Do the Georgia Bulldogs Have an Upcoming Date with Michigan, Notre Dame, Ohio State, or Penn State?

Is there life in "The Movement" yet?
Gentry Estes says maybe so, and he got that straight from the horse’s mouth:
Preliminary discussions have taken place with Michigan, Notre Dame, Ohio State and Penn State about the prospect of one or more of them scheduling a home-and-home series with Georgia in the future, UGA athletics director Greg McGarity confirmed to Dawgs247.
"We’d love to do a home-and-home with a Big Ten or Midwestern school that has a rich tradition," McGarity said. "We’re going to work as hard as we can to make that happen.
"Hopefully, within the next year, we’ll be able to have something in writing."
Bill King likewise sees this as a story that could have legs:
This obviously is the kind of exception McGarity alluded to earlier in the season when he first announced he preferred a cupcake-heavy seven-home-game schedule model for the Dogs. As he told the Athens Banner-Herald early in November, Ohio State, Michigan, Notre Dame and Penn State are the types of nonconference home-and-home series he wants to sign. But, he added, "we’d do that periodically. It’s got to be at the right time and against the right opponent that has the same rich tradition of college football as the University of Georgia."
Does this mean I should book a flight to Ann Arbor and schedule a visit to Zingerman’s to buy some of that applewood-smoked bacon I’ve enjoyed so much as a member of the bacon of the month club? Brian Cook says not so fast, my friends:
Would Michigan be interested? I'd hope so. Dave Brandon's already set up a neutral site matchup with Alabama that's slightly cool but also thousands of miles from either campus in a generic, if swanky, corporate stadium. From a fan's perspective having a home and home with Georgia is way cooler than a one-off in Dallas. From a financial perspective not so much—Michigan's getting a home game's worth of revenue from the Jerryworld game—but money isn't everything and Michigan needs something to spruce up the schedule in years when Nebraska, Ohio State, and Notre Dame are all road games. Of course, "sprucing up" the schedule in those years means "making it brutal," so maybe not.
Would they be more interested than the other three schools listed? Probably not. I'd bet Michigan is the least likely of the four to actually land a series with Georgia. Because of their Notre Dame series they have to work in games against actual opponents where they can; Penn State and Ohio State don't have any annual commitments and Notre Dame has to fill twelve games every year.
I’d rather see the Georgia Bulldogs play the Michigan Wolverines than any of the other three options offered, but Brian is right that the Maize and Blue probably are the least likely of the Red and Black’s four potential once and future Big Ten opponents. Personally, I’m in "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me" mode on this one; I’ll believe it when I see it, but not before. Where is the rest of Bulldog Nation on this one?
Go ‘Dawgs!
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I would also prefer to see Michigan be the team we schedule.
Unfortunately, I think it’s more likely to be…

Interesting that Brian Cook...
says that OSU doesn’t have any annual commitments. Maybe he means they have commitments that they can get out of, because they have home-home match-ups with Cal-Va Tech-Oklahoma-Tenn set up. Born and raised in Ohio, now living in Athens, so I’d love to see OSU replace Cal with the Classic City Canines.
I think he meant that Ohio State had a series of home-and-homes, . . .
. . . but no long-term non-conference series like Michigan and Notre Dame have with one another. Greg McGarity is looking long-term, which is more conducive to the Buckeyes’ scheduling than to Michigan’s or Notre Dame’s (because the Wolverines and the Fighting Irish agreed to an extension until I’m in my mid-60s or thereabouts).
Go 'Dawgs!
Oh yes, fail
at reading comprehension for me.
Well, I wouldn’t be surprised if OSU would agree to a home-home. Coach Sweater Vest has repeatedly talked about the importance of scheduling a marquee game early, and UGA would fit that wish. Just very hard to see that being done within the next 9 years (without dropping a current home-home) due to the addition of Nebraska and the conference championship game.
I think that's workable, actually.
McGarity clearly was thinking a few years down the road, so it wouldn’t surprise me to see Georgia and Ohio State ink a deal for a decade from now.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Dec 21, 2010 10:39 PM EST up reply actions
Well that would be excellent.
It’s somewhat hard to see Ohio State becoming an irrelevant team barring some NCAA infractions (rumors are flying right now of a possible improper benefits situation – discounted or free tattoos or something) or a coaching changed that leads them in that direction (see: Michigan now, Nebraska a decade ago, Miami a decade ago). So now that you have my hopes up, I will prepare for this to never happen. That way it will be so much better when it does pan out.
They need to schedule Toledo Rockets
The up and coming Ohio powerhouse!
Notre Dame? I'm with Grizzard...
…who wrote once that he hoped Georgia never played Notre Dame again; that way we’d always be 1-0 against them.
by Dawglicious on Dec 22, 2010 4:28 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Meh.
I think we should consistently be positioned to beat Notre Dame in the 21st century. Lewis never could have known that ND would cease to be ND.
I don't have time for any of this... and yet... here I am.
by Gen. Stoopnagle on Dec 23, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
Notre Dame
I would prefer Notre Dame to all of those. Next, Penn State. Michigan and tOSU? I’d be fired up, but I can live without playing them.
The thing about the Big Ten is that we have 3 bowl tie-ins which would pit us against them in January. If we want to play a Big Ten team, all we have to do is be an 8 or 9 win team and we’ll land opposite one of them in Orlando or Tampa or Jacksonville.
I understand the travel, etc for not playing Pac-10 teams home-and-home, but in terms of interest I prefer those match-ups because otherwise, we’ll never see those teams.
On top of all of that, who seriously wants to travel to the Rust Belt?
I don't have time for any of this... and yet... here I am.
by Gen. Stoopnagle on Dec 23, 2010 11:51 AM EST reply actions
good points - makes me think Big 12 is the way to go. Or whatever they call themselves.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker

by 































