Georgia Fans Want to Play Texas, Call for 8:50 Kickoff Time
Shortly after Michigan and Notre Dame agreed to maintain hostilities for another two decades, I shifted my focus to other out-of-conference matchups I would deem desirable. Accordingly, I put the following inquiry to Bulldog Nation: "Now that Michigan is off the table, what marquee non-conference matchup would you most like to see Georgia schedule?"
A couple of late votes slipped in after I formally closed out the balloting, although they would have made no difference in the standings even had the polls remained open. The top choice was Texas, which boasted a 40 per cent plurality and finished well ahead of runner-up Penn State (28%). The Bruins were a distant third with 13 per cent.
"None of the above" hauled in seven per cent of the ballots cast, finishing just in front of North Carolina. Although Tar Heel partisans would be up for a resumption of the onetime rivalry, only six per cent of Georgia fans felt likewise. After U.N.C. came T.C.U. (4%), Rutgers (2%), and Navy (0%).

State University of New Jersey alumna Kristin Davis was disappointed by the scant support received by the Scarlet Knights in the most recent Dawg Sports poll.
After that poll question was posted, of course, it came to light that Georgia has its eye on scheduling a top-tier home-and-home series for 2011 and 2012, which changed the math for me considerably.
Consequently, even though not all denizens of Bulldog Nation are persuaded that Georgia's schedule needs upgrading, I posed a new question: "All right, no kidding this time. Which team do you really want to see Georgia play in 2011 and 2012?"
Your votes go here and your explanations go in the comments below or in the diaries to the right.
Go 'Dawgs!
0 recs |
6
comments
Comments
I like Cal
Speaking of stellar state schools, did anyone happen to catch the opinion piece by Stanley Fish in the NY Times' TimesSelect online, called "Access vs. Quality"? Here's a fun bit:
"Florida is not even in the second tier of university systems in this country. Florida does not have a single campus that measures up to the best schools in the systems of Virginia, Wisconsin and Georgia, nevermind first-tier states like California, Michigan and North Carolina."
The entire article is available (with subscription) at http://select.nytimes.com/2007/08/01/opinion/01fish.html
I can't help blushing a little at the prospect of my alma mater's being considered on par with Virginia and Wisconsin.
by NCT on Aug 4, 2007 10:35 PM EDT 0 recs
I hadn't mentioned it lately . . .
by T Kyle King on
Aug 4, 2007 10:39 PM EDT
up
0 recs
whoa
by NCT on
Aug 4, 2007 10:41 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I've found your secret
by Auburn91 on Aug 5, 2007 11:53 AM EDT 0 recs
Well...
That said, why is UGA looking for 2011 and 2012, and not 2012 and 2013? That leaves 2010 as an empty spot on the schedule, which likely means a non-BCS type-team in that year, and the same thing for 2013 as well.
Really, what they should be doing is looking for a quality pair in 2010 and 2011, and then 2012 and 2013.
I will say that I would expect Southern Cal to be firmly mediocre by the time 2011 rolls around. Pete Carroll's not getting any younger, and honestly, as soon as he gets a great NFL job with full front-office control, I have a hard time seeing him still at USC. Maybe that's just my wishful thinking, but I'm sure his atrocious record at the NFL level still bothers him a bit.
by CAJason80 on Aug 6, 2007 12:51 PM EDT 0 recs
This is just off the top of my head . . .
Louisville is on the slate for 2011 and 2012, but Damon Evans evidently is thinking higher up on the food chain, historically if not right this very minute.
by T Kyle King on
Aug 6, 2007 1:59 PM EDT
up
0 recs






