Georgia Bulldogs v. Auburn Tigers: The Haphazard Ill-Informed Roundball Preview
Georgia is a very solid team.
Stephen Expat (February 3, 2011)
After handing the Hogs their first home loss of the season, the Georgia Bulldogs return home to Athens sporting a 15-6 overall mark and a .500 ledger in SEC play. As Seth Emerson noted, there is a dearth of teams with losing conference records in the Eastern Division. The same cannot be said for the SEC West; Georgia, the fifth-place team in the East, would be tied for second place in the opposite division with a team the Bulldogs just beat head-to-head. In basketball, unlike in football, the West is the weaker half of the league.
This brings us to the Auburn Tigers, about whom I have been asked to offer my thoughts.
In the wake of their Thursday night loss to the Tennessee Volunteers, the Plainsmen are 8-14 overall, 1-7 in conference play, 1-4 in true road games, and 1-7 in their last eight outings. Through the season’s first 21 games, the Orange and Blue ranked tenth in the SEC in free throw percentage, eleventh in the league in scoring offense, and last in the conference in scoring margin, field goal percentage, blocked shots, and defensive rebounds. Auburn is the last-place team in the weaker division of what historically has not been a basketball conference. The Tigers are bad.
How bad is Auburn? Auburn is so bad that the Plainsmen have no leading scorer. All right, that’s not true; through 21 games, the Tigers’ leading scorer was Earnest Ross, who is not one of the top 20 scorers in the conference. The Orange and Blue sophomore would not be the leading scorer on any other team in the conference, nor would he be the second-leading scorer on seven of the eleven other teams in the league, nor would he be the third-leading scorer for the Georgia Bulldogs or the Kentucky Wildcats. Travis Leslie, Gerald Robinson, and Trey Thompkins all average more points per game than Ross. Basically, no one has done less scoring in college than the Plainsmen since Clark Kent and Lana Lang in the fifth season of "Smallville."
The Tigers are guided by first-year head coach Tony Barbee, who played for John Calipari at UMass and served as an assistant to Coach Cal at Memphis. You may know Coach Barbee from his previous stint with the UTEP Miners, or, more recently, from the Pixar film "Toy Story 3," in which he played a pivotal role by using his relationship with Ken to help rescue Andy’s other toys from the Caterpillar Room, to which they had been consigned by Lots-o'-Huggin' Bear and his evil minions.
Frankly, Georgia ought to win this game handily, and I might even be tempted to forecast a relatively effortless victory, were it not for the fact that Auburn recently went on the road and carded a double-digit win over the South Carolina Gamecocks. Having done it before, the Orange and Blue certainly are capable of doing it again.
That does not mean Georgia does not have certain advantages, of course. For one thing, the Tigers are terrible against teams with our mascot. Auburn lost to the UNC-Asheville Bulldogs by one on November 12, fell to the Samford Bulldogs by eleven on November 19, and were hammered by the Mississippi St. Bulldogs (whom Georgia beat convincingly) by 19 on January 16. The Plainsmen are 0-3 this season against teams nicknamed "Bulldogs," the margins in those games have been getting larger, and Auburn has yet to score as many as 70 points in any of those games. Forget home court advantage and conference standings; the name on the jersey ought to be enough to win this one.
Still, last year’s meeting between these two teams appeared every bit as winnable as this one, and the result was an absolute disaster for the Hoop Dogs, so we cannot be too wary of the Tigers. Saturday afternoon’s showdown in Stegeman Coliseum will be the 175th series meeting in a roundball rivalry dating back to the 1907-1908 season, but, because NCAA sanctions from the Jim Harrick era wiped what would have been a Red and Black win from the basketball record book, Auburn officially holds an all-time 87-86 lead over Georgia on the hardwood. Although I hope this game will not be close, I nevertheless am encouraged by the fact that the Bulldogs have gone 7-1 this year in games settled by three or fewer points (and some of us would stick an asterisk next to that "1").
Despite the poor quality of the competition (or, perhaps, because of it), the Athenians need this victory. As Rangers100 noted in a recent comment thread, Wednesday night’s win vaulted Georgia into the RPI top 40. The latest NCAA Tournament projection has the Bulldogs being seeded ninth in the Cleveland Pod (seriously, Cleveland?) of the East Region. If, as anticipated, the Red and Black need to secure six wins in their nine remaining regular-season games in order to ensure themselves of receiving a tourney bid, Georgia’s outing against Auburn simply must be one that adds an integer to the left-hand side of the Bulldogs’ ledger.
