Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dan Marino Starting College For Developmentally Disabled

The Top Five Non-Conference Games You Think Won't Be Good . . . But Will

Have you voted? All right, you can stay. If not, go vote and don't come back 'til you've done your civic duty like a good American. (Vote for Burnt Orange Nation's Peter Bean while you're at it.)

The balloting is far from over and, while you can't just sit there and cast multiple votes in succession at a single sitting like Casey McCall attempting to get the better of his much cooler co-anchor, you aren't limited to casting just one vote per computer, either. The polls will remain open through Saturday night, so please vote at least once a day from every computer to which you have access. (If you're in a University of Georgia computer lab, by all means, go vote from every terminal in the room!)

Now that you've exercised the franchise and kept the world safe for democracy, I'll let you in on a little secret. Although, unfortunately, there are some non-conference games you think will be good that won't, this fact is made up for by the reality that some games that look like laughers won't wind up as lopsided as you imagine.

In literary circles, we call this "foreshadowing."

I'm not necessarily forecasting any upsets, you understand; I just think there are some heavy favorites in non-marquee out-of-conference contests that are going to get some serious scares put into them. It wouldn't surprise me if an underdog pulled off a shocker, but I'm predicting that the outcomes of each of the following contests will remain in doubt in the fourth quarter as I bring you . . .

The Top Five Non-Conference Games You Think Won't Be Good . . . But Will:

Central Michigan at Clemson (October 20): After back-to-back conference outings against Georgia Tech and Virginia Tech, the Tigers will get an October 13 open date before beginning a stretch run that includes games against Boston College and Wake Forest sandwiched between road trips to Maryland and South Carolina in four of the season's last five weeks. Hold on a minute, though . . . Tommy Bowden's squad managed to shoehorn a home date with the Chippewas into the second half of their slate. Defending M.A.C. champion Central Michigan is coming off of a 10-win season capped off by a Motor City Bowl victory and the Chippewas scored 31 or more points in six of their last seven games in 2006. If you think Central Michigan can't put a serious scare into an A.C.C. squad, you weren't watching the Chippewas' near-upset of Boston College last August.

Oregon State at Cincinnati (September 6): Believe it or not, this is a clash of B.C.S. conference opponents. Folks forget that, but the Big East's Bearcats upset surging Rutgers last season and concluded the campaign with a victory in a January bowl game. (All right, it was the International Bowl, but still. . . .) The Beavers, meanwhile, posted a 10-4 season complete with a win over Southern California and a Sun Bowl victory, but Oregon State absorbed drubbings from Boise State (42-14), California (41-13), and U.C.L.A. (25-7) while skating by with five wins by a touchdown or less. In fact, in their last 11 road games, the Beavers are 6-5, with only one of their wins (over lowly Stanford) coming by more than 10 points. Oregon State simply does not play well on its opponents' home fields and, the last time the Beavers played a Big East team on the road, Louisville handed them a 63-27 setback. Cincinnati isn't Louisville, but the Bearcats will give the Beavers all they can handle.

The foregoing mention of the Scarlet Knights obligates me to post a photograph of State University of New Jersey alumna Kristin Davis.

Florida State at Colorado (September 15): Plenty of talent remains on hand in Tallahassee and the coaching staff has been improved by the addition of Jimbo Fisher and the return of Chuck Amato, so the Seminoles appear on the verge of a resurgence, perhaps even a renascence. The Buffaloes have lost 14 of their last 16 games and last year's two-win season was the worst endured by a Colorado team since the 1-10 debacle that was Bill McCartney's third campaign in 1984. However, Dan Hawkins's inaugural squad in Boulder was competitive, sustaining half of its 10 losses by single-digit margins and handing Insight Bowl champion Texas Tech a 30-6 whipping. After winning 10 or more games in each season from 1987 to 2000, Florida State has lost four or more games in four of the last six years. The 'Noles haven't beaten a current Big 12 opponent by a double-digit margin outside of the borders of the Sunshine State since New Year's Day 1990 and the Buffaloes will give F.S.U. a game in Boulder this time, as well . . . particularly if Bobby Bowden is caught looking ahead to his September 29 showdown with the Crimson Tide in Jacksonville.

Ohio State at Washington (September 15): Last year, Washington lost to Hawaii Bowl-bound Arizona State by three points, fell at Rose Bowl champion Southern California by six points, and dropped a seven-point decision at Holiday Bowl champion California. Had the Huskies won any one of those games, Tyrone Willingham's team would have been bowl-eligible just one season removed from a 30-game run in which U-Dub went 6-24. Despite that recent downcycle, Washington's last home loss to a Big Ten team came in the third game of Don James's second season in Seattle in 1976; since that time, the Huskies have gone 11-0 against the Big Ten on the U.W. campus, posting wins over Indiana in 2003, Michigan in 1983 and 2001, Minnesota in 1976, Northwestern in 1980 and 1984, Ohio State in 1986 and 1994, Purdue in 1987 and 1989, and Wisconsin in 1992. The Buckeyes have only five seniors on scholarship, none of whom happens to be named Ted Ginn, Anthony Gonzalez, Antonio Pittman, or Troy Smith. I still expect Ohio State to win, but Washington will let the defending Big Ten champions know they've been in a fight.

