Three Lessons from a Tumultuous Day of College Football Free-for-All
Wow. Today has been perhaps the wildest day in one of the wildest weeks in the history of intercollegiate athletics, with commissioners, presidents, and athletic directors rearranging the college football landscape like Woodrow Wilson redrawing the map of Europe at the end of World War I . . . when the only political scientist ever elected president arrogantly set the stage for several subsequent European wars, both large and small.
Against that backdrop, and with another crazy day likely to come our way tomorrow, what lessons have we learned so far? Here are two things we know for sure, followed by a third that might turn out to be true in the end. These are they:
1. Having a large television market nearby is not the same thing as having a lot of people who are willing to watch your team play football games on television. As their school becomes suddenly contrite, fans of the Missouri Tigers are asking how their school was lapped by the Nebraska Cornhuskers as the apple of the Big Ten’s eye. Kansas City and St. Louis, after all, trump Lincoln and Omaha as media markets.
What the power brokers have figured out, though, is that it’s not the size of the media market near the team, it’s the size of the team in the media market. Rutgers and Syracuse may be near New York City, but the Orange and the Scarlet Knights hold little sway over sports viewers in the Big Apple. Boston College boasts a solid football program in a major metropolis, but the Eagles’ local following pales in comparison to the fan bases for the Patriots and the Red Sox.
Given its location, enrollment, surrounding population, league affiliation, and lack of an in-state intercollegiate rival, the University of Missouri ought to boast a much better program than it historically has, but the Tigers are who they are. Nebraska is more attractive than Mizzou because the Cornhuskers command every TV set in their state. "We’ve got more people" is an argument that comes up short against the retort, "We’ve got more people who’ll watch." All Missouri offers the Big Ten Network is more would-be subscribers who won’t subscribe.
2. The critics of SEC academics have been revealed as hypocrites. This tweet by dawgsonline said it best:
PAC-10's first addition in decades is a school that just announced APR sanctions. I think that'll about do it for the academics high horse.
No one denies the quality of Pac-10 academics, but vineyarddawg has rendered yeoman’s service in debunking the extreme claims we have heard, as has C&F. Particularly galling to me has been the ignorant disregard of the academic standing of my own alma mater, the University of Georgia.
According to the U.S. News & World Report rankings, Georgia is a Tier 1 institution that ranks ahead of Colorado, Texas A&M, and five of the ten existing members of the Pac-10. One of the Pac-10 institutions that ranks ahead of Georgia, of course, is the University of California at Berkeley, which was established in 1868.
In the spring of 1869, John LeConte arrived on the West Coast to begin his service as a professor of physics at Cal. LeConte, who had practiced medicine after graduating from the New York College of Physicians and Surgeons, became acting president just a few short months following his arrival. After serving as acting president a second time in 1875, he began a five-year tenure as president of the University of California in 1876. From 1881 until his death a decade later, LeConte served as a member of the physics faculty.
In September 1869, John LeConte was joined in Berkeley by his brother, Joseph. Joseph LeConte also held a medical degree from the New York College of Physicians and Surgeons, as well as a natural history degree from Harvard University. He became Cal’s first professor of geology and natural history, serving in that capacity until his death in 1901, and he held the post of president of both the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Geological Society of America.
Joseph LeConte is the namesake of the LeConte Canyon, the LeConte Divide, LeConte Falls, the LeConte Glacier, Mount LeConte, the Sierra Club’s LeConte Memorial Lodge, Hollywood’s LeConte Middle School, and LeConte Avenue in Los Angeles. Both brothers were honored in 1898 by the dedication of the LeConte Oak on the Berkeley campus.
John and Joseph LeConte both were educated as undergraduates in Franklin College, the oldest college of the University of Georgia. The University of California is a great academic institution, which owes no small measure of its early greatness to men who matriculated in Athens before carrying their knowledge and wisdom to Berkeley.
3. There’s nowhere to go from here but down . . . right? I declared this the best offseason ever in January. With all this tumult, is it inevitable that we’re in for a dull season in the fall? I mean, nothing on the field could compare to what has gone on between seasons, could it?
Go ‘Dawgs!
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don't know about this
I’m reading over at BurnOrangeNation, and I find this:
Is not that scary. LSU, Bama, UGA, etc have always enticed some athletes that want the SEC easier academics. But if A&M gives them the Texas tie-in it worries me. All those schools will start really poaching.
Not to ask a dumb question, but how much easier is it to get into UGA than Texas? I don’t know how to check a claim like that.
I can't answer that . . .
. . . except to make two points, the first of which I made at Burnt Orange Nation in February:
According to the 2010 U.S. News & World Report rankings, the University of Georgia is a tier one national university with more selective admissions, a score of 51, and an overall rank of 58th.
