What Sort of Football Season is in Store for the Georgia Bulldogs in 2011?
Earlier today, Senator Blutarsky meticulously set forth the reasons for optimism, pessimism, and skepticism regarding the Georgia Bulldogs’ 2011 football season, and I find it hard to believe that anyone would take serious issue with any of the Senator’s points. I, too, have resisted the siren song of springtime chatter, as I will believe the latest recapitulation of the perennial platitudes about how guys are really getting after it in the weight room with a new attitude when I see results on the field. Every year, every team talks that talk when the flowers are in bloom and the reborn world is full of boundless possibility; it is not until the autumn, when there is a nip in the air and the earth prepares to wither and hibernate for a season, that we learn who truly has the fire in the belly and the iron in the soul required to walk the walk.
There are, in short, no certain signs there for us to see; though signs there may be, we have been offered no indicators reliable enough to trust. We have been greeted with lots of positives since the new year dawned, from the hiring of new coaches to the signing of a stellar recruiting class to a lengthy run without a player arrest that stretches back to last October 11, but these plusses may add up to nothing, while the jury remains out on some changes and other changes undeniably are for the worse.
The meager tea leaves we are left to parse in the offseason tell us nothing, but the alternative to straining to glean larger meaning from the largely meaningless is to sit and wait patiently, which we all know we aren’t going to do. It falls to us, then, to wonder what to make of what is written on Twitter and said at Bulldog Club meetings, to ask whether the Liberty Bowl loss to the Central Florida Knights sent the squad into the offseason doldrums or left the team collectively with a bad taste in its mouth. Truthfully, bowl results are among the most notoriously unreliable outcomes; the loss to the Boston College Eagles to end the 2001 season had no bearing upon the Bulldogs’ ability to win 13 games and an SEC championship in 2002, while the Sugar Bowl win over the Hawaii Warriors did nothing to prevent crushing losses to the Alabama Crimson Tide and the Florida Gators the following year.
Would a 2-0 start represent a dead cat bounce, or would it mean the ‘Dawgs were off to the races? Would an 0-2 opening indicate that the wheels were coming off of the wagon, or might it serve as a precursor to a run akin to that made by the Florida St. Seminoles in 1989, when the Tribe dropped their first two games yet finished 10-2, with a win over the eventual national champion Miami Hurricanes? Will kicking off the campaign with a big game pay dividends, as it did when the Red and Black opened against the Clemson Tigers in 2002 and 2003, the Boise St. Broncos in 2005, and the Oklahoma St. Cowboys in 2007, or will it represent the first stumbling block of a subpar season, as was the case when Georgia lost in Stillwater to start the 2009 campaign? Will the Bulldogs be the SEC’s biggest disappointment in 2011, or do we just need to chill?
I do not know the answers to these questions, but I am given two reasons for hope, and I have two causes for concern. These, in that order, are they:
- In the piece linked to at the outset of this posting, Senator Blutarsky quoted Todd Grantham for the proposition that, "in all seven of the team’s losses last season, the Bulldogs were leading or within one possession during the fourth quarter." Though I will repose faith in the changes to the strength and conditioning program when I see the ‘Dawgs get tougher in the fourth quarter the way they did in their heyday, I am heartened by the atypical nature of last year’s results in that regard.
Between 2001 and 2009, Coach Richt’s teams were 73-8 in games in which they led or were tied at the half and 82-5 in games in which they led or were tied at the end of the third quarter; prior to 2010, Mark Richt-coached squads did not wilt down the stretch. Even in the star-crossed 2009 season, Georgia went 4-2 in games decided by a touchdown or less. If the downward trend continues in close contests in 2011, obviously, that will represent a distressing pattern, but, for the moment, it is fair to say that history offers encouraging evidence that last year was aberrational in many ways. - While I share everyone else’s worries about the offense, I believe the defense is going to be much improved. Last year, Coach Grantham’s defense halted the free fall from the Willie Martinez era, and, just as the Alabama Crimson Tide improved dramatically from 2007 (Nick Saban’s first year at the Capstone, when the Tide went 6-6 in the regular season during the team’s initial autumn in the 3-4) to 2008 (when Alabama posted five more wins and sustained four fewer losses than the year before), the Georgia D should be markedly better in its second season under Coach Saban’s former defensive line coach. Defense still wins championships . . . especially in Athens, where Coach Richt’s first nine Bulldog squads went 79-9 in games in which they scored at least 18 points.
- This brings us to the first of my causes for concern, both of which find expression in comparing behavior exhibited earlier in Mark Richt’s tenure in the Classic City to corresponding, and distinguishable, behavior demonstrated more recently. The Red and Black found themselves in similar situations at halftime of their respective games against the Auburn Tigers in 2002 and the Florida Gators in 2008. In each case, the ‘Dawgs were playing a longstanding orange-and-blue-clad conference rival in a venue outside of Athens, trailing 14-3 at the break in a game in which a win would deliver an Eastern Division championship and a shot at a whole lot more. There the similarities ended, though, because the Athenians came back to claim a stirring victory with "70 X Takeoff" in the former instance while folding like deck chairs in an embarrassing blowout in the latter.
What differentiated those two games? In a word, leadership. Jon Stinchcomb famously gave a fiery motivational speech to the team in 2002, then he practiced what he preached when he recovered a crucial fumble for a touchdown to spark the second-half resurgence that resurrected the Red and Black’s championship chances. Where was the leadership in 2008? Where has it been since? The shortcomings of such high-profile players as Washaun Ealey, Caleb King, and Zach Mettenberger in that department have been undeniable.
We need players to step up and fill that void. Who will take that leadership role? Ray Drew? Kwame Geathers? Ben Jones? Aaron Murray? There has been a marked lack of that kind of player accountability in recent seasons, and perhaps the dearth of offseason shenanigans attests to a change in attitudes, but someone needs to stand up and say, "Follow me." There is no lack of talent on this team; judging by the number of former Bulldogs to be found on NFL rosters over the last two decades, a lack of talent hasn’t been the problem for a very long time. The 1980 national championship team was far from the most talented Georgia team of all time, but it had leadership in spades. - This brings me to a point I have made before, regarding the different mindsets underlying Coach Richt’s fourth-down decisionmaking against Clemson at the start of the 2002 season and against UCF at the end of the 2010 season. I prefer the younger, bolder Coach Richt to the cautious, older Coach Richt, which is why I liked the fire of his recent remarks in Macon and I wish he hadn’t tried to put a happy face on being Righteously Indignant Richt. There’s a reason why we in the SEC won’t play football on Sundays, and I like it that Coach Richt is exhibiting a little more Hellfire and brimstone this offseason and a little less turning the other cheek. Even if he regretted it later---and Mark Richt has apologized for far less---I like the fact that he said "Hell" instead of "heck." As Curtis Armstrong said to Tom Cruise in "Risky Business," if you can’t say it, you can’t do it. I’m glad that Mark is giving ‘em Hell, but I am dismayed that he backed off from that stance somewhat. I don’t want the head coach who gave the guy in Macon a hug afterward to be the head coach who’s standing on the Sanford Stadium sideline on Saturdays this fall; just as I wanted a defensive coordinator who said "ass" in his interview, I want a head coach who says "Hell" when it’s warranted and doesn’t feel bad about it afterward.
Manic Kyle has become more skeptical as Depressive Kyle has become more hopeful. This season could be an absolute disaster or a smashing success; the autumn that opens in the Georgia Dome in September could conclude in December with an SEC Championship Game appearance in that same venue, or that same month could see Kirby Smart being introduced by Greg McGarity in Butts-Mehre Heritage Hall. We could also be in for a 9-3 season that ends with a win over a Big Ten team in a Sunshine State bowl game and a No. 14 final ranking that leaves everyone feeling lukewarm.
We just don’t know. For now, all we can do is sit, and wait, and search for signs we know will tell us nothing, except in retrospect; for now, all we can do is fret, and hope, and vote.
Go ‘Dawgs!
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I chose "guardedly pessimistic."
The past two years have proven to me that pessimism is the best policy. I would rather be pleasantly surprised that we started 5-0 than heartbroken beyond words that we have 2-game losing streaks to both South Carolina and Mississippi State.
I have a fervent hope that Georgia can rise above our recent challenges to defeat Boise State, South Carolina, and Mississippi State to start 5-0 (after which anything would be possible). I don’t expect it, though. Everything would have to fall into place, freshmen (and a JUCO transfer) would have to immediately contribute at a high level, and green notebooks would have to be purged from existence for such a result to occur.
