Vanderbilt 24, Georgia 22
I told you I was worried about Vanderbilt!
I rarely miss a home game; between October 2, 1993, and October 2, 1999, I went six years without being absent from a contest between the hedges. Since becoming a father, though, I sometimes have had to skip a trip to Athens in order to fulfill my more important responsibilities at home.
Today was one of those days. As many of you know, my wife, Susan, is a teacher. (In fact, many of you will recall that, during the 2005-'06 school term, she was a finalist for Fayette County Teacher of the Year.) Today, Susan had a continuing education course to attend, so I spent the day at home with our son, Thomas.
Thomas and I went to the bank, to the store, and to Chick-fil-A for supper. In between, we played outside on the swingset, enjoyed a riveting game of Ants in the Pants, watched a little T.V., played with various toys out in the yard, and generally had a fine time together as father and son. As a result of this, I did not attend the homecoming game and I was able to follow the action only intermittently.
In other words, I had the best day of any devoted denizen of Bulldog Nation.
First of all, I would like to put this setback into context. Although losing to Vanderbilt is bad, this loss is not comparable to the Bulldogs' 1994 loss to the Commodores between the hedges. In that atrocious outing, Georgia was slapped around by an inferior team for 60 minutes. There was no excuse for what happened at the homecoming game 12 years ago.

(Photograph from The Greenville News.)
Today's defeat, while embarrassing, was to a team that is nowhere near as bad as the 1994 Commodores were. Bobby Johnson has Vandy headed in the right direction; as I noted earlier, the 'Dores have made a habit of playing quality conference opponents tough.
Last year, Vanderbilt went on the road and likely would have beaten Florida in Gainesville, but for a terrible officiating call. Last year, Vanderbilt went on the road and beat Tennessee in Knoxville. This year, after three straight close calls in conference play, Vanderbilt went on the road and beat Georgia in Athens.
We have known for some time now that this was the Bulldogs' year of living dangerously. Close shaves against Colorado and Ole Miss---neither of which is markedly better than Vanderbilt, despite their more storied histories---put us on notice that this Georgia squad was barely scraping by, so it should have come as no surprise that a Commodore squad that has been falling just short for a couple or three years now would play the Red and Black tight and have a chance to come away with the win.
I credit Coach Johnson and his team for finding a way to gut out a victory and I congratulate Vanderbilt on a hard-earned upset. Having given credit where credit is due, however, I must say that losing to the Commodores in the Classic City is inexcusable and the fact that it has happened means that some serious changes need to be made.
Several Dawg Sports readers already have expressed their opinions upon these subjects and I believe a consensus is forming, but it is necessary to articulate what needs to happen, and why, for the good of the program. Mark Richt is the right man to lead Georgia in the 21st century, but he is not infallible and it is time to correct some defects.
During the English Civil War, Lord Falkland said that, "when it is not necessary to change, it is necessary not to change." The need has arisen and the requisite changes are these:
1. Start Matthew Stafford in every remaining game and allow him to take every meaningful snap for the rest of the season. My cousin, quoting my uncle, said it best: "Don't lose with seniors."

At this point, I think we all know we're going 8-5. The 'Dawgs are going to beat Mississippi State and Kentucky, lose to Florida and Auburn, and go into the Georgia Tech game at 7-4. Either the Red and Black will lose to the Ramblin' Wreck and drop down to a bowl game against a lesser opponent the Bulldogs can beat or the Classic City Canines will beat the Yellow Jackets and move up to a bowl game against an equal opponent to which Georgia will lose. Either way, the handwriting is on the wall.
That being the case, what is to be gained by leaving Joe Tereshinski III under center? What games will he win that Stafford would lose? Aren't we better off with Stafford taking snaps at quarterback and Tereshinski spending quality time with the punt team? If this season is lost, anyway, why not get next year's starter the playing time he needs to make next year a success?
