Don't Bet On It: National Game of Disinterest
You know the teams I picked in the S.E.C., including my bold pick of Kentucky to beat L.S.U. You know the teams I picked in the national games of interest. You know the words to the country song I wrote about Doug Gillett's weekend. (Hang on . . . that last one wasn't really pertinent, was it? O.K., skip that.)
What you don't yet know, and what you doubtless eagerly await the announcement of, is this week's national game of disinterest.

The Operation Overdrive-era Power Rangers (top) attempt to outduel the S.P.D.-era Power Rangers (bottom) as the team least concerned with the national game of disinterest.
As you are aware, the national game of disinterest is that one contest each week with respect to which I refuse to offer a prediction because I am utterly indifferent to the outcome and, frankly, would rather not be bothered to have to look up the final score afterwards.
It may surprise you somewhat to learn that this week's national game of disinterest is . . .
Texas A&M at Texas Tech
I know, I know, I know . . . how can I say such a thing? (Technically, I didn't say it, I wrote it, but you know what I mean.) The Aggies are 5-1. The Red Raiders are 5-1. They're both ranked on my BlogPoll ballot.
But, I mean, come on . . . look at 'em, will you?
Texas A&M has beaten Division I-AA Montana State and four Division I-A teams (Fresno State, Louisiana-Monroe, Baylor, and Oklahoma State) with a combined record of 10-12 whose wins were over Arkansas State, Buffalo, Florida Atlantic, Louisiana Tech, Nevada, Rice, Sacramento State, Sam Houston State, Texas State, and, um, Texas Tech. Dennis Franchione's squad also got skunked by Miami (Florida).
Also, having this snake-oil salesman as a head coach doesn't help.
Texas Tech has beaten Division I-AA Northwestern State and four Division I-A teams (Southern Methodist, U.T.E.P., Rice, and Iowa State) with a combined record of 7-15 whose wins were over Iowa, New Mexico, North Texas, S.M.U., Southern Miss, Texas Southern, and Tulsa. Mike Leach's squad also lost a shootout with an Oklahoma State team which (I am sad to say) was not as good as advertised.
Also, having this snake-oil salesman as a head coach doesn't help.
Neither of these teams has done anything except beat the crummy teams that have beaten every crummy team in the Lone Star State. The combatants from College Station and from Lubbock are little more than Hawaii with a twang . . . and a loss.
The loser will have been exposed as a fraud. The winner will have proven nothing. I'm not particularly interested in sticking around to learn whether the team from "The Home of the Illegal Substitution Penalty" or the team with the least masculine mascot in intercollegiate athletics is the bigger of the two pretenders.
Go 'Dawgs!
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Huh?
Sir,
Still, there are some things that Texas Tech has done against its admittedly weak schedule that no other team in the nation has done, and many of them have also played soft schedules. You will not be able to ignore Michael Crabtree forever.
by Red Blooded @ Dawg Sports on Oct 11, 2007 10:08 AM EDT reply actions
Great Call
Red Blooded, I didn't mean . . .
It may very well be the case that the Aggies and the Red Raiders are good football teams, but you wouldn't know it because they, like Hawaii, have done it against nobodies.
As for whether I'll be able to ignore Michael Crabtree forever, I believe I will.
I apologize if I hurt your feelings, but Mike Leach is a big boy and he has boosted the caliber of the Texas Tech program to a level that ought to put the Red Raiders above such soft scheduling. Until he starts scheduling with the cavalier attitude of a pirate, he's going to get his share of deserved ribbing.
Merely a dispute with his scheduling...
Rely on SMQ at your own risk, the fact is that Michael Crabtree may very well be not only the most statistically dominant receiver in the nation but one of if not the most physically gifted receivers in the nation. This despite playing quarterback in High School, which I'm sure hasn't given him an edge in reading defenses or opposing cornerbacks.
But then again talk is cheap. Crabtree has been outstanding against bad defenses. I assume that if he produces against quality defenses throughout conference play that you'll be willing to admit his hegemony in the CFB receiving ranks.
by Red Blooded @ Dawg Sports on Oct 12, 2007 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions
I pledge to you, Red Blooded . . .
Feel free to leave comments or diaries keeping us posted on the young man's progress and I will give credit where credit is due.
by T Kyle King on Oct 12, 2007 12:33 AM EDT up reply actions
Kyle gets his wish
Of course, this means that most of our defensive staff will stay in tact for a while, because we can't really fire Martinez or Jancek (sp?) because they are former defensive coordinators at Central Michigan, so if we fire them before next season, what will the TV announcers have to drone on about next year. We can't really steal their material.
On a side note, if for some reason our defense plays really bad in that game, part of the contract includes a clause that we can ship any unwanted coaches back up to... wherever Central Michigan is located, after the game.
Also, I am looking forward to MaconDawg's drink du jour that is inspired by the Chippewas.

by 
















