Week Five BlogPoll Ballot Draft Submitted for Review and Comment
This week, I started with a clean white piece of paper and came up with the following preliminary BlogPoll ballot for your review and comment:
Dawg Sports Ballot - Week 6
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama Crimson Tide | -- |
| 2 | Oregon Ducks | 1 |
| 3 | Oklahoma Sooners | 8 |
| 4 | Arizona Wildcats | 6 |
| 5 | Ohio St. Buckeyes | -3 |
| 6 | Boise St. Broncos | -2 |
| 7 | TCU Horned Frogs | -2 |
| 8 | Auburn Tigers | -1 |
| 9 | Michigan St. Spartans | 8 |
| 10 | Oklahoma St. Cowboys | -- |
| 11 | Florida Gators | -3 |
| 12 | Stanford Cardinal | -6 |
| 13 | Iowa Hawkeyes | 7 |
| 14 | LSU Tigers | 5 |
| 15 | South Carolina Gamecocks | -1 |
| 16 | Michigan Wolverines | 6 |
| 17 | Arkansas Razorbacks | -4 |
| 18 | Florida St. Seminoles | -- |
| 19 | Nevada Wolf Pack | -7 |
| 20 | Utah Utes | -11 |
| 21 | Nebraska Cornhuskers | -6 |
| 22 | Miami Hurricanes | 2 |
| 23 | Missouri Tigers | -- |
| 24 | Northwestern Wildcats | -- |
| 25 | Wisconsin Badgers | -9 |
| Dropouts: N.C. State Wolfpack, West Virginia Mountaineers, Texas Longhorns | ||
SB Nation BlogPoll College Football Top 25 Rankings "
I’ll be happy to explain any particular placements you deem peculiar, but here is a brief summary of how my top 25 came together:
Alabama is ranked No. 1 because the Crimson Tide very clearly is the best team in the country. Anyone who argues otherwise is smoking something.
Speaking of smoking something, Oregon staked a claim to the No. 2 spot by coming back to beat a solid Stanford team. While the Cardinal represent the Ducks’ only victory over a Division I-A team with a winning record, Oregon won on the road against Arizona State and Tennessee squads that came within whiskers of bumping off Wisconsin and LSU, respectively, on the road.
I hated to rank the Sooners this high, because four of Oklahoma’s five wins have come by margins of eight or fewer points, but Bob Stoops’s troops closed the deal against Florida State, Air Force, and Texas to post a trio of victories over teams with winning records.
While both wins were close, Arizona carded victories over Iowa and Cal, and all of the Wildcats’ Division I-A wins were over teams with records of .500 or better. That earned Arizona a spot in front of the Buckeyes, whose 5-0 ledger includes an increasingly impressive win over Miami but is weighed down by victories over Ohio (2-3), Marshall (1-4), and Eastern Michigan (0-5). (Insert your "Ohio State has the toughest schedule in the country this year! It’s a fact!" joke here.)
That win over the Hurricanes kept the Buckeyes in front of Boise State, whose best win was a neutral-site nailbiter over Virginia Tech. I had a tough time deciding between the Broncos and the Horned Frogs, both of whom beat Oregon State. Texas Christian’s best win theoretically was against a Baylor club with an improbable 4-1 record, but I’m leaving Boise State ahead of TCU for the time being. I could be convinced to flip-flop the two mid-major powers, however.
Although Auburn’s wins over Sun Belt schedule fodder are nothing of note, the Plainsmen eked out a trio of victories by eight or fewer points against Mississippi State, Clemson, and South Carolina outfits at .500 or above. That gave the Tigers a marginally more impressive resume than the Spartans, whose solid win over Wisconsin is offset by victories over Division I-AA Northern Colorado and a pair of 1-3 teams (Western Michigan and Florida Atlantic), as well as a narrow escape over a Notre Dame club that now sits at 2-3.
I know Oklahoma State is overrated. You know Oklahoma State is overrated. Heck, the Cowboys barely got by Troy, but the Pokes’ comeback win over Texas A&M counted for something, and Oklahoma State’s 4-0 record warranted a spot above the Gators, who got spanked by the Tide and had little meat in a resume that includes home wins over Miami (Ohio), South Florida, and Kentucky.
