Georgia Bulldogs v. Washington Huskies: It's a Dawg Eat Dawg Tournament!

All right, this "Dawg" thing is getting out of hand.
If fans of the Washington Huskies want to refer to their team as "Dawgs," that’s fine; I even understand the rationale of wanting to use a synonym that allows them to emphasize the "W," although that strikes me as bending over backwards to secure a "Sesame Street"-style letter-specific sponsorship for a mascot designation that, as The984 correctly pointed out, involves a breed of dog, but not the word "dog."
It makes sense for fans of the Alabama Crimson Tide to yell, "Roll Tide!" Likewise, there is logic behind a fan of the Tennessee Volunteers yelling, "Go Vols!" or, naturally, a fan of the Georgia Bulldogs yelling (phonetically), "Go ’Dawgs!" Fans of the Boston College Eagles, Oregon Ducks, and South Carolina Gamecocks, however, do not yell generically, "Go Birds!" Partisans of the Arkansas Razorbacks, Colorado Buffaloes, and Texas Longhorns do not exhort broadly, "Go Livestock!" No one who roots for the Cincinnati Bearcats, Kansas Jayhawks, or Virginia Tech Hokies shouts out: "Go Fictitious Amalgamations Found Nowhere in Nature!" You will never hear calls of support for all secondary colors, the entire ecclesiastical hierarchy, or all individuals who are not sui juris from boosters of the Syracuse Orange, Wake Forest Demon Deacons, and UTEP Miners, respectively. The Huskies’ use of synecdoche is, therefore, highly unusual, but, by employing a Southerner’s typical brand of tolerance (read: indifference to the weird things folks in other places choose to do), I could’ve lived with it, though thinking it odd.
What pushed this over the top for me, though, was the above use by the University of Washington’s official athletics website of the terms "Dawgs" (for the Huskies) and "Dogs" (for the Bulldogs). For one thing, it’s just rude; being big believers in Southern hospitality, we don’t do that sort of thing, as evidenced by this headline from the official University of Georgia athletics website:

(Please note, for whatever it might be worth, that the URL of the Washington website refers to the Huskies, whereas the URL of the Georgia website refers to the ‘Dogs, spelling it correctly, not phonetically, of course; after all, these are professionals. If an organization is going to refer to one of the two mascots colloquially, though, it should not call the Huskies "Dawgs" and deny that term to the Red and Black; I would grudgingly accept it as correct to refer to both in that manner, but, if it’s going to be one and not the other, clearly, Georgia’s claim to the name is far superior to Washington’s.)
Let’s forget the fact that the University of Georgia was chartered more than three-quarters of a century before the University of Washington was founded, and that classes had been held in Athens for 60 years on the day the Seattle institution opened its doors (although, by the time the Territorial University of Washington began educating students on November 4, 1861, the University of Georgia student body largely was engaged in more arduous pursuits outside the classroom); let’s forget the fact that U-Dub’s sports teams were known as the Sun Dodgers until 1922, two years after the "Bulldog" moniker was affixed permanently to the Red and Black and more than two decades after the Athenians’ canine nickname was employed initially; can we just focus on the fact that they don’t talk like us in the Pacific Northwest?
"Dawg" is the phonetic spelling of how a Southerner says "dog." (It has always struck me that, while "dog" spelled backwards is the name commonly associated with the Almighty, the Southern pronunciation of "dog"---dawg---spelled backwards is the northern pronunciation of the familiar name used when referring to the Creator; think of Chandler Bing’s on-again/off-again girlfriend from "Friends," Janice Litman Goralnick, née Hosenstein, uttering in nasal elongated fashion the phrase typically abbreviated "OMG.")
In other parts of the country, they don’t pronounce "dog" dawg, they pronounce it dahg, so that it rhymes with "log" (which, according to Ken Kesey’s Sometimes a Great Notion, they do a lot of in that region of the country). In the Cascadian English spoken in the Pacific Northwest, including the state of Washington, speakers pronounce vowels in such a way that "cot" and "caught" become homophones, and "aw" is conflated with "ah." (When the issue of vowel sounds arose, I naturally consulted NCT for his thoughts upon the subject, and he pointed me in the direction of a helpful map.)
In noting the foregoing, I am not knocking the way anyone else speaks (though I’ll be getting to that momentarily), but it seems fair to assert that, if you can’t say the nickname, you can’t claim the nickname. Washington has no more basis for calling the Huskies "Dawgs" than Georgia has for calling the Bulldogs "Dahgs"; those phonetic renditions simply are not accurate reflections of the ways in which the respective fan bases speak.
Before, I just wanted to see my team win a basketball game for the sake of seeing my team win a basketball game; now, I want the Red and Black to defeat the Purple and Gold so that all right-thinking---and, more to the point, right-speaking---people will know, and all wrong-thinking people will learn, who are, and who are not, the ‘Dawgs.
I don’t even have to use the phrase here, do I? Well, I will, anyway:
Go ‘Dawgs!
26 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I see they've gotten to you, too, Kyle.
As dismissive as they’re being to us, I hope we’re equally so tomorrow.
As for linguistics, I remember my linguistics professor in college making the cot-caught point. He grew up in Seattle and actually said it that way…it was pretty funny to hear him try to say cawt the way most of the class did. I had always heard horror stories about linguistics, but I ended up loving the class. Had I taken it sooner, I might have tried to minor in it, but I didn’t uncover that interest until the spring semester of my senior year, so no dice.
Did you have Peter Jorgensen, by any chance?
I took a linguistics class, as well, and wish I’d taken it as my major (at the time there was no specific department: it was one of those interdisciplinary things). In the fantasy world in which I go back to school and remain there for life, I’ll get a graduate degree in linguistics with smatterings of foreign language, anthropology, neurology, childhood development, comparative literature, etc. Or maybe that’s what heaven will be like if I don’t make it back to school in this life.
BTW, have you read Steven Pinker’s The Language Instinct? It’s been out a while and some of the information might be outdated, but I found it fascinating and a good combination of academically interesting without requiring highly technical knowledge.
No, I had a young guy not much older than me.
If I remember correctly, I was actually closer in age to my professor than I was to many of the freshmen in the class. I’m trying to remember his name right now and, for the life of me, I can’t. He had a very strange quirk with the word “raven”. He could tell you how to say it in a vast number of languages and, when learning a new language, it was always the first word he learned to say.
As for The Language Instinct, no, I haven’t, but I’ll be sure to check it out. Thanks for the suggestion.
by hailtogeorgia on Mar 17, 2011 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions
I had Professor Jorgensen. . .
. . . first quarter of my freshman year. Not for linguistics, though. The class was “Nordic Literature (Honors).” Very amiable man. As I recall, he broke academic ground with a new theory about Unferth’s sword in Beowulf or something. Boy, that takes me back over twenty-three years.
And I say phooey on the Huskies.
by College Buddy on Mar 18, 2011 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Ah, Beowulf.
I still remember what my brother-in-law said about it: “Beowulf was the greatest thing written in the history of the English language, until the second guy wrote.”
Beowulf is like Uncle Miltie: great because it was first, not first because it was great.
That’s really neither here nor there, but, at this stage of the game, I don’t know that any of us is in any position to begrudge another of us a tangential literary aside.
Go 'Dawgs!
comeon! beowulf is fantastic
the guy is so much of a badass that he rips the monster’s arm off and beats him with it then he goes and kicks the monster’s mom’s ass!
Remember the Rose Bowl: The Story of the Alabama Crimson Tide & the Grandaddy of Them All
English literature wasn’t English until ’long about Canterbury Tales. Beowulf was just old Viking tales set down in the local language. The certainty with which I wrote those statements does not reflect my certainty in them. It was just a quick observation that seemed fun to make. But given time, I bet I could construct a pretty decent argument.
Beowulf???
Ain’t that one of them thar aneemated movies?

