Dawg Sports: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Simon Says: Jamaal 'outlived his welcome here' Bar-right-arrows



Laissez Les Bons Temps Rouler!

I've been meaning to write something about The Blue-Gray Sky, a self-described "Notre Dame scrapbook" produced by ten contributing writers who collectively have crafted one of the most respected sites in the college football blogosphere.  

Due to the position the Fighting Irish occupy in the sport, it is impossible for any college football fan to be neutral where the Golden Domers are concerned.  You can be a U.C.L.A. fan and have no opinion about Alabama; you can be a Clemson fan and never give a thought to Iowa; you can pull for Syracuse and hold no views about Texas A&M one way or the other . . . but, if you follow college football, you have to take a stand on Notre Dame.  Either you love 'em or you hate 'em; there is no in between.  

It's like being a baseball fan and not having a firm opinion about the Yankees . . . it simply can't be done.

It goes without saying that the guys at Blue-Gray Sky and I fall on opposite sides of that particular divide and, as a result, our views diverge upon many other points, as well . . . up to and including the proper spelling of certain colors we agree are important.  

To their way of thinking, the October sky against which Harry Stuhldreher, Don Miller, Sleepy Jim Crowley, and Elmer Layden were outlined is gray; to my way of thinking, the color of the uniform my great-great-grandfather wore into battle in 1862 was grey.  

Along those same lines, I didn't much care for it when B.G.S.'s Mike wrote that Robert E. Lee was "a villain because he made the unforgivable mistake of casting his lot with the bad guys" and drew an analogy between the commanding officer of the Army of Northern Virginia and Erwin Rommel.  Those characterizations crept a little closer than I would've liked to the sort of absurd accusation leveled by the Fighting Irish fan (not a contributor to Blue-Gray Sky, I would hasten to add) who wrongly wrote of me that "[t]he only way he could be more 'Anti-Catholic' is if you combined his DNA with that of Jerry Falwell, Bob Jones, and Osama Bin Laden."  However, Mike later clarified that his accusations of villainy were "facetious," so I am willing to overlook those jokes, even if I didn't find them particularly funny.  

I guess I'd be more inclined to use the phrase "the bad guys" to describe the side that burned my home town to the ground, but maybe that's just me.

In short, Blue-Gray Sky is a fine weblog and a recent posting that appeared there (purely coincidentally) dovetailed nicely with something I wrote earlier this week.  

Although it now appears that some of Pat's speculation may have been premature, there are hints that Notre Dame may revive Knute Rockne's tradition of "barnstorming," when the legendary Fighting Irish coach took his team around the country to play neutral site games against stiff competition, essentially inventing intersectional scheduling.  

Since one of Notre Dame's putative neutral site games tentatively was slated to be played in New Orleans in 2011, Pat had this intriguing observation to offer regarding the Golden Domers' prospective opponent in the Big Easy:  

Georgia just cancelled a 2011 game with Cincinnati and now is in need of an out of conference opponent.  I seriously doubt that the Bulldogs would want to travel up to South Bend to play the Irish, but what would they say to a game in New Orleans, live on NBC? . . .  The Irish and the Bulldogs have only met once, a 17-10 Irish loss in the 1981 Sugar Bowl, so it would be nice to get a chance to even up the series.  Besides, Georgia doesn't play LSU that year so it wouldn't be a repeat trip to the Bayou for the Bulldogs.  At least one of the four "neutral site" games ought to be against a traditional power from a BCS conference school, and Georgia sounds good to me.

While I'm not entirely sure it's accurate to say that Georgia cancelled the game with Cincinnati rather than the other way around, the rest of what Pat had to say sounds good to me, too, even if the prospect of playing a game on "live" T.V. isn't quite as jaw-dropping as he made it sound.  

The 'Dawgs haven't traveled to New Orleans during the regular season since playing their last road game against Tulane in 1972 and there would be a nice symmetry to facing the Irish a second time at the site at which the Red and Black won their most recent national title.  

On Wednesday, I wrote that Notre Dame would be my fifth choice for a major non-conference opponent---yes, fifth, not sixth; I was kidding about Kristin Davis's alma mater---so I am all for Pat's suggestion.  

Obligatory Kristin Davis photo.

The moral of the story is that The Blue-Gray Sky is a fine weblog that should be placed in the same category with Every Day Should Be Saturday and Swamp Ball . . . namely, sites you will want to visit regularly despite the authors' team affiliation.  