Stanford is a solid squad, but the Cardinal couldn’t close the deal in Eugene, and, while the win at UCLA has improved with age, the victories over Wake Forest and Notre Dame haven’t. The Hawkeyes were buoyed by a quality loss by a close margin on the road against undefeated Arizona, plus a win over a decent Penn State team. That enabled Iowa to stay ahead of Louisiana State, which has a deceptive 5-0 ledger marred by three close calls against overmatched opposition.
A win over a pretty decent Southern Miss club, coupled with a quality loss by eight points on the road against undefeated Auburn, kept South Carolina stable as the only SEC East squad not to lose this weekend. The Wolverines are skating on thin ice, just like the Bayou Bengals, but the Maize and Blue’s close calls came against Indiana, Notre Dame, and Division I-AA Massachusetts.
At this point, the pickings get pretty slim, as only two of the last nine teams in the top 25 have defeated a Division I-A opponent with a winning record. Arkansas, for instance, has beaten no one of note; the Hogs’ No. 17 ranking reflects only their quality loss against Alabama. The Seminoles, by contrast, thumped a weak slate and were blown out by Oklahoma. Nevada has a good win over Cal, which puts the Wolf Pack ahead of a Utah unit whose best win was at home in overtime against Pitt. Thumping a 2-2 Pac-10 team counts for more than sneaking by a 2-2 Big East team, particularly since the Utes’ other victims have a combined 2-13 record.
Nebraska gets credit for thrashing Washington on the road, but the Cornhuskers’ remaining slate has consisted of Idaho, winless Western Kentucky, and Division I-AA South Dakota State. The ‘Canes appear much improved, but it will take more than wins over Division I-AA Florida A&M and a pair of middling 2-2 clubs in Pitt and Clemson to erase the memory of what happened to Miami in the Horseshoe.
I hate ranking Missouri at all, given the Tigers’ meager resume of Illinois, McNeese State, San Diego State, and Miami (Ohio), but Mizzou is 4-0 and none of the team’s Division I-A victims are below .500, so the Tigers will receive an undeserved ranking. Northwestern has the weakest record of achievement of any 5-0 team in the land; the Wildcats’ only convincing victories came against Division I-AA Illinois State and one-win Rice, and Northwestern won single-score victories over one-win Vanderbilt, one-win Minnesota, and two-win Central Michigan. If I had anyone else to put here, I would.
Wisconsin was exposed against Michigan State, dropping the Badgers to 4-1 and forcing them to rely upon a resume consisting of wins over a Division I-AA team (Austin Peay) and a pair of 1-4 teams (UNLV and San Jose State), with a signature victory at home by one point over an Arizona State squad with a losing record. Wisconsin doesn’t have much upon which to hang its hat, but it had more than Fresno State, which got to 3-1 by beating Cincinnati (1-3), Utah State (2-3), and Division I-AA Cal Poly while getting rocked by Ole Miss.
While the Fresno St. Bulldogs received consideration for inclusion, the USC Trojans and the members of the Big East did not. Anyone who believes I have slighted any of those teams is encouraged to look at their respective schedules before attempting to persuade me that I have overlooked worthy candidates. I looked at their schedules; I haven’t, and they aren’t. With respect to Southern California, yes, I get to say, "I told you so."
I watched the Oklahoma State-Texas A&M game on Thursday night, portions of the BYU-Utah State game on Friday night, and a fair amount of the Clemson-Miami game, the end of the LSU-Tennessee game, and the entirety of the Georgia-Colorado game on Saturday.
Your questions and constructive criticisms are welcome in the comments below.
Go ‘Dawgs!
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Why not Southern Miss over Northwestern?
They have the inexplicably close win over La Tech, but I have watched enough of their season to feel confident projecting them as one of the 40+ teams that would be 5-0 with Northwestern’s schedule, and the Golden Eagles would have likely been more convincing in most of the victories.
I was glad to see you used the “going to need a bigger goat” line. It occurred to me as soon as the game in Boulder went final, but I was fairly certain the gallows humor would be unappreciated from an outsider.
