Schedule Watch: Week 3
In which we take a quick look at how our 2011 opponents fared the preceding week
|
|
Finally, some teams on our schedule moved past their cupcakes to some real meat while we took advantage of the pastry cart that rolled Between the Hedges Saturday. Sugar high, anyone? That’s all fine and good, but let’s not experience a crash in Oxford this coming weekend, aight?
Hereafter follow brief -- and I mean brief -- glances at how everybody else did this weekend. |
Ole Miss Rebels (1-2, 0-1 SEC) lost to Vandy 7-30. Coach Giggity earned a rare and special distinction by leading teams in losing efforts against three different Vanderbilt coaches. Out of the last seven games between the Commodores and the Rebels, Vandy has won five, which is how many interceptions they got on Saturday in Nashville. Folks are asking whether Vandy is that good or Ole Miss is that bad, and consensus seems to say it’s the latter. Expect Ole Miss to have circled the wagons a bit by the time Georgia shows up in Oxford this coming weekend. In other words, it’s a trap.
Mississippi State Bulldogs (1-2, 0-2 SEC) lost to LSU 19-6. First of all, 19-6 is a Football Score. There was a time when a score like 26-21 in the 1980 Georgia-Florida game (and the 1981 game, too, for that matter) felt like an out-of-control shootout, prompting one to wonder whether anybody played defense any more. I’m serious. Second, I still am sold on Mississippi State as a pretty good football team. Not many teams will stop the Other Bulldogs’ Chris Relf and Vick Ballard as easily as LSU did. I certainly don’t expect us to, but maybe our defense will be effective enough.
Tennessee Volunteers (2-1, 0-1 SEC) lost to Florida 23-33. I didn’t watch this. I loosely followed the game’s progress via Twitter while sipping bourbon outside a bar on Broad Street in Athens after our game. I was especially amused by the complaints about all the penalties, especially of the pass interference variety. You mean somebody’s actually calling the Gators on all that crap they’ve been getting away with for years? Alas, 150 penalty yards notwithstanding, Florida managed to stave off a Tennessee comeback effort.
Vanderbilt Commodores (3-0, 1-0 SEC) defeated Ole Miss 30-7. Oh, Vandy. I remember all my life, you’ve never fielded very good teams, even though you were good for an occasional upset. I don’t think this qualifies. But now Ole Miss fans are crying in the breeze, the pain calling. Oh, Vandy.
Florida Gators (3-0, 1-0 SEC) defeated Tennessee 33-23. Did I mention Chris Rainey is a beast? Yes, I did. Yes, he is. Anything else? Not really seeing it (also, not taking anything for granted, but just sayin’).
New Mexico State Aggies (1-2, 0-0 WAC) lost to UTEP 10-16. The Aggies beat a Big 10 team last week then fell to a team that’s in last place in C-USA’s Western Division. This almost certainly is a meaningless comparison, and I freely admit to knowing next to nothing about those we call "mid-majors". New Mexico State QB Andrew Manley better have been manly, as he was sacked six times while throwing for 242 yards and a touchdown. The Aggies could get nothing going on the ground: 16 yards on 29 carries. Defensive lines take note.
Auburn Tigers (2-1, 1-0 SEC) lost to Clemson 24-38. I told you the Faustian deal would not last 24 years. It lasted 17 games. Conference pride, you say? Pffft. I hate Auburn.
Kentucky Wildcats (2-1, 0-0 SEC) lost to Louisville. The Wildcats weren’t able to mount a late comeback, although they did manage a touchdown in the final five minutes to come within seven. Kentucky’s offense did reasonably well through the air, numbers-wise (27 of 41 for 255 yards) but had only 35 rushing yards. This is not how we win football games east of the Mississippi.
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (3-0, 0-0 ACC) defeated Kansas 66-24. Fun with numbers: Tech had 768 total yards on offense, 604 of which were rushing, but their time of possession was almost five minutes less than Kansas’s. The Jackets’ passing game became a little less prominent, proportionately speaking, but if you can run for more than 600 yards against a defense, why bother throwing the ball? Things seem to be ticking pretty well for the Tech offense. I’m not quite ready to be all that concerned about a defense that gave up 24 points to Kansas, however.
