Bobby Johnson's Sudden Retirement Sends Shock Waves Through SEC
You never know exactly where a day is going to take you. On Wednesday morning, I scheduled this posting to appear on Wednesday afternoon. In the interim, Bobby Johnson abruptly resigned as the head coach of the Vanderbilt Commodores. Be forewarned, therefore, that this posting is going to be all over the place.
Beyond sharing Dr. Saturday’s hope that Coach Johnson’s decision was not the result of a health issue, I am at a loss. In an offseason chock-full of unexpected twists, this was among the most completely out of left field. How do you come to grips with the fact that Bobby Petrino did not leave before Bobby Johnson did? All I know to say is that I wish Coach Johnson well.
Past that point, though, I have a couple of questions. First of all, Is this an ominous sign for Mark Richt? I suspect that Paul Finebaum thinks so, although the talk-radio gadfly’s position on Coach Richt appears to justify faith in Indian rain dances. After all, every Indian rain dance in history has, at some point in the future, been followed by rain. Finebaum should try Googling "post hoc ergo propter hoc."
Secondly, Tony Barnhart echoed the sentiment expressed by Potter Stewart upon the latter’s retirement from the U.S. Supreme Court. On that occasion, Justice Stewart remarked: "I'm a firm believer that it's better to go too soon than stay too long." Barnhart suggests that this may have been the crux of Coach Johnson’s reasoning, and Team Speed Kills agrees.
Accordingly, I have to wonder about the timing. When not writing haiku about the retirement, Dr. Saturday wisely observed: "That's a December decision." I admire Bobby Johnson and what he accomplished in Nashville, but, if this was a decision having nothing to do with private health concerns or a hidden scandal (as appears absolutely to be the case), did he leave his team in the lurch by quitting on the eve of the season? (In the interests of equal time, I should add that at least some Vanderbilt fans believe July is the correct time for such an announcement.)
These next three items are completely unrelated, but I didn’t know where else to put them, so here they are: I found this picture strangely appropriate, I found this website and the results it produced to be way off base, and I found this Twitter update to be conclusive proof that its author has absolutely no knowledge of the Georgia Bulldogs’ recent scheduling practices.
All in all, it’s been another baffling day in the SEC.
Go ‘Dawgs!
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I hate double posting...
… so I’ll just link to it. I think this (generally) is how Mark Richt will leave Georgia, Finebaum and other naysayers be damned.
I plugged my most recent post in
And got David Foster Wallace, whom I have yet to read. It would be nice to know the basis for their analysis; otherwise I’m going to assume they just pick a name at random.
Leaving insightful football commentary and analysis to other people since 2006.
I am also a DFW apparently,
I have read his work, and I do not see the resemblance. If it had said “Lewis Grizzard after mescaline and before editing”, however, I would be both humbled and amazed. Would also buy “Lou Holtz post-lobotomy” and “random Deadspin commentor”
Not an altogether inappropriate question
Is whether or not this will actually have any effect on the win/loss ratio for Vandy this year? I doubt it.
Given how bad the prospects for the Commodores were to begin with, . . .
. . . it is doubtful this will make much of a difference, and it certainly will provide cover for the interim head coach, given the circumstances under which he took over the program. An 0-8 record in SEC play is entirely possible.
Go 'Dawgs!
Apparently I write like James Joyce
I don’t know if I should take that as a compliment that I am brilliant (highly unlikely) or as an insult that my writing is largely incoherent to the general public — which sounds about right.
"I want anything wearing red and black to tear the head off anything that isn't."
- Lewis Grizzard
by RedCrake on Jul 14, 2010 9:44 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I think it's bizarre at best and random at worst (the website, not your writing).
I have twice given it the text of my baseball game report in which I deliberately emulated the writing styles of Cormac McCarthy, Tom Wolfe, and William Faulkner. I was given two different answers, and neither of those answers was either Cormac McCarthy, Tom Wolfe, or William Faulkner. When I tried the Chris Fowler section of The Sound and the GameDay, it told me I write like P.G. Wodehouse.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Jul 14, 2010 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions
i agree w
"I want anything wearing red and black to tear the head off anything that isn't."
- Lewis Grizzard
by RedCrake on Jul 14, 2010 10:36 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
lets try that again...
I agree with your analysis
but must argue with your assessment
my writing is both bizarre and random
and know I’m writing like ee cummings
"I want anything wearing red and black to tear the head off anything that isn't."
- Lewis Grizzard
by RedCrake on Jul 14, 2010 10:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I got Vonnegut, Issac Asimov, David Foster Wallace, and P. G. Wodehouse with four different samples. A fifth produced a repeat of Wallace. I’m not sure what to make of that, but I feel good knowing no one else I’ve seen has come up Asimov yet.
Team Speed Kills
SBNation's SEC Blog
To my knowledge, no one's gotten Faulkner yet . . .
. . . and I’m sorry, but, if William Faulkner isn’t being used as one of the standards, the people doing the judging are in no position to judge.
Vonnegut and Wallace appear to come up a lot for two writers with such distinctive styles.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Jul 14, 2010 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Puzo & Wallace
My recent post was declared to be in the style of Mario Puzo, and another sample came up David Foster Wallace. To be fair, the second sample was full of irony, so at least Wallace made sense (right after I looked Wallace up in wikipedia.)
"Never refuse to do a kindness unless the act would work great injury to yourself, and never refuse to take a drink- under any circumstances." Mark Twain

by 
