I plan to write a full-season prediction Fan Post as we get closer to the season. My realistic expectation, though, is that we will start 3-2, but not go 0-2 in our first 2 games. If we start 0-2, the pressure gets ratcheted up to stratospheric levels, the danger of losing the team comes into play, and a nuclear meltdown of a season becomes a real possibility.
Before even reading this post, I will give you an answer to your question:
a bad one.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
I guess...
i’ll be the “Yin” to your “Dang”.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
by DavetheDawg on May 19, 2011 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Before reading:
The SEC East race will likely be decided by the results of its games against the West.
UGA plays: Auburn, Miss St, @ Ole Miss (also hosts SoCar)
SoCar plays: Auburn, @ Miss St, @ Arkansas
UF plays: Bama, @ LSU, @ Auburn
Is South Carolina better than Georgia? Probably, but UGA will be favored to win the division in Vegas because of schedule. And UF, um, good luck with that. They could be right there with UGA & SoCar but yet have little shot of winning the East due to the schedule.
'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
For my money, UGA, Clemson, and Miami were all among the 35 best teams last season. And all struggled with mental toughness and turnovers. They all seem very similar to me.
'11: Minimum Goal: Win 10 games again
'10: 7th in offense, 41st in defense. Division Champions. 10-4. (6-3)
'09: 3rd in offense, 107th in defense. 7-6 (4-4)
Tomahawk Nation: Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!
Follow Tomahawk Nation's Twitter feed!
UGA was very similar to Clemson and Miami last year.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the most damning statement I have heard anyone make regarding the 2010 version of the team.
(And I agree with it, by the way.)
by vineyarddawg on May 18, 2011 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions
My answer?
I couldn’t even begin to think about knowing how to answer that question
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
If memory serves, . . .
. . . that’s very similar to a statement Oliver Platt’s character made in one of the “West Wing” episodes about the concealment of the president’s MS.
Go 'Dawgs!
The President was secretly a woman?
Wow, maybe I should have watched that show, after all.
by vineyarddawg on May 18, 2011 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions
MS, not PMS.
Seriously, you should buy the first couple or three seasons on DVD. You’d enjoy it.
Go 'Dawgs!
well said
Kyle, you can really spin a yarn. I enjoyed reading it.
I'm unreservedly pessimistic by nature,
so I concur with the person who said a few months ago that he or she would assume that we were going to play like a horse’s ass until proven otherwise.
by Cherokee's Grip on May 19, 2011 1:01 AM EDT reply actions
I don't know how to answer this
So much of the season depends on whether or not the 2011 recruiting class is a good as advertised, and that’s pretty scary. In order to have the season we all hope for, the Dawgs are going to at least need Crowell, Mitchell, Jenkins, and a couple of the linemen to step up in a big way. I’m not saying they won’t, but there are too many eggs in this one basket for my liking.
Sic 'em Dawgs
by ClassicCityDawg on May 19, 2011 2:21 AM EDT reply actions
That;s my worry as well...
we need Crowell to be Lattimore, and Jenkins to be Cody. That’s two recruits who’ve had as much immediate impact as anyone in the past 10, if not 30 years in the SEC, and we need it in the same class? The odds aren’t strong.
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
I don't think that we need Crowell to be Lattimore
Right away.. If we can have a much improved defense this year, and have an offense that is roughly equal to last year’s, we should be much improved. King can handle providing us a mediocre rushing game for a while, which would be sufficient if both of the above hold out. Or, Crowell could come in and somehow get pass blocking in his first week of summer practice. In that case, I’d say our chances are pretty decent.
I’m much less worried about the defense than the offense. Murray is worth his weight in gold, however, if Orson Charles can’t get the ball on every play, I’m worried about our passing. Some receivers have to step up.
To borrow and tweak a device found elsewhere ...
“Crazy Old Testament Richt”, perhaps?
I’m cautiously optimistic. I’m prone to wild optimism, so the tempering prompted by the last couple of seasons places my current attitude still on the optimistic side, but along a tamer line.
It all comes down
to the defense for me. The moment Big Bad John™ signed on to play for Todd Grantham is when my optimism, as cautious as it is, grew. The fact that Kwame Geathers has become a factor is super bonus points. Who knows? He may prove to be better than Jenkins. I’m looking at the defense now more than ever to carry the day. Even an average secondary can look pretty good when the other guys can’t run and their quarterback is always on the move, or on his back.
