Georgia Bulldogs 59, Coastal Carolina Chanticleers 0: We Had More 'Dawgs
I'm not expecting to grow flowers in the desert,
But I can live and breathe and see the sun in wintertime.
Big Country, "In a Big Country"
We knew going in that there was no "good" outcome to this game; the range of options ran from "bad" to "expected." The best possible result was a convincing win in which the Georgia Bulldogs didn’t monkey around with the opposition for a quarter and a half, in which the coaches were able to empty the bench, and in which no one was injured. That mission, however meager in aspiration, was accomplished.
The Red and Black led by 21 after one quarter, by 35 at the half, and by 59 as the Redcoats struck up "Krypton Fanfare" with 15 minutes left to play. The ‘Dawgs led the Chanticleers in virtually every statistical category: first downs (23-7), total offense (470-112), passing yardage (276-49), and rushing yardage (194-63). Georgia held the ball for more than 34 minutes, was +2 in turnover margin, and converted more than half its third-down attempts while allowing Coastal Carolina to pick up the requisite yardage on fewer than one-fifth of the Chants’ third-down tries.
Let’s not oversell the significance or flawlessness of today’s performance, though. The Bulldogs’ 52 yards in penalties included a couple of big holding calls. Too many of Carlton Thomas’s 15 carries were up the middle for minimal gains. A Bacarri Rambo interception was followed by a lost fumble. Aaron Murray was far from sharp, or, at least, as far from sharp as a quarterback can be on a day on which he completes 18 of 26 passes for 188 yards, three touchdowns, and no interceptions while rushing for another score.
We must not permit ourselves to believe this win means anything. The 59 points were the most scored by Georgia since the 2004 Kentucky game, but it means no more than the 55-point outburst against Louisiana-Lafayette that preceded last year’s four-game losing streak. The shutout was the Bulldogs’ third such blanking in as many seasons, but it means no more than the back-to-back goose eggs that preceded a 3-4 stumble through the middle of the 2006 campaign. As tempting as it is to ascribe outsized importance to Isaiah Crowell’s 86 rushing yards, or to Tavarres King’s and Malcolm Mitchell’s six catches apiece, we, like Tina Turner before us, must try to ignore that it means more than that.
All the Bulldogs’ beatdown of a Division I-AA opponent means is that Georgia dominated an inferior team the way the Red and Black should have. That, though, is more than we are accustomed to getting out of these body bag games, so maybe playing up to their potential against no one in particular offers some hope that the Athenians are ready to play up to their potential against someone of significance for the first time since . . . when? the 2009 Georgia Tech game? the 2008 Sugar Bowl? Well, let’s not start treating wins over Coastal Carolina, Hawaii, and Georgia Tech as equivalent to wins over major conference opposition quite yet.
Let’s acknowledge this much, though: My son and I arrived in Sanford Stadium early this afternoon wearing light jackets to ward against the first faint chill of fall on an overcast autumn day, but, before long, we had shed them, preferring instead to cheer on the Bulldogs in our shirtsleeves as the cloud cover broke, the light shone through, and the day was warmed. Today didn’t get us as far as, "I say it’s all right," but at least it got us as far as, "Here comes the sun."
Go ‘Dawgs!
54 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't know if you read other comments or not, but I completely agree.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
Having more Dawgs than CCU is fun
But as you said meaningless.
I feel pretty good about next weekend (not confident, but good). The real question remains do we have more Dawgs than the Bizarro Bulldogs.
Then and only then will we have any legitimate notion of the trajectory this team is on.
Sacrificing goats, chugging Maker's Mark, and walking underneath The Arch.
by RedCrake on Sep 17, 2011 9:36 PM EDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
We should very well beat Ole Miss, and fairly well. If we lose, then the seat is no longer hot. So I agree with you, the test will be MSU, which is manageable, but they are very strong.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
(sigh)...
/tosses vampire teeth.
/climbs back aboard bus.
I’ve seen enough talent on the UGA sidelines, and enough weaknesses in most of our remaining SEC opponents to let the dreaded breath of hope and opportunity waft upon my neck. It tingles. I’ve had this feeling before. She’s such a damn tease….
Run Lindsay Run!