2. Turn the play-calling duties over to Mike Bobo. This one is fairly self-explanatory. The consistent success enjoyed by such C.E.O.-style head coaches as Auburn's Tommy Tuberville and Tennessee's Phillip Fulmer attests to the utility of a head coach being a head coach . . . and only a head coach.
Coach Bobo is going to be an offensive coordinator somewhere sometime soon and, as a former Georgia quarterback, he is particularly well-suited to be calling the plays at his alma mater. Coach Bobo has earned the promotion and Coach Richt needs to relinquish that responsibility.

3. Fire Willie Martinez and promote Rodney Garner to defensive coordinator right now. I don't mean reshuffle some of the coaching responsibilities on the defensive side of the ball. I don't mean make some staff changes at the end of the season. I mean have Coach Martinez's belongings packed in cardboard boxes and placed out in the hallway by the time he arrives at the office Monday morning.
While my preference would be to hire Will Muschamp away from Auburn, Hamp is right that such a move would cost the 'Dawgs their recruiting coordinator and there's no way to make a staff change at mid-season without promoting from within.

Last week, I said I was not yet ready to get rid of Coach Martinez, but now I have had enough. In the last two games, the Bulldogs have given up a combined 75 points . . . the most conceded by the Red and Black in back-to-back outings since the 1999 Georgia Tech game and the 2000 Outback Bowl. Following the latter of those defensive disasters, Georgia's defensive coordinator, Kevin Ramsey, was fired unceremoniously and replaced with Gary Gibbs. A similar upgrade is warranted now.
Coach Martinez simply lacks the ability to make halftime adjustments. The 'Dawgs carried leads into the locker room on each of the last two Saturdays before going on to lose both games at home. In the 52 games in which Brian VanGorder was Georgia's defensive coordinator, the Red and Black held their opponents scoreless in the second half seven times, allowed three points in the final two periods four times, surrendered six points after intermission on five occasions, permitted seven points in the last two quarters in 18 instances, and conceded eight points following the break once.
35 times in 52 games, Coach VanGorder's halftime adjustments kept the opposing team's second-half scoring in the single digits, with one-fifth of those stellar defensive efforts involving shutouts after intermission. Of the remaining 17 games during which Coach VanGorder had an Athens mailing address, the 'Dawgs gave up more than 14 points in the final two stanzas just seven times.
In the 20 games since Coach VanGorder was succeeded---though by no means replaced---by Coach Martinez, the Bulldogs have given up double-digit point totals in the last two quarters eight times while pitching four second-half shutouts. In other words, a Willie Martinez-coached defense is twice as likely to give up 10 or more points after halftime as it is to hold an opponent scoreless after halftime.

Moreover, the trend is getting worse rather than better. In the Red and Black's last 12 outings, the Bulldogs have given up 17 or more points in the second half three times. In the last two weeks, Georgia has surrendered 54 second-half points . . . more than half the total number of second-half points given up by Brian VanGorder's defense in three of his four complete seasons.
The bottom line is that Georgia used to win games because Coach VanGorder outcoached the opposition in the second half and the Bulldogs now lose games because Coach Martinez gets outcoached by the opposition in the second half.
For every "W" in "Willie," there are two "L"s. Coach Martinez is a nice guy, but, like Ray Goff, he was promoted beyond his level of ability. It is time for Coach Martinez to go.
On a more positive note, Kristin Davis's alma mater improved to 6-0 in dramatic fashion today, so at least there's that.

(Photograph from Star Pulse.)
Go 'Dawgs!
0 recs |
18
comments
Comments
Vandy loss
- The drop of an apparent touchdown pass - Stafford to Milner.
- The missed field goal in the fourth quarter.
- The first down play (we shoulda stopped 'em) for Vandy with about a minute to go.
by Elmo Lewis on Oct 15, 2006 9:06 AM EDT 0 recs
Bench Milner and other rants...
