Dawg Sports: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Starting PG: Ridnour or Sessions? Bar-right-arrows



Radical Realignment 2007: S.W.C.

March is the most exciting time of the year for fans of college basketball and it is a month of eager anticipation for major league baseball fans anxious to see the season get underway, but, for the college football fan, it is perhaps the most interminable part of the offseason. The bowls and polls are over and done, the recruiting classes have been signed, the spring game has yet to be played (except at Auburn), and the preview magazines will not be on the newsstands until the summer. What is a football fan to do?

This is the offseason, as seen from the point of view of a college football fan.

In my case, I use this opportunity to realign the Division I-A conferences in a radical fashion. Thus far, I have shoved Conference U.S.A. to the periphery, made the Pac-10 truly Pacific and the W.A.C. genuinely Western, reanimated the Big West, and reconstituted the M.A.C. Now the time has come to resurrect the Southwest Conference:

Baylor
Houston
North Texas
Rice
Southern Methodist
Texas
Texas A&M
Texas Christian
Texas Tech
U.T.E.P.

This one's a no-brainer: 10 teams to a conference; 10 Division I-A teams in Texas . . . voila, you've got yourself a league, comprised completely of Lone Star State squads. No state lines were crossed in the making of this conference.

Shown here are Lone Starr, commissioner of the new Southwest Conference, and Princess Vespa, the league's director of compliance.

For most of the league, of course, this represents no change more jarring than a return to the old neighborhood. Eight of those 10 teams previously were members of the Southwest Conference: Baylor (1915-1995), Houston (1976-1995), Rice (1915-1995), S.M.U. (1918-1995), T.C.U. (1923-1995), Texas (1915-1995), Texas A&M (1915-1995), and Texas Tech (1960-1995).

Although the Mean Green's league affiliations have been limited to the Missouri Valley Conference (1957-1974), the Big West (1996-2000), and the Sun Belt (since 2001), and while U.N.T. was in the Division I-AA playoffs as recently as 1994 (when North Texas lost in the first round to Boise State), the school that produced four winning records in six years under Hayden Fry deserves its chance to compete with the big boys. This is, after all, the squad whose first postseason berth was a victory in the 1946 Optimist Bowl . . . and one that beat Texas Tech in Lubbock as recently as 1999.

If nothing else, the Mean Green could contribute some quality commercials.

Likewise, the Miners have called the Border Conference (1935-1961), the W.A.C. (1968-2004), and Conference U.S.A. (since 2005) home, but U.T.E.P. shared the Western Athletic Conference crown with the Horned Frogs in 2000 and, during the Mike Price era, the Miners have beaten Houston (44-41 in 2005), Rice (35-28 in 2004 and 38-31 in 2005), and Southern Methodist (57-27 in 2004 and 24-21 in 2006). U.T.E.P. also lost to the Red Raiders in overtime last year.

If current Conference U.S.A. members Houston, Rice, and S.M.U. are going to return to their former S.W.C. affiliation, it seems only fair that fellow C.-U.S.A. West squad U.T.E.P. should be taken along for the ride. It also makes sense to bring the Miners in with the Mean Green, since U.T.E.P. and U.N.T., while never league rivals, still played one another annually from 1951 to 1966.

Coming soon . . . the brand-new Central Conference.

Go 'Dawgs!

0 recs | Comment 6 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Southwest
Interesting. I think TCU would fare well, but worry about disparity in a league which clearly has a bottom that uh, sucks.

BTW Kyle, are you planning on moving up any I-AA teams in your new conference realignment?

by AdamN on Mar 18, 2007 9:54 PM EDT   0 recs

I won't be moving any Division I-AA teams up . . .
. . . because I think we have too many teams in Division I-A already.

Obviously, you are right that there is a disparity between the top and the bottom of the new S.W.C., but, since I am using geography as my guide, that couldn't be helped.

I tend to think that, absent unduly restrictive institutional restraints (for which the Southwest Conference, to put it delicately, was not noted in its prior incarnation), almost any public university's athletics program will benefit in the long term from any upgrade in its conference affiliation.

If the likes of North Texas and U.T.E.P. were to receive 10 per cent of the bowl money generated by Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Christian, Texas Tech, and the like, as well as to receive the increased media coverage and television exposure major conference membership would entail, their gridiron fortunes would improve.

No, the Mean Green and the Miners never will be on a par with the Longhorns, but the rising tide of a realigned conference would lift all boats. We have seen the opposite of this phenomenon since former S.W.C. powers like Houston and T.C.U. were cast into lesser leagues and generally began playing at their opponents' level. It is the same distance from the outhouse back to the mansion as it was from the mansion down to the outhouse.

by T Kyle King on Mar 18, 2007 10:15 PM EDT   0 recs

To continue further on my point
The Ivy League (shunned en masse to Div IAA about 25 years ago) belongs in your radical realignment.

The Ivy League has a history as rich as any other conference.  The Ivies have won their share of National Championships (albeit in the years before such championships were bought and paid for).  There are more professional football players per capita from the Ivies than any other conference.  And Ed Marinaro was screwed out of the Heisman in 1971.  Ok - that last one wasn't relevant to my point, but I couldn't figuree out where else to slide it in.  And since you HATE AUBURN, I am sure we can agree that Pat Sullivan is the least deserving of all of the Heisman Throphy winners.

The reinstatement of the Ivy League and its members in Div IA would recognize that college FOOTBALL was meant to be COLLEGE football.  The Ivies would not likely pose much of a threat anytime soon to a Major Major - but there are some Minor Majors who would be surprised every so often.

The Ivies belong playing with the 'big boys' if only in the Uptopian world that exists here at Dawgsports.com Nation.

by Blogger who came in from the cold on Mar 19, 2007 12:32 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

TACky
That's the Texas Athletic Conference, affectionately known as TACky.  

by 34hawk on Mar 19, 2007 9:23 AM EDT   0 recs

Academic, anyone?
I have to admit, I'm a little surprised you haven't put together an "All Academic" type conference. Good work though, I'm enjoying these.

by AdamN on Mar 19, 2007 6:31 PM EDT   0 recs

Yeah, I kind of went that route . . .
. . . in last year's realignment, but, since I was going mostly by geography this year, I pretty much cast academics by the wayside as a criterion.

by T Kyle King on Mar 19, 2007 7:36 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
What's the Deal?
Millers_crossing
Mayor, you may have lost your title
Millers_crossing
Which of these teams will reemerge as national contenders?
100_0141_small
Marcus Howard is loved in the pro's
Small
Georgia bar in LA???
36413436t_small
ASU Tix in Hand; You East Coasters Will Have them Today or Tomorrow
Uga_small
Sturdivant Injured?  NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
Uk_game_small
New Brass Recording of "Red and Black March"
Millers_crossing
Bama QB
Small
NCAA '09

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

ad

Site Meter