That's exactly how I feel today. In fact, things maybe worse, because minus UF, everyone has exposed their underbelly,
and with our given talent, we should do very well. We now have a interesting piece of dichotomy. UGA should easily beat Ole MIss, for example, however a loss means “goodbye”, the same for most all of our other opponents. MSU and UF are the only games that may get a pass, however, couple a UF loss with a loss to a bad UT or AU or Ole Miss this year. Game over.
I am going to expect wins win until proven otherwise. The otherwise no longer matters because it will make the decision for us. All of our opponents are beatable minus UF. And beating UF will go a long ways in a lot of ways.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
I would agree with that, except for the parts that reflect favorably upon Florida.
The Gators have to be considered the frontrunners in the East now, but that’s more about the obvious weaknesses of Georgia, South Carolina, and Tennessee than about any strengths of Florida’s. The Gators had a huge lead on the Volunteers today, but they let the Big Orange back into it and had to win a nailbiter. Against a better team, Florida would have lost today after holding a big advantage.
Florida is a thoroughly beatable team; they just happen not to be beatable by the Bulldogs because they wear Florida uniforms, but that doesn’t mean they’re good. Heck, based on what I’ve seen in the first three weeks of the season, I’m not at all convinced that Vanderbilt isn’t playing the best football in the East right now.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Sep 17, 2011 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions
I wouldnt call it a nailbiter at all. Not sure you got to watch the whole game. UT got 10 pts in the 4th which is more a result of UF pulling some early celebration than any playcalling or ability.
UF had 14 in the 3rd, and fairly dominated the first half. It was never close in my view at all.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
Maybe, but I tend to agree . . .
. . . with C&F: When you’re up 30-7 at home over a struggling team you have lately owned, and you let it get at all close because of penalties and other errors, you’re a football team of questionable quality.
I’ll put it this way: If the Gators were wearing the uniforms of literally any other team in Division I-A, we wouldn’t consider them even remotely the biggest challenge on our remaining slate.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Sep 17, 2011 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions
This is the same Tennessee
That lost to 6-7 Georgia 41 to 14 yes?
I don’t buy that this game shows any strength for the Jorts whatsoever.
Tennessee is who we thought they were (Bray’s awesome performance against terrible teams in November not withstanding).
Sacrificing goats, chugging Maker's Mark, and walking underneath The Arch.
by RedCrake on Sep 17, 2011 10:44 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
If I buy into your's and Kyle's arguments, then that makes it even worse.
That means every game is manageable, and a loss to UF is even worse. Which is, again, good news because we can win, but very bad news even quicker if we lose.
The penalties and stupid mistakes did hurt them, but their play making was fine.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
Don't get me wrong... the UF game scares the hell out of me...
As it should any Georgia fan at this point.
Point is, I’m way past the notion that any news is good. All news is bad news.
I’ll believe every game is manageable when I see us manage it.
Sacrificing goats, chugging Maker's Mark, and walking underneath The Arch.
by RedCrake on Sep 17, 2011 11:13 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
but that's just the point - every team we play exposed their weakness, and some big ones
UGA losing now is even worse. We have no excuses. There will be plenty of film. There are no standouts in the East. CMR must win.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
agreed
Sacrificing goats, chugging Maker's Mark, and walking underneath The Arch.
by RedCrake on Sep 17, 2011 11:30 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Well, thank you. Because today seems to be one of those days when nobody agrees with me!
/bro hug
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
Just sayin'
With a honey in the middle, there’s some leeway.
by NCT on Sep 18, 2011 11:53 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I agree with you completely tank
But then having my concurrence will not stand you in good stead with your compadres.I was at the Swamp tonight and I saw a UF team capable of good things. We need work but we’re probably going to surprise some folks. That feels good after being written off. I wish you well.
Florida...hmph!

Success is never final. --Winston Churchill
by Inteljumper on Sep 17, 2011 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn't consider today a weakness for South Carolina
that offense, especially when run with well executed discipline like you can get from Naval Academy kids, is extremely difficult to stop. Especially in a week after a hard game where there was probably an early week hangover in practice. Plus their schedule doesn’t look too difficult until November, plenty of time for kids to grow into roles on D.
http://sportsandgrits.com/
by Mr. Sanchez on Sep 17, 2011 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions
A W is a W is a W.
I agree it wasn’t flawless, but today was exactly what our boys needed. Even if the goals are meager, accomplishing them handily is good for our collective psyche. The D posted a shutout. The O scored on its first five possessions. A bunch of young’ins got to play. No one was injured. After the last 3 years, I’ll take it.
by Spears on Sep 17, 2011 10:06 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Kyle, I can help you with the first three of your 25 -
OK
LSU
Bama
Hope that helps. )
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
I believe it is highly likely . . .
. . . that you have accurately described the top three spots on my BlogPoll ballot.
Go 'Dawgs!
I worked on that pretty hard, glad I could help
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
Despite the loss tonight...
I would like to welcome the Atlantic Coast Conference (otherwise known as Florida State University) back to college football relevance. FSU has finally put a quality product on the field for the first time since Mark Richt came to Athens. I don’t see anybody in their league (or the Gators) beating them the rest of the season.
I agree, FisheriesDawg.
And by “I agree,” I of course don’t count the inexplicable 21-point loss that FSU will certainly suffer to some horrible team like Wake Forest or Duke on a Thursday night road game.
by vineyarddawg on Sep 17, 2011 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Some pundit will utter the fateful words,
“FSU controls their own destiny in the ACC,” and FSU will promptly lose to Maryland (which will be wearing those jerseys that look like Two-Face kissing Pikachu’s backside).
by Cherokee's Grip on Sep 18, 2011 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions
The MAJOR good feeling about today is....
we beat our cupcake better than Yech beat theirs.
Some people call it a Sling Blade, I call it a Kaiser Blade….ummm hmm
I HATE 35 (ORANGE)
I agree somewhat with that statement. Yes, CC is a Div. I-AA opponent that we dominated and should have dominated, and that game proves nothing in terms of matchup with other SEC teams.
But, this game does matter, in a way. It is a win, and it gives the Dawgs their first win of the season, it’s the first home game (technically), and it ends the 2-game losing streak. It changes the record to 1-2 (0-1). It is a win, and we should be proud of it.
My dad taught me how to make meat for sloppy joes and my mom let me turn over hot dogs on the grill.
by ChopMaster on Jun 25, 2011 7:25 PM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Jun 28, 2011 9:50 PM EDT reply actions
"Here in the National League where we play REAL baseball, DH means double-header." -Me.
Technically, South Carolina wasn't at home?
And the losing streak was 3 games, not 2.
http://sportsandgrits.com/
Technically correct is
the best kind of correct.
![]()
http://sportsandgrits.com/
by Mr. Sanchez on Sep 18, 2011 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions
I took a little hope from the fact that they outplayed South Carolina...
in most respects. Yesterday’s game didn’t do anything to dampen that spark, so in that respect it was perfect. The people above are right that we won’t know how righted the ship is until the MSU game. Ole Miss is terrible, and even with an off game Georgia will win next week by at least two touchdowns.
All we can take from the CC game is...
That we actually dominated every facet of the game (as we should have against any FCS team). I do however think that this game coupled with Ole Miss next weekend will serve as “the warmup” we never got at the beginning of the season with opening up with 2 highly ranked opponents. It will serve as a good stretch to right the wrongs, build some momentum and confidence. Next true test is the OTHER Bulldogs. Definitely winnable as we sit right now.
A couple of things that were a bit troubling from yesterday’s games…
1) OLine had a few lapses in effort against the CC Dline. No excuse for them to be making plays in our backfield.
2) Aaron Murray didn’t look as sharp as he should have. Just hasn’t seemed as accurate so far this season as he did last season. I know he’ll pull it together, just would like to see better accuracy from a guy who is know for his outstanding mechanics/footwork.
All in all, we did with this game what we were supposed to, which in itself is a step in the right direction. Too many times in the past we toyed around with inferior competition too much and didn’t come with enough fire. Hopefully, this is a sign of things to come! GO DAWGS!!!
"I'm from Ohio, but if I'd known when I was two what it was like down South, I would have crawled here on my hands and knees."-Frank Sinkwich, University of Georgia
I know I will get pummled for this but here we go...
How is it that this win against CC seems to have generated more skepticism than the loss against USC last week? I feel that the loss last week (for some, mind you) created a since of cautioned optimism. Listen I am not in any way suggesting that we start sucking down the Kool-Aid and we all take a dip in the Strawberry River but I do feel that we have to be willing to look at this thing in a holistic perspective (not that I claim to be able to accurately portray one – but I will try).
Regardless of where you stand on the CMR situation, you still have to be willing to evaluate our program based on where it is in talent, depth, new coaches implementing new systems, inexperience, and also the strength of your opponent. I know that all of you will read this and immediately respond: Oh here come the excuses for why we should except mediocrity. Please hear me, NO ONE is more sick and tired of the ineptness that we have witnessed out there on that football field, whether it is Between the Hedges (sorry I have to capitalize that) or on the national stage in a bowl game against the likes of UCF.
As I have mentioned here before, I do not think that the team was of the proper mindset, coming into the 2008 season, to carry the banner of a #1 ranked football team throughout the course of that entire season. We had the talent, but we “needed more DAWG”. We did not have that tenacity, that JYD stuff. Now please hear me… that is plain and simple, coaching. That is CMR’s coaching staff that, for whatever reason, did not prepare that #1 ranked team to be a #1 ranked team. They quickly got absolutely punched in and about the face and crotch by Alabama for an entire half before they realized that in order to be a top 5 program, you may actually have to show up and defend that ranking by actually playing a game.
Why did (or do…I have seen some change in this) Mark Richt led teams traditionally come out and look as if though, in order to prepare for Saturdays games, they spent all week rehearsing Shakespearean tragedies only to then let the madness unfold before their captive audience that has left us many times without response … other than … “huh…?”, “why?”, “Uncle!”, “Could you pass me that… yes the entire bottle!”
That being said… this is nothing new. Here are the facts.
1) Our coaching staff has been reshuffled from top to bottom. In some instances these changes are not even over a year old yet. We are in the second year (as in year #2) of implementing the 3-4 D and quite frankly, I am liking what I see. I see a D that is GATA’s. We are wrapping up well, swarming to the ball, and I don’t know about you but I remember a D just a few years ago that could not get a turnover even if the ball was dangling on the ground around their feet. They would simply try to roll the ball around until our opponent had enough time to locate, attack, and recover the lost possession. This D however seems to have put that miserable period behind us.
2) After 2008 we lost Knowshon, Stafford, and our top receiver in Massaquoi to the 2009 NFL draft. This is not an excuse but it is a reality … a team must fill this void and it was a significant void. Joe Cox played well and was a DGD but he was not going to lead this team to being a superior squad on game days. Yes I know all teams have to do this and must go through this process but with that in mind, most teams do experience a drop off of performance during the young players’ learning curves.
3) At the same time that we are breaking in a Freshman QB in 2010, we are also breaking in a brand new defensive scheme with players that are not entirely fit for playing that scheme. 2011 marks the first year that we are actually putting the physical pieces in place to manage a 3-4 scheme. Expect more growing pains on D – or at least be aware that they will likely occur. Why? These new physical pieces I am speaking of are young, plain and simple.
Facts are over – here come opinions:
1) The Dream Team is still a Dream!
Guys, we saw Ray Drew for the first time on the field yesterday. We are in a place now where we have to let this recruiting class play out under their current coaching, otherwise prepare yourself for the lack of stability that is occurring at UT now. I feel that this class can and will be as successful as Mark Richts earlier SEC championship teams. I believe CTG is the guy that will get this D back to being a force in the SEC.
2) Mark Richt was not fired but he has altered his course:
When this occurred and Mark Richt removed Willy, he declared the changing of the course for this program. He decided that the D was not getting it done. When he changed the strengthening coach, he was declaring what we all were seeing, we were not physically fit enough late in games. Here is my point with this, he has to be given time (like you would with any new coach) to implement these types of coaching and personnel changes. Its only logical. Listen, maybe he should have been fired but he wasn’t! He now has to be given time to see if these changes take hold.
3) 2008 was NOT 2009 and/or 2010: These years are completely different from each other, other than the fact that all three were difficult and hard to witness by the Dawg Nation. 2008 hurt because expectations were so high. We were promptly outclassed by a more prepared team, at home, and on national television. From there we went on to underwhelm and not be worthy of the #1 ranking were undeservedly given in the first place. 2009; enter Joe Cox and a year that resembled the skill level of Joe Cox, good but not good enough. Of course it was frustrating. We all just wanted to at least see improvement in how we executed, even in a loss. We did not get that and changes in the coaching staff were made.
2010, could and should almost look like 1/2 of CMR staff’s first year at UGA. You know why? Because it was! It was CTG’s first year at UGA, along with other key pieces. He has done major things in his 1st year and 3 games. Would you as a fan base fire a new coach after 1 year and 3 games? Listen I hear ya, the W’s & L’s situation has got to change but we missed on our chance to rid ourselves of a guy that now stands with a 97-36 record. He, his new staff, and his highly touted recruiting class will, and should, be given time to pan out. I for one am getting on board with everything I got. I do believe that the guy with the 97-36 record still knows how to win. I believe we are recruiting the kind of talent to get us there. I feel we must give CTG’s tenacity and 3-4 D a chance that goes beyond two years. I also am insanely frustrated by Bobo’s play calling at times but this is a team that has put up 101 points in two games. I hope that cooler heads prevail in this case and that this coaching staff is given the necessary time to turn the ship around. And no, 2 years is not enough time to turn the ship around when you have undergone the changes in players, personnel, and schemes that we have. It has been somewhat of a perfect storm and I believe CMR,CTG, these players and maybe CMB come out of this storm better than ever.
Those wishing Richt gone, I think, do not really want what they ask for. I feel that in the end, in one way or another, whether it is by leading our program back to national elite status or by taking his abilities elsewhere, he will come out showing that his getting to 97 wins was no fluke. In the end, this is not some pro-Richt campaign. Around college football it is about W’s & L’s and we haven’t been really piling up the W’s of late. But I would say that our case is a bit unique and requires some clear headed evaluation. This downturn has many factors and also exists on multiple levels. The disappointments have been mounting over the course of three years and this is dangerous. The villagers begin to go looking for a witch to dunk and worry about reasoning later.
Before we go breaking out the pitch forks and firing up the torches, I say we all take a step back, clear our heads a bit, and look at this 2011 team where they are. We lost to a then #5 team – we looked bad. We lost to a then #12 SEC team – we looked better. We destroyed a cupcake 59 – 0 – and looked like a beast doing it. This team is growing before our eyes. They are past the personnel and schematic changes and simply need time to mature. All the talk of firings and Richt on the hot seat only go to creating more instability with our program in regards to recruiting. What will be… will be – but I for one am committing once again to get behind these players, these coaches (yes including Mike Bobo), and to be an encouragement to the entire Dawg Nation. Lets get excited about the improvements we have seen and be willing to give credit where credit is due. We have a chance to be a good damn team here guys and our Dawgs need us. They need our optimism and our belief in them. CMB needs it! CMR needs it! CTG needs it! Our boys out on that field need it and we should give it to them on every down of every game.
My sincere thoughts
GO DAWGS!
"Uvarum, Uvarum Fit, Uvarum.... double Fit..."
- Augustus "Gus" McCrae
by Munson's_Marbles on Sep 18, 2011 11:24 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Please cut and paste and make a fanpost.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
Done
"Uvarum, Uvarum Fit, Uvarum.... double Fit..."
- Augustus "Gus" McCrae
by Munson's_Marbles on Sep 18, 2011 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah sorry about that
I am still making some rookie mistakes out there. Thanks for coaching me up! : )
"Uvarum, Uvarum Fit, Uvarum.... double Fit..."
- Augustus "Gus" McCrae
by Munson's_Marbles on Sep 18, 2011 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Not a mistake so much as
Recognition of a high-quality comment and the desire for it to be more prominent.
by NCT on Sep 18, 2011 9:30 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Appreciate that NCT
"Uvarum, Uvarum Fit, Uvarum.... double Fit..."
- Augustus "Gus" McCrae
by Munson's_Marbles on Sep 18, 2011 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions
This is a very good post
With a little bit of luck and continued “growth,” we could run the table. In all likelihood, I see an 8-4 team at the end before the bowls. But I also see an 8-4 team that could be poised for another 12-1 type campaign in 2012 (8-4 in 2001, 12-1 in 2002…pre-bowls. Symmetry?) This team has tremendous upside and is built for future success. Near-future success. Who knows, that run may have begun on Saturday. There are still some things to be worked out and we are still razor-thin in some key areas.