Offensive line depth notwithstanding, I’m not as concerned about the offense for some reason. I believe our receivers will prove to be capable. Hell, even Herman Archie caught more than he dropped back in the day. Sure, A.J. isn’t with us anymore and Kris Durham is long gone…and is probably going to be one of the steals of the draft. But I believe our defense will be hard to score upon and may put the offense in short-field situations on more than a few occasions.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
When did Kwame become a factor?
he impressed in spring, as sooooooooooooo many have before him. Like with all the spring hype, I’ll wait and see how they look come fall. Ronnie Powell is my go-to example of a guy who lit it up every spring, only to have his G-Day yardage trump his gains for the entire regular season.
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
by Mr. Sanchez on May 19, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
I've
been schooled.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
by DavetheDawg on May 19, 2011 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, Mr. Sanchez is tearing it up lately.
I’ve thoroughly enjoyed his and vineyarddawg’s exchange on the pros and cons of Vince Dooley’s athletic directorship, in which they both are making exceedingly good points.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on May 19, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
indeed...
some excellent debate.
I guess my points about Kwame just amplify the curse that is mine: I’m an eternal optimist. I set myself up for disappointment. I distinctly remember about this time last year saying “this will be a special season.” Well, it turned out to be special for our rivals.
Still, I believe big Kwame will be a force this season. Dammit. There I go again.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
by DavetheDawg on May 19, 2011 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions
I hope so...
I’m a big fan of the family Geathers, but just saying that uplifting stories in the offseason, especially lately, have gone sour real quick come fall.
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
by Mr. Sanchez on May 19, 2011 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Really?
I thought I was getting massacred.
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
by Mr. Sanchez on May 19, 2011 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't think so.
You have some reasonable points, and Vince Dooley certainly was far from “without fault” in his tenure. His biggest shortcomings, as you have mentioned were the lack of improvement in the Steg and the lack of a competitive baseball venue that has kept up with the state of other facilities around the SEC.
In spite of Dooley’s significant success in building other sports programs, you could legitimately argue that all of that progress came at the expense of Georgia’s facilities for two of the three most prestigious sports in the collegiate world: basketball and baseball. (And don’t forget, after his football coaching tenure, he hired both Ray Goff and Jim Donnan before we got Mark Richt.)
My main point was that Dooley has an impressive AD resume, and your point was that it still has significant flaws. I think we’re both right.
by vineyarddawg on May 19, 2011 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions
(And don’t forget, after his football coaching tenure, he hired both Ray Goff and Jim Donnan before we got Mark Richt.)
And he wasnt fully on board with getting CMR, which was just insanity. We almost didn’t get him.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
Richt was unproven, so I can understand the trepidation...
I had it as well if just because the closest example for Richt was Brad Scott. And from the way things get talked about, if you discount him for not being fully on board with Richt, you’ve got to do the same thing with the mistake of Goff.
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
He was the most sought out OC in the nation ATT. Maybe he hadnt been a head coach - but that was a no brainer in my book.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
All I'm saying is...
Brad Scott had a pretty similar background to Richt, and his tenure didn’t turn out well. I had my doubts because of Scott, and how Florida St didn’t really have to outcoach a lot of their competition since they had such an enormous talent advantage.
I’m not saying Richt wasn’t an unworthy candidate, as he absolutely was deserving of the job. I’m just saying I can see how and why some might have been cautious in saying he’d be as successful as he’s been.
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
I'd agree...
although I’d credit the success of the other programs due to their coaches, Yoculan, Diaz, Wallace, Bauerle, among others, as much if not much more so than VD. He didn’t cause the success, he just didn’t screw it up, which as we’ve seen is something to be said positively in and of itself.
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
Pessimism
Our team went 6-7. We lost two NFL receivers, our leading rusher, two productive LBs, multiple offensive linemen, two hearty FBs, and we are trying to replace all of this with a juco transfer big (e.g., bad) guy named John and a bunch of gifted high-schoolers. That would be great, if we were a high school team.
I’d put us down as favorites for the AAAA state championship, but only if all our players can make satisfactory academic progress.
by first and thom on May 19, 2011 10:05 AM EDT reply actions

by 

































