Week Three BlogPoll Ballot Draft
As I indicated earlier, Georgia night games and day-long Sunday church obligations are not conducive to my duties here at Dawg Sports, which include voting in the BlogPoll. This week’s top 25 is a modification of last week’s ballot, although, next week, I will begin working the resume ranking approach into the mix, so you should expect to see significant changes from this arrangement:
![]() | ||
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama | 4 |
| 2 | Texas | 2 |
| 3 | Florida | 2 |
| 4 | California | 1 |
| 5 | Southern Cal | 3 |
| 6 | Ohio State | |
| 7 | Mississippi | |
| 8 | Boise State | |
| 9 | Oklahoma | 2 |
| 10 | UCLA | 3 |
| 11 | Miami (Florida) | |
| 12 | Penn State | 2 |
| 13 | Virginia Tech | 2 |
| 14 | Florida State | |
| 15 | Cincinnati | 1 |
| 16 | LSU | 2 |
| 17 | Brigham Young | 8 |
| 18 | Washington | |
| 19 | TCU | 7 |
| 20 | Oklahoma State | 1 |
| 21 | North Carolina | |
| 22 | Georgia | |
| 23 | Georgia Tech | 5 |
| 24 | Oregon | |
| 25 | Michigan | 2 |
| Last week's ballot | ||
I felt badly about dropping the Penn St. Nittany Lions, the TCU Horned Frogs, the Pittsburgh Panthers, the Houston Cougars, the Michigan Wolverines, and the Wisconsin Badgers, but, for once, I felt like I had too many teams rather than too few.
On the whole, the Alabama Crimson Tide have looked like the more complete team than the Florida Gators, so the Red Elephants rose to the top spot while the Sunshine State Saurians dropped a couple of notches following their underwhelming performance against the Tennessee Volunteers. Where was 49-10 when we needed it, you bunch of orange-and-blue-wearing sissy-marys? Congratulations on earning Lane Kiffin a Charlie Weis-style contract extension, nancy-boys.
I really didn’t like moving the Texas Longhorns up after they played a back-and-forth game with the depleted Texas Tech Red Raiders, but what else was I going to do? The California Golden Bears let the Minnesota Golden Gophers hang around for far too long, I had to drop the USC Trojans after yet another road loss to an unranked Pac-10 opponent (yet I couldn’t drop them below the Ohio St. Buckeyes), and I wasn’t about to move the Mississippi Rebels up and have SEC teams ranked first, second, and third, since that would have earned me an accusation of ranking four SEC teams in my top three from a University of Michigan-educated engineer.

My sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-ranked squads stayed put because nothing in their respective wins seemed to justify moving them, but the Florida St. Seminoles’ 54-28 blasting of the BYU Cougars dropped the latter to No. 17 and earned the former a No. 14 placement. In a related item, the Miami Hurricanes leapt into the poll at No. 11 after throttling the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (now ranked 23rd) in a game that wasn’t remotely as close as the score indicated.
Vacancies in the top ten were filled by the Oklahoma Sooners after they manhandled the Tulsa Golden Hurricane and by the UCLA Bruins in the wake of their 23-9 win over the Kansas St. Wildcats. The lack of poll love for the club from Westwood baffles me. Rick Neuheisel’s crew beat San Diego State handily, defeated the Vols by four points in Knoxville to card a triumph that looks even better in retrospect, and dropped a two-touchdown setback on a Big 12 team. Why isn’t that counting for more in the eyes of the voters? I don’t get it.
I regret that the sudden crowding of the field prevented me from giving to the Virginia Tech Hokies and the Cincinnati Bearcats the boosts they rightfully deserved, and I am open to arguments for why other teams ought to be moved down to accommodate them. The LSU Tigers have done nothing to impress me other than have the letters "LSU" on their helmets, so the Bayou Bengals’ slow slide continues.
