The Top Five Non-Conference Games You Think Will Be Good . . . But Won't
Permit me to begin with a friendly reminder that the Ladies . . . have unveiled the National League West, the Mid-Atlantic Conference, the Campbell Conference, and the all-important AFC North in their long-awaited hot blogger bracket.
You'll want to vote for me (and for fellow Georgia weblogger Kanu of Dodgy at Best fame). I'd hate to have to break out a little good old-fashioned voter fraud (although I do have family in McRae!), so let's try doing this legitimately for a change.
If you ain't cheatin', you ain't tryin'!
In other words . . . go vote for me now, dang it!
Back? Good. Now go vote for me again!
Back? Good. Now we turn to the topic at hand:
Every year, September schedules feature certain key matchups between non-conference opponents, many of which are not traditional rivals. These intriguing showdowns between unfamiliar yet decorated opponents pique the interest of the college football world because they represent departures from expectations yet offer the promise of a good game.
Every year, we look forward to these sorts of clashes . . . and, every year, some of them let us down.
For example . . .
Accordingly, in order to help you avoid a letdown, I am here to offer . . .
The Top Five Non-Conference Games You Think Will Be Good . . . But Won't:
Miami at Oklahoma (September 8): This series got a lot of press when it was announced, and not without good reason. Between 1983 and 2001, these two programs combined to claim seven national championships and the clashes between Barry Switzer's Sooners and Jimmy Johnson's Hurricanes were epic battles between two lawless programs captained by two future Dallas Cowboys coaches. The bloom, however, is off the 2002 Rose Bowl in Coral Gables. The defending Big 12 champions return 16 starters and the 'Canes are in transition under a new head coach and a questionable play-caller. The Sooners will win this early season showdown in a rout in Norman.
Louisville at Kentucky (September 15): The Wildcats are coming off of their best season since at least 1998 and, arguably, since 1984. Kentucky returns 17 starters, including Andre Woodson and Rafael Little, but Rich Brooks's staff was upgraded considerably with the addition of Steve Brown as defensive coordinator. (Rich Brooks's staff would have been upgraded considerably with the addition of Charlie Brown as defensive coordinator.) The Cardinals, on the other hand, are a team in transition and U. of L. must travel to Lexington to break in a new coach in a rivalry game. I ain't buying the hype. Kentucky benefited handsomely from an extremely favorable turnover margin in 2006 and the ball can only bounce your way for so long. I'm taking Louisville to trounce the 'Cats handily.
Kansas State at Auburn (September 1): These Wildcats also showed some signs of life last season, as first-year coach Ron Prince and true freshman quarterback Josh Freeman guided K-State to a bowl berth and a big win over defending national champion Texas. Now, in a dramatic departure from the cupcake-based diet upon the basis of which Bill Snyder built the program in Manhattan, the 'Cats will travel to the Plains to take on a Tiger team notorious for slow starts in early season out-of-conference clashes on Tommy Tuberville's watch. Should Auburn be on upset alert? I wish that it were so, but, sadly, the larger feline is going to maul the visiting kitties from further down the food chain. Auburn will crush Kansas State.
I hate Auburn.
Virginia Tech at Louisiana State (September 8): As always, Frank Beamer will field a smothering defense and bring exceedingly sound special teams play to the table, taking his Hokies into Death Valley to face an exceedingly talented Bayou Bengal squad. Both teams are expected to contend strongly in their respective divisions and each stands at least a decent chance at making it to the conference championship game. This one ought to be good, but I don't think it will be. V.P.I. is 1-2 against Southeastern Conference squads since the 1998 Music City Bowl . . . and the lone win during that period was a 26-8 thrashing of L.S.U. in Blacksburg early in the 2002 campaign. Don't think the Fighting Tigers have forgotten that beatdown. Don't think Louisiana State won't avenge that loss big-time at home.
Georgia Tech at Notre Dame (September 1): After last year's close contest in Atlanta, we should be expecting another brutal battle in South Bend this season, right? Wrong. The bad news for the Fighting Irish is that they lost their starting quarterback. The good news for the Yellow Jackets is that they lost their starting quarterback. The Golden Tornado fields a stout defense and an improved offense despite the loss of Calvin Johnson, whereas the Golden Domers lost a lot of firepower on offense, have been consistently atrocious on defense against good teams under Charlie Weis, and may be reduced to fielding a Clausen at quarterback. I don't expect this one to be close; I think the Ramblin' Wreck is going to roll right over Notre Dame.