Remember that foreshadowing thing I mentioned earlier?

Texas Christian at Texas (September 8): I'll admit that I felt better about this forecast before I found out that it had been scheduled for a 6:00 kickoff, but I have never before failed to give the Horned Frogs their due, so I'm sticking with my prediction. T.C.U. clearly is the class of the Lone Star State squads that were kicked to the curb after the Southwest Conference folded in 1995; in their post-S.W.C. vagabond existence, the Frogs have leapt from league to league while attending eight bowls in the last nine seasons and winning 10 or more games five times in the past seven years. Gary Patterson's teams certainly have not shied away from staring down Big 12 opponents, claiming victories at Oklahoma, over Iowa State in the Houston Bowl, at Baylor, and against Texas Tech during the course of the 2005 and 2006 campaigns. A victory over the Longhorns, obviously, would give the Horned Frogs their signature win over a B.C.S. conference opponent and, while I don't think Texas Christian quite has the muscle to pull it off, I certainly think the Frogs will make a respectable showing and I give them at least a puncher's chance to land a knockout blow.

As always, I welcome dissenting opinions . . . but, first, be sure to cast your vote in blind obedience to my command! (Please.)

Go 'Dawgs!

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good picks, and if I may add one more...
I'm completely biased, but I think the Navy-Rutgers showdown on Friday night on ESPN (week two) will be much more competitive than people think. Last year's matchup was deceiving, and Rutgers won the game on questionable calls in '05, a year after Navy dismantled them in '04. The expectations couldn't be higher for Rutgers while the expectations for Navy have been dialed down from past seasons, so if Paul Johnson is ever going to get his huge upset, it could be here. Rutgers is a very good football team, but I'm not buying the National Title contender hype, and I think they are going to have a fight on their hands in this one, especially considering the circumstances of last year's game.

I like TCU's chances even if the game is in Austin, and I think Dan Lefevor and C. Mich are going to be very dangerous even without Brian Kelly.

by AdamN on Jun 7, 2007 9:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Wow.
Big moment for me. I visit Dawgs Sports daily for the quality writing and commentary, never expecting to see my Red Raiders represented here (for obvious reasons). And what do I see on the front page but my beloved Double T?

But it had to be last year's TCU game, didn't it Kyle? Dagger -> heart.

by Red Blooded @ Dawg Sports on Jun 8, 2007 9:46 AM EDT reply actions  

Oh and...
I don't expect Texas to have any trouble with TCU. At the risk of sounding bitter, they unleashed a vicious defense on a fairly subpar Red Raider team that was still going through growing pains under a new, young quarterback for the first time in four years.

by Red Blooded @ Dawg Sports on Jun 8, 2007 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

eh
Florida State is going to WOMP the Buffaloes so bad in that opening match-up that Coach Dan Hawkins will think he was coaching one of those intra-mural squads that he LOVES so much.

I'm gonna have to tuck this post into the memory banks so I can remind you of it once the thrashing ends.

TomahawkNation.com

FSU at Colorado = Joke of a Match-Up

"The views and opinions expressed in this post are strictly those of the posts author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by TomahawkNation.com. HAH!

by JScott on Jun 8, 2007 10:23 AM EDT reply actions  

In my defense . . .
. . . I openly admit that I have no idea what I'm talking about when I'm predicting the outcomes of football games, which is why I call it Don't Bet On It!

by T Kyle King on Jun 8, 2007 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Central Michigan
I have not checked on it, but a team like CMU usually peaks and then drops.  Usually a team like that has a big group of seniors.

Too lazy right now to research it however.

by SkiDawg1985 on Jun 8, 2007 10:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Good point
My detailed knowledge of Central Michigan football is limited, as well, so I wouldn't want to make any claims that purported to be authoritative; if someone better informed would like to step in and set me straight, I would be much obliged.

After reading your comment, I picked up a preview magazine from a year ago and the projected depth chart for the Chippewas forecast the following starters by position and class standing:

  • Seniors: 7 (center, defensive end, cornerback, left tackle, 2 linebackers, wide receiver)
  • Juniors: 8 (defensive end, defensive tackle, linebacker, punter, right guard, safety, 2 wide receivers)
  • Sophomores: 7 (left guard, nose tackle, placekicker, quarterback, right tackle, running back, tight end)
  • Freshmen: 2 (cornerback, safety)
To the extent that this projection turned out to be correct (which, obviously, it didn't entirely, although I am not 100 per cent certain to what extent it deviated from the reality), Central Michigan lost upperclassmen at key positions (most notably, in the defensive front seven and in the middle of the offensive line), but much of the offense returns intact.

It's a valid point, though, and I regret that I cannot answer it with greater precision.

by T Kyle King on Jun 8, 2007 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.

Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

017oa_small MaconDawg

Editors

Redstage_small DavetheDawg

Whistling_past_small NCT

434477_small vineyarddawg

Layfield_logo_small RedCrake

Hey-why-so-serious_small tankertoad

Podunkdawg_as_a_child_small podunkdawg

Dawggone_small Ludakit

Authors

28488_443996218101_804558101_5903592_3665419_n_small Spears

Small hailtogeorgia

Killface_small Mr. Sanchez

50questions-accountant_small The Quincy Carter of Accountants