Georgia Bulldogs Ranked 19th in AP Preseason Poll; Red and Black Fans Simultaneously Swell with Pride and Cringe with Fear
We in Bulldog Nation had something else on our minds yesterday, so you may not have noticed that the Associated Press preseason poll was released on Saturday, and several SEC squads were included in the top 25, among them your Georgia Bulldogs.
Eight of the league’s twelve teams will enter the autumn ranked. In addition to No. 19 Georgia, the conference placed the No. 2 Alabama Crimson Tide, No. 4 LSU Tigers, No. 12 South Carolina Gamecocks, No. 15 Arkansas Razorbacks, No. 20 Mississippi St. Bulldogs, No. 22 Florida Gators, and No. 23 Auburn Tigers in the top 25.
My emotions are decidedly mixed. On the one hand, I am pleased to see relatively objective observers placing a measure of faith in the offseason alterations that have occurred in Athens. On the other hand, I have a tough time conceding a top 20 spot to the Red and Black until I see something on the field of play that convinces me that the 2011 Bulldogs are an improvement upon the 2009 and 2010 squads. I believe they will be, but I am not an objective observer, not even relatively, so I would like to see some tangible evidence that persuades me my faith is not misplaced.
If the sportswriters are right, though, the Red and Black’s record ought to improve considerably from last year to this: Georgia plays four of the seven SEC squads that joined the Classic City Canines in the preseason poll, but the ‘Dawgs are scheduled to cross paths only with one of the four conference clubs ranked ahead of the Red and Black. The Bulldogs face two of the top twelve teams in the initial AP top 25 in the season’s first two weeks, but they will not tangle with another team ranked higher than 20th in the preseason sportswriters’ poll the rest of the way.
Critics often malign Georgia’s opening opponent, the Boise St. Broncos, for playing what amounts to a two-game season in any given year. If the rankings are right, the Red and Black effectively may play a two-game season of their own, in the campaign’s first couple of weekends.
What caught your eye about the preseason rankings? Let us know in the comments below.
Go ‘Dawgs!
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My negativity
Is dominating the poll right now.
Too high. We should’ve been ranked 120th.
"Don't go ninja'n nobody that don't need ninja'n!" ~ Kung Fu Hillbilly.
I'm abstaining
But if there was a “Pre-season polls are ridiculous and I refuse to pay attention to them” option… I probably would’ve selected that one.
"If there's one thing worse than chlamydia, it's Florida." ~ Emma Stone
by RedCrake on Aug 21, 2011 9:33 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
UGA being ranked
Is a direct result of the Chick-Fil-A kick off Classic, it’ll draw in more viewers.
I like your conspiracy type thinking.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
I am a non-believer in preseason rankings
No polls should not come out until about weeks 4 or 5. But for the political tool that is the preseason poll then yes.. I agree with the ranking that UGA got… I can`t believe Notre DAme is ranked above us but that will change when they play Navy, anyhoo…. GO DAWGS!! 13 days left!!!!!
by JaxDawg on Aug 21, 2011 12:05 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I'm a sheep
and I like to be told what teams are good by people who are supposed to know more than me. I’m more likely to watch a big ten game if each team has a little double digit number by their names.
That may sound like sarcasm but its true. The early polls aren’t in themselves a problem, its a lot of the voters’ mindset when it comes to being flexible. The “not dropping a team till it loses” is certainly an issue, but it really only matters when it comes to BCS rankings. I don’t think that starting the poll 5 or 6 weeks in is gonna solve that because even though an official poll wouldn’t exist, there would always be one in their head anyway.
by Mark Mandingo on Aug 21, 2011 12:55 PM EDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
It might not solve anything
But the people who do vote on these teams will have a better picture by weeks 5 or 6 how a team could predictably finish the season, because by week 5 most teams are into the meat of their schedule and have played at least 2-3 games that are relevant to their conference. Of course voters are going to have their own opinion, but at least it would be a more accurate view I would think.
Too Low, Obviously!
The new Nike Pro Combat Gear comes with a guaranteed top 15 finish, after all!
by ConfofChamps on Aug 21, 2011 3:07 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Is there any way Skeptical Dog . . .
. . . can serve as interim mascot until a new Uga is appointed?
Go 'Dawgs!
I don't know, Kyle
I like my mascots huskier.
"Don't go ninja'n nobody that don't need ninja'n!" ~ Kung Fu Hillbilly.
by Jman781 on Aug 21, 2011 10:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I am here to announce the founding of a new political party.
The Rank is Too Damn High.
by first and thom on Aug 22, 2011 1:22 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs

Success is never final. --Winston Churchill
by Inteljumper on Aug 22, 2011 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs

by 































