Dawg Sports: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Edgar Renteria is a San Francisco Giant Bar-right-arrows



Thursday Night Dawg Bites

The intercollegiate athletics blogosphere is a busy place and, sometimes, it's all you can do to keep up . . . but don't worry, 'cause I've got you covered, so just give me a few minutes and I'll get you pretty much completely up to date, more or less.

Dawg Sports brings you the very latest in current events, hampered only by cultural references permanently stuck in the '80s!

Here's what you need to know before your weekend gets underway:

If it's December, it must be time to be talking about the college football postseason and how to improve it. I remain a traditionalist, as do the gentlemen from the heartland at Corn Nation, where Carolina March's playoff proposal has been faulted for its lack of home field advantage and the very notion of a postseason tournament has been found wanting for the following reason:

Fans need to decide whether or not the purpose of a playoff system is to decide who has the best team OR just crown a champion. If you want to crown a champion, have a playoff but don't kid yourself that the best team may emerge.

Exactly. Playoffs regularly sacrifice accuracy for the sake of certainty, producing such aberrational results as the 1997 world champion Florida Marlins. While offseason debate is one of college football's great strengths, March madness gives way to April apathy after the N.C.A.A. tournament produces results we quickly cease to care about and simply cannot trust.

Nothing in the history of playoff systems suggests that a Division I-A college football tournament would produce a "true" national champion any more regularly or reliably than the poll system . . . but Doug Gillett disagrees, as he asserts:

Even last year, which was perfect given that we had 12-0 Texas taking on 12-0 USC, we could've pit Texas against Penn State and USC against West Virginia and then seated the winners from those two games in the Rose Bowl. Sure, that sounds like we'd be mucking with a perfect situation, but if Texas and USC are really the best two teams in the country, they should win their games and they'd have nothing to worry about.

How do we reconcile that claim with the reality that top-seeded teams regularly fall in the N.C.A.A. men's basketball tournament . . . or the fact that the main reason folks watch the first day of that tournament is to see which favorites get upset? In his zeal to improve an admittedly flawed B.C.S. system, Doug urges us to "let the chips fall where they may" and "do something." Come on, now, Doug . . . you don't really want to make me quote Lord Falkland at you, do you?

At the end of the day, I consider college football bowl games and poll rankings to be as fundamentally American as . . . well, as fundamentally American as, say, Kristin Davis walking dogs on the steps of the U.S. Capitol!

Kristin Davis wonders why proponents of a college football playoff hate America. (Photograph from Virgin.net.)

Speaking of bowl games, since the fine fellows over at Roll Bama Roll have been saying some kind things about me, it's only right that I should return the favor by pointing you in the direction of R.B.R.'s Poinsettia Bowl preview, which is the first of several in a series.

Meanwhile, over at Focus on Sports, Fotodog has rearranged the bowl schedule, whereas both the Rakes of Mallow and The Cover Two have made the case for Florida over Michigan.

As I mentioned recently, Rocky Top Talk's Joel is setting up the first annual BlogPoll awards. Unfortunately, Joel also is recovering from an illness, so be patient.

Joel's publicist explained that his recent collapse at the awards show dress rehearsal was the result of "exhaustion" following "a severe head cold," although it is rumored in some circles that Joel surreptitiously checked himself into the Betty Ford Center and was quietly replaced by Jon Stewart as the host of the gala event. (Photograph from Virgin.net.)

The wonderfully well-named Georgia/U.C.L.A. weblog What's Bruin, Dawg? features the musings of a man whose East Coast bias and West Coast bias "fight all the time." Among his finest work is this hilarious piece on Reggie Ball, who is the subject of our current poll question.

Since the author of What's Bruin, Dawg? now calls the City of Angels home, I suppose that paves the way for a segue to this follow-up on the aftermath of the Battle of Los Angeles: Conquest Chronicles has entered the fray and sparked some discussion. If you are among those who believe that Pac-10 fans lack passion for their teams, you need to be reading Conquest Chronicles and Bruins Nation, who demonstrate that West Coast fans are as intense as any in the country.

This is only marginally related to college football, but a recent posting about charitable giving among different groups by Jason Pye, the chairman of the Georgia Libertarian Party, reminded me of an experience I had a couple or three years ago.

At Christmas, the Kiwanis Club to which I then belonged provided volunteer bell-ringers for the Salvation Army. In one- or two-hour shifts, we would stand outside local shopping establishments ringing the bell and taking donations from folks heading into and out of the stores. I spent part of one Saturday afternoon doing this.

Due to the time of year, many shoppers were wearing sports apparel to show their support for their favorite teams, so I was able to take an unscientific survey of the giving patterns of particular fan bases. While the Georgia fans were pretty good givers, the Alabama fans clearly were the most generous . . . and the Georgia Tech faithful were the stingiest of all.

They all claimed not to have any change left over after purchasing the "Revenge of the Nerds" soundtrack.

While Paul Westerdawg didn't break the story for everyone, he was the one who broke it for me, because I read at his site that Boston College's Tom O'Brien will be taking over the program at N.C. State.

Am I the only one who totally doesn't get that move? Short of a preference for warmer weather, what would cause a man to prefer the Wolfpack over the Eagles? B.C. and N.C. State are in the same conference; they may even play in the same division, although, honestly, I'm not willing to take the time to look it up to find out for sure. It seems to me that this is a lateral move at best . . . and I would consider it a step down for Coach O'Brien. Am I missing something?

I do my best to give LD a little credit, so it's nice to see him giving himself a little credit, too.