To put that into context, the same rankings deem the University of Texas as a tier one national university with more selective admissions, a score of 57, and an overall rank of 47th.
In short, Texas is a slightly better undergraduate institution than Georgia, but only slightly, as evidenced by the fact that both Georgia and Texas would rank squarely in the middle of the Pac-10 as currently constituted, outranked by five teams and outranking five teams. Certainly, in the quarter-century since the Jan Kemp scandal, Georgia’s admissions standards, both for athletes and for non-athletes, have gone up by leaps and bounds.
My second point is that the Longhorns annually bring in one of the nation’s top recruiting hauls. Last year, if memory serves, Texas signed literally every prep player to whom Mack Brown extended a scholarship offer. Maybe Coach Brown has built a top-tier program only out of players who would be accepted into the University of Texas even without their athletic abilities, but, if so, he’s not getting enough credit for doing so; you’d think the media would be all over that. The other explanation is that he’s bringing in at least some athletes of questionable academic credentials, just like everybody else. I’ll leave it to you to decide which is more likely.
Bottom line: Texas fans who’ve never lived in Georgia probably believe the gap between Athens and Austin is much, much larger than it actually is, and probably believe that based upon Lewis Grizzard jokes about rolled-down windows and the like that are 25 years out of date. The University of Texas is every bit as good as they think it is; the University of Georgia is considerably better than they give it credit for being, but they are acting from ignorance rather than from malice.
Go 'Dawgs!
I appreciate your measured response
However, I must admit, it does sting to see my home school so freely disparaged over and over again. I do not appreciate the lackadaisical manner in which Peter Bean implies that the SEC exists in an academic “wilderness.”
I also feel the sting...
but I don’t believe that perception is directed towards UGA specifically as it is the SEC as a whole. Vandy, UF, and UGA, in that order, are obviously the cream of the SEC (academically speaking), with a decently large gap between Vandy and the #2 school, UF. Our bottom weighs us down in the same way that the WAC’s bottom weighs them down athletically.
by marktheshark on Jun 10, 2010 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions
It always comes down to the same thing
Every fan wants to believe that their school is the one that puts academics ahead of everything and would never allow an unqualified athlete in. (Insert rival school here) will lower their standards for an athlete, but not my team! I hate to burst bubbles, but everybody does it. Some schools may be better academically on the whole, but anybody who thinks that all athletes are held to those same standards is intentionally deluding themselves.
by SG Standard on Jun 10, 2010 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions
"Our bottom weighs us down ..."
Yeah, sorry about that. We’re still shaking off the effects of crippling poverty and decades of oppressing a third of our population. We’re working on it, though. Promise.
Red Cup Rebellion - Changing the culture of Ole Miss Athletics
Destroying your traditions since [YEAR REDACTED].
by Ivory Tower on Jun 11, 2010 12:24 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Good point
For undergrads, UGA is almost the same school at UT, although I think UT does a little better in some of the sciences than UGA. An undergrad liberal arts education at these schools is very comparable.
UT has a better endowment, more resources, better professors on average, and some really high powered graduate programs. But the differences are minimal.
UF and UGA hold their own with any big state schools in the country. You make a great point about the bottom weighing the entire conference down. No offense to alums from those schools — but we’re talking about fairly objective measurable date here. The fact is, the bottom half of the SEC is pretty low academically.
by Dawg en Tejas on Jun 11, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions
They are calling us stupid rednecks
They don’t care about our academics. They want to use the most tired lines in the book: that all Southerners are stupid, ignorant, and racist. Honestly, it’s downright offensive. The best criticism I ever read of the US News ranking is that they simply boil down to Size of Endowment. LSU is a Tier One university as well, as are most SEC schools. But it’s not like A&M’s endowment will go away if they play us in football.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
Well, if that's the way they feel...
… then ah don’t be wantin’ no Texas-folk near my dadburned confurnce anyway! Them cowboy-boot-wearin’ carbetbaggers can just start runnin’ right over the state line and right into Californy! Nothin’ but a bunch of lib’rals and homer-sexuals out there anyway. Oh, and they can have have my gun when they pry it from my cold, dead hands.
(Did I catch everything, Poseur?)
by vineyarddawg on Jun 11, 2010 2:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Sounds 'bout right
And the Austin music scene is overrated. The best Texas bands are from Denton. Yeah, I said it.
(I will admit to never firing a gun until I moved to Texas… boy, was I missing out)
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
Now I can really say I've heard it all....
Denton music scene > Austin music scene
This is truly laughable.
I spent 5 years in Athens and I’m closing in on 5 in Austin right now. I’ve been to Denton a few times. Comparing Denton to either Austin or Athens on any grounds is a failed venture.
