Don't Bet On It!: Week Ten College Football Forecasts Around the SEC
My SEC Power Poll and BlogPoll ballots have been cast scrapped, so now I will begin forecasting next weekend’s games, starting by going around the SEC. Yeah, Saturday stunk, but, as was pointed out in one of the comment threads, tomorrow is another day, so let’s give it a whirl, shall we?
I was 4-0 in last week’s conference forecasts, which upped my SEC prognosticating ledger for the season to 43-9. That level of success simply cannot be sustained, so, if you know what’s good for you, you’ll jump off the bandwagon right here. For Pete’s sake, whatever you do, . . . Don’t Bet On It!
Here are this week’s Southeastern Conference contests, all of which will be played on Saturday, November 6:
Wow, believe it or not, I’m still not there yet. Like Rhett, I still can’t bring myself to give a damn, as I continue to be half-dejected and half-numb following the most gut-wrenching Georgia loss since the 2008 Alabama game.
In 1992, Esquire published a profile of John Mellencamp entitled "Jack and Diane Are Dead," which meant, of course, that the singer’s former John Cougar persona no longer was relevant to the populist Midwestern troubadour he had become. Well, in that sense---and, I wish to stress (quite happily, in fact), not in the literal sense---it is fair to say that Buck and Lindsay are dead. To show how that (again, only figuratively) is true, I offer the following words, which were uttered by Shug Jordan to Dan Magill:
We had some mighty good football teams at Georgia in those days. One of the best was in 1950, and it is not remembered as one of the best because it went 6-2-3, but it easily could have been undefeated. We had a hell of a defense, allowed only 5.5 points per game, but we lost our quarterback to an injury in the first game in beating Maryland, 27-7, and Maryland was probably the best team we played. After losing [quarterback Billy] Grant, we never could generate a consistent offense, and we averaged only 14.3 points per game.
Why, you may be asking, was Shug Jordan, the longtime Auburn coach and one of the namesakes of Jordan-Hare Stadium, referring to the Georgia Bulldogs as "we"? You may be forgiven for not knowing that Coach Jordan was a former assistant coach under Wally Butts in Athens, because it was, after all, 1950. Well, in 1980, 1950 was exactly as far in the past as 1980 is for us today. As much as I love the history of the University of Georgia in virtually all its facets, the fact is that Buck Belue’s touchdown pass to Lindsay Scott is of historical interest only, having no bearing whatsoever on where we are as a program right now.
Consequently, I remain today where I have been since Saturday. There’s simply no way the Bulldogs should have lost last Saturday’s game, and, until I come to grips with the fact that they did, I just don’t care what one set of teams is or is not going to do against another set of teams next Saturday.
Will I succeed in overcoming my funk and abandoning this theme before the end of the week? Don’t Bet On It!
Go ‘Dawgs!
1 comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"Traditional rivals" is a phrase that has been bandied around here a lot lately.
The only teams that rise to "traditional rival’ status are the teams you lose to. Lets think of GT for a minute. Most of the talk is that they don’t even “qualify” as a rival they are so bad. My hatred for Auburn has simmered way down since our record against them has improved. Same with UT.
Ergo, a coach is rarely going to have a great record against a team that the fanbase considers a “traditional rival” because the focus is always on the team that is giving you the most trouble, not the team you own.
During the ‘80s Clemson was much more our hated rival than Florida. Why? the answer is obvious. We owned Florida, but not Clemson.
Don’t forget to give Richt credit for demoting some teams from hated rival status.
by hbtd on Nov 1, 2010 10:17 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs

by 
