I agree with your assessment about how unprepared this team was in 2008. The last two seasons have been lost and them’s the facts. But the coaching staff in place right now are trying to fix something that was broken far beyond we, The Collective, we probably willing to admit…and looking back on last season no one should have predicted anything but mediocrity or worse.
We’re young. We’re learning and growing. But the learning curve with the talent we currently possess shouldn’t be nearly as steep as the learning curve with the talent we didn’t possess over the last few years. Better days are ahead, sooner than later. I truly hope Richt reaps the benefits of this. I want to see him as our coach next year.
The bus? Someone save my seat.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
by DavetheDawg on Sep 18, 2011 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I would love to see CMR the coach for the next 10 years!
But every time I start thinking positively, I get the chills, violent shakes and nausea.
Success is never final. --Winston Churchill
Pessimism
It works for me. I am overjoyed when we win and eh when we lose. It keeps me from going postal on small animals. :)
sell out streak
Just out of curiosity, how does everybody feel about the streak ending? Personally, I hate aa games because it makes me feel like I’m being treated as an atm for the athletic dept. So I don’t really have a problem. Vote with your feet. I think if it where the Kentucky game, it would have been sold out. I’m just curious.
by Mark Mandingo on Sep 18, 2011 12:01 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I feel rotten about it.
I was there. But the way we count, it wouldn’t have mattered if I hadn’t been there, because my ticket was bought a while back.
As a practical matter, this is just a little tick in a column in McGarity’s and the athletic board’s ledger of how to handle personnel decisions after the season.
by NCT on Sep 18, 2011 12:18 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
yeah
No doubt if we were 2-0 that game would be sold out. I guess I’d feel bad if it were an sec game, but like I said, I hate I-aa games with a passion. At least give me a Kent state before you take my money. (note: I live about 12 hours away so its purely a philosophical question for me).
by Mark Mandingo on Sep 18, 2011 12:40 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I'm absolutely fine with it, for three reasons.
First of all, we all know these are bogus numbers, anyway. They’re counting tickets sold, not butts in seats, so several of those supposed “sellouts” weren’t before a packed house.
Secondly, I can’t fault Greg McGarity for this sort of scheduling because (a) I’m going to be there, anyway, and McGarity knows that, so I can’t blame anyone but myself, and (b) he learned it from Jeremy Foley, whose scheduling helped the Florida Gators to three national championships in a 13-year period.
Finally, Nebraska has the nation’s longest sellout streak, the preservation of which has kept the Cornhuskers from pulling the trigger on a long-overdue expansion of their stadium. Long-running college football sellout streaks are analogous to Hartsfield-Jackson’s consistent contention for the title “world’s busiest airport” (which is the case because Atlanta needs two airports); both are indicators of poor planning, rather than points of pride.
Go 'Dawgs!
so you're saying
Gymnastics sellouts were what was preventing the Stegman reservation for so many years.
by Mark Mandingo on Sep 18, 2011 7:52 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
My analysis:
Nothing but positives here for the Dawgs.
+ Aaron Murray showed some decent speed, and Hutson Mason really looked prepared in the game, which is good to see from a 2nd string player.
+ Isaiah Crowell ran, ran, and ran some more. He felt like he was in high school, and that’s a good feeling.
+ The O-Line got it going, allowing no sacks and not much pressure on Murray/Mason/Welch.
+ The Defense was just IT, allowing no points and less than 100 total yards for CC, I believe. Bacarri Rambo showed good awareness, picking off a pass from Aramis Hillary, although fumbling it back to them.
+ The receivers are gaining confidence and are just working it like themselves. Malcom Mitchell, the fresman, continues to be a consistent and reliable target for Murray. Tavarres King gained much condfidence and caught a lot of passes.
- It looks like Crowell still has a lingering shoulder problem. He was out of the game for small pockets of time in the game, but he still performed well.
My dad taught me how to make meat for sloppy joes and my mom let me turn over hot dogs on the grill.
by ChopMaster on Jun 25, 2011 7:25 PM CDT
by justincredubil02 on Jun 28, 2011 9:50 PM EDT reply actions
"Here in the National League where we play REAL baseball, DH means double-header." -Me.

by 

































