The Mark Richt Victory Watch: Georgia Bulldogs Defeat Louisiana-Lafayette 55-7
On a sunny Saturday in Sanford Stadium, the Georgia Bulldogs began their 2010 campaign with a solid performance in a 55-7 thumping of the Louisiana Ragin Cajuns between the hedges.
A lone defensive lapse in a quick-change situation following an interception was all that stood between Todd Grantham’s defense and a shutout, while quality efforts under center from starter Aaron Murray and backup Hutson Mason allowed the ‘Dawgs to kick off the autumn with a win, which allows us to update the Mark Richt Victory Watch.
This afternoon, Coach Richt carded his 91st career triumph with the Red and Black. Mark Richt is now 110 wins shy of tying Vince Dooley for the all-time school record for victories.
Mark Richt has more wins (91), fewer losses (27), and a better winning percentage (.771) than any other head football coach in Georgia history after 118 games. Wally Butts (83-32-3, .716) and Vince Dooley (78-35-5, .682) both trailed Coach Richt at the same point in their respective careers.
At the time of their respective retirements, both Coach Butts and Coach Dooley were the winningest head coach in Bulldog history to that point. Coach Butts and Coach Dooley each spent more than two decades on the Sanford Stadium sideline before stepping down to become full-time athletic directors in Athens. Both men managed to survive downcycles in their careers during which they were thought by some to be on the hot seat.
Go ‘Dawgs!
41 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Kyle has to worry about being all copyright-ey...
… but I’m just a random guy posting some stuff on the internet, so here’s the picture.

Good job, Dawgs. There ain’t nothing like being a Bulldog on Saturday night after a Georgia win.
Any more doubts?
That CMR is the best coach in the history of UGA football?
http://hobnailboot.wordpress.com/
I don't really doubt that...
But I have even fewer doubts that Todd Grantham is the best UGA DC of the last 5 years.
"I want anything wearing red and black to tear the head off anything that isn't."
- Lewis Grizzard
by RedCrake on Sep 4, 2010 5:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I was almost giddy
watching us play actual defense again. It was like the players knew what to do and, you know, did it. I don’t even care if it was ULL…last year that team would have scored three TDs on us, I’m sure.
If he was, he's going to have a hard time drawing up a defensive game plan.
No A.J. Green, no Washaun Ealey, no Tavarres King, all I-formation. The Bulldogs played it very close to the vest and put next to nothing on film. It was as good a “plain vanilla” performance as we’ve seen in a while.
Go 'Dawgs!
Dooley and Butts
How could anybody have known those two were on the hot seat without Paul Finebaum to tell them so?
by SG Standard on Sep 4, 2010 5:41 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Fair point.
There were, however, rumblings among the fan base during “The Drought” in the 1950s and in the wake of the defensively disastrous 1974 season. Patience proved to be a virtue in both instances: Wally Butts rebounded to close out his career with four straight wins over Georgia Tech in his final four years, including a ten-win SEC championship season in 1959, whereas Vince Dooley (with more than a little help from Erk Russell) put together a pretty solid run (particularly in SEC play) from 1975 to 1983.
Go 'Dawgs!
I saw many "Dump Dooley" signs
before that conference championship (tied with Ole Miss?) and Sugar Bowl trip. There were a lot of people who wanted him gone.
Exactly.
The stretch from 1969 to 1974 was not a good one for Vince; the Bulldogs finished .500 three times in six years and had a seven-win season in 1972, when at least one commentator picked Georgia to win the national championship. Plenty of fans wanted him gone, and Fred Davison gave Coach Dooley a contract extension prior to the 1975 season. Georgia won nine games that year and ten games (and the SEC title) the next.
Go 'Dawgs!
Dang I love these posts
You are a thoughtful and powerfully expressive man, Mr. King. I appreiciate the pathos you bring to this gig and, in the wake of Munson’s retiremen, find you to be perhaps the leading expression of the peculiar rugged pessimism that has long characterized our beloved football team.
That said, there’s no substitute for a win. I would rather read “we winned again” than pretty much anything else.
Thanks, first and thom.
As I often say, if you expect the worst, your only options are to be proven right or pleasantly surprised.
Nothing makes me happier than to be pleasantly surprised for a change.
Go 'Dawgs!
So for those of us who couldn't watch the game,
and understanding the plain vanilla offense mentioned above, is there anyone who really stood out as special? Or was this just a good team win?
Kris Durham was awesome.
Other than that, I think the team as a whole just did a great job of executing.
That Murray guy looked pretty good
Leaving insightful football commentary and analysis to other people since 2006.
The defense
Our linebackers played really, really well. But as we know, it takes a good effort by the DL for the linebackers to shine. Justin Houston was SPEED rushing off the end. Safety play was really good minus the one incident. Jakar Hamilton had one of the best interceptions in recent memory with a one hander that had me wondering if AJ had snuck onto the field.
Really, nothing to complain about from top to bottom. Blair had two long field goals, what 52 and 47 yards(?), and our punting was great as usual.
I guess one fault would be kick return defense early in the game but I think we kinda settled down. That reminds me, Branden Smith had a great day returning punts and we had about three big crackbacks today. We brought the wood on defense and special teams. Loved it.
I don't remember him making any big plays on defense
But #1 looked good on offense and as punt returner
Leaving insightful football commentary and analysis to other people since 2006.
Thanks very much for the information.
Hope you won’t mind the occasional question or 10 during the year, I’m stuck in Penn St, Temple and Villanova country and we don’t get good football information up this way….
Go Dawgs!
I'd have to give him a shade under awesome for that awful interception.
It was one of the worst receiver plays I’ve seen since Martrez Milner rumbled on the turf.
ouch a Martrez Milner reference
saw him make a TD catch in preseason and I said “He caught it!?!”
That guy was diagnosed with the dropsies at birth.
by UgaBulldog14 on Sep 4, 2010 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions
What do Martrez Milner and Roberto Duran have in common?
They’re both nicknamed “Hands of Stone.”
Go 'Dawgs!
Murray
Even though it was againts ULL; I was very impressed with Murray. The only thing he needs to learn is sometimes it is better to slide rather than try to pick up extra yards on the ground. Scrambling like he did today against an SEC defense will land him in the hospital.
Murray...
Give him the 50 yard TD pass that his 3rd-string QB dropped, and the 35 yard on-the-money pass to Durham that bounced off his numbers into the DB’s hands, and I think he might have enjoyed an OK day.
I love this kid.
I was pretty impressed
with Murray, but I’d say the Durham interception averages out with the sure-fire interception ULL dropped in the end zone.
Seems like a small thing
…but shoot, do I enjoy watching B-Smoove return punts in lieu of Logan’s fair catches.
Murray did okay...
he made some bad decisions though. In particular, the touchdown at the end of the first half, while riveting, endearing, and exciting, was a really bad idea. The odds were against him…you’ve got to play the numbers there. I know Richt and Bobo seemed frustrated with that play and several others and Richt said as much in his post-game comments. But, it was his first start—I thought he did pretty good. I am glad that we have Mason though.
On a personal note, it was my daughter’s first trip to Sanford Stadium today. It was a very special day. Winning 55-7 just made it that much better.
Definitely sweating this next game…they look pretty damn tough.
How 'Bout Them Dawgs!
+ & -'s
(+’s)
- Murray Overall…good arm; good mobility
- D-fence (3-4) Grantham getting jacked and emotional is a good sign to balance the flatlined 5 beats a minute from CMR
- Secondary and defensive pressure
- Kicking Game
- Team speed
(-’s)
- Murray’s dropped interception and a few decisions he made
- running game
- still too many penalties on offense
- Bobo runnning it on 3 and 20 from midfield
- Screen passes in general
2 years to the Cup
Would agree with everything except...
the running game. A 5 yard per run average and almost 200 yards on the ground was pretty good I thought. And we didn’t have Ealey.
How 'Bout Them Dawgs!
I think Thomas looked more consistent than King
King did have that nice TD run but not much other than that.
Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but only one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win.
I Corinthians 9:24
by Southern Dawg on Sep 5, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Granted it wasn't the Colts
but you have to be encouraged the way the DEFENSE flew around the field – played in position – flew to the ball – MADE tackles (for the most part) and played with great intensity for 60 minutes.
The OL was a bit of a disappointment but I suspect they will improve markedly from this game to the SC game.
My Gator buddy sent me an email – he is so freaked out (I think the Gators had 14 muffed snaps) he turned off the Gator game mid way through the 3rd quarter. I have never seen him so worried – I’m loving it :-)
I don’t remember who said it but I concur – this may be the best coaching staff we have had in a long time. I’m really looking forward to the next game and season.
Run blocking was suspect...
… but I think the pass blocking was very good. Aaron Murray was not sacked, and when he had to scramble, it was only because the receivers were covered and he waited too long.
In fact, I remember one pass play relatively early in the game where the O-Line absolutely blew their defenders away, and it looked like 4 of the 5 guys were just standing there looking for someone to hit, because the entire d-line was lying there at their feet.
There was a big drop-off on run plays early in the game, though. Most of the big early runs were mostly exceptional effort by Caleb King and Carlton Thomas.
by vineyarddawg on Sep 5, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions
A good foundation
This was a good foundation game. Good fundamentals. Our QB can generally decide to whom he should throw the ball and generally throw it in a manner that results in that person catching it. Our receivers can obtain possession of the passes that come their way. Our lineman both blocked and protected. Our running backs made yards and did not fumble.
Run blocking could have been better and we relied too much on big runs to raise an otherwise pedestrian yards-per-attempt level. Twenty 5-yard runs are better than one 100 yard run and 19 runs for no gain. Ask Florida.
Our defense played with intensity, discipline, and intelligence. They were fundamentally sound and soundly fundamental. Opposing receivers had to contend with our defenders’ physical presences throughout the entirety of their routes. Blitzes produced pressure. Contact produced tackles.
All of these things are necessary hallmarks of a good program. Failures – two notable ones – need to be corrected. If we can do the simple tasks consistently, we will win the games in which we have marked superiority. To win games in which we do not have marked superiority, we will have to do better. The first rule of being a good team is not being a bad team.
I think the sludge has been washed away. The debris has been removed. As for what will now be built, all I can say is that I trust the builders and the raw materials are among the finest in the conference. Whether the end result will be an enduring success is yet to be seen.
Ok, I know we would rather talk about CMR and his lack of bun warmers, but
can anyone deny that the Mad Hatter has the seat warmers on high and a sizable number of hot embers just beneath the chair? He was playing a team with 12 or so players suspended, not just any players but good players. If Munson (I love that man) were calling the Chick Fil A game, how many times would he have discussed “Ol Lady Luck” and “saving LSU’s whatchamacallits”?
I agree with first and thom. My terminology in his last paragraph might be a bit different, but we basically agree on everything. I would answer his last sentence with this thought. Besides the raw materials and the builders, don’t forget the architects. I think the architects are doing the job to put the raw materials in the right places and in the right quantity to have them be as strong as they can be. With that in mind, unless and until we run into a team with similar materials, similar builders, and similar architects we have the advantage. When we do run into that team or those teams, it will be a matter of who strikes first and who strikes hardest. Judging from Coach G, we will be striking hard. Judging from Coach MR, we will be striking with precision and intelligence. That spells good things for the Dawgs.
About the somewhat lackluster running game
I am no football ex-pert, but I taped the game and have watched it twice. ULL was scheming to stop the run…much of the game there were 8 defenders “in the box”.
"so, will try to kick one a hundred thousand miles. We're holding it on our own 49 and a half: and Butler kicked a long one...a long one...oh my God! Oh my God!!"

by 















