Wednesday Morning Dawg Bites
These are busy times in Bulldog Nation, so much that is afoot requires our attention. Consequently, and without further ado, I offer you a quick run-down of events of note, on the field and in the blogosphere, complete with a rare admission of error on my part, so you'll want to be sure to read all the way to the end:
- You can feel it in the air . . . college baseball season is almost upon us! As Quinton McDawg reminds us, David Perno's Diamond Dogs are like "Star Trek" movies: the even-numbered ones are good and the odd-numbered ones are bad. Let us know how you think the Red and Black will fare this baseball season.
- It's always nice to get a mention from the traditional media, but did the Journal-Constitution really have to call it "Trolling the Dawgosphere"? It's not like they sent a guy into the bad part of town to interview bloggers down by the docks or anything. Heck, even though we don't put "product" in our hair, some of us even shower and shave on consecutive days.
O.K., not so much with the shaving for me lately, but still. . . .
- Personally, given the choices available in the championship round, I'd have gone with Rachel Bilson (and I find it inconceivable that Jessica Biel didn't make the finals), but Roll Bama Roll officially has anointed Brittany Snow as its 2008 sweetheart. (I'd be willing to wager twenty bucks that Watson is the only regular Dawg Sports commenter who knows who Brittany Snow is, so we'd be most appreciative if he could offer an explanation for the benefit of NCT, 34hawk, LD, College Buddy, DC Trojan, MaconDawg, me, and the rest of the gang.)
- I have been known to give Les Miles a hard time, to the point where my colleagues over at And the Valley Shook have commented (with only mild hyperbole) on my "near-weekly slam of Les Miles." Last summer, an L.S.U. fan, Billy, sent me an e-mail calling me on my criticisms of the Bayou Bengals' head coach. He wrote:
...you'll be ready to post something giving Les Miles a little credit if LSU wins a conference title or more this year.
I wrote in reply:
You may rest assured that I will give credit where credit is due if Coach Miles leads the Bayou Bengals to a conference or national title. If he manages not to say anything along the way that makes us all look bad as S.E.C. fans, he will win points with me for that, as well.
Thanks for visiting Dawg Sports and for taking the time to share your views.
Sincerely,
T. Kyle King
I sent that e-mail on July 15, 2007, and Louisiana State went on to win the national title, on my BlogPoll ballot as well as in all the major polls. Thereafter, I received the following e-mail from Billy, which arrived on Valentine's Day 2008 and comes to you accompanied by a strong adult language advisory (not to mention a serious need for some proofreading):
Nick Saban
Urban Meyer
Tommy Tubberville [sic.]
Bob Stoops
Jim Tressell [sic.]
Charlie Weiss [sic.]
Steve Spurrier
Miles has beaten them all in his 3 seasons in Baton Rouge. I know its [sic.] hard to admit when you're wrong, but for him to truly be [sic.] this dumb, I guess the rest of the SEC is filled with people who are even dumber. Either that or coaching must REALLY not matter, because Miles is winning 11 games a year despite being apparently a functioning retard. Are you seriously that deluded to believe this? Georgia's been recruiting at a pretty damn comparable level the last few years, so if talent can really overcome coaching that badly, why doesn't Mark Richt have more to show for it?
If Miles is a bad coach for "going 10-2 with 12-0 talent," as you've said, what does that make Mark Richt last season? Given that he lost at home to a 6-6 South Carolina team and got skullfucked by Tennessee? Or how about in 2004 when he couldn't win the East despite Greene, Pollack, Davis, Pope, Thurman, Brown and Gibson? How many NFL guys were on that team?
In general, I find you to be a decent analyst regarding football, but this continued bashing of Les Miles is so one-sided and ignorant of the facts that it's really getting pretty sad.
Give the man his due. He obviously knows how to do something right.
Surely every denizen of the blogosphere, whether blogger, commenter, or lurker, knows by now that I stand resolutely in the camp that believes you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, so I cannot claim that I cotton to Billy's approach; he might have gotten a more favorable reaction from me, and one accompanied by fewer qualifications, had he gone about his objective a bit less brusquely (and with fewer split infinitives). Accordingly, ere I concede his basic premise, permit me to add a couple of caveats.
Really, has getting a Southern lawyer riled up ever been a good idea?
If I were making a case for Les Miles's coaching acumen, I don't think I'd be hurling animadversions and imprecations regarding another team's success against the Tennessee Volunteers. (Mark Richt has a winning record against the Big Orange and his assistant coaches have never had to dissuade him from attempting frantically to call a time out during a clock stoppage.) Likewise, if I were an L.S.U. fan, I don't know that I'd be too terribly critical of Georgia's 2004 team.