Stafford should play the rest of the way. I don't care if he throws 30 more picks. This team is headed (maybe) for the DelMonte Canned New Potato Bowl located somewhere in Northern Idaho anyway, so let's prepared him for future greatness. Let's wear out his arm, expose him to some adversity, let him screw up, make some plays, get humbled, achieve some glory and get ready to spit fire and fart thunderbolts for the next several years.
Willie Martinez is probably a good man. He's not a good coach. I think Erk could do a better job right now...and his headsets only work on a celestial frequency as far as I know...
Coach Richt: I think you're at a crossroads. You are about to lose this team. Let's see what you've got. I don't care if we lose the next 2,3,4, or 5 games. I want us to be competitive. Yesterday, when the chips were down, we weren't competitive. Competitive teams make touchdown catches, don't fumble inside your own thirty right after the second half kickoff, make defensive stops and should have put away Vanderbilt early and often. We had our chances. This team is really very fortunate to have the five wins we do have at this point.
We are last year's Tennessee.
by DavetheDawg on Oct 15, 2006 11:22 AM EDT 0 recs
Post Script
by DavetheDawg on Oct 15, 2006 11:24 AM EDT 0 recs
It isnt too late....
As I stated in a prevoius post... Work on the future! Let the youth play! We have a lot of talented underclassmen. Coach em up and give em time! Let MS and/or JC throw to the young guys. Milner made one mistake so I am not ready to call him "T Edwards" yet. Run the ball, play action, and mix in some deep balls. You know... what we do for just two quarters a game!
It may seem radical, but why not take the player names of the jerseys and strip the helmets of stickers. This team needs a wake up call. I dont think we have a bunch of egos but they seem a bit asleep (maybe a side effect of our so-called calm coach)
Biggest problem is coaching issues. It has been said before, but we need an O coordinator (Bobo?)and a new D. A real O could focus on the offense while MR watches THE TEAM. I hate to endorse firing anyone but WM was just a default choice anyhow.
by ssidedawg1 on Oct 15, 2006 12:13 PM EDT 0 recs
Dawgs, AJC, and other sore subjects ....
It may seem radical, but why not take the player names of the jerseys and strip the helmets of stickers.
Good idea, kinda like the old "TEAM me" shirts.
Was this blog the subject of a vent in today's AJC Sports Vent? Why do the writers think they have to be Jay Leno? How about some simple, to-the-point aports reporting and commentary without the unfunny attempts at humor? Ditto (1)Barnhart -a UT guy with an anti-UGA bias and (2)Moore - Please move back to South Bend.
Also, the Stones have decided against an Atlanta visit on this leg of their tour. Is the ATL too near coconut trees?
by Elmo Lewis on Oct 15, 2006 1:36 PM EDT 0 recs
Other suggestions
by jocwalk on Oct 15, 2006 3:44 PM EDT 0 recs
The David Pollack suggestion . . .
While I hope No. 47's N.F.L. career is not over, there can be no doubt that he would be a fine addition to the staff and, if Rodney Garner is moved up to defensive coordinator (as he should be), Pollack would make a suitable replacement as defensive line coach.
Good suggestion!
by T Kyle King on Oct 15, 2006 4:18 PM EDT 0 recs
the main problem...
That said, with the exception of starting Stafford the rest of the way, the above suggestions are ludicrous.
It is often wise to promote a player simply because the guy in front of him has proven he can't get the job done. It is rarely wise to promote a coach for the same reason, especially in the middle of the season.
What, exactly, has Mike Bobo done to inspire confidence as an OC?
And why, exactly, do we want to promote the recruiting coordinator to DC? He's a great recruiter, but then the janitor is probably a great janitor, and that doesn't mean he should be DC.
by 34hawk on Oct 15, 2006 5:56 PM EDT 0 recs
In addition to being recruiting coordinator . . .
Coach Garner is one of 20 coaches selected for the 2004 N.C.A.A. Advanced Coaching Academy and one of 10 selected for the 2004 N.C.A.A. Expert Coaching Academy.