In the process of so doing, LD performed the valuable social service of calling our attention to Michael's entertaining exercise in shooting fish in a barrel. Apparently, there are those who believe that S.E.C. fans aren't critical of Les Miles, but, fortunately, And the Valley Shook knows better, as the guys at A.T.V.S. have taken note of my "near-weekly slam of Les Miles."

Hey, it's not my fault the dude's a goober!

Finally, this really isn't pertinent for present purposes, but I have old friends and extended family members who keep up with me by reading Dawg Sports, so I suppose I should mention that, last weekend, I officially was selected to serve as the president of the Henry County Bar Association for 2007.

That ought to be plenty of data to get you through the next few days. I hope all of you have a good weekend . . . or, at least, as good a weekend as you can have without college football.

The bowls can't get here soon enough.

Go 'Dawgs!

0 recs | Comment 4 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Baseball comparisons
It would be a serious mistake to compare a potential College Football playoff system to anything outside of football playoff systems.  A college football playoff might share much with it's older brother, the NFL playoff.  

It won't ever share anything with the MLB or NBA playoffs (or NHL, for that matter).

More later.

by peacedog on Dec 8, 2006 11:44 AM EST   0 recs

You're right
In major league baseball, the N.H.L., and the N.B.A., it takes three or four aberrational results to erase a season's worth of demonstrable achievements (as happens often enough to be troubling).

In the N.C.A.A. men's basketball tournament and the N.F.L. playoffs, it only takes one aberrational result to erase a season's worth of demonstrable achievements.

I gave the idea of a Division I-A college football playoff way too much credit by comparing it to the major league baseball playoffs, which (while quite unreliable) are a good deal more reliable than a college football playoff would be.

by T Kyle King on Dec 8, 2006 12:01 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Not quite
There are legitimate criticisms of a college football playoff, and I am looking forward to your date with SMQ - it should provide some excellent commentary.  

The point you are making here won't be among the excellent commentary, though.  You can't compare across sports like this - the various sports are so different fundamentally speaking that such comparisons of their playoff formats just can't work when examining a potential format for College football.

"Reliability" is a funny term to use here.  We'll come back to it.  

It would be interesting to examine the MCFP (Mythical College Football Playoff, hence forth) next to it's older brother the NFL (where, incidentally, there is much lower rate of volatility.  Probably the lowest of all the professional sports playoffs) and it's younger brother highschool football (which is very volatale; such is the life of 16-18 year old kids).  I wonder if either of you will visit, or jointly visit, this topic as part of the discussion.

I will use volatile instead of reliable - perhaps a semantic issue but it seems like a more meaningful distinction to me.  The unspoken assumption (by both of us) is that the high seeds are better than the low seeds.  A reasonable statement.  And to a degree, I'd measure volatility as lower seeds beating higher seeds.  I would not, however, treat all such occurences as equal.  The difference will narrow as the playoffs progress (naturally and generally speaking; that won't always be true from one year to the next but it will probably be true far more often than not; the true juggernauts, at any level, are rare).  #2 beating #1 isn't necessary an abberation, nor a sign of unreliabilith.  At some point, you're frequently dealing with a handful of mostly even teams.  In which case all bets, as they say, are off.

the NHL and Baseball don't enter into any discussion on a football playoff.  Of course they're more volatile.  No sport (possibly save Soccer) is as affected by one position as hockey is by it's goal keeper.  The keepers - hot keepers peeking at the right time - are frequently a major reason why the playoff results are so volatile.  #8s beating #1s and so on.  It's absolutely true in hockey.

Starting Pitchers, and their bullpen bretheren, get a chance to affect games like that in baseball playoffs.  To a more limited degree; your average ace gets 3 series starts if he is lucky.  Your average fireball closer gets 4 appearances if he is lucky.  But a team with two very good starters and a capable pen can get hot and make a run.  And even win it, sometimes (see: Marlins, Diamondbacks, to name two).  

Basketball - yeah, college hoops is incredibly volatile.  And yet frequently the winner of the Dance (in the "modern", that is 64+ team tournament field) is frequently a top team.  The Dukes, UNCs, and Arizona's greatly outnumber the Villanovas.  Due to the nature of the setup, the big party gets crashed much more frequently than you'd see in the NFL playoffs, sure.  The NBA has less volatility.  The semis and finalls are more frequently littered with the top seeds than not.  Unlike Basketball and hockey, the extended playoff series there usually give the best team a significant advantage (in NHL and NBA, I'd say it [i]can[/i] give such an advantage, but frequently it does not).

Football isn't affected in such ways; the sport is just that different.  While the Quarterback has a gigantic influence on the game, it isn't the same as what a hot goalie or a couple of good pitchers can do in a playoff series for their sports.

The NFL just isn't subjected to these things.  Highschool football playoffs are volatile, but for very different reasons than the NBA, NHL, MLB, etc.  College football, as it so frequently does, would blend the NFL and highschool football in most (but not all) formats.  More volatile than the NFL (how much more will depend on the format) but more stable than highschool.

by peacedog on Dec 8, 2006 1:06 PM EST   0 recs

Hate to be a Hater
I think Kristin Davis is about as beautiful as any hottie you could put her up against (whether in a bowl style format or a playoff system), but those dogs she is walking have to be the most cliche rich-people dogs I have ever seen.
Someone get that girl a Bulldog!

by fotodog on Dec 8, 2006 9:13 PM EST   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why cant we vary our O? And Dreaming Of JESSICA ALBA
Small
What are reasonable expectations?
Small
I know yall hate Auburn
Small
What about a lil UGA option?
Small
Kick Ass Gators Man Cave
Small
I know it's early...
Small
What is the difference......
Small
Finally, New Kicker at Georgia....
Small
UGA BAND
Small
The Munson Tribute

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

ad

Site Meter