"They've just discovered a new use for sheep over there at Clemson... wool." - Lewis Grizzard
by GwinnettGamecock on Oct 3, 2010 11:57 PM EDT reply actions
Thanks for the suggestion.
I’ll give the Golden Eagles a look before the final ballots are due. Much obliged.
Go 'Dawgs!
I looked at it again, and, as much as I'd like to go with the Eagles, . . .
. . . I just can’t do it.
Northwestern, Southern Miss, and Wisconsin between them have beaten no teams with winning records, or even any teams with .500 records.
The Wildcats have beaten four teams with losing records and one Division I-AA team. The Golden Eagles and the Badgers both have beaten three teams with losing records and one Division I-AA team. I have to give Northwestern the nod, since they’re 5-0 and both Southern Miss and Wisconsin are 4-1.
Wisconsin and Southern Miss have remarkably similar resumes. The Badgers beat two 1-4 teams (San Jose State at home and UNLV on the road), one 2-3 team (Arizona State at home), and one Division I-AA team (Austin Peay). The Eagles beat two 1-4 teams (Marshall at home and Louisiana Tech on the road), one 2-3 team (Kansas at home), and one Division I-AA team (Prairie View A&M). That’s more or less a wash, particularly with both winning one nailbiter (Wisconsin over Arizona State at home and Southern Miss over Louisiana Tech on the road).
For me, the difference is in the two teams’ respective losses. Wisconsin lost at Michigan State. The Spartans are 5-0 and the score was relatively close. Southern Miss lost at South Carolina. The Gamecocks are 3-1 and the score was not at all close.
Accordingly, while I will keep my eye on Southern Mississippi, I cannot, in good conscience, rank them this week. Thanks for the suggestion, though.
Go 'Dawgs!
Upon that point, Muckbeast, you and I are in complete agreement.
It’s very difficult to sit down and sift through the records and results on Sunday when you know your team isn’t even in the conversation.
Go 'Dawgs!
I bet. Ugh. I’m glad I’m not the one who has to do it. Though I still appreciate you doing it, as it gives me something to read. Heh.
And yes, that’s what hurts the worst – the lack of national relevance. :(
Word on the street is that Kyle is writing or has written a book. That will give us something to read. I’m scoring brownie points with him by promoting his book since he’s the moderator; but on the other hand, his writing is legitimately entertaining – so it should in fact be a fun read. I’ll purchase it.
I saw Georgia playing female volleyball against Starkville this weekend on TV. I don’t think I dreamed that up, and don’t know who won. If they don’t improve in football this season, just latch onto whatever they win in and pretend that you don’t give two hoots about football. Auburn does that with the swimming and equestrian teams many football seasons.
by Stephen1980 on Oct 4, 2010 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
That used to be gymnastics for me. My daughters both do gymnastics, and I went to some meets in the 90s when I was in law school, so it worked out well.
But yeah… you know what happened to that.
by Muckbeast on Oct 4, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Man...
We’re a basketball school now.
"You can't print what I said, but they have to catch us." - Chipper Jones
by Jman781 on Oct 4, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
LOL - that is just awesome.
"One thing I will never do as long as I’m at Georgia is lose to Florida." - Herschel Walker
I think this a very good poll..
And I agree with Muckbeast…I don’t know how you do it…I usually swear off college football once the Dawgs lose. Heck, even my adoptive Trojans lost their first legit test of the season…
"You can't print what I said, but they have to catch us." - Chipper Jones
Muckbeast, Jman781, I am obliged to you both.
I’m not going to lie to you . . . these are tough times to be a Georgia sports blogger, but MaconDawg and I are not going to go the “pictures of kittens” route (at least not as a site theme; creepy kittens in the comment threads are permitted, albeit disturbing). Comments of this nature help more than you know.
Stephen1980, I thank you for the mention of the manuscript, Fighting Like Cats and Dogs, which is a game-by-game history of the Georgia-Clemson rivalry. I don’t yet have a publisher, although one is considering the manuscript. I will keep all of you posted, and I thank you for your interest.
Go 'Dawgs!

by 
1
-3

