Boise State Broncos (2-0, 0-0 MWC) defeated Toledo 40-15. I watched most of this game, and I got a little worried early on that Toledo pull the upset, making our loss to the Broncos look even worse (at least, worse from the standpoint of W-L records only, because I’m not sure it could look much worse than it did for those who actually saw it). But Kellen Moore did what he does; the Boise State Broncos picked up steam; and the Broncos ran off with the game.
South Carolina Gamecocks (3-0, 1-0 SEC) defeated Navy 24-21. The triple option can be tricky if you don’t go up against it on a regular basis. Just ask the Jayhawks. And if you’re a Gamecock fan at the end of a regular season in which you were undefeated, but with a whole bunch of 3-point wins in your record, I’m pretty sure you’re cool with that. While it’s happening, however, you fret. Honestly, I wish the Gamecocks well, as long as they find at least a couple of SEC games to lose.
GO DAWGS!
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nicely done

"Uvarum, Uvarum Fit, Uvarum.... double Fit..."
- Augustus "Gus" McCrae
by Munson's_Marbles on Sep 22, 2011 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Why does it matter what Boise does from here on out?
We’ve already lost two games. We’re not going to be in the national championship discussion so how that loss looks is completely irrelevant. Our season will be judged by how we do against our SEC schedule.
Dude
The point of his post is to look at our opponents are fairing. It’s exactly what the computers are going to do as well. This isn’t a post about who is in the NC discussion.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
I get that.
I just didn’t get the “I got a little worried early on that Toledo might pull the upset” part. It just doesn’t matter one bit. The computers aren’t going to make a difference no matter what for us because the only way we make a BCS game this year is if we win the SEC.
I was rooting for Toledo because I want Boise to lose at least one game this year. If I thought Boise winning out would be in any way beneficial to UGA, I wouldn’t have done so. Fwiw, I would be pulling for them had we won in the Dome.
by FisheriesDawg on Sep 21, 2011 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I can understand that.
At this point, it costs us nothing for the Broncos to win out; I didn’t enjoy losing three games in 2003, but it soothed the pain of those losses to be able to say, “Well, at least those three losses were to the national champion and the team that beat the national champion!” If Boise State goes undefeated, it will be better (psychologically, at least) for us to have lost to an undefeated team than to a one- or two-loss team. Your mileage may vary, though; I certainly see the logic of your point that it makes no practical difference, since Georgia isn’t going to be anywhere close to being in the mix for the bowl games for which the formula matters.
The flipside of that, though, is that there clearly is no benefit to us for BSU to lose. A Boise State setback isn’t going to clear the way for us, the way (theoretically) a South Carolina conference loss could open the door for us to sneak back into the race for the Eastern Division. (That, though, is not going to happen, so I’d just as soon the Gamecocks repeated as division champions, because I’d rather them win it than the Gators.)
It’s all in how you choose to look at it, but tankertoad is right: NCT is telling us how our opponents fared, and offering his take on the importance of those events. As always, we welcome alternative viewpoints.
Go 'Dawgs!
I disagree.
I can see how Boise winning out can be bad for us. We’re a major conference team. The more Boise wins, the more it legitimizes teams that play farcical schedules when it comes to the national title discussion. Think about what their 2006 team did for that joke of a Hawaii team in 2007. Without Boise and their Statue of Liberty game, Hawaii very likely doesn’t get a chance to embarrass themselves in the Sugar Bowl and instead they’re playing a 5-loss ACC team in the Aloha Bowl like they should have been.
Now, fast-forward a few years to the point that people are legitimately giving thought to the idea of letting a team like Boise actually play for the national title. Given our luck as it relates to the MNC game (1-loss SECC in the wrong year, losses to the wrong two teams in 2007), it wouldn’t shock me if we managed to get screwed over in the future with a one-loss UGA team getting left out in favor of an undefeated mid-major that didn’t play anyone of substance.
Nothing against this specific Boise team, but I think they’re a bad thing for programs like ours. David slaying Goliath isn’t good for us given that we’re in the Goliath conference.
by FisheriesDawg on Sep 21, 2011 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I dunno.
I think Boise is a pretty good team and deserves its ranking. They schedule pretty aggressively and play pretty well against that schedule. Teams with tiny stadiums in outer Mongolia won’t get many teams willing to come visit, but Boise has taken their show on the road – two years in a row. Would they benefit from tougher competition all the time? Of course. But I like the way those boys play football. We didn’t so much as lose that game as Boise State went out there and won it. Maybe we’d have done better out of the I-formation and if ‘Tree hadn’t been injured, but you won’t hear me asking for a mulligan.
by first and thom on Sep 21, 2011 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not asking for a mulligan either...
but do you think beating Georgia, TCU, and a bunch of tomato cans makes a team deserving of a national title shot over, say, what LSU is attempting to do this season?
It is unfortunate for Boise, but they’re very rarely going to be deserving of a shot over a team that has to test themselves on a regular basis. Even if they’re as good as a comparable team from a BCS league, they haven’t earned their shot. Are you telling me you’d be OK with it if Georgia won the SEC with one loss (let’s say to Alabama in the regular season with a win in the rematch in Atlanta) and got left out of the national championship game in favor of an undefeated Boise?
by FisheriesDawg on Sep 21, 2011 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Hard to answer that question in a vacuum - which means that the answer is "it depends."
Teams that play tough schedules get every benefit of the doubt from me, but schedule is not everything. I can conceive of circumstances in which a non-AQ could deserve that shot over a 1-loss SEC team, but it would have to be a pretty darn good non-AQ team.
Football rankings are subjective, and – I think – delightfully so. Boise State is a fine team. While their conference does not automatically qualify them for a BCS bowl, their schedule should not automatically disqualify them from being the best team in the country. They will probably end up as the lowest-ranked undefeated team in a few weeks, and they will need some luck to get picked to play for it all. But if they look like the best team in the country, even against weak teams, then they should play for it all.
by first and thom on Sep 21, 2011 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
OK
I don’t think they’ve looked anywhere near the best team in the country. They’re very good, but I’ve been more impressed with at least 6-7 teams than I have with Boise State. That’s the subjectivity you’re talking about, though. Unfortunately for them, they’re not going to get a chance to change many minds, either. The people that are on their bandwagon are going to see 30-point wins over UNLV as proof that Boise is awesome. The people that aren’t are going to see their complete dearth of quality wins.
At least with teams like LSU, Alabama, Oklahoma, Wisconsin, Texas A&M, and Stanford we’re going to get several opportunities to see them tested. With Boise we’ll just never know, and a lot of that is unfortunately UGA’s fault for not putting up a fight.
by FisheriesDawg on Sep 22, 2011 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions
It matters to me only
… because it would be even more depressing to have lost to a team that lost to a school whose name I barely recognize. You are correct, however, that what Boise State does from here on out will have 0 effect on what kind of hardware we do or don’t get after the season. And honestly, I’m forcing myself to read about games about which I otherwise would not, and as long as I’m doing so, I’m writing about it. You can expect a line or two about Coastal Carolina in future posts, even. Having written that, I appreciate that what I find amusing or informative is not universally so. But that’s the story of my life.
It could be worse.
You could find yourself utterly incapable of writing anything (including an apology for the last thing you wrote) that doesn’t insult, alienate, and infuriate whole groups of people. That, at least of late, is the story of my life.
Go 'Dawgs!
At least you stick with writing,
I moved on to more direct means of insulting, alienating, and infuriating whole groups of people.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
That would at least be viscerally satisfying.
Under certain circumstances, it even would be good exercise.
It’s just getting very, very wearying trying to show class, trying to be civil, trying to be respectful, and failing (or being seen as having failed, which, at the end of the day, is the same thing) at that objective every . . . single . . . time.
Go 'Dawgs!
Hey Kyle...
You’re the best at what you do, I don’t want to hear any nonsense about failing. Pre-tuned ears (or eyes, in this case) will hear(read) what they want to. You are far more gracious than most I know, and definitely more than me. All of Dawg Sports follows your lead!
Success is never final. --Winston Churchill
by Inteljumper on Sep 21, 2011 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions

by 






