/self-deprecating (former English major) redneck faux ignorance
"If there's one thing worse than chlamydia, it's Florida." ~ Emma Stone, Easy A
My linguistics professor...
ironically was an Asian grad student that had stereotypical problems in pronunciation.
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
by Mr. Sanchez on Mar 17, 2011 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
As Mark Richt would say...
There’s a good chance the dawgs will be putting the rock in the hole in the dome tomorrow.
If I were a Duke student or alumnus,
I would advocate replacing “Cameron Crazies” with “Pandemonium”.
Er, not to be "that" guy
But Dawg spelled backward isn’t gawd. It’s gwad. And misguided though Northerners may be, I don’t think many of them say “gwad.”
We agree on the spelling.
Clearly, though, “gwad” is closer to the northern pronunciation than “gawd” would be. Again, use the (admittedly egregious) Janice example, supra: “Oh . . . mwy . . .,” &c.; it works better if you say it aloud (not that I’m advocating taking the Lord’s name in vain), but trust me when I tell you that, if you watch an old “Friends” episode, you’ll see that I’m right.
There’d probably be a “Friends” episode on TBS tonight, except I hear regular programming has been pre-empted for some reason! :)
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Mar 17, 2011 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
One might also spell it...
… “goo-ahd,” but with more of a gutteral “w” sound in the “goo” part. (Or, in other words, like “gw-ad.”)
I’m there with you on the reference, even though Mrs. Vineyarddawg is the “Friends” fan.
by vineyarddawg on Mar 17, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions
i hate auburn
carry on…
Remember the Rose Bowl: The Story of the Alabama Crimson Tide & the Grandaddy of Them All
by kleph on Mar 17, 2011 6:03 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I thought about mentioning Auburn, . . .
. . . but I figured delving into that whole nickname-is-Tiger/cheer-is-“War-Eagle!”/mascot-is-an-eagle-named-“Tiger” thing would just get us too far afield to be worth the effort.
Go 'Dawgs!
Now that you mention it, Auburn is the one who should be using synecdoche.
They should be yelling, “Go Kingdom Animalia!”
(I would also accept “War Kingdom Animalia,” but only because of the historical use of the “War” moniker.)
by vineyarddawg on Mar 17, 2011 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Have you ever played "War Kingdom Animalia" on XBox?
The graphics rock!
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Mar 17, 2011 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
That's why I've taken to calling them Plainsmeagles...
Pronounced Plain-character from Lord of the Rings-s. Patent pending.
http://sportsandgrits.blogspot.com/
Nice
I got that last one. Forget about it, Jake.
by AttyinDuluth on Mar 18, 2011 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions

by 






























