Dawg Sports: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Radical Realignment 2007: Introduction

No matter what I came up with to write about this evening, I was doomed to have no better than the fourth-best idea of the day. In terms of inherent coolness, nothing I had to offer could possibly compare to LD's announcement, The Lawgiver's data, or my son's suggestion to his mother that the fried shrimp she was preparing for supper tonight would go well with bacon.

Accordingly, I thought I might as well go ahead and get started on what is liable to be an annual springtime ritual here at Dawg Sports . . . the radical realignment of the Division I-A college football conferences. I undertook this selfsame task last year (with questionable results), so I thought I'd try it again, only, this time, I have taken a somewhat different approach.

Last year, I reshuffled the arrangement of the 119 Division I-A teams into nine 12-member conferences, one 10-member conference, and one independent (not Notre Dame, incidentally). This was partly an attempt to level the playing field by forcing every league to host a title tilt, for which I was criticized by fans from conferences which do not determine their champions in this manner.

I oppose this in principle but enjoy it in practice.

Accordingly, I went in the opposite direction this year, creating 11 leagues with 10 members each and a twelfth with nine teams, so that none of the Division I-A conferences would host a championship game and, thanks to the advent of the 12-game regular-season schedule, all of the leagues could play a full round-robin schedule in which every team plays every other team with which it shares an affiliation.

This year, I relied almost entirely upon geographic contiguity, rather than historic rivalries or competitive balance, as the primary criterion for clustering teams together. (There is one noteworthy exception to this rule, to which I shall get anon.) As a traditionalist, I wouldn't advocate this particular arrangement, but I believe it is a useful exercise in looking at the sport in a new way and there is an argument to be made that, when a team with untapped potential is elevated from the so-called "mid-major" ranks to a B.C.S. conference, that program's upgrade in status will be accompanied by the opportunity to demonstrate its quality. We saw this with Louisville and I believe we are starting to see this with South Florida.

Ere we get down to the business of throwing less heralded squads into the deep end with their more muscular neighbors to see if they will sink or swim, though, I must take out the trash, as it were. I believe it generally is conceded that 119 Division I-A teams is a few too many and I thought about dropping nine squads down to the Division I-AA ranks.

Howard, I forget whether you coach at F.A.U. or at F.I.U., but, either way, you're on the list.

Doing so, however, created some complications, as some of the bottom-dwellers of big-time college football maintain one-sided rivalries with upper-echelon competition and, should those elite squads wish to continue playing those grudge matches annually even in this new world order, I would not wish to penalize them unduly.

Consequently, I will begin the 2007 edition of radical realignment by laying out the nine-member hodgepodge that is the new Conference U.S.A. (Where possible, I have retained recognizable league names in order to maintain some scintilla of continuity.) The member institutions of this refurbished (read: downgraded) conference share nothing in common except crummy football and the fact that they will be the only Division I-A league to play eight (rather than nine) conference games frees them up to be schedule fodder for the big boys, should they be so inclined (which they shouldn't be, but that's a separate conversation).

Stay tuned. . . .

Go 'Dawgs!

0 recs | Comment 1 comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Return the Ivies to Div IA
If you add the Ivy League back where they belong that gets you to 127 Div I teams.  Elevate one more team (say.... Ga Southern) to Div I and you have 128 teams.  128 is equal to 2 raised to the 7th power.  That means that if a tournament was approved, every team could be part of the post season tournament and it would only take 2 months - seems like a long time?

Consider this - start the College Football Season on Labor Day weekend. That means that Thanksgiving weekend is the 12th weekend of the season.  That puts Georgia v. Ga Tech, Ohio St v. Michigan, Army v. Navy etc etc on the BIGGEST football weekend of the year.

That in turn puts the Round of 8 (think Regional Finals in basketball) on New Years weekend.  The Final Four (to borrow a phrase) comes the weekend after New Years and the National Title game can then be scheduled for the weekend between NFL Conference Championship games and the Super Bowl.

The Ivies are restored to their rightful place; we could see regional rivalies such as Harvard v. BC, Princeton v. Rutgers, UofP v. UVa., Cornell v. Syracuse.

Can we all agree that in terms of rich football tradition, that the Ivy League can match any existing league?

by Blogger who came in from the cold on Mar 12, 2007 11:41 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.
Start posting about the Bulldogs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Flowerchucker_small
Quick Question re: Branden Smith
Small
College Football Preview Luncheon
Photo_69_small
Individual/Composite calendars for iCal/Outlook?
Small
College Football Preview Luncheon
Small
muschamp recruits in georgia
Associated_20press_clayliston_1965_l_small
How to Taunt a Georgia Fan
Mtsu_sm_small
Going to UGA
Small
oklahoma state blog
Small
2009 Competition Improves
Small
100 Cocktails

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

Official Partner of CBS Sports