Four Questions for the Georgia Bulldogs: Ray Goff, Gene Chizik, Will Muschamp, and What to Do When Winning the Opening Coin Toss
The offseason between the 2009 and 2010 college football campaigns was the wackiest ever, but the coming offseason is off to a promising start as one that will give last year’s a run for its money. If you’re like me, your head is spinning just a little bit as you strive to process everything that is happening. I can’t promise to provide you with any answers, but I’ll at least do what I can to help clarify the questions. While far from a comprehensive list, these are they:
Is Ray Goff beginning to develop a coaching tree? Mike Bobo, whom Coach Goff recruited and who spent two years of his varsity career playing quarterback for Vince Dooley’s successor, is now the offensive coordinator for the Bulldogs. Kirby Smart, whom Coach Goff recruited and who spent the first year of his varsity career playing for Coach Goff, is now the defensive coordinator for the Crimson Tide. Will Muschamp, who played defensive back for Coach Goff from 1991 to 1994, is now the head coach of the Gators. Greg Davis and Mac McWhorter, who until recently were mainstays of Mack Brown’s hugely successful Texas program, both served as assistants under Coach Goff in Athens. Is it a coincidence that Coach Goff and Dustin Hoffman’s character from "Rain Man" both went by "Ray"? Maybe Coach Goff was a coaching savant, and we never knew it.
Did Gene Chizik deserve to be designated the national coach of the year? In 1992, Rob Reiner groused that he didn’t receive an Academy Award nomination for best director for "A Few Good Men." His reasoning was that he had to be a finalist for best director to have produced a film so universally recognized for its excellence. After all, "A Few Good Men" received four Oscar nominations (including best picture and best supporting actor for Jack Nicholson) and five Golden Globe nominations (including best film, best screenplay for Aaron Sorkin, best actor for Tom Cruise, and best supporting actor for Jack Nicholson). The film also featured numerous well-known character actors (including Christopher Guest, J.A. Preston, and J.T. Walsh), several rising stars (including Cuba Gooding Jr., Joshua Malina, and Noah Wyle), and a solid supporting cast (including Kevin Bacon, Demi Moore, Kevin Pollak, and Kiefer Sutherland). In my opinion, that’s why Rob Reiner didn’t get nominated for best director; heck, if you gave me an Aaron Sorkin screenplay and that cast, I could turn out the best movie of the year, too.
So it is with Gene Chizik. Coach Chizik, whose hiring impressed exactly no one, has guided the Tigers to an undefeated regular season, an SEC title, and a berth in the BCS National Championship Game. How has he done it? Well, he did it by having Nick Fairley (who won the Lombardi Trophy), Gus Malzahn (who won the Frank Broyles Award), Cam Newton (who won the Walter Camp Award, won the Davey O’Brien Award, won the Maxwell Award, and won the Heisman Trophy), and Cecil Newton (who won the Nobel Prize for Economics). All right, I made up that last one, but the rest is all true.
When you have the best defensive player, best offensive player, best overall player, and best assistant coach, how hard is it to be the head coach? It seems to me that Coach Chizik’s job largely consists of saying what former Kansas City Royals manager Jim Frey said to George Brett when offering him advice on hitting: "Attaway to hit, George."
Should the Bulldogs change their kickoff strategy? No, I’m not talking about Jon Fabris’s infamous directional kicking approach; I’m talking about the decision whether to receive or defer when winning the opening coin toss. Ordinarily, Georgia elects to kick off to open the first quarter, in order to get the ball first in the third quarter. I generally agree with that strategy, but, after Sean Payton popularized the surprise second half onside kick in last year’s Super Bowl, I am starting to question the wisdom of the conventional wisdom.
I can think of two instances in which Coach Payton’s maneuver worked against the Red and Black. The first was in the 2005 Louisiana-Monroe game, and the second was in the 2010 Auburn game. Twice is two times too many, particularly considering how well the trickery worked for the opposing team (even though the Bulldogs supposedly had been warned to be on the lookout for it against the Plainsmen).
In 2011, an Aaron Murray-led Georgia offense likely will begin the season ahead of Todd Grantham’s defense. Next fall, the ‘Dawgs start out against a Boise State outfit boasting a potent offense and a South Carolina club returning every prominent point-scoring weapon you can name. Coach Bobo has been criticized (fairly) for failing to keep his foot on the gas with his play calling. In order to address all of these valid concerns, I believe the Bulldogs should elect to receive the opening kickoff when winning the toss in 2011.
Is Will Muschamp a good fit for Florida? Earlier this autumn, I received a reader e-mail that made an excellent point regarding the Gators’ success. Wrote that commenter:
FL is completely aligned in thought and action. Bernie Machen, Jeremy Foley, Urban Meyer, Huntley Johnson, the Gville police, and of course the fanbase - all read the same sheet of music. All are singularly committed to winning. GA has an unpopular President, a disjointed foundation(s) (due to Adams), a bitter APD that admittedly targets athletes b/c they believe they are spoiled brats, and a fanbase that while being supportive of McGarity, is becoming distinctly divided on Mark Richt.
That struck me as a good point then, and the recent hiring of Coach Muschamp in Gainesville caused me to think back to it. Whatever one may think of the relative merits of Dan Mullen, Will Muschamp, and Charlie Strong, it is abundantly clear which of them is the odd man out when it comes to the Florida athletics program. Coaches Mullen and Strong worked for Urban Meyer, who, despite not having any previous connections to the Sunshine State Saurians, did have a prior relationship with Dr. Machen at the University of Utah.
Does Coach Muschamp, who has numerous ties to the Southeastern Conference but no previous connection with the Gators (despite having lived in Gainesville for a few years a long time ago), fit the mold, or will he have a new way of doing things that differs dramatically from the unified approach that has been evident with the Orange and Blue for the last two decades? If the latter, what is the likelihood that the accompanying paradigm shift makes the combination of a good coach with a successful program a bad match? Sometimes, those two rights add up to a wrong, and, if he does not fit, when must he quit?
Here, evidently, is what Coach Meyer thinks of Coach Muschamp’s ability to get with the program:
He’s a tremendous recruiter. I have bumped into him many times over the years on the road while on recruiting trips.
That seems like less than a ringing endorsement. I know of no one who thinks Will Muschamp was a bad hire, and I have gone on record repeatedly in support of the proposition that Will Muschamp is a great choice to be a head coach, but being a good coach and being a good fit aren’t always the same thing, and the high level of success at which Coach Meyer operated raises the very real question whether any change in the program is a change for the worse.
As coaches go, Urban Meyer was the Beatles. The best-case scenario for replacing him is the Rolling Stones . . . not quite as good, but still quite good enough. The farther you get from the Beatles formula, though, the less likely it is that you’ll get the Stones and the more likely it is that you’ll get Hootie and the Blowfish. How likely is it that what Sam Rayburn, as speaker of the House, said of Dwight Eisenhower as president of the United States ("Good man, wrong job") is true of Will Muschamp as head coach of the Florida Gators?
Those are some of the questions I have; if you have answers, feel free to share your thoughts in the comments below.
Go ‘Dawgs!
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
answers:
1) weird – don’t want to think on that.
2) yes – he is the lead, um, eagle (still pending NCAA…………)
3) yes – but way too late and shouldn’t even have to be discussed
4) no – but i don’t really care, his problem, not mine or our schools.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
If by Stones>Beatles you mean
there are more of them staying alive, then yes. I love the Stones, but worship the Beatles.
by Dawglicious on Dec 14, 2010 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
Seems like there’s a chicken-and-egg quality to your criticism of the Chizik award. Stepping back from my UGA fandom for a minute, sure all of the supporting cast there are great and deserving, but would they have been as successful working/playing for other teams? Maybe Chizik deserves credit for doing what’s very often one of the hardest jobs as a leader – creating the system for them all to flourish in, letting the whole exceed the sum of the parts, and then getting the hell out of the way…
It's not very difficult for the whole to exceed the sum of the parts...
when one of those parts is the best college football player in the country.
Let me ask you this, Kumatan, because I think this question answers The Chizik Conundrum better than any statement. How many games do you think the Auburn Tigers would have won without Cam Newton?
In the spirit of full disclosure, I’ll give my answer. I think that without Newton, the Tigers wouldn’t have beaten South Carolina (the first time), Clemson, Kentucky, LSU, Georgia, or Alabama. I’ll venture to say that they very likely wouldn’t have beaten Arkansas, but I’m not certain on that one. I think that their win total would be no greater than six and Chizik definitely wouldn’t be winning the Coach of the Year award.
by hailtogeorgia on Dec 14, 2010 8:56 AM EST up reply actions
Very interesting questions you pose here.
Several of us Aubs have debated this question. My stance is that one mark of a good leader is attracting outstanding others around you and managing the whole. The Cam question is interesting too. Hard to say what might have been in any scenario because one decision leads to another and so on (I guess we’ll see next year, as my guess is that both Fairley and Newton will go pro). My pov, for what it’s worth – Chizik is undervalued and I like it.
Those are fair points.
Chizik did hire Malzahn and recruit those guys, etc., so I can see your logic. Being a head coach isn’t always about the coaching, it’s about the ability to put good coaches and players around you. I’ve heard from numerous Georgia baseball players (one of whom was my former roommate) that our own head baseball coach, David Perno, isn’t a good coach. He’s a good recruiter and he delegates well…he does a good job of picking good assistant coaches. Chizik could very well fall in that category. At the same time, he could have lucked out. We’ll see.
In any event, I’m assuming your POV is that Chizik is undervalued in the eyes of many in the public. He just won Coach of the Year, so it would be hard for him to be too undervalued otherwise.
by hailtogeorgia on Dec 14, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions
Yes; you assume correctly. It's interesting that he didn't win SEC coach of
the year, or, that he isn’t given credit by so many for the season. Also noteworthy is his name isn’t mentioned for any coaching vacancies. It makes me wonder, is he a good coach, a good manager, recruiter, delegator…. I hope it’s all of the above but, like you, I’m sure time will tell. Maybe those other SEC coached who didn’t vote for him know something we don’t…..
I'm pretty sure he won one of the SEC coach of the year awards.
I thought Gene Chizik won one and Steve Spurrier won the other, although I could be mistaken.
I remember thinking how weird it was that Dan Mullen didn’t win either of them, because it seemed to me that he did more with less than anyone in the league.
Go 'Dawgs!
Dan Mullen, to me, was the most impressive coach this year.
Chizik and Bobby P won on the strength of their QBs and Spurrier, well, he’s 6 years into this experiment. Mullen is going to be scary once he gets a stellar player.
The most disappointing had to be Saban: but one has to wonder just how much a coach can keep a team focused when they were all but named MNC champs before the season even started. They must be the most talented 3 loss team in the land.
If you're gonna do it, go ugly early.
I'm pretty sure that Chiz won a national award and Spurrier the SEC.
Agree about DM – he’s a keeper.
Gene Chizik certainly won at least one national coach of the year award, . . .
. . . but he also won the Associated Press SEC coach of the year award, while the Evil Genius won the same honor from his fellow coaches.
To me, that compounds the craziness. No disrespect to either Gene Chizik or Steve Spurrier, but, when you look at what each of them had at his disposal, it seems clear to me that Dan Mullen did more with less. There are no Marcus Lattimores or Cameron Newtons in Starkville, after all. The idea that there could be two SEC coaches of the year, and Dan Mullen is neither of them, is 27 kinds of baffling to me.
Go 'Dawgs!
"That's pretty genius."
People who say Auburn’s offensive production would have cost the Tigers 6 wins are misled I think. Malzahn has put up extremely similar numbers every place he has been. While games against Kentucky, MSU, USC, and Clemson looked close, those games were never really out of hand, and I think some could have been won without Cam. I think it is pretty naive to think Auburn would have had a worse record than last year given Auburn’s incredibly favorable schedule this year (Clemson, USC, UGA, LSU and Arky all at home)… Obviously this is just guess work, but I think 8-4 or 9-3 is reasonable without Cam.
