Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NCAA Tournament Bubble Watch

Would an SEC Championship Game Rematch Between the Georgia Bulldogs and the Auburn Tigers Enhance or Diminish the Deep South's Oldest Rivalry?

While we’re in the final stages of our preparations for college football season, I wanted to offer an SEC twist on the recent imbroglio over putting the Michigan Wolverines and the Ohio St. Buckeyes in different divisions of the Big Ten. To put it mildly, this has been controversial; to put it bluntly, this has been Armageddon, largely because it likely requires moving the game to an earlier point in the season.

However, over at SB Nation’s Tennessee Volunteers weblog, Rocky Top Talk, Holly Anderson of Dr. Saturday, Every Day Should Be Saturday, and SB Nation Los Angeles fame made the following excellent point, from a Big Orange fan’s perspective:

Is there anybody here who wouldn't love a second crack at Alabama in any given season? We play them on the regular, but meeting them in the Georgia Dome in December would be something special, right? Am I missing something? It's never worked out that way so far, but I'd be more excited about seeing my "favorite" rivals again than any other team in the SEC. What about y'all?

As I noted in the comments, I think Holly is absolutely right. The only thing I would enjoy more than seeing the Georgia Bulldogs represent the SEC East in Atlanta would be arriving there and finding that our oldest rivals, the Auburn Tigers, were waiting for us as the representatives of the SEC West.

Will noted, though, that the SEC Championship Game has featured five rematches of regular-season outings in its 18-year-history, all of them in a six-year period from 1999 to 2004. Although the Plainsmen faced the Florida Gators in the Georgia Dome in 2000, the remaining perennial traditional inter-division rivalries (Alabama-Tennessee, Georgia-Auburn, and, to a much lesser extent, Florida-LSU) have never been replayed.

This probably underscores Brian Cook’s point that a Michigan-Ohio State rematch in the Big Ten title tilt would be infrequent at best, but Holly’s question is a good one precisely because we have no experience upon which to rely in answering it. I completely agree with her position that two games against a heated rival from the other side of the divide would enhance, rather than diminish, the rivalry. As Madeline Kahn once said, "Too much of a good thing is an even better thing."

Although the Deep South’s Oldest Rivalry went to a home-and-home arrangement in 1959, Georgia and Auburn have a long history of neutral-site contests; 59 of the 113 series meetings occurred in Atlanta (12 times), Columbus (39 times), Macon (four times), Montgomery (twice), and Savannah (twice). The Plainsmen lead the series overall (53-52-8), while the Bulldogs hold the edge away from campus (27-26-6). Two games against the Tigers in a single season would be sweet, and renewing hostilities at a neutral site for the first time since Fran Tarkenton’s sophomore season would be even better.

What do you think?

Go ‘Dawgs!

Poll
Would an SEC Championship Game rematch between the Georgia Bulldogs and the Auburn Tigers diminish or enhance the Deep South's Oldest Rivalry?
A rematch would diminish the rivalry.
3 votes
A rematch would enhance the rivalry.
168 votes
A rematch would have no effect upon the rivalry.
46 votes
I don't know, but I hope to find out this December!
51 votes
None of the above. (Explain in comments below.)
3 votes

271 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Obviously enhance...

competing for titles always seems to enhance rivalries, see Miami/FSU in the 90s, FSU/Florida in the 90s, Michigan/Ohio St in the early part of this decade, Georgia/Clemson in the early 80s, Georgia/Auburn in the mid 80s, Texas/Oklahoma this decade, Oklahoma/Nebraska in the 80s, Duke/NC in basketball, and on and on and on. So of course, if Georgia/Auburn were deciding championships between top 10 caliber teams, the rivalry would only be increased by the quality of the teams involved.

A couple of other points, not to correct the lovely Ms. Kahn, but too much of a good thing isn’t good. Hence using the words “too much” to begin the sentence. If it was just a better thing, you’d say ’a lot" of a good thing instead.

And just a general aside, the SEC did it right in maintaining historic rivalries like Georgia/Auburn late in the year, and Alabama/Tennessee on the 3rd Saturday in October. That link from the past to the present helps enhance rivalries, and the conference as a whole. The Big 12 made a HUGE mistake when it failed to keep or create such rivalries (was LSU/Florida really that big before this decade?) like Oklahoma/Nebraska primarily. Would Nebraska have been as likely to bolt if the rivalry with the Sooners was still a powerful yearly event, and had the revenue from it?

by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 30, 2010 7:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Good points.

