What Sort of Tradition Would Texas A&M Bring to the SEC?
And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
Matthew 24:6
Between reports that Texas A&M turned down the Pac-10 and that Texas A&M didn’t turn down the Pac-10 and that Texas A&M may or may not have turned down the Pac-10, this situation contains more rumors than a Fleetwood Mac album, so our best bet is to take a break, take a deep breath, and deal with what we know. That brings me to this recent comment:
A&M is South Carolina but with off-field traditions and a few good
seasons
Lots of talk, very little on-field success
The Aggies might possibly be joining us in the Southeastern Conference, so it’s worth asking ourselves whether this comment accurately characterizes the program we may soon be welcoming into the fold. Is Texas A&M comparable to the Gamecocks at the time we added South Carolina to the conference?
In the 80-year history of the Southwest Conference, the Aggies captured seventeen league championships in football, fifteen of which Texas A&M won outright. Only the Longhorns could claim more conference crowns in their old stomping grounds, but the College Station club clearly dominated the later years of the SWC: Texas A&M finished alone in first place in the league six times in the last eleven years of the conference’s existence.
Texas A&M is the only team other than Oklahoma or Texas to represent the South Division in the Big 12 championship game, as the Aggies fell to eventual national champion Nebraska in 1997 and upset national championship contender Kansas State in 1998. In short, the would-be thirteenth SEC member has a much more storied championship pedigree than the Gamecocks, whose 1969 ACC title represents the only championship crown in South Carolina history.
In 1939, the Aggies capped off a national championship campaign with a Sugar Bowl victory over previously unbeaten SEC member Tulane. Between 1991 and 1994, R.C. Slocum’s Texas A&M squads went 42-5-1 and attended three consecutive Cotton Bowls. The Palmetto State Poultry had no comparable period of sustained success before entering the SEC, as South Carolina’s best run came during a 17-7 stretch under Lou Holtz in 2000 and 2001, when the Gamecocks posted consecutive Outback Bowl wins over Ohio State. Those Garnet and Black units certainly were good teams---I was in the stands to watch the Palmetto State Poultry defeat the Classic City Canines in both of those years---but they were not dominant in the conference the way the Aggies were throughout much of the 1990s.
In short, South Carolina took up football in 1892 and has posted a double-digit win total once, while Texas A&M first fielded a gridiron team in 1894 and has carded ten or more victories eleven times. The Gamecocks have gone winless four times and have gone undefeated once (in 1907), whereas the Aggies have completed a season with no victories once (in 1948) and have ended the autumn without so much as a single loss nine times.
Texas A&M also brings to the table an endowment of over $5 billion, as well as athletic facilities that include a football complex in Kyle Field’s south end zone and an indoor practice facility. The arena in College Station presently seats a little over 83,000; at the time they began Southeastern Conference play, the Gamecocks set a new attendance record in Williams-Brice Stadium in their 1992 opener against Georgia. That game was witnessed first-hand by 75,060 fans.
Lest I be accused anew of being "unnecessarily condescending" toward our SEC East neighbors in Columbia as part of my "MO regarding any opponent of the Bulldawgs," I should hasten to add that the Gamecock faithful view the Aggies as "a prize in their own rights." No less respected an authority than Phil Steele says the South Carolina "program is a sleeping giant," and, as a Georgia fan, I have a tough time disparaging any opponent whose games against the Bulldogs routinely are settled by razor-thin margins, as many of the Athenians’ meetings with the South Carolinians have been. Since 1993, nine out of seventeen series showdowns have been settled by a touchdown or less, including seven of the last nine. The Garnet and Black boast a better program than we wish they did.
However, there is no question that Texas A&M offers a more storied pedigree and a more solid program in 2010 than South Carolina offered when the Gamecocks were invited into the league in 1990. Certainly, the Aggies have had more than just a few good seasons, and they have had their share of on-field success. They will have that success again soon, and I hope they will have it in the SEC West.
Go ‘Dawgs!
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Here here!!!!!
Great job TKK!!!! aTm is a more storied program than those screaming chickens (I still have nightmares of that sound in WB Stadium after Q Carter threw those ints) but yes the chicks are building a stronger and stronger program each year. Honestly, I’m fearful of them this year, especially with the Evil one coaching them. aTm would rebuild as well, which is one of the reasons I like the idea of adding them.
Nicely done, Kyle
I bet you can’t wait for the season to start so things will slow down, huh?
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
T Kyle, i need more than 30 posts a day - you arent keeping up with my info gathering ability )
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
I just hope that
this time next week, we are all toasting to Texas A&M being the newest member to the SEC.
I saw that original comment...
… and replied to it before I saw this post. Excellent job of delineating the Aggies’ on-field historical success.
It is also worth mentioning that Texas A&M is on the short list of biggest NCAA offenders,
having been on probation as many times as Auburn. Several of A&M’s prolonged periods of success can be directly correlated to a probation period that followed shortly after.
Despite just having a national champion who happened to be on probation while winning the title, the SEC has significantly curbed the outlaw mentality that has frequently dogged its member institutions. Perhaps A&M, if it is no longer suckling at the UT teet, will no longer feel compelled to keep up with the Horns, thus reducing their propensity for skirting the rules?
While Scu has traditionally been one of the worst programs in NCAA football, most of A&M’s perceived success has resulted from cheating. Not really sure that they are much better.
our last probation hit was in 1994
you’re bringing up news from over 16 years ago? Classy.
Oklahoma and texas have both been on NCAA probation since 1994, but I noticed you didn’t mention that.
With the latest trends in the rumors ...
(where “latest” means “what I personally have seen most recently” as opposed to some absolute descriptive term)
I’m beginning to think that Slive’s overtures to A&M may have been calculated to prevent the Pac-10’s expansion into Texas at least as much as to give the SEC a Texas presence. Sure, the Pac-10 would take Texas without Texas A&M, but will Texas go? Fans’ opinions aside, it appears that Texas really wants the narrative not to include “Texas destroyed the Big XII”. Coupled with whatever Texas politicians do on Wednesday, it might be enough to stabilize what’s left of the Big XII. The loss of Nebraska is a big blow, but I’m thinking it’s still possible. The resulting conference would be even more beholden to UT, perhaps, but from the SEC’s perspective, who cares? The point would be to keep the Pac-10 out of the state of Texas or, as an alternative remedy, make sure the Pac-10 doesn’t have exclusive domain over it.
It’s times like this that make me really miss the Big 8 and the SWC.
I dont get why...
Everyone only looks at College Football as the only collegiate sport. You can talk trash about Gamecock football all you want, we know were not dominant in SEC play, fact is not too many would be. But we are dominant in Baseball, and compete heavily in other sports.

by 

