That’s just an unbelievable statement.
by Dawg en Tejas on Jun 11, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions
"The University of Texas is every bit as good as they think it is"
According to those very shaky rankings, the University of Texas is somewhere around the 50th best school in the nation. That is not “as good as they think it is”. A good many Longhorn backers have been speaking and acting as if they are better suited for rowing competitions with Sorbonne and Oxford. I attended an SEC school of which I am fiercely proud, and I will put my qualifications and education against anyone from UT-Austin or anywhere else in the Big 12 or Pac-10.
It is nothing more than the bigotry described below by poseur, and it it really ticks me off. It is another manifestation of an intellectual arrogance that has infected discourse in this country away from athletics, and the UT-Austin crowd even directs it at their own fans. Every fanbase has people who occasionally say stupid things and embarrass the rest, but I have never encountered a group as disdainful of and apologetic for their “t-shirt fans” (their words) as Longhorns. They do all but hide in them in the metaphoric basement in discussions of moving to the Pac-10 or Big Ten.
I was taught that one of the worst things you can do is “get too big for your britches” and start to believe you are better than your people. It’s too bad the mothers of Texas failed their children in imparting the same lesson.
by GwinnettGamecock on Jun 11, 2010 2:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Using an ice pick to open a six-pack...
This post is so over the top it made me laugh. Almost sounds like an Aggie (A&M fan) ghostwrote it. There is some bizarre and completely baseless BS getting thrown around on this thread. In fact, I created an SB account just because of this circus.
You’re within your right to get mad at Longhorn pride/hubris. It’s certainly there. Longhorns are a confident bunch. Sometimes, downright arrogant. But you fell overboard with your closing statements — I mean, seriously? You’re really going to paint the Texas fanbase with that brush? That’s fine, but I’m not sure I’d be comfortable going out on such a shaky limb in portraying an entire fanbase like that.
I went to UGA for undergrad. Like you, I’m a proud product of my home state school and the SEC. But, look man, facts are facts. I came to Texas for grad school. Why would I leave the SEC? I wanted to get a graduate degree at a big state school with a real football program and in a great college town. In the SEC, for what I study, only Vanderbilt can really compare in quality. I could not have gotten a degree quite like this at ANY state school in the SEC. Some would have been comparable, namely those at UGA and UF. But none would have provided the same kind of prestige and opportunity after graduation.
Since I got to Austin, I realized the comparative advantages of Texas: massive endowment, impressive research output, excellent graduate programs and faculty. In these categories, UT beats all public SEC schools. However, I also realized that being an undergrad at UT isn’t so different than other quality state schools. This point has been correctly made by a few folks in this thread. I’m an SEC apologist/homer myself, but I’m not going to lie to myself about this kind of comparison.
Comparing “your qualifications” to other individuals from UT or other schools is different from objectively comparing the research output, resources, academic programs and faculties at the various schools. Congrats on your individual accomplishments and your pride, but the objective measurements tell a different story at the institutional level.
I agree that the academics BS is not the real reason why Texas wouldn’t end up in the SEC — there are so many reasons for that. But let’s not kid ourselves. Texas is not some giant 50,000+ student Ivy. Nor is Texas what you seem to think it is.
by Dawg en Tejas on Jun 11, 2010 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Submitted without comment (for as long as I can help myself)
According to UT Austin’s website, the average SAT score for the 2009 freshman class was 1223.
According to the Texas A&M website, the average SAT score for 2009 freshmen was 1210.
According to UGA’s website, the average SAT score for 2009 freshmen was 1263.
by NCT on Jun 10, 2010 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I agree with blackertai, NCT.
That was a valuable insight succinctly conveyed. (I appreciate brevity for the same reason I appreciate athleticism: my lack of it makes me respect those who possess it.)
I now launch into my day even more confident of the quality of my education than I was before. Thanks!
Go 'Dawgs!
Ditto
I agree with all of the above.
This tells part of the story: Undergrad admissions.
There are some confounding factors hanging around and there’s a lot more to comparing institutions. But it’s good to remember that — on most measures — the class of the SEC really can compete with just about any state school in the country.
by Dawg en Tejas on Jun 11, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Ahhh yes, that day in January
was a fabulous hilarious day…….
"Never refuse to do a kindness unless the act would work great injury to yourself, and never refuse to take a drink- under any circumstances." Mark Twain
Not True
On the face of it the BigTen network contract is really dependent on the size of the footprint since cable markets outside the footprint only pay .1x and those within pay x for each subscriber (not technical or true but correct in spirit). Quality is important in the longrun and it is quite conceivable that the Husker nation footprint for cable purposes extends into the st. louis market.
One think that is important to remember going forward is the fundamental difference in terms of what an SEC TV deal is after vs the BIG 10 deal because they are really night and day in terms of how they work and generate revenue.

by 

















