Don't Bet On It: National Games of Disinterest (Special Edition)
Ordinarily, I wait until after I have predicted the outcomes of each week's S.E.C. contests and national games of interest ere I declare the national game of disinterest . . . the specific college football contest toward which I feel such complete indifference that I am disinclined even to distinguish the teams sufficiently to offer a forecast.
This week, however, I have opted to start by announcing the national game of disinterest from the outset, so that you will be able to ignore the sport's least compelling confrontation throughout the week.

In some ways, it is fair to say that Sir MixaLot was the father of this week's national games of disinterest. (Photograph from Music Mobs.)
I might have done this differently had I elected to proclaim Louisiana-Lafayette's visit to Florida International the national game of disinterest, but I may have made that one the national game of disinterest already. Instead, I am pleased to announce that this is . . . National Mid-American Conference Week of Disinterest!
Consider the following slate of M.A.C. games sprinkled throughout your work week:
Ball State at Toledo (Tuesday, November 14)
Miami (Ohio) at Bowling Green (Wednesday, November 15)
Akron at Ohio (Thursday, November 16)
Central Michigan at Northern Illinois (Friday, November 17)
Western Michigan at Florida State (Saturday, November 18)
Are we actually expected to tell these teams apart? Is the average college football fan truly obligated to be able to differentiate between Central Michigan and Western Michigan, between Akron and Toledo, or between Miami (Ohio) and Ohio (Ohio)? By Friday morning, won't even football fans in Louisiana be saying, "Man, Ohio has way too many Division I-A schools"?

Five straight days of eating these for supper? That's too much Mac.
Let's assume that you devoted every night this week to watching a M.A.C. game on television. At the end of the week, would you really be all that sure that you hadn't watched the same two teams play each other five times while wearing different uniforms?
Perhaps I'm being overly harsh. Maybe it's perfectly reasonable to expect a college football fan to be able to tell these teams apart. Try matching the M.A.C. mascot with the college town:
- Bobcats
- Broncos
- Bulls
- Cardinals
- Chippewas
- Eagles
- Falcons
- Golden Flashes
- Huskies
- RedHawks
- Rockets
- Zips
b. Athens
c. Buffalo
d. Bowling Green
e. DeKalb
f. Kalamazoo
g. Kent
h. Mount Pleasant
i. Muncie
j. Oxford
k. Toledo
l. Ypsilanti
Double-check my math, but I believe those mascots include a canine, a feline, an equine, four types of birds, an Indian tribe, three synonyms for speed, and the Chicago N.B.A. franchise, while the hometowns of M.A.C. schools include five locales that are namesakes for their universities, the nearest big city to Mayberry, three monikers that aren't even actual words, and three places in Georgia.

Five straight days of "Baby Don't Get Hooked on Me" and "It's Hard to be Humble"? That's too much Mac. (Photograph from Universal Music Group Nashville.)
I like my Mid-American Conference football in small doses, but I quickly reach the point of diminishing marginal returns during five straight days of M.A.C. showdowns. It's a fine league in moderate increments, but this is overkill and I can't pick five consecutive contests if I can't tell one from the next.
For that reason, I am declaring this the National Mid-American Conference Week of Disinterest.
Go 'Dawgs!
0 recs |
4
comments
Comments
Give it a shot...
- b
- f
- c
- i
- l
- h
- d
- g
- e
- j
- k
- a
by fotodog on Nov 14, 2006 1:15 AM EST 0 recs
You're not actually going to make me . . .
by T Kyle King on Nov 14, 2006 7:24 AM EST 0 recs
He's right
I've been to Mount Pleasant. It's kind of pleasant, though I don't remember any mounts. Seemed flat to me, actually.
As a resident of DeKalb County, Georgia, I do take offense to the way the residents of the home of NIU pronounce it.
And really, as long as you know the nicknames of the teams, it's not that hard. 5 of the schools are the same as the city.
by LD on Nov 14, 2006 8:51 AM EST 0 recs
city names, err, which you already mentioned...
Only one of those 5 televised games in this post has an impact on the conference title. Central Michigan has already clinched the Western Division. And Ohio needs just one win in its last two games to clinch the Eastern division. So Akron at Ohio might have some slight interest, since it could determine a title. But even if Ohio loses that game, all they have to do is beat 1-9 Miami to get to the title.
But to play the devil's advocate on the game of disinterest, as I tend to, there might be some interest in the MAC for SEC fans. The Motor City Bowl is one of the few bowl games that might have room for an at-large team. And if the SEC only gets one team to the BCS, and there are 9 SEC bowl eligible schools and only 8 tie-ins... well, you can see where I'm going. The Motor City Bowl is supposed to take the Big 10 #7 team. I think it's pretty much a given that two Big 10 teams will make the BCS. That'll send Wisconsin to the Capital One Bowl, Penn State to the Outback Bowl, Purdue to the Alamo Bowl, and then it gets fuzzy. The Big 10 has three more bowl tie-ins (Sun, Champs Sports, and Motor City), but only one more team that's bowl eligible right now - Iowa. Indiana needs a win at Purdue to get eligible. Minnesota needs a win at Iowa to get eligible. Unless both happen, the Big 10 won't fill all its bowl slots, and the bottom of the pack is the Motor City.
So if the next few weeks mess things up in the SEC, we could see the last picked SEC team rolling into Detroit to play Central Michigan or Ohio. And I hate to say it, but if the Dawgs get worked by Tech, USC somehow tops Clemson, and maybe Alabama beats Auburn and a few other things happen, it's still not out of the question that the team left out in the SEC tie-ins is Georgia. Kentucky will be preferable for lower tier bowls because they haven't been to a bowl in so long. Alabama is preferable to Georgia because of geography - their fans would be more likely to travel to Shreveport or Memphis. And if South Carolina wins their last two, and because their legion of fans travels well, and they might be more attractive than a Georgia team coming off a big loss and suffering through a down year. Remember 2000, how the SEC just kept letting Georgia slide down the ladder. So let's not mock the MAC too much just yet. Remember what happened last year with the Mountaineers...
by LD on
Nov 14, 2006 9:13 AM EST
up
0 recs






