Super Bowl Sunday Dawg Bites
It's been a busy week in the blogosphere, what with the 2006 College Football Blogger Awards and all, so, if you're like me, you've gotten a bit behind, but don't worry, 'cause I'm here to get you all caught up in rapid-fire fashion, so here we go:
- For those of you fretting over Doug Gillett's self-esteem, fear not; he has adopted an "I'm O.K., Tyra Banks is O.K." outlook on life. (Whether you're also O.K. is your issue, apparently.) For his part, Paul Westerdawg is taking his defeat in stride, but, if the Georgia Sports Blog has as good a year in 2007 as it did in 2006, Paul and Dawgnoxious will get the recognition they deserve next year.
- I don't cover recruiting, for two reasons. First of all, the only way I would have the foggiest notion of which high school players are the best in the state (much less in the country) would be to consult the sources that anyone interested in recruiting already is consulting, so my sole utility would be as a conduit of information already available elsewhere, to which I could add nothing. Secondly, I agree with Orson Swindle that recruiting analysis is a bit creepy, not unlike the countdown clocks many bars displayed marking the days, hours, minutes, and seconds remaining until the Olsen twins turned 18. Fortunately, you can get your recruiting fix from MaconDawg.
Kristin Davis is counting down the minutes 'til national signing day. (Photograph from Yahoo! GeoCities.)
- Speaking of Orson, by the way, it was decided that Every Day Should Be Saturday didn't win enough dadgum awards at the C.F.B.A.s, so he now is the proud recipient of Best Audio Thing/Podcast, as well. (Please don't let technical terminology like "Audio Thing" throw you too much. As Dan Rydell once put it, "I know there's a lot of jargon, but some of these are pretty self-explanatory.")
- Need proof that the S.E.C. is the country's most defensively-oriented conference, in which passing yardage largely is irrelevant? Sunday Morning Quarterback has the facts with which to back up all of our knee-jerk reactions! If you want to know how Georgia stacked up, check out Senator Blutarsky's examination of the subject.
- Here at Dawg Sports, I've been seeking consensus (which I attained, at least with the fellows at Burnt Orange Nation and, to a lesser extent, with Tightwad Hill), keeping track of the Gym Dogs, and using Lynyrd Skynyrd as a parenting aid.
Unfortunately, they never recorded a song called "Sweet Home, Georgia."
- The Diamond Dogs open their season next Friday with a home game at Foley Field against Oregon State. How well do you expect Georgia to fare in baseball in 2007?
- Finally, since it's Super Bowl Sunday and all, I wanted to close with a quotation from my old pal Chuck, who offered the following observation in a recent e-mail:
I couldn't have said it better myself. Enjoy the rest of the Super Bowl, everyone.
Go 'Dawgs!
0 recs |
4
comments
Comments
Super Bowl Dog Bites
I'm just breaking down a little film on future Dawgs, which is really just a way to feed my addiction to X's and O's during the offseason without having to resort to watching Qunicy Carter play in an abandoned airplane hanger. Thanks for the loan of the phrase "Too Much Information". I was going to call it "Class of 2007: Curb Your Enthusiasm" but a gang of marauding HBO lawyers threatened to beat me up and send Robert Goulet into my office to mess with my stuff if I did.
by MaconDawg on Feb 5, 2007 1:11 PM EST 0 recs
Mea culpa, MaconDawg
What I meant to say---but what I said badly---was that my general ignorance and the likes of Tom Lemming caused me to shy away from covering recruiting, but that it was still worth following (hence, the caption underneath the Kristin Davis picture), so, for those who wanted to see recruiting covered well, they should visit your site.
That was the intent, but, clearly, that distinction didn't make it from my brain to my weblog, for which I apologize.
by T Kyle King on
Feb 5, 2007 7:20 PM EST
up
0 recs
Super Bowl vs. collegiate home game
by CW on Feb 5, 2007 6:33 PM EST 0 recs
I respectfully disagree
I don't believe that's even remotely close to being true. For one thing, if there were as many impassioned fans interested in attending N.F.L. games as there were impassioned fans interested in attending college football games, there'd be more N.F.L. arenas in the 92,000-105,000 seating capacity range.
As for the Super Bowl itself, the number of actual fans of the respective teams that make it into the game is a good deal less than you would find at your average neutral-site bowl game and far, far less than you would find at your average college home game.
The price of Super Bowl tickets alone (as compared to the price of tickets to a college football game) makes your assertion highly unlikely and the Super Bowl far outdistances any other sporting event as a corporate spectacle.
A substantial chunk of Super Bowl attendees are schmoozing corporate types with about as much interest in the game as Ted Turner, who fell asleep while watching a team he owned compete in one of the most exciting World Series ever.
The next time I see David Spade staring glassy-eyed into space and Patrick Warburton chatting up his buddy in Sanford Stadium, I'll concede your point, but not until then.
The Super Bowl has the lowest percentage of sports fans in attendance of any sporting event anywhere, and not by a narrow margin.
by T Kyle King on
Feb 5, 2007 7:29 PM EST
up
0 recs





