucky (to Conference USA)
Georgia Southern (to Conference USA)
ACC |
(Top) |
North | South |
Boston College |
Miami (FL) |
Penn State |
NC State |
Pitt | North Carolina |
Syracuse | Virginia Tech |
UConn | Virginia |
West Virginia |
Wake Forest |
Big East
|
(Second-Tier) |
North | South |
Army | Appalachian State |
Buffalo | Duke |
Delaware | East Carolina |
Rutgers | Marshall |
Temple | Maryland |
Villanova | Navy |
Third-Tier Conferences |
|
Colonial Athletic Association (DC, KY, MD, NC, VA, WV) |
Patriot League (CT, DE, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI) |
Campbell | Bryant |
Davidson | Bucknell |
Elon | Central Conn. St. |
Gardner-Webb | Colgate |
Georgetown | Duquesne |
James Madison | Fordham |
Liberty | Holy Cross (MA) |
Old Dominion | Lafayette |
Richmond | Lehigh |
Towson | Maine |
VMI | Marist |
Western Carolina | Monmouth |
William & Mary | New Hampshire |
Rhode Island | |
Sacred Heart | |
St. Francis (PA) | |
SUNY-Albany | |
SUNY-Stony Brook | |
UMass | |
Wagner |
If this system were in place in 2012:
Relegated: Boston College (to Big East)
Virginia (to Big East)
Army or Delaware (to Patriot League)
Maryland or Appalachian State (to CAA)
Promoted: Rutgers (to ACC)
Duke or East Carolina (to ACC)
Old Dominion (to Big East)
Stony Brook or Lehigh (to Big East)
Big Ten
|
(Top) |
East | West |
Indiana |
Illinois |
Michigan |
Iowa |
Notre Dame |
Minnesota |
Ohio State |
Northwestern |
Purdue | Wisconsin |
Michigan State |
Iowa State |
Mid-American Conference
|
(Second-Tier) |
East | West |
Cincinnati | Northern Illinois |
Akron | Central Michigan |
Kent | Eastern Michigan |
Bowling Green |
Western Michigan |
Miami (OH) |
Toledo |
Ohio U. |
Ball State |
Third-Tier Conferences |
|
Pioneer Conference (IA, ND, SD, IL) |
Ohio Valley Conference (IN, OH, MI) |
Drake | Butler |
North Dakota |
Dayton |
North Dakota State |
Valparaiso |
South Dakota |
Indiana State |
South Dakota State |
Youngstown State |
Northern Iowa |
|
Eastern Illinois |
|
Illinois State |
|
Southern Illinois |
|
Western Illinois |
|
Robert Morris |
If this system were in place in 2012:
Relegated: Indiana (to MAC)
Illinois (to MAC)
Akron (to Ohio Valley)
Eastern Michigan (to Ohio Valley)
Promoted: Cincinnati (to B1G)
Northern Illinois (to B1G)
North Dakota State (to MAC)
Butler (to MAC)
Big XII
|
(Top) |
North | South |
Kansas |
Arkansas |
Kansas State |
LSU |
Missouri |
Oklahoma |
Nebraska |
Texas Tech |
Oklahoma State |
Texas |
TCU |
Texas A&M |
Mountain West
|
(Second-Tier) |
East | West |
Colorado |
Air Force |
Louisiana Tech |
Baylor |
Louisiana-Lafayette | Colorado State |
Houston |
Tulsa |
Rice |
UTEP |
SMU |
Wyoming |
Third-Tier Conferences |
|
Southland Conference (LA, AR) |
Missouri Valley Conference (TX, NM, CO, MO) |
Louisiana-Monroe | North Texas |
Tulane |
New Mexico |
McNeese State |
New Mexico State |
Nicholls State |
UT San Antonio |
Northwestern State (LA) |
Lamar |
Southeastern Louisiana |
Sam Houston State |
Arkansas State |
Stephen F. Austin |
Central Arkansas |
Texas State |
Northern Colorado |
|
Missouri State |
|
SE Missouri State |
If this system were in place in 2012:
Relegated: Kansas (to Mountain West)
Arkansas (to Mountain West)
Colorado (to Missouri Valley)
UTEP (to Missouri Valley)
Promoted: Louisiana Tech (to Big XII)
Baylor or Tulsa (to Big XII)
Louisiana-Monroe (to Mountain West)
New Mexico (to Mountain West)
Pac-12
|
(Top) |
North | South |
Boise State |
Arizona |
Cal |
Arizona State |
Oregon |
BYU |
Oregon State |
UCLA |
Stanford | USC |
Washington |
Utah |
WAC
|
(Second-Tier) |
North | South |
Fresno State |
Hawaii |
Idaho | Nevada |
Washington State |
UNLV |
Montana |
Utah State |
Eastern Washington |
San Diego State |
San Jose State |
Northern Arizona |
Third-Tier Conference |
Great West Conference (CA, UT, OR, ID, MT) |
San Diego U. |
Cal Poly |
Southern Utah |
UC-Davis |
Portland State |
Sacramento State |
Weber State |
Idaho State |
Montana State |
If this system were in place in 2012:
Relegated: Cal (to WAC)
Utah (to WAC)
Idaho or Montana (to Great West)
UNLV (to Great West)
Promoted: San Jose State (to Pac-12)
Utah State (to Pac-12)
Montana State (to WAC)
Cal Poly (to WAC)
I think this is an equitable system, and it completely eliminates the threat of further realignment. If a team from the lower tiers wants to play their way up into big-boy football, they have a path with which to do just that.
Please also note that I'm not dealing with the postseason at all in this post. In fact, you could ostensibly still have the Division I-AA playoffs, since Division I-AA is now just the third tier of football. Heck for people who love playoffs, you could even have a new playoff between the champions of the tier two leagues. But the bottom line is that this system is created to deal with the sport as a whole and the regular season, not the postseason.
The real sticking point, from a practical standpoint, is the issue of scholarships. Today's schools in Division I-A (tiers one and two in this system) currently are allowed 85 scholarships, while Division I-AA schools (tier three in this system) are only allowed 60 scholarships. I think that issue could be overcome, however, either by simply lifting the I-AA scholarship limit to 85 or by providing a special "golden parachute" provision for schools that get relegated to tier three by allowing them to phase down to 60 scholarships over a two-year period.
Let me know what you think in the comment section below!