SEC Power Poll Ballot: Week Four

I have submitted the first draft of my BlogPoll ballot (on which your feedback is appreciated), so now it is time to cast my weekly SEC Power Poll ballot. Here, in my estimation, is how the twelve teams of the Southeastern Conference stack up in comparison to one another:
1. Alabama Crimson Tide (4-0): Nick Saban’s club looks like the most complete team in the league. ‘Bama has looked solid in every outing and it’s tough to pick out a game remaining on the schedule in which the Tide shouldn’t be favored by a respectable margin. Alabama isn’t flashy and is as unhyped as one of the sport’s historic powers can be, but, right now, they’re the SEC squad you’d least like to see your team face next Saturday.
2. Florida Gators (4-0): Obviously, their struggles against the Big Orange at home and the question mark the Sunshine State Saurians face at quarterback in the wake of Tim Tebow’s concussion are not sufficient justification for ranking the Orange and Blue second in the SEC. Clearly, the only plausible explanation can be my blind virulent hatred of Urban Meyer and my incessant insinuations that everything Coach Meyer says is a lie. Yeah, that must be it.
3. LSU Tigers (4-0): This is easily the shakiest pick for the third-best team in the conference since, well, I picked Ole Miss last week. Hopefully, it will end equally badly for the SEC West team in question when it travels to take on an SEC East squad on the road.
4. Auburn Tigers (4-0): I’m not any happier about this vote than you are, but they walloped a Mississippi State club that looked pretty good against Louisiana State and they beat West Virginia, so the Plainsmen didn’t just get to 4-0 by playing patsies. The Alabama Polytechnic Institute earned this spot, at least for this week. I hate Auburn.

(Disclaimer: The foregoing statement was intended as an expression of institutional rivalry rather than as a statement of personal dislike. This has been a public service announcement.)
5. Georgia Bulldogs (3-1): Unless and until the ‘Dawgs quit turning it over three times a week and letting the opposition stay in games the Red and Black otherwise would be winning handily, the Classic City Canines are living on borrowed time while they work their way through the mediocre part of the schedule.
6. South Carolina Gamecocks (3-1): Yes, it was a signature win, but, in the end, the Palmetto State Poultry were ahead by more than a field goal but less than a touchdown in a night game at home in which the Gamecocks had held the lead since right around halftime, Ole Miss got back into it after losing an early lead then picked up a first down well inside South Carolina territory in the closing minutes, and it came down to an incomplete pass on fourth down. Does that mean the Rebels registered a last-second loss? ‘Cause it looked more to me like the winning team won.
7. Mississippi Rebels (2-1): We all knew we were overrating the Rebs, but we all did it anyway. The fact that Ole Miss is the best team in the bottom half of the league ought to cause us all to reassess our claims that the Southeastern Conference is the toughest in the land. We may be the league that stinks the least from top to bottom, but that isn’t the same thing.
8. Kentucky Wildcats (2-1): You could throw a blanket over the last five teams in the SEC. No, I’m not saying they’re similar (although they are); I’m actually suggesting that you throw a blanket over them, because they are one ugly bunch of football teams.