During his near-decade as a Georgia defensive coach, Coach Garner has coached Kedric Golston, Charles Grant, Emarlos Leroy, Brandon Miller, Richard Seymour, Paul Snellings, Marcus Stroud, Johnathan Sullivan, and Ken Veal. All of these former 'Dawgs signed N.F.L. contracts, four were drafted in the first round, and two were Pro Bowl starters.
Mike Bobo is in his seventh season as a quarterbacks coach and his sixth at Georgia. He is a coach's son and a former Bulldog quarterback.
In his first season back in Athens, Coach Bobo directed David Greene to S.E.C. Freshman of the Year honors. Greene went on to become the most prolific passer in school history and the winningest quarterback in N.C.A.A. history.
Coach Bobo also coached D.J. Shockley to all-S.E.C. honors and, under his tutelage, both Greene and Shockley became first-rate decisionmakers under center.
Finally, while I believe some changes are in order and some criticisms are warranted, let us not forget that Mark Richt is one of only six coaches in S.E.C. history to have won two conference titles in their first five years on the job. He is one of only five S.E.C. coaches to have registered four straight 10-win seasons and his 57-15 record is unmatched in school history.
We knew this was going to be a rebuilding year; never before in the Mark Richt era have the Bulldogs begun a season after losing so much in the way of quantity and quality from the year before. During Ray Goff's and Jim Donnan's days coaching the 'Dawgs, 10-win seasons were aberrational and mediocrity was the norm. With Coach Richt at the helm, a 5-2 start is considered disastrous precisely because double-digit win totals and Eastern Division crowns have become expected.
Let's not forget what Coach Richt has meant to this program before we begin running him down after one bad month in five and a half good years.
by T Kyle King on Oct 15, 2006 7:27 PM EDT 0 recs
Richt's record
On a different note, while I sometimes think promoting from within is a good thing, it is not always a good thing. Personally, given how bad UGA's defensive line play has been for 2005 and 2006, there's NO WAY I would promote Garner. I don't care who he coached who had the talent to end up in the NFL. An interesting prospect would be Jerry Glanville. He is currently the D.C. at Hawaii with his good friend June Jones. However, I saw an interview with him in which he said he told June early on that once they got Hawaii's program turned around, Glanville would be looking for greener pastures. It may be a tough sell but if there's one thing that Glanville can do it is coaching defenses.
by jocwalk on
Oct 16, 2006 3:34 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Milner
That said, I am not opposed to Tripp seeing more time and catch opps.
by fotodog on Oct 16, 2006 3:44 AM EDT 0 recs
Ray Goff
Georgia is no place for coaches on training wheels. Do you honestly want to see Rodney Garner matching wits with Steve Spurrier, Urban Meyer, and Tommy Tuberville? He might be great. He'd probably suck. The point is that we just don't know, and great programs don't need to risk the great unknown.
Georgia is a good enough program to attract top shelf, proven, coaching talent at the coordinator positions.
by 34hawk on Oct 16, 2006 11:31 AM EDT 0 recs
That's an unfair comparison
Secondly, coaching probably is less critical to the skills necessary to be a successful running back than it is to the skills necessary to be a successful defensive lineman. Without minimizing the importance of coaching at any position, I think it is fair to say that most successful tailbacks (like Rogers) are "instinctive" runners who know what to do once they have hit the hole. Schemes, stunts, twists, and assignments are crucial to success as a lineman, however. The success of Coach Garner's charges speaks more to his abilities as a coach than the success of George Rogers speaks to Ray Goff's abilities as a coach.
Thirdly, Coach Goff made the leap from position coach to head coach without ever serving as a coordinator. Such a large career jump is hardly comparable to promoting a long-serving and successful defensive line coach to defensive coordinator, which is the next logical step in Coach Garner's career progression.
Finally, being "established" doesn't necessarily make you good and it certainly doesn't make you better than a guy who's waiting for his opportunity to shine at the next level. Jim Donnan was an established head coach at Marshall when he got the Georgia job; Mark Richt had no prior head coaching experience when he was hired to succeed Coach Donnan. I think it's pretty clear which was the better hire.
by T Kyle King on
Oct 16, 2006 12:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
asdf
I think they are both good coaches, and both have obvious flaws. Donnan did slightly worse with lessor talents. Richt's flaws are just now becoming apparent. I hope he learns and improves quickly.
Richt must become more decisive on personnel issues. He must become more demanding of player performance and demonstrate this with some serious bench time for underperformers. And he must upgrade his coaching staff in the off season.
Bobo may be a great coordinater. Let him go prove it somewhere like NC State and then we can talk about the UGA OC position.
by 34hawk on
Oct 16, 2006 6:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Getting Back on Track
I also do not think JoeT is playing poorly at all, and I would still go with him. It is not time yet to start "playing for next year" by putting MS or JC in permanently. We still have games to win this year and Joe is still the better quarterback. How can it be his fault when the recievers are dropping passess--IN THE END ZONE! Plus, MS has already demonstrated a freshman tendency to throw interceptions. We also need to run the ball more, especially since our recievers can't hold onto the ball! I just don't understand, with our supposedly great backfield, why we aren't getting more from it. Southerland has shown he is ready to handle the ball a lot more than he has. Brown and Ware have not impressed me. Come on Richt, you're supposed to be an offensive coach, start producing some points.
Still, the major problem we have is on defense. If we have the talent we are supposed to have, then its clearly a coaching problem. I'm stumped! We are not adjusting, we are not meeting the weekly challenges that come our way. We do need a change.
by ProfDawg on Oct 16, 2006 11:49 AM EDT 0 recs
Anyone considered our personnel?
This is what we knew coming into this season:
1.We are paper thin in the OL. And its not like those guys are Max Jean-Gilles clones or anything. It's midseason, and we're lucky if we have even 5 or 6 guys healthy to play in the line, no matter how good they are.
2.We have not playmakers at WR. We knew that, and it hasn't changed. They're solid, but nobody like a Ginn Jr or Calvin Johnson or Jarrett that can break a game open or make a defense scheme differently.
3.Our secondary is inexperienced - and not as talented as years before. Past 3 years we've been blessed with good CB play and great safeties. But we knew coming in that we lost a lot there, and you can't find an All-American at safety EVERY year.
4.We've got solid linebackers, but nobody in the Odell Thurman mold. Tony Taylor is having a very good senior year, but none of the guys are "freaks" that carry a defense like Channing Crowder or AJ Hawk or anybody like that.
5.Our Special Teams are very good. Injuries have completely killed us there. Flowers and Henderson have been hurt a good deal, Coutu loss has killed our kick return game AND hurt our place-kicking.
6.We have inexperienced QBs. And that hasn't changed even after midseason, because they couldn't distinguish themselves and are still splitting reps and time at practice. In retrospect, maybe we should've just gone with one, but JTIII's injury and the fact that nobody could pull away from the pact made Richt's decision impossible.
7.TE play would drop. We knew Millner has had drop problems. And nothing has changed, although to his defense, he did make a huge one against Colorado and did lead the team in receiving last week before his injury.
8.Our FBs and RBs are very good, and they have been. They've also been injured a lot. And although the production might not be there, I blame that on #1, the OL.
9.Our DL would be very good. And for the most part they have been. The fact that we haven't pressured the QB the past couple of games is because they're putting more guys back there to protect than we rush. And when we do blitz, they've been torching us - which I blame on #3 secondary and #4 linebackers.
So we knew those nine things coming into the season. And they proved to be right. We have a lot of problems right now, but maybe we just don't have the right kind of weapons. My first thoughts after the game were to give RG the DC job and to let Staff take over, and I don't think that's a bad idea still...but we as fans just need to realize that this is a down a year and we just don't have a lot of weapons out there.
I also think we need to quit bad-mouthing players and coaches and just support who we have out there on the field-those guys are doing the best they can with what they have around them. Booing like were last week and not supporting them only gives the wrong message to them and to potential recruits and their familes (who do listen a lot to radio/internet/fans at games).
This is a hard time for them and they give their sweat and blood out there everyday for us. They haven't quit and our coaching staff hasn't lost control, like UT last year or GT teams of past...but we as fans need to do our job and stay behind them and they'll keep fighting. GATA!
by oreo on Oct 16, 2006 2:53 PM EDT 0 recs
a rebuttal
- The offensive line is fat, slow, and lazy. When they go against a leaner, faster defensive line, it gives them problems. I've noticed that they will block hard a play or two and then seem to loaf. I believe this has been a HUGE factor for both RB and QB production. I also fault Neil Callaway. If you really look at the offensive line play going back four seasons, you'll find that UGA's has been among the worst in the SEC regardless of who was playing. As a testament to that, Colorado often brought two guys on blitzes. As best I could tell, Callaway never changed any blocking schemes.
- Massaquoi was a serious play-maker last year. A player doesn't need to be 6' 4" to be a play-maker. Refer to #89, Carolina Panthers for verification.
- While we knew our secondary was inexperienced, that's Martinez's alleged field of expertise. When players are literally pointing fingers at each other as if to say "That was YOUR GUY!" that's bad coaching pure and simple. Also, as for having two "great" safeties, we had two hard-hitting safeties. Let's not confuse the two since Davis and Blue cost UGA the Tennessee game in 2004 by biting on simple play-action not once but twice leaving their assignments wide open. UGA had no business losing that game and it was the play of those two players that cost them the game.
- The linebackers are okay. They're pretty good but also seem to miss their assignments and are really marginal tacklers.
- Our special teams play is also so-so. Look at how Tennessee was consistently hemming the kick returns in and how UGA had three punts blocked in two games. Brown's average return during that game, if you take away the 99-yarder was less than 9.5 yards. That's horrible. Opponents are consistently doing as well or better on their kick returns than UGA. You're right about Coutu. That's been costly. How Bailey has remained on the team, I do not know. He was originally replaced by Coutu due to his abysmal performance and has already looked shaky. This point is pretty much moot though since UGA is consistently having drives stall in the red zone.
- While there is inexperience in the QB position, I think that's the least of UGA's worries. The problem with this area is due in large part to Richt and his ridiculous play calling. He has four running backs that could start at any school in the SEC. Southerland has really been the bright spot in the RB corps. The real issue to me is that Richt is still trying to throw the ball as much or more than he is trying to run it. As I recall, UGA only rushed with Lumpkin and Brown 21 times COMBINED in the Tennessee game while they both averaged 6+ yards per carry. UGA threw the ball 25 times. Given that Tennessee was trying to turn the game into a track meet, a good coach would have tried to run the ball more and just throw screen passes to keep eating up the clock. Against Vandy, there were 30 passing attempts compared to 28 rushing attempts from the TB position. When you can't stop the other team's offense, you keep them off the field. You don't try to beat them with inexperienced QB's. Again, bad play calling.
- As for tight-ends, Chandler is better than Milner but, in true Richt fashion, he is starting the senior over the sophomore regardless of who is the better overall player.
- The DL play is not very good. Tennessee pretty much ran the ball at will. Other teams have abused the DL (Auburn, Florida, West Virginia, Ole Miss (135 yards by ONE player), etc.) at times as well. UGA has the two most over-rated defensive ends in the conference. I think they bought into the hype about how good they were supposed to be and forgot that they actually had to prove it on the field. Against Tennessee, they were non-factors.
by jocwalk on
Oct 16, 2006 4:27 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Can you say "overreacting"?
by Elmo Lewis on Oct 17, 2006 6:48 AM EDT 0 recs