As far as Chizik… The guy takes a program off a devastating losing season, a program that pretty much everyone agreed was too low on raw talent to compete for the SEC, and in two years brings in the nation’s best OC, Off. player, and Def. player, and wins the SEC and plays for a national championship. Add to that the fact that Auburn was behind to 8 teams this year, and behind BY DOUBLE DIGITS to UGA, Clemson, USC, and Alabama. Auburn managed to outscore opponents 128-48 in the 4th quarter. I would think that means great coaching, great adjustments.
Putting the right people in the right places to win close game, I would say that = Coach of the Year.
Dwight Eisenhower
Eisenhower’s presidency is considered to be one of the upper tier presidents by historians. Sam Rayburn’s problem with Ike was that he wasn’t a Democrat. I’m sure Speaker Rayburn was more of an Adlai guy.
Regarding number three,
I’ve been pushing for this for several years now. The Bulldog offense under Bobo has been largely high-flying (whether that’s attributable to Bobo or the players themselves could be speculated…see: Chizik, Gene & Newton, Cam) for the past three or four years, and I have never been sure why we don’t go ahead and take the ball first. Considering the team’s record this past year when scoring first vs. not scoring first, it would almost seem imprudent to kick the ball away. We have an offense with the ability to drive down the field and put points on the board in bunches. Why not take the ball early, drive down the field, score, put pressure on the other team to keep up and take some pressure off of ourselves?
I agree...
I thought we should have taken the ball to begin the game this past year if we won the toss. I can partially understand the coach-think by deferring because of Murray’s inexperience, but it backfired against ’Carolina and Arkansas. If memory serves, both teams took the opening possession and scored.
Murray’s youth was not the liability on this team the coaches (and perhaps, you and I) feared early on. The defense was. And unless our defense is playing dominant, shut-down football, play to your strengths…which is offensive football. Take the kick. Score. Rinse, lather, repeat.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
-Erk Russell
Exactly.
Too many times, we put the onus on ourselves by giving up an opening drive score. With an inexperienced defense (I don’t care that Darryl Gamble and Justin Houston are technically veterans…everyone this year was inexperienced) you need to start them off knowing that they already have a lead. It’s much easier to play with a lead than it is to play from behind, so don’t handicap yourself.
This is the same reason that I’m a proponent of taking the ball first in overtime. You don’t need to see if the other team kicks a field goal or scores a touchdown (or anything at all) to know that to guarantee you won’t lose, you must score a touchdown. Go out balls to the wall and score a touchdown. If you have to kick a field goal, so be it. At the very least (assuming you don’t miss the field goal), you’ll have a three point lead and the pressure is on the other team to atleast match you.
by hailtogeorgia on Dec 14, 2010 10:05 AM EST up reply actions
Let's not forget
How many times we put the onus on the D by fumbling to start our first series of a half, or going 3 and out to start a half looking woefully under prepared. And didn’t we lose two on side kicks this year early in a half?
Dave – you mentioned it backfired against two teams, I would add Auburn as well if we won the toss, if we didn’t, well, it was still embarrassing as heck to on that on side kick.
I don’t know how many times we won / loss the toss, but I can’t believe we never learned our lesson to drop the hammer and keep it down.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
If you take the ball, though,
the possibility is much greater that you are going to put points on the board than it is that you are going to turn the ball over. We improved turnover margin greatly and our offense is pretty damned good. If you don’t take the ball…the onus is definitely on the d, no questions asked. I’ll take the former, thanks.
by hailtogeorgia on Dec 14, 2010 2:50 PM EST up reply actions
My initial reactions:
1) The formation of a Ray Goff coaching tree that benefits all of Georgia’s rivals, but not Georgia:

2) Gene Chizik’s suitability to win the coach of the year award:

(Obvious, sorry. Auburn can’t handle the truth.)
3) Changing our coin-flip decision:

4) On the possibility of Will Muschamp being a bad fit at Florida:


by 


































