Which Was the Worst Loss of the 2007 College Football Season?
I apologize profusely for the light posting this evening, but I have been hampered by temporary technical difficulties. Fortunately, the diaries have been an active place of late, which is a good thing, so check 'em out and feel free to add one of your own.
In the meantime, the time has come to report on the results of the vote on the most recent Dawg Sports poll question; viz., "Which was the most embarrassing loss of the college football season?" Of the available contenders, Appalachian State's win over Michigan garnered the most votes, finishing first on 133 of the 251 ballots cast (53.0%).

In the Wolverines' defense, the Mountaineers are 10-2 and just advanced to the second round of the Division I-AA playoffs.
The Crimson Tide faithful will be comforted to know that a comparatively paltry 83 voters (33.1%) deemed Alabama's loss to Louisiana-Monroe the season's most shameful setback, while Southern California fans will be relieved to learn that only 35 ballots (13.9%) were cast for the proposition that the Trojans' defeat at the hands of lowly Stanford constituted the campaign's most embarrassing outcome. (By the way, the line of the year regarding the Cardinal was this: "Well, of course, Stanford had the most difficult schedule in the country. They did not have to play Stanford.")
Under the circumstances, the new poll question is as obvious as it is intriguing: "Which of the B.C.S. bowls would you most like to see Georgia attend?" Would you prefer the history and pageantry of the Granddaddy of 'Em All, the oldest existing bowl that the 'Dawgs have never won, or the site of the first bowl Georgia ever attended?
Your votes go here. I'll be back with more tomorrow.
Go 'Dawgs!
0 recs |
10
comments
Comments
It's not even close
Even better would be a match with the University of Spoiled Children. If the Dawgs win such a game I believe they'll be the preseason number one for 2008. And given the irrationality of the BCS methodology and contributing polls, the psychology of starting the season in first place could be an important factor in a potential national championship run.
by 34hawk on Nov 26, 2007 11:16 PM EST 0 recs
Irrational exuberance
I would agree that a top 10 ranking certainly keeps a team within the psychological range of being in the National Championship game, but ultimately you've got to win out... well, except this year apparently.
As for a Rose Bowl involving USC and Georgia, I think that would make for pretty compelling viewing. However, you might need to put that tired "spoiled children" joke out to pasture - there are certainly some seriously wealthy undergrads, but many many more like my friends, whose parents had jobs like high school teacher, electrical engineer, suit salesman, bank branch manager, partner at Arthur Anderson... okay, maybe that last one isn't such a great example.
by DC Trojan on
Nov 27, 2007 12:48 AM EST
up
0 recs
Re: "spoiled children"
by NCT on
Nov 27, 2007 9:04 AM EST
up
0 recs
to your point...
by DC Trojan on
Nov 27, 2007 3:12 PM EST
up
0 recs
You must have inferred
by 34hawk on
Nov 27, 2007 9:50 PM EST
up
0 recs
I take exception to that
by DC Trojan on
Nov 28, 2007 12:49 PM EST
up
0 recs
Bezerkley!
by 34hawk on
Nov 28, 2007 3:50 PM EST
up
0 recs
Stanford
by DC Trojan on
Nov 28, 2007 5:34 PM EST
up
0 recs
"hand-me-down Volvo wagon"
Actually, I don't really care which BCS Bowl we go to as long as we win. I am just glad we won't be going to the Outback Bowl with that mercilessly early start.
by fotodog on Nov 27, 2007 9:31 AM EST 0 recs
Indeed!
by ProfDawg on Nov 27, 2007 3:28 PM EST 0 recs