Florida-LSU wasn’t as much of a rivalry before expansion, or even through the 1990s, which is why I afforded it lesser status than Will did.

To clarify Madeline Kahn’s statement, she was speaking at a celebrity roast (for Burt Reynolds, I believe), so it was intended as an exaggeration for the sake of comedy. I’m sorry that didn’t come through better in print.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Aug 30, 2010 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, I understood it,...

it’s kind of a common saying I thought, as “can’t have too much of a good thing”, which ignores the meaning of “too much”. Just me being a grammar prick, I guess.

by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 30, 2010 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not a problem.

We take the English language pretty seriously around these parts. :)

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Aug 30, 2010 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also wanted to note, I'd agree on LSU-Florida,...

but that’s also the beauty of these things. If you set the right two teams, you can end up with quite a power matchup and create a new rivalry (see our Georgia/Tennessee discussion earlier this summer). Nebraska and Penn St aren’t a rivalry, but let them both stick around the top 25 for a decade while playing every year, winning a couple times between them. You also keep pagentry of Michigan/Ohio St at the end of a year, among other historic rivalries in that conference (since it seems like every Big 10 game in November is played for a Paul Bunyan axe or oaken bucket or golden squirrel or something) If I’m the Big 10+2, or the Pac 10+2, I’m looking to create those type of rivalries going forward. If there are any current standing rivalries, you try your best to keep them in tact, and hopefully you get lucky with two teams having coinciding extended periods of success, which combined with yearly play helps make a rivalry much stronger than it may truly be (again, see our debate from earlier this summer, but on Georgia/Clemson).

by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 31, 2010 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Best venue

So if UGA and Cow Poly meet each other in the conference title game, can we play like we used to play and have the whole thing in Piedmont Park?

by BarnettShoals on Aug 31, 2010 2:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Or maybe ...

We can alternate between Piedmont park (or Grady High) and Memorial Stadium in Columbus.

by NCT on Aug 31, 2010 7:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Auburn should play at home in Phenix City

The only way Auburn has ever been considered lovelier than anywhere is because of its proximity to Phenix City. Even the spelling is ugly.

by first and thom on Aug 31, 2010 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

No Columbus...

we already get enough crap from fans and whiners about how Jacksonville is too close to Gainesville, I’d rather not play in Columbus against a team from the Columbus suburbs. Atlanta only, maybe Augusta.

by Mr. Sanchez on Aug 31, 2010 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

According to Stewie....

Mandel, that is, this is all completely irrelevant. He’s picked us to be the at-large SEC contender in the Sugar Bowl. He didn’t elaborate on if we did that by overcoming FL, yet losing to AL in Atlanta or FL lost to AL in the Atlanta, but we had a season a-la 2007. Then again, he could just be off his rocker.

Re-Auburn, the championship game would have the east vs. west championship feel, not the traditional UGA vs. Auburn rivalry feel. It would set up a good rematch for the rivalry in the next season though.

by mbrd71 on Aug 31, 2010 11:07 AM EDT reply actions  

It can't do anything BUT enhance the rivalry!

’Nuff said.

The above statements are owned by Sam Robards. If you use these statements in other venues, that's ok!

by Sam Robards, Dawg Fan on Aug 31, 2010 2:39 PM EDT reply actions  

isn't this debate kind of moot considering

the only time georgia is gonna see atlanta anytime soon is when they play at tech.

by yourgatoroverlord on Sep 2, 2010 4:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Good stuff.

How go the tryouts for a walk-on center?

by NCT on Sep 5, 2010 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.

Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

017oa_small MaconDawg

Editors

Redstage_small DavetheDawg

Whistling_past_small NCT

434477_small vineyarddawg

Layfield_logo_small RedCrake

Hey-why-so-serious_small tankertoad

Podunkdawg_as_a_child_small podunkdawg

Dawggone_small Ludakit

Authors

28488_443996218101_804558101_5903592_3665419_n_small Spears

Small hailtogeorgia

Killface_small Mr. Sanchez

50questions-accountant_small The Quincy Carter of Accountants