I’ve been trying to keep my attention focused on the NCAA baseball super regionals---as you know, Louisville was eliminated, while Coastal Carolina, Vanderbilt, and Virginia remain in contention, which is relevant if David Perno is interested in taking my suggestions---but the truth is that all of our energies are concentrated this weekend on the question of SEC expansion.
Consequently, let me go ahead and ask you the question:
Go ‘Dawgs!
Poll
Assuming that Oklahoma and Texas are unavailable, what should the Southeastern Conference do regarding expansion?
The SEC should not expand at the present time. (49 votes)
The SEC should add only Texas A&M. (15 votes)
The SEC should add Texas A&M and an ACC team, but it doesn't matter which ACC team. (8 votes)
The SEC should add two ACC teams, but it doesn't matter which two. (3 votes)
The SEC should add Texas A&M and another team to the west. (22 votes)
The SEC should add Clemson and Texas A&M. (50 votes)
The SEC should add North Carolina and Texas A&M. (30 votes)
The SEC should add Virginia Tech and Texas A&M. (95 votes)
The SEC should add Georgia Tech and Texas A&M. (21 votes)
The SEC should add Florida State and Texas A&M. (36 votes)
The SEC should add Miami (Florida) and Texas A&M. (12 votes)
The SEC should add Texas A&M and a non-ACC team to the east. (Explain in comments.) (9 votes)
The SEC should add two specific ACC teams. (Explain in comments.) (2 votes)
The SEC should add Texas A&M and three other teams. (38 votes)
The SEC should add four teams, but Texas A&M should not be one of them. (11 votes)
None of the above. (Explain in comments.) (7 votes)
408 total votes
There are 12 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.