Hopefully, the many denizens of the Bulldog blogosphere will get the chance to cross paths with the B.G.S. guys in the Big Easy in 2011.  

Go 'Dawgs!  

0 recs | Comment 7 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Two thoughts
  1. As an Alabama fan, I'm highly offended to see Alabama lumped in with Iowa and Texas A&M as teams you could be indifferent about.  I suppose one can be indifferent about Alabama, but I want better company to be ignored with. :D
  2. William Tecumseh Sherman is a cocksucker.  I'm glad the South lost the Civil War, but that doesn't make Sherman any less of a wanker. One of the few people not alive during my lifetime that I genuinely despise.  There were only about 4-5 buildings in this entire town not burned to the ground, and incredibly, they didn't burn the only structure in town built for military purposes.

by Nico on Apr 20, 2006 11:21 PM EDT   0 recs

No offense, Nico
Just to clarify:  I'm not neutral about Alabama, which is my second-favorite S.E.C. team, but I can see why folks who "aren't from around here" don't have strong feelings about the Tide.  

Obviously, I don't lump 'Bama in with Iowa or Texas A&M as programs.  All I meant was that you could ask, say, an Oregon State Beavers fan what he thought of Alabama and receive a reply like, "I don't know.  I hear Bear Bryant was good, but I don't really follow them that much, to tell you the truth."  

On the other hand, if you ask a college football fan what he thinks of Notre Dame, his answer will be definitive.  He'll either love 'em or hate 'em.  The Irish either will be his favorite team or his most hated team.  Either he'll gripe about how the A.P. voters always underrate Notre Dame or he'll gripe about how the A.P. voters always overrate Notre Dame.  

It is possible to find middle ground where Alabama is concerned.  No such middle ground exists where Notre Dame is concerned.  That's all I meant.  

by T Kyle King on Apr 20, 2006 11:45 PM EDT   0 recs

None take
I know what you meant.  I was just being a typical Alabama fan (which is actually a rarity for me.)

Oh, and the AP typically overrates Notre Dame...which Alabama fans know ALL. TOO. WELL.  

Just read up on 1966 & 1977.  

The 'elusive' threepeat should've happened twice already.

by Nico on Apr 20, 2006 11:55 PM EDT   0 recs

Exception to the Rule
I suppose I'm an exception to the 'Notre Dame rule'.  I don't hate or love them.  I respect their history and admire their tradition, while I despise the media's constant olfactory-rectal-inversion affair with the Fightin' Irish.

Who can blame them for staying independent when NBC is throwing boatloads of money at them?  Sure it would be nice if they joined the Big 10, but does it really matter in the grand scheme of things?

I'll pull for them if it helps UGA, and I'll pull against them if they're ranked ahead of UGA.  Otherwise, whatever.

by Hobnail Boot on Apr 21, 2006 3:29 AM EDT   0 recs

"Total War"
Wanna know who brought "terrorism" and "total war" into the consciousness of America?  William Tecumseh Sherman and his band of goons.  Yay, North!

Oh, and Notre Dame sucks.

by imarealist on Apr 21, 2006 8:35 AM EDT   0 recs

To be fair to Sherman...
To be fair to Sherman "terrorism" and "total war" in this country predate him by a good 200+ years.  The slaughter of hundreds of Pequot Indians and the torching of their homes in the Connecticut River Valley in 1637 merely laid the foundation for Sherman's "work."

by Nico on Apr 21, 2006 9:21 AM EDT   0 recs

True...
While I agree that he did not invent total war or terrorism, I would argue that he "brought [them] into the consciousness of America."  The absurd stances the federal government has taken toward the American Indians are far from the consciousness of the American public, save for a few people who actually know something about history.

by imarealist on Apr 21, 2006 11:48 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Millers_crossing
Conference predictions--part two
Millers_crossing
ACL injuries
Small
Fun CMR Coaching Stat Observation
Small
"Farewell to the Tracks", 1980
017oa_small
Can someone explain to me . . .
Millers_crossing
One Dawg's Thoughts on the BCS Conferences--Part I
Images_small
Coaches Poll
Small
Gameday Traditions
Small
Attn Bulldog Fans: Washaun Ealey and ECI
Crown_small
tailgating

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

ad

Site Meter