Those are my thoughts; we welcome yours.
By the way . . . don't forget to go vote!
Coming Soon: The Top Five Non-Conference Games You Think Won't Be Good . . . But Will.
Go 'Dawgs!
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
A dissent
by Doug on
Jun 6, 2007 5:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Well ...
But ...
A. I am not.
B. Kentucky almost handed a far superior Louisville team a loss at Commonwealth two years ago when U of L wasn't in transition, Kentucky wasn't nearly as good on either side of the ball and Louisville had that other guy as coach for a couple of years.
C. The odds have to be figured against us, but I'm holding out for an upset here, or at least a very competitive game.
by Truzenzuzex on
Jun 6, 2007 5:53 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
on what
Josh Freeman is a star in the making, and just because they've spent the last 20 years playing high schools in non-conference doesn't mean that KSU is going to lay down and die when they face a real team.
VT will play decently against LSU but lose.
And Georgia Tech will roll over Notre Dame? Don't forget, they still have Chan 'the disease' Gailey.
http://www.cornnation.com
by cornnation on
Jun 6, 2007 6:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I love you Kyle but I disagree with you on UK-UL..
I really disagree on 4 out of 5 of them except for K. State-Auburn. That one I agree with you on 100 percent.
About my 'Cats....
I actually think that our victory over your Dawgs last year was better than the national media made it out to be. Your Dawgs were much better than most people especially here in my home state of WV gave you credit for. One of my friends said that the only reason we beat UGA last year was because you were down. I strongly disagree. You crushed Auburn, beat a Ga. Tech team ranked for most of the season, and shocked Va. Tech last year after being down big time earlier in the game. Most people besides UK and UGA fans agree with them probably because of UK's losing football teams in the past.
As for U of Kentucky vs. Louisville you might be 100 percent right that it could possibly be right considered UL's dominance over us the last few years.
But I don't think UK will struggle as much against UL this time. Yes I know UL still might crush us but I highly doubt it. We have the best leadership we've ever had in years with returning seniors Andre Woodson, Keenan Burton, Raphael Little, Jacob Tamme, Wesley Woodyard, and sophomore Trevard Lindley who is much more mature than his soph. status would indicate.
I think that if UK can hang in there at least for the 1st quarter we have a shot against them. Yes they hammered us pretty good last season and they could very well do it again but I don't think will happen. I think the game will decided by 10 points or less. At least I hope so....
By the way, Kyle, I do want to sincerely apologize to you as far as my home state WVU fans are concerned. WVU fans still hate you guys today really for no reason at all when your UGA fans did nothing wrong to deserve that shoddy treatment. They love WVU and nobody else. Every team that plays WVU on gameday is automatically considered a mortal enemy no matter whom the opponent is. Most West Virginians I know are not like that and those WVU fans wreck even older West Virginians' reputation as well as WVU's when they do stuff like that. I'm sorry for the way they've treated you then and still do sadly even now. You guys deserved better.
And you run a great site as well. Keep up the good work.
by ukcatfan191 on
Jun 11, 2007 1:48 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I disagree with you on 3 other games as well...
Now on VT-LSU I really disagree with you on that one. Virginia Tech is one very good team. I think your reasoning on this is due to the fact your Dawgs beat them pretty soundly in the second half when you guys played last year. I can understand that.
Miami-Oklahoma could be much better game than most people think. Yes I know Miami is down right now but I think they're still dangerous at any time.
On Ga. Tech-Notre Dame I can see your analysis on that as well. Yes I know Notre Dame is down but they still have that "leprechaun" working for them and they like Miami can strike at any time.
You know more about Ga. Tech than I do but I still think Ga. Tech is very vulnerable esp. with game in Notre Dame. They don't have Calvin Johnson anymore and that will hurt them big time.
Yes I know Ga. Tech played WVU very tough and kept it much closer than I ever thought it would be but WVU didn't have a healthy Steve Slaton that game where he missed the entire second half and still WVU managed to win.
I do agree with you very much that Notre Dame is overrated this season. It's probably just because they're "Notre Dame."
Like every thing else in life we will just have to wait and see....
by ukcatfan191 on
Jun 11, 2007 10:09 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs








