Georgia Bulldogs 2011 Season Preview: The Mississippi State Game
We are at the point of counting down the days until college football season, and the anticipation is driving some folks to drink as the Georgia Bulldogs prepare to surrender the Fulmer Cup and, with any luck, earn their way back into a postseason top 25. We are in the process of previewing the dozen opponents who stand in the way of the latter objective, and we now focus our attentions upon the Mississippi St. Bulldogs, who will visit Sanford Stadium on October 1.
While there were worse losses yet to come, Georgia’s 12-point road loss to Mississippi State last year felt at the time like the end of the world. This sensation was attributable partly to the fact that it snapped a nine-game winning streak by our Bulldogs over their Bulldogs that dated back to the mid-1970s. In a series that got underway in 1914, Georgia has gone 16-6 against Mississippi State, with half of the Red and Black’s losses coming in the first four series meetings. Prior to 2010, the Classic City Canines had fallen to MSU by a double-digit margin just once since Fran Tarkenton received his diploma from Athens High School.
Unfortunately, these are not your father’s Magnolia State Mongrels. Mississippi State’s 2010 season was successful by every measure, and, while the Western Division Bulldogs will need to negotiate a tough schedule and replace the entire linebacker corps in order to sustain their momentum in 2011, their achievements last fall included a second-place SEC finish in rushing offense and a third-place league standing in scoring defense. Running the ball well and stopping the other team from scoring are the cornerstones of a formula for success in the Southeastern Conference that has worked roughly since Reconstruction.
Despite the void at linebacker, State’s stellar defense returns mostly intact, with seven starters coming back with the intention of improving upon an autumn that saw the other Bulldogs end up 15th in the AP poll but fifth in the SEC West. However, they will have to do it without Pernell McPhee, Chris White, or K.J. Wright, and also without defensive coordinator Manny Diaz---no, not our Manny Diaz---who lit out for Austin to take over the vacancy on the Texas Longhorns’ staff that was left when Will Muschamp bolted for Gainesville. This leaves the MSU defensive unit in the hands of Coach Diaz’s co-defensive coordinator, Chris Wilson.
On the opposite side of the ball, the lynchpin of the MSU offense is quarterback Chris Relf, about whom I have bad news, good news, and worse news. The bad news is that Relf got better as a passer down the stretch last season, making a dramatic leap forward that saw him hook up with his intended receiver on almost 70 per cent of his passes over the course of the last three games. The good news is that his improvement may have been a chimera. The worse news is that it may not matter, because even the original version of Relf was good enough to beat Georgia last year.
In the battle between the Bulldogs in Starkville last fall, Relf was the home team’s leading passer and leading rusher. The Mississippi State signal caller connected on eight of 13 aerials for 135 yards and a touchdown while picking up 97 yards on 21 carries. In the Mississippians’ decisive 17-point fourth quarter against Georgia, Relf completed two of three passes for 48 yards and kept the ball seven times for 38 rushing yards. It’s no wonder Dan Mullen says, "I need Chris Relf to be a Chris Relf." Yeah, we pretty much need him not to be, and it’d be nice if MSU backup quarterback Dylan Favre wasn’t too much like his uncle, either.
Relf, who is on the watch list for the Davey O’Brien National Quarterback Award, is joined in the backfield by Doak Walker Award candidate Vick Ballard. As I noted in the Maple Street Press annual opponent preview section, Ballard’s 20 rushing touchdowns last year were the most by any SEC running back, and two of his treks into the end zone came during his 14-carry, 77-yard effort against the Athenians. If last year’s SEC stats (in which he finished sixth in rushing production) are any indication, Ballard will be second only to Marcus Lattimore as the best back Georgia will face in conference play in 2011. (That’s right, boys and girls; for the fifth straight game, the Classic City Canines will face a challenge to their run defense that likely will dictate the terms of the engagement. This is a recording.) For what it’s worth, three-fourths of Ballard’s 2010 TDs came in State wins . . . and three-fourths of his scores came against unranked opponents, as well.
If only to prepare you for the return of "Too Much Information" in the fall, I should throw in a handful of random tidbits while I’m at it, so here goes: Mississippi State finished third in the league both in third-down percentage (45.9%) and in third-down percentage allowed (34.6%), while the Bizarro Bulldogs registered an SEC West-best three blocks on special teams last season.
For the Red and Black, who haven’t lost to MSU between the hedges since 1956 but who did not look good the last time the two sets of Bulldogs squared off in Sanford Stadium, this is a revenge game. Also, Mississippi State fans hate Ole Miss so much that they rip on The Sound and the Fury. Dude, that’s just wrong. More than two full shelves of my library are devoted to William Faulkner. You could say the guy’s had an influence on me. Heck, I quote Faulkner while we’re losing to Mississippi State! You don’t mess with Faulkner, people. I want to beat the faux Bulldogs just for that crack alone.
For their part, the MSU faithful appear resigned to a loss in Athens, noting: "This will be a completely different game for us this year. Their QB has experience now. Their defense is getting their act together. And we are playing in their house." While I discount none of that---Georgia is, after all, 9-1 all-time against Mississippi State in Sanford Stadium---our Bulldogs cannot take their Bulldogs lightly, especially after last year. This represents the fourth critical contest of the campaign’s first five games, and the season’s second straight "must win" outing against Magnolia State opposition. If the Athenians aren’t at least above .500 after this game, the autumn of the long knives will be underway, and more than a couple of the callers who phone in to the postgame show will ask unabashedly whether Greg McGarity ought to regard Dan Mullen’s first foray into the Classic City as a job interview.
Also on Dawg Sports: Boise State game preview . . . South Carolina game preview . . . Coastal Carolina game preview . . . Ole Miss game preview . . . Maple Street Press annual!
Go ‘Dawgs!
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm on the fence about whether this game
or the South Carolina one will be the toughest game played in Sanford Stadium this year. I think the SC game is more important, because they are a divisional foe and the outcome of that game will have a great impact on the SEC East race and could set the tone for the 2011 Georgia Bulldogs season, even though the “revenge factor” will definitely play a role in making the Miss. St. game important.
Also, I don’t know how I missed the influential book list when it was posted, but I have to make a comment that may get me banned: Go Down, Moses is Faulkner’s greatest novel.
Reasonable Faulkner fans may differ over which is his greatest work.
The interesting point of contention on Go Down, Moses, of course, is whether it truly qualifies as a novel at all. Anything containing “The Bear” has to be given its due, though (particularly in the wake of the concluding scene of “Talladega Nights”).
I am prepared to argue for Absalom, Absalom! (though I have a soft spot for The Sound and the Fury), but I certainly am open to alternative arguments.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Jul 25, 2011 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
The Sound and the Gameday posts
are amazing. Thank you for bringing those to my attention. Might I suggest “The Sound and the Coaches” with the second part narrated by Les Miles (of course), the third by Bobby Petrino, and the first by Lane Kiffin/Ed Orgeron/Houston Nutt?
You probably have a more thought out and practiced argument for Absalom than I do for Go Down, Moses, so I’m willing to let reasonable minds differ about that (Mainly because I’ve only read Absalom once, so I’d have to go back through it for a complete comparison, which I would like to do one day but don’t have time right now).
As to whether Go Down, Moses is a novel: while I can see the arguments from people who view it as more a collection of stories than a novel, I think the better argument is that it is an episodic novel and ultimately I have to defer to the opinion of Faulkner about how to view his book. The stories are connected first by subject matter in terms of place and characters, but most importantly by theme. And they are all exponentially better when read in the context of the others. I don’t think people would have that argument if the publisher hadn’t initially published the book as Go Down, Moses and Other Stories (against Faulkner’s wishes).
I am prepared to argue for The Reivers.
Though I am equally prepared to lose, as long as, in the process of losing, we can accomplish some imputation whereby by the denegration (relatively speaking) of Faulkner’s last work inures to the benefit of The Receivers who will don the red and black this year. Maybe somebody should stand in the endzone with a sardine, though I fear it is going to take more than two.
by first and thom on Jul 25, 2011 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I can get "As I Lay Dying" for $4 on kindle.
I have to confess, I have only read The Sound and the Fury and it was a half-hearted attempt at best and a very long time ago. All things being equal, I wish my teacher in 8th grade assigned me anything by Faulkner over Gone With the Wind. As I understand it, Absalom, Absalom has some really wacky diction and style that can be almost hard to read. Which mayhap be why Kyle likes it so much.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
It's worth going back to The Sound and the Fury.
When the shadow of the sash appeared on the curtains it was between seven and eight o’ clock and then I was in time again, hearing the watch. It was Grandfather’s and when Father gave it to me he said I give you the mausoleum of all hope and desire; it’s rather excruciating-ly apt that you will use it to gain the reducto absurdum of all human experience which can fit your individual needs no better than it fitted his or his father’s. I give it to you not that you may remember time, but that you might forget it now and then for a moment and not spend all your breath trying to conquer it. Because no battle is ever won he said. They are not even fought. The field only reveals to man his own folly and despair, and victory is an illusion of philosophers and fools.
I’m suddenly thirsty for some bourbon.
by Spears on Jul 25, 2011 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
One good rule of thumb is that Faulkner isn't "almost" anything.
Absalom Absalom isn’t almost hard to read, it’s darn hard. You get different versions of the same story from different narrators operating out of different memories and different suggestions. Sentences are long as a rule and complicated. Chronology? Bump that. Rules are broken (even defied), but the view from the summit reaches a far horizon.
by first and thom on Jul 26, 2011 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
"Intruder in the Dust"?..
…was that a Faulkner short story?…at any rate a great movie
Cry 'Havoc,' and let slip the Dawgs of war; - Julius Caesar, Act III, Scene 1

by 

