Toward that end, Mark Fox needs to instruct his equipment managers (a) to break out the silver britches and (b) not to loan Rob Chubb any shoes. Saturday’s contest is scheduled to tip off at 1:30 p.m. in Stegeman Coliseum. The game will be televised on the SEC Network, and student tickets (albeit only student tickets) are still available. Frankly, when my wife and I were discussing finding a home basketball game to attend this year, this was the one I preferred, but an unavoidable commitment intervened, so I encourage you all the more strongly to be there if you can, and to root your hardest for the Red and Black.
Incidentally, in case you might not have been aware of it already, I hate Auburn.
Go ‘Dawgs! Auburna delenda est!
49 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Can someone please let me know when the bug that won't let us leave comments is fixed?
Thanks!
by vineyarddawg on Feb 4, 2011 9:56 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
vineyarddawg just left a comment about not being able to leave comments.
That is so . . .meta.
/Just checking to see if I could in fact comment.
Технология трудно
Почему все теперь на русском!
Будь ты проклят, SBNation!
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
So the Russians finally invaded Miami?
I figured it would happen eventually. Unless that’s Greek. In which case, I am totally surprised.
/has no idea what language Dave is commenting in.
//Got to bed late after a concert last night and am a little slow this morning, so Dave may be commenting in English for all I know.
I am
Russian spy. Dasvidaniya, Komrade!
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
Da!

(In my best Russian Voice) A Great Patriot who bring capitalistic nation to knees. Superior mind no match for weak American, but not as desirable as large Ukranian Cossack woman. Must now go. Anna is here to retrieve toothbrush from my apartment.(end voice).
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
by DavetheDawg on Feb 4, 2011 10:47 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
It is Russian.
And it’s something to the extent of the technology being difficult in Russian (though I’m not entirely sure). Then it says “Damn you, SBNation!”…of that I’m confident.
by hailtogeorgia on Feb 4, 2011 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
Wait, wuh?
You don’t like Aubie?
In all seriousness, the Dawgs should win this one going away. As you said, we need this win to keep us from sweating selection day, as we still have tough road games against UF and UT and a home games against Xavier and Vandy still on the schedule. A loss to Aubie would hurt—a lot.
Additionally, I hope we beat out Aubie for Jen…er, Big Bad John (I fear hailtogeorgia is watching), too.
Go Dawgs!
I am a fan of the Dawgs, Falcons, and Braves...oh...and tacos, but I like the other three more.
like that new roommate movie
"Sure I steal bases. I just like to do it 4 at a time." -Konerko-
by oneloyaldawg on Feb 4, 2011 12:08 PM EST up reply actions
It's snowing again
on the 4th day of my snowbound-ness.
Must be time for me to move south – very very very far south.
I can bake like a demon.
You know, Hawai'i has a lot of military activity...
… and a much more favorable climate!
Of course, Warner Robins is nice this time of year, too. :-)
by vineyarddawg on Feb 4, 2011 12:29 PM EST up reply actions
with apologies to the blog....
Country Roads, take me home to the place I belong Warner Robins, Middle Georgia, take me home, Country Roads!
I can bake like a demon.
Right now Warner Robins is 40 degrees with occasional sleet overnight.
But at least the roads are clear, the barbeque is pork, and no one will look at your car and think you’re a Packers fan. Except when you go down to Colquitt County.
More apologies to the blog......
Sweet Home Middle Georgia,
where the skies are so blue,
Sweet Home Middle Georgia,
Lord I’m coming home to you
Up in Macon they’ve got the Allmans,
they’ve been known to pick a song or two,
Lord they get me off so much,
they pick me up when I’m feeling blue
now how bout you?
I can bake like a demon.
Duane Allman

Just because.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
Because I'm that guy
Kyle, you know I’m a fan of the blog and your writing, the latter of which strongly suggests we somehow may be kin. Furthermore, I am aware that I push beyond the limits of good manners far too often. But see this comment’s subject. And, as I’ve written before (although not in so many words), qui m’aime, m’aime mon chien aussi.
I am shocked — shocked — that you do not find the use of the word “loan” as a verb objectionable, as the readily available and perfectly suitable “lend” is right there for the taking. It’s not, I assure you, a moral judgment (or even close, as is my view of the Oxford comma), but I have you linguistically profiled, and any deviations from the profile (which speak more to errors in the profile I’ve developed than they do to errors in your words) create the kind of internal dissonance that requires some effort to tune.
Having written that, I will add that your indulgence and that of my fellow members of the Dawg Sports Commentariat permits me to entertain myself (probably selfishly) with comments like this in a manner unavailable almost anywhere else.
We now return to our regularly scheduled (i.e., 24/7) hating of Auburn.
LOLOL
I should probably issue a blog-wide thank you for keeping me amused and limiting the PBSD symptoms for me during this my winter of much discontent.
For those unaware, PBSD is a serious & debilitating disease which mimics “cabin-fever” but is more severe and is caused by confinement due to excessive amounts of frozen precipitation . Yes if you or someone you know is suffering from PBSD – you should contact a mental health professional immediately.
I can bake like a demon.
And I wonder...
why I stress about posting comments on this site.
from now on to play it safe i will not punctuate or correcting garmammer mistkes and spellingerrs as i type my comments for fear that i will comeac ross as a complete idiot instaed i wills=im ply let mey OPINIONS ALONE (sorry hti CPAS lock) display my intellectual inferioriness ;-)
I am a fan of the Dawgs, Falcons, and Braves...oh...and tacos, but I like the other three more.
For what it's worth ...
I think, perhaps, my penultimate sentence should have included “permit” and not “permits”, because the subject of that verb (your indulgence and that of my fellow members…) is plural. Damn. It.
This seems like a good spot.
Question for the grammar folk: after the end of a sentence, one space or two?
I have always used two spaces at the end sentences; in my mind, this was the correct way to end sentences. Now I am reading that the two-space rule is dead, for modern computers adapt for the space problems that originally arose when the use of typewriters was the norm and two-spaces are aesthetically ugly.
I don’t like using one space—it simply feels awkward to me.
What say y’all?
I am a fan of the Dawgs, Falcons, and Braves...oh...and tacos, but I like the other three more.
I prefer two spaces.
I don’t always follow that rule to the nth degree, but I like it for the clarity it offers. In the event that one mistypes a comma for a period, the two space rule makes it completely clear that the intention was to begin a new sentence and not continue the current one. On top of that, I think it adds ease to reading. One space very often causes the paragraph to run together somewhat, whereas two spaces serves as a bit of an indention.
by hailtogeorgia on Feb 4, 2011 11:27 AM EST up reply actions
I prefer two spaces, which I invariably use in correspondence and legal writing.
I use one space here at the weblog, but only because of spacing issues. As is evident in some of the older postings here, the second space following a period that falls at the end of a line sometimes carries over to the start of the next line, creating an awkward and unintended indentation that makes the succeeding sentence look like the start of a subparagraph. For that reason, and that reason alone, I place one space following a period here.
Go 'Dawgs!
I agree with two.
I have heard that many reputable style guides call for only one space. I prefer two for the reasons cited above. I also have found that many web sites automatically eliminate the second space from my contributions. Because I am powerless to stop it, I don’t let it bother me. Actually, this web site might be one of them.
Confirmed.
Yes, I typed two spaces after each sentence in the preceding comment. There now is only one.
A FB friend linked to a story about this recently
The gist was that any copy editor or grammatician™ will tell you there should be only one space at the end of a sentence. My reply:
“As soon as it’s easier to end a sentence with a period than by double tapping the space key on my smartphone, I’ll consider it. Since most (if not all) of us have to find the SHIFT key and then the period, I’m not slowing down the process just to conform with a rule no one follows outside of an English class…”
And that comment, like most of mine here, killed the thread before a meaningful dialog could be established…
by Just Some Dawg on Feb 4, 2011 1:34 PM EST up reply actions
I am reminded of something my torts professor taught me.
“You may not have to, but if you do, you are.”
In Erie R.R. v. Stewart, 40 F.2d 855 (6th Cir. 1930), a man was injured when the vehicle in which he was a passenger was struck by a train while crossing the tracks. The railroad company employed a watchman at the crossing to warn members of the public against approaching trains, but this practice was entirely voluntary and certainly done without any statutory obligation or even, apparently, because of some industry standard. But the practice was known to the public, specifically including the injured party and his driver. The watchman was not present when this particular vehicle approached the crossing or, for some other reason, did not warn of the oncoming train. Even in the absence of a showing that placement of a watchman, generally, was an appropriate standard of care, the mere fact that the railroad company employed the practice and that the injured party was aware of the practice was enough for the court to determine that the company’s failure to have done so in this instance constituted a breach of a standard of care it had set for itself. Had the company never used a watchman, the injured man would have had a more difficult job establishing negligence.
… [I]f there be some duty, it cannot be less than that the company must use reasonable care to see that reliance by members of the educated public upon its representation of safety is not converted into a trap.
So. Errors, whether due to carelessness or ignorance, in grammar and/or style on the Internets do not hurt my feelings. I am open-minded (heh) and accepting of the casual nature of the beast. But here, it felt like Kyle’s watchman was taking a nap. Recognizing that the word use in question has been accepted by many (if not most) English speakers, I yet claimed injury because of the standard I perceived to have been set.
by NCT on Feb 4, 2011 1:03 PM EST up reply actions
must be a slow
law day in Georgia today =)
It’s an even slower snow day in Oklahoma today……
I can bake like a demon.
not really slow
I’m just very highly skilled at ignoring my responsibilities. I’ve been doing it since I was a student. Of course, the fact that I still live means that I’m also highly skilled at producing under pressure at the last minute.
by NCT on Feb 4, 2011 1:30 PM EST up reply actions
This whets my appetite.
Am I linguistically profiled already, NCT?
by hailtogeorgia on Feb 4, 2011 10:44 AM EST up reply actions
(Probably) fortunately for you, no.
It’s not something I do on purpose. It’s just something that happens or doesn’t over time as chunks of data become available. Comments typically don’t have enough mass, if you will, to generate the required pattern. And even if and when such profiles develop, it’s not something I likely could sit down and describe: it’s more of a set of abstract ideas by which further data, as it is added, is compared. The incoming data is either consistent with the idea set or it is not.
Interesting.
Personally, I’m a judger, so I couldn’t really be mad at you if I were already profiled. I don’t mean that I judge people in a good or bad light, I just make observations, and those observations naturally lead to other judgements.
by hailtogeorgia on Feb 4, 2011 11:16 AM EST up reply actions
Interesting...

I am a fan of the Dawgs, Falcons, and Braves...oh...and tacos, but I like the other three more.
Big Bad Judge
I am a fan of the Dawgs, Falcons, and Braves...oh...and tacos, but I like the other three more.
by Jman781 on Feb 4, 2011 11:29 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
As an aside.
I enjoy the grammar comments.
Also, I read Blood Meridian due to comments from this site (not a fan).
Good times.
I am a fan of the Dawgs, Falcons, and Braves...oh...and tacos, but I like the other three more.
In retrospect, beginning with Blood Meridian definitely constitutes leaping into the deep end . . .
. . . where Cormac McCarthy is concerned. Perhaps we should have suggested a different starting point.
Whenever I am asked to recommend a beginning point for a reading of Faulkner, I typically suggest The Unvanquished, not because it is a great novel (for it is not), but because it acquaints the reader with the characters and the writing style which will become more familiar later.
Along similar lines, I would recommend beginning the six films (using the broadest interpretation) of Kevin Smith’s “Jersey Trilogy” with “Mallrats,” which occurs first chronologically and begins an upward trajectory that carries through “Clerks” and “Chasing Amy,” with the ultimate payoff of getting all the inside jokes in “Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back.”
Go 'Dawgs!
I started with...
No Country for Old Men. I read The Road next, which is my favorite of the three McCarthy books I have read thus far. Blood Meridian was simply too much for me.
While I appreciate the vocabulary to some extent, I found myself running to a dictionary far too often to look up niche words such as “rebozo” or “jacal.” Once I got used to the writing style and dropped the dictionary, I found the story depressing, gruesome, and sorely lacking of a discernible plot—maybe that was the point: the book was supposed to be pointless and depressing.
That said, I am still eager to read the Border Triology.
I am a fan of the Dawgs, Falcons, and Braves...oh...and tacos, but I like the other three more.
Drat!
You are, of course, correct. While focusing on including all the pertinent links (including the link to the Rocky Top Talk recap of last night’s Auburn-Tennessee game, which tipped off at 9:00) and completing the preview in time to have it posted shortly after midnight, I simply missed that. I have not checked, but I suspect that the story to which I linked used the word “loan,” and I merely repeated that error without thinking. If not, the error is entirely mine.
There are perhaps four living people of my acquaintance who have the capacity to make me self-conscious about my English usage, but, you, NCT, most assuredly are one of them. (Were I to list all of you, I would use the Oxford comma between the penultimate and ultimate names on the list, though I go back and forth over whether I would list you alphabetically or chronologically.) In any case, I feel bad about my mistake.
Onward carry.
Go 'Dawgs!
... which is to say.
It made me feel good.
by NCT on Feb 4, 2011 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I could dig it...
and Hoopdawgs is already doing that. (Don’t know if you have the link.)
BTW…his latest tweet is pretty funny.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
Rats.
I am going to miss seeing the game as it is played, because I will be serving as a judge for the Fulton County Mock Trial competition. I will, therefore, be on Internet restriction until after I’ve watched the game via TiVo.
Your comment makes this as opportune a time as any for me to note . . .
. . . that, because my wife is a coach of the mock trial team representing the high school at which she teaches, she also will be spending the entire day this Saturday at a regional mock trial competition (though not the one in Fulton County), so I will have charge of our two children for the day, and, therefore, I will not be watching the game as it unfolds in real time, nor will I be taking part in the comment thread (which will serve as the Big Bad John commitment comment thread, as well), nor will my postgame wrapup be anything like instantaneous, although it will, as usual, be ill-informed.
Yes, that was all one sentence. I’m working on re-establishing my grammar geek street cred.
Go 'Dawgs!

by 

































