Week One BlogPoll Ballot Draft
Compiling this week’s BlogPoll ballot was, by turns, easy to the point of obviousness and difficult to the point of distraction. Because many teams took on opponents offering no substantial challenge whatsoever, there often was only marginal movement, but I tended at this early juncture to reward teams for meaningful victories and punish their opponents for disheartening losses. It all will come out in the wash once everyone has played someone. Here is the draft of my ballot:
![]() | ||
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Florida | |
| 2 | Southern Cal | 1 |
| 3 | Texas | 1 |
| 4 | Alabama | 4 |
| 5 | Oklahoma State | 6 |
| 6 | California | 3 |
| 7 | Mississippi | 5 |
| 8 | Boise State | 7 |
| 9 | Brigham Young | 11 |
| 10 | Penn State | 3 |
| 11 | Clemson | 1 |
| 12 | LSU | 7 |
| 13 | Ohio State | 7 |
| 14 | Oklahoma | 10 |
| 15 | Georgia Tech | 2 |
| 16 | Virginia Tech | 2 |
| 17 | TCU | |
| 18 | North Carolina | 1 |
| 19 | UCLA | 3 |
| 20 | Cincinnati | |
| 21 | Missouri | |
| 22 | Michigan State | |
| 23 | Pittsburgh | |
| 24 | Nebraska | |
| 25 | Notre Dame | |
| Last week's ballot | ||
Explanations follow after the jump.
The Southern Miss. Golden Eagles were never more than a placeholder at No. 25, whereas a weak performance in victory by the Iowa Hawkeyes and weak performances in defeat by the Oregon Ducks and the Georgia Bulldogs caused those teams to fall from the top 25. While a close setback to the Alabama Crimson Tide kept the Virginia Tech Hokies from dropping more than a couple of spots, the Oklahoma Sooners’ loss of Sam Bradford, coupled with their high postseason placement, resulted in a larger plummet, from fourth to 14th. Anyone who saw the Kerwin Bell lookalike the Sooners had under center after their Heisman Trophy winner went down knows I am being generous.
The top-ranked Florida Gators did nothing Saturday to disabuse me of the notion that the Sunshine State Saurians are the No. 1 team in the land, while the USC Trojans’ 56-3 demolition of the San Jose St. Spartans impressed me more than the Texas Longhorns’ surrender of 20 points to a Sun Belt team, so Southern California and Texas switched places on my ballot.
Narrow escapes against overmatched opposition renewed my doubts about the LSU Tigers and the Ohio St. Buckeyes, who now are ranked 12th and 13th, respectively. The Penn St. Nittany Lions didn’t exactly trash the Akron Zips, so Joe Paterno’s crew slipped from seventh to tenth, in order to make room for such rising stars as ‘Bama at No. 4, the Oklahoma St. Cowboys at No. 5, the California Golden Bears at No. 6, the Mississippi Rebels at No. 7, the Boise St. Broncos at No. 8, and the BYU Cougars at No. 9 after all six carded impressive victories on Labor Day weekend.
Because they did not do as much as the newest additions to the top ten, several teams took slight dips, such as the Clemson Tigers (from tenth to 11th), the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (from 13th to 15th), and the UCLA Bruins (from 16th to 19th). The 17th-ranked TCU Horned Frogs did not play, so they did not move, and I likewise left the Michigan St. Spartans and Pittsburgh Panthers ranked 22nd and 23rd, respectively, after predictably lopsided wins over Division I-AA patsies gave me little to go on in deciding whether to move either team.
The North Carolina Tar Heels inched up a notch from No. 19 to No. 18, due chiefly to what other teams did or failed to do, and the spots cleared out at the bottom of my ballot were filled, in succession, by the No. 20 Cincinnati Bearcats, the No. 21 Missouri Tigers, the No. 24 Nebraska Cornhuskers, and the No. 25 Notre Dame Fighting Irish after those teams throttled decent (though still well short of good) opposition.
I’m looking for a reason to boot the Irish from the poll and I’ll take any credible excuse you give me. Please note that nothing that occurred during the nursing-home purse-slapping in Tallahassee on Monday night constitutes a credible excuse. I gave no consideration to any other teams, because, frankly, I had trouble coming up with 25 rankable teams as it was.
I watched Thursday night’s opening outings pitting the South Carolina Gamecocks against the N.C. State Wolfpack and Boise State against Oregon. Friday was a travel day and I attended the Georgia-Oklahoma State game on Saturday. That evening, after our arrival at the home of my brother-in-law’s other uncle, we watched about half of the Oklahoma-Brigham Young game and thereafter viewed what was left of the Alabama-Virginia Tech game. (When in Oklahoma, do as the Oklahomans do.)
On Sunday, I went out on the pond in a boat on a fishing excursion, took part in a game of competitive fetch involving the numerous dogs who were on hand, rode out to the dig site where Trav’s family has found the remains of a turn-of-the-century homestead, helped shoo donkeys away from a gate while exiting, and watched a good bit of the Ole Miss-Memphis game and a fair amount of the Colorado-Colorado State game. I spent most of Monday getting back to the Peach State, and, after my arrival, I saw a very little bit of the Cincinnati-Rutgers game and every bit of the Florida State-Miami game after putting the kids to bed.
If anything in the foregoing looks off the wall to you, go ahead and let me know, because the holiday weekend made for a short turnaround time on BlogPoll ballots this week.
Go ‘Dawgs!
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting...
… so Florida is number one in the country, but number two in the SEC? I’m not sayin’… I’m just sayin’.
Oklahoma State’s rise was inevitable, since either they or Georgia would have risen into the top 10 simply by virtue of having beat the other team. It’s worth questioning, though, whether or not a victory that certainly wasn’t easy over the #21-ranked team in the country is enough to vault you past California, who whipped an ACC team, or Ole Miss, who eventually comfortably put away a rival in Memphis?
Oh, and I'm glad you didn't like FSU/Miami, either.
The TV broadcasters and talking heads on ESPN Radio seemed to think it was an amazing game and worthy of “instant classic” status. While I understand that the term “classic” now has approximately the same about of relative value as the Confederate dollar in 1866, applying the term to the FSU/Miami(FL) game is just silly.
What I saw in that game was 2 defenses who make the 2008 Georgia crew look like a freakin’ juggernaut. I don’t think I’ve ever seen so much poor tackling outside of the 2nd half in last year’s Georgia Tech game. (In fact, it was just about that bad.) Miami is going to get throttled Sun-Belt-style by Oklahoma if they keep playing defense like that.
Exciting but not necessarily well-played – I couldn’t bear to pay too much attention (I despise both teams), but it seemed like every time I looked up a receiver was running free through a hopelessly confused secondary for a twenty-yard completion.
Miami’s D – by all accounts – has a lot of talent, but it’s inconsistent… GaTech made it look very silly indeed last season. And last season’s FSU D was good but nothing special, certainly not capable of stopping a really top-end O.
No Utah?
Did you forget them or really don’t think much of their 15 game unbeaten streak, including their recent romp over ’Bama in the Sugar Bowl? Would think that after BYU beat OK, the Mountain West would be getting a touch more respect.
I rated the Utes highly last season . . .
. . . but that was last season. For the relevant period being covered by this poll—-namely, the 2009 college football season—-Utah has a one-game winning streak, the same as most of the teams I have ranked in the top 25.
It’s not disrespect for the Mountain West; I think the fact that I have two mid-majors in my top nine attests to my openmindedness in that respect. However, the Utes lost a lot of talent off of last year’s squad and all they did on Thursday night was beat Utah State. If they get by Oregon on September 19, they’ll get my attention, but, right now, I’m not seeing anything that gives me reason to rate them more highly than I did in the preseason. Sorry.
Go 'Dawgs!
Poll thoughts
BYU’s win was more impressive than Boise State’s. Oregon looks to be right about terrible, while Oklahoma is still a top 15 team. Neutral field vs. home field… I would give the nod to BYU over Boise State… even if it is just one place difference.
Georgia is ranked too highly. I know they aren’t ranked. Even being unranked is too high.
The dude abides.
Good points on the mid-majors
Because of the Labor Day night game, the turnaround time on this week’s ballot was too quick to allow much in the way of commentary and revision, but I’ll bear that in mind next week. On the whole, I thought Boise State looked better, but you make a sound argument about the quality of the teams they beat, and the Cougars were fairly well shutting down the Sooners even before Sam Bradford was injured.
I feel your pain on the Georgia ranking, but, right now, I can’t say you’re wrong.
Go 'Dawgs!
Because it pains me to see you reduced to ranking Notre Dame ...
If you’re looking for a reason not to have Notre Dame in your Top 25 – and like any red-blooded American, you should be doing just that – might I submit for your consideration the Baylor Bears. Sure, they only won by three points, but it was a road win against a respectable Wake Forest team that has been a regular post-season program lately. They’ve got a hot young quarterback in Robert Griffin, and I would not be surprised if they are this year’s Vanderbilt. They’ll string a few victories together, upset a Big 12 school with more name recognition than talent, and everyone will start ranking them until the Bears remember they are the Baylor Bears and start to lose again. But in the meantime, you can get in on the action early and be there to say “I told you so”.
Is Baylor one of the Top 25 teams in the nation? Probably not. Was their close road win over Wake any better than the Irish’s big home win over Nevada? Well … the point is, I know how much it must have pained you to type the letters “N-O-T-R-E D-A-M-E” on your ballot. It pains us to read them, too. So I’m just trying to give you some options to consider to save us the anguish and avoid ranking the Irish for as long as possible.
Much obliged, rebelcraig . . .
. . . and thanks for the assist in the earlier comment thread a couple of days ago, as well.
Go 'Dawgs!

by 
1
1 
