Maybe it isn’t so much that I hate Auburn as it is that I love knowing how to spell. (Image courtesy Roll Bama Roll.)
9. Mississippi St. Bulldogs (2-2): This may be the finest 2-2 team in the country. Given what he has done with what he had at his disposal upon his arrival, Dan Mullen may have been the best head coaching hire in the league this year.
10. Tennessee Volunteers (2-2): It is absolutely certain that this is not the finest 2-2 team in the country. Given what he has done with what he had at his disposal upon his arrival, Lane Kiffin may have been the worst head coaching hire in the league this year. (Actually, that last part was just included for symmetry’s sake. Lane Kiffin clearly was the worst head coaching hire in the league this year.)
11. Arkansas Razorbacks (1-2): Congratulations on making Georgia’s win over the Hogs appear absolutely meaningless . . . and on ticking me off with your animadversions against our mascot. I think a lot more highly of Uga than I do of most people I’ve ever met, by the way.
12. Vanderbilt Commodores (2-2): I felt badly about consigning Vandy to the cellar, but let’s face it . . . the ‘Dores are used to it by now. Why is it that the team with the highest-ranking seafaring mascot is so bad and the team with the lowest-ranking seafaring mascot (Navy Midshipmen) is so good? There may be a New Testament parable in there somewhere. . . .
Go ‘Dawgs!
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It would,
but I forgot the parts where the Rebels had the lead, moved the ball consistently, outgained their opponent by 100+, were victimized by special team gaffes, and faced an and goal in the dying seconds that had the stadium holding it’s collective breath.
by GwinnettGamecock on Sep 28, 2009 11:01 PM EDT reply actions
Ole Miss led until just inside the nine-minute mark of the second quarter . . .
. . . and I’ll bet Williams-Brice Stadium was holding its collective breath in the final seconds last Thursday night, as well, but I take your point.
“Victimized” is an exquisite choice of word, in which 115 years of futility are neatly summarized. Was Georgia “victimized” by the three turnovers that allowed South Carolina to make a game of it? I tend to think the Bulldogs were at fault for not taking care of the football, but, hey, if it’s easier for the Gamecock faithful to look at it that way, be my guest.
Maybe we should look into declaring South Carolina fandom a psychiatric “syndrome,” so that it can be used as a legal excuse by criminal defendants. Perhaps an academic discipline can be devoted to its study, as well. If you’re going to go in for victimhood, go all in for victimhood.
The Fighting Fowl have won a big game on national television since returning home from Athens. How ‘bout enjoying that instead of continuing to claim moral victory in a game in which South Carolina was not the better team? The Palmetto State Poultry outgained the Classic City Canines by over 100 yards and still couldn’t win? How is that a point in the Gamecocks’ favor rather than an indictment of their inability to close the deal?
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Sep 28, 2009 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions
It has not been noted how some of that 100+ happened.
SC didn’t do a whole lot of stopping UGA all night (nor vice versa), but UGA only used half the field for much of the evening because of the massive return yardage. Georgia was int’d once, fumbled once, punted once, set to punt another time, and scored on every other touch. UGA also stopped SC from scoring only four times. When the hidden yardage of the returns is factored, it not only explains some of the TOP imbalance but much of the total yards discrepancy too on a night when neither D could much stop the other.
So since the SC D clearly didn’t do any more stopping than the UGA D, let’s just stop citing those 100 yards and TOP stats as some sort of evidence of SC’s superiority.
I am enjoying it,
I just don’t understand why the SC game continues to be an issue for you. I wanted a win in Athens, and I do not consider the result a moral victory at all. On the contrary, it was a gutwrenching loss, one which I have never claimed should have been a South Carolina win.
As I’ve said here, Georgia made the pivotal plays they needed to make to get the win, and it was a deserved victory for the Bulldogs. I do take issue with any contention that the game was not as close as the final score would indicate. Had Rennie Curran not tipped the ball away on 4th down, I would believe a result for the Gamecocks was just as deserved.
I think if one were to ask neutral observers, they would struggle to find similarities between the South Carolina-Georgia game and the South Caroline-Ole Miss game. Georgia has defeated two quality opponents since then as well, yet you are still referencing the South Carolina result. I don’t get why it is apparently such a sore spot, but it is clear we have entirely different takes on the contest.
by GwinnettGamecock on Sep 29, 2009 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Please understand that I am responding . . .
. . . to the refusal of others to let it go, rather than not letting it go myself.
What is a sore spot with me is the apparent determination of some to make it look like Georgia caught the breaks and South Carolina didn’t. The Gamecocks caught just as many breaks as the Bulldogs did, yet, with all those advantages, they couldn’t get the win. This is not to the Palmetto State Poultry’s credit.
If neutral observers would have difficulty finding similarities between those two games after I have gone to the trouble of pointing out the multiple characteristics they have in common, I would suggest to said neutral observers that they consider the possibility that they have issues regarding reading comprehension.
Said neutral observers also might want to work on their ability to discern sarcasm when they see it, as well.
Go 'Dawgs!
If it's any consolation to you, by the way . . .
. . . he’s still calling it a “”http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Pollin-At-what-point-do-coaches-start-caring-w?urn=ncaaf,192646" target="new">last-second loss at Georgia," so I feel perfectly justified in calling it Mississippi’s last-second loss at South Carolina. Both characterizations are equally accurate . . . which is to say, not at all.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Sep 29, 2009 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Drat
That should have included this link. I have no idea why it didn’t.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Sep 29, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Begun the mascot wars have...
… or, at least, mascot war started by the Hog fans. Thankfully, though, it seems to have kind of fizzled out.
I still maintain that having a unique or creative mascot simply for the purposes of being creative isn’t that special. I mean, can you imagine having this guy show up at your football games on the sidelines?

Evergreen State College… all hail the fighting geoducks (pronounced gooey-ducks).
The optimist in me...
Would love to argue Georgia’s position, but the turnovers preclude my doing so.
That said… I really like Georgia in this game (the turnovers have to stop sometime, right?) But thät could easily be the optimist coming out again.
Behold, this year's College Gameday Sign:
"Joe Cox -- He circumcises ANGELS!"
by RedCrake on Sep 29, 2009 12:29 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
I just want to go on record . . .
as the first one to point out that Gus Malzahn versus Willie Martinez just doesn’t look like a fair fight at this point. I fear it’s going to look like Kasparov playing chess against Homer Simpson.
And I have to agree on placing them 4th at this juncture, even though it pains me. That win over Missy St. looks a lot better this week than it did last, and the West Virginia win was a pretty solid effort.
To continue vineyarddawg’s theme, most concerned about the WarPlainsTigerChiziks, I am.
georgia vs lsu. georgia is getting 3 points.
georgia has played a much tougher schedule than lsu and i expect them to win the game outright. i think lsu has two wins vs the sunbelt conference. i know they beat ul lafeyette and i think one other team in that conference. the team who has played the tougher schedule usually wins the game. lsu needed a goal line stand to beat miss. state. i like your qb better than lsu’s. my money is on georgia. peace out. ramble on!
by wolfmanshowlforever on Sep 29, 2009 6:26 PM EDT reply actions
In September, all I really wanted from the Gamecocks was a 2-2 record on 9/29/09.
I’ll gladly take 3-1. Clearly, 4-0 was too much to hope for. Heh.
--Robert
by a gamecock fan on Sep 29, 2009 11:34 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Err...
That should read, “In August,…”
--Robert
by a gamecock fan on Sep 29, 2009 11:35 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Kyle
Do you honestly believe that Kentucky is better than Tennessee? I understand you don’t dig on Kiffin. And that’s cool. A lot of people don’t.
But would you be willing to put money on Kentucky if they played Tennessee on a neutral field? If you’re not a betting man, then assume that you have to bet on the game. In other words, your only three options are: (1) put your money on Tennessee, (2) put your money on Kentucky, or (3) the world ends. And, oh yeah, this is your life savings.
Would you bet on Kentucky?
And I’m seriously not trying to antagonize here. If you say Kentucky, I’ll believe you.
_______________________________
Eric Berry is better at football than you.
I'm not saying Kentucky would beat Tennessee . . .
. . . although, at the moment, I don’t have any particular reason to think the Wildcats won’t win that game, aside from the fact that, for a long time, Kentucky hasn’t won that game. For the moment, though, the ’Cats have done more than the Vols this season.
Go 'Dawgs!

by 

