I likewise don't know that my basic criticism of Les Miles---that he guides 13-0 talent to an 11-2 record---necessarily has been debunked by a 12-2 season, particularly in light of his decision to throw the ball in the final seconds against Auburn, which (as noted by Orson and by Sunday Morning Quarterback) was an ill-considered move, no matter how much MGoBlog tried to justify it when defending the man Brian Cook then mistakenly believed would be Michigan's next coach. (To Brian's credit, he knew in more temperate and less error-prone times that the Miles-to-Michigan movement was worse than orthogonally wrong.)
Nevertheless, a promise is a promise; I wrote last July that I would give Coach Miles credit if he led L.S.U. to an S.E.C. championship or a national title, and he did both of those things, guiding the Fighting Tigers to victory with a series of gutsy fourth-down calls against Florida. He may have needed a heck of a lot of help to do it, but do it he did, and, although I'm glad to know that my head coach is not so desperately in need of defending that I'd have hung onto an e-mail for seven months just so I could tell the author of it that I told him so, the fact is that Billy told me so, and I am a man of my word.
Billy, if you're out there reading this, you were right and I was wrong: Les Miles is a better coach than I gave him credit for being, and he has the national championship to prove it. Personally, I don't think he's in a class with Mark Richt---who, unlike Les Miles, has (a) a season with fewer than two losses in his ledger, (b) more than one conference championship to his credit, and (c) a 1-0 record in head-to-head competition with the other guy---but, like Sunday Morning Quarterback says, the crystal ball cures all.
Go 'Dawgs!
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well said
-- oh, it's too hard. I give up.
Big of you
by DamGoodDawg on Feb 20, 2008 9:25 AM EST reply actions
That analogy . . .
You just knew he was going to get through the S.E.C. without a scratch!
I'm now picturing him running onto the field to the tune of "Flight of the Valkyries."
Nice job.
I know who Brittany Snow is.
She's cute and sort of likable, if very young though.
by LD on Feb 20, 2008 9:52 AM EST reply actions
LD . . .
My bad.
to boldly go
Alternatively, if it was good enough for Chaucer, it's certainly good enough for me.
Both of the instances from your correspondent, as cited above, could be taken as examples of infinitives split for emphasis, which is legitimate in contemporary American usage.
There's no excuse for the spelling errors and repudiation of apostrophes, however.
I admit it . . .
Kudos to you for taking advantage of my recent run of "Star Trek" references by citing Captain Kirk's opening narration in support of your argument. Very well done, indeed.
In my defense, I freely acknowledge that I am an uptight grammar nerd. My desire to avoid ending sentences with prepositions has led me to eschew the baseball term "R.B.I." for the term "R.I.W.W.B.": the run in which was batted.
I have even been known to use a ten-word phrase of which the last eight words were ". . . and the horse in on which you rode." Under certain circumstances, I am willing to be vulgar for the sake of emphasis, but there simply is no excuse for mangling the language.
split infinitives
As for prepositions, Kyle, did you hear about the boy's complaint when his father came upstairs to read him the wrong bedtime story?
"What did you bring that book I don't want to be read to out of up for?"
And one more thing: have you seen the illustrated version of The Elements of Style? It's great. My folks gave it to each of us children for Christmas a couple of years ago.
not serious, but reflexive
As an RBR author...
by Nico @ Dawg Sports on Feb 20, 2008 12:43 PM EST reply actions
I had no idea
To answer your question Kyle, I actually had to google Snow to jog my memory to get a visual of her. After remembering that she played sort of sex kitten character(she is my age) in Nip/Tuck three seasons ago (I used to watch the show back then) I could see why people would maybe voted for her (not to mention her role in L&O SVU as a sex crazed student of an older professor in a few episodes. Another one of my fave shows but I digress.)
All in all, I had to ask my girlfriend what else she was in and she promptly responded with two movies I've never seen, "John Tucker Must Die" (ironically Bilson is in that movie as well) and "Hairspray". After reviewing the bracketing, I would have voted for Scarlett before Snow but I must admit she is attractive.
The only thing not going for Snow is that she is not as well known as the others. With that said, my conclusion is that I can see why people might put her in the finals over Johannson (younger, vixen look, not blonde for those that like that). And not to mention the roles I stated above were very likely to have swung the vote her way, with Bilson being like you said Kyle, a more wholesome type if you will.
Lucas
The George Lucas look is intentional, right?
Ouch!
I have nothing against Lucas, who was responsible for one of the great moments of my youth (I was 14 years old when I sat in a theatre and saw Princess Leia in a gold bikini, an image that had the same resonance for me that it had for the male members of the cast of "Friends"), but I don't want to look like him.
If it weren't for the show of solidarity with Bulldog Nation, I'd shave the darn thing rather than let this particular consensus form.
George Lucas?
http://www.movieactors.com/freeseframes-1026/Silverado90.jpeg
Contrary to popular belief...
by Todd @ Dawg Sports on Feb 20, 2008 10:28 PM EST reply actions

by 















