The University of Georgia is aware of the article mentioning Orson Charles and has been in communication with the NCAA. There are no issues with UGA or eligibility issues with Orson Charles. UGA will have no further comment regarding this matter.
UGA Athletic Department via Gentry Estes
9 months ago
DavetheDawg
8 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Glad to hear it
now go catch 2 TD’s vs. Boise, Mr. Charles
Dawg fan by birth,
no longer in Beaumont by the grace of God.
by Dawg in Beaumont on Aug 17, 2011 1:53 PM EDT reply actions
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong
but I’ve always thought benefits given to someone who didn’t attend the benefitters school of choice weren’t against the rules. Is that true, so that if say I was paying off a kid to go to Georgia than chose to attend Clemson instead, he’d be clean?
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
amateur status?
I think the problem would be the fact that it would affect their “amateur status” . I don’t think Orson received any benefits but if a player did receive say, cash, then their ability to play college sports as an “amateur” could be called into question.
I could be wrong but that’s how i understand it….
I think that's exactly the issue, so...
Andre Debose and Bryce Brown, who received benefits, may get suspended for a game or two.
by Biggus Rickus on Aug 17, 2011 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions
That also is my understanding.
If Shapiro’s account of giving Orson a tour of his U-jersey-filled closet is accurate, then an infraction arose from it. However, if there were no actual benefits provided to Orson, he’s cool; what remains is an impermissible contact by a U booster, which goes against Miami.
$300 rule?
I am trying to remember but wasn’t there are rule that we all were forced to learn about last year with the AJ Green Jerseygate 2k10 fiasco? I seem to remember something about $300 was the limit before it becomes a major violation. Anyone remember?






