The Washington Huskies hung tough with my No. 16 team and beat my No. 5 team, so they enter the poll at No. 18. Once again, I am open to justifications for placing U-Dub higher. The Oklahoma St. Cowboys crept up, although I’d like to think they shouldn’t have, and the North Carolina Tar Heels benefited from being undefeated in what appears suddenly to be a much more stout ACC than I previously had believed.
The Georgia Bulldogs stayed put, but at least they’re clearly the best team in the state. The Oregon Ducks re-entered the rankings after beating the Utah Utes, although their latest affront to fashion very nearly kept them out of the top 25. The Auburn Tigers and the Iowa Hawkeyes received consideration for inclusion, and the former’s omission had nothing to do with the fact that I hate Auburn, although I do, in point of fact, hate Auburn. (I hate Auburn. See?)
I was able to enjoy every minute of Thursday night’s Georgia Tech-Miami tilt. On Friday night, I watched the Boise State-Fresno State game while wishing Reshad Jones had been able to have that WAC officiating crew in Stillwater. I saw almost all of the Boston College-Clemson game (lightning delays and all), all of the Georgia-Arkansas game, and parts of the Florida-Tennessee, Michigan State-Notre Dame, and Auburn-West Virginia games.
Your constructive criticisms are welcome, as always.
Go ‘Dawgs!
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"The LSU Tigers have done nothing to impress me other than have the letters "LSU" on their helmets, so the Bayou Bengals’ slow slide continues."
What about beating Washington @ Washington, the same place Southern Cal lost on Saturday? I think that showed Washington is better than people think, and you have to give LSU some credit.
I give LSU credit for that win . . .
. . . which is why I ranked the Fighting Tigers 16th and the Huskies 18th. Do you think Louisiana State deserves a bigger bump than that for the win at Washington? If so, which teams do the Bayou Bengals deserve to leapfrog?
(Those aren’t challenges, by the way; they’re actual non-rhetorical questions. You make a legitimate point, and I want to see how far it goes in terms of actually affecting my ballot. Thanks for your input.)
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Sep 21, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
RE :
It was actually easier to say “LSU should be ranked higher” than to choose a team or teams that need to be moved down to make room.
Two teams that stand out to me are UCLA and Penn State.
UCLA is undefeated with home wins over San Diego State (1-2) and Kansas State (1-2). A road victory over Tennessee (1-2) is sandwiched between those two. Opponents’ win/loss is 3-6.
Penn State is undefeated with home wins over Akron (1-2), Syracuse (1-2), and Temple (0-2). Opponents’ win/loss is 2-6.
LSU is undefeated with wins at Washington (2-1), over Vandy (1-2) at home, and against Louisiana-Lafayette (2-1) at home. Opponents’ win/loss is 5-4.
Louisiana-Lafayette holds a win over Kansas State by a score of 17-15, while UCLA only a week afterward pulled out a 23-9 victory of the Ragin’ Cajuns. Those were the only mutual opponents I saw.
Then you throw in Washington’s win over Southern Cal (your #5 team and rightfully so) in the same stadium that LSU won 31-23 in the season opener, I really think it might be worth bumping Penn State and UCLA down just to move LSU up a couple spots.
Well, by Les Miles logic we're 1-1-1, so give PSU some credit
I mean, an overtime loss is really a tie, right? (Actually, it is; regular season overtime is nonsense in college footbell. In a sport where statistical rankings and polls are highly significant, it’s important that a tie be recorded as a tie.)
I don't usually get into the polling that much
But Mississippi seems a little high on that list for a true resume ranking. At the least, I’d suggest flipping them with Boise State who, unlike the Rebels, have a win over a BCS team.
Leaving insightful football commentary and analysis to other people since 2006.
If we're talking the corpus
Da U needs to be a bit higher. Two ranked teams, two good W’s. If it’s a power poll, then that seems about right.
Good call on U-Dub, who suddenly look like the competent team they’ve been most of my life (the defense is still a Chinese fire drill, but this is not the same hapless, listless crew Ty had).
"Hollywood made a movie of my life. The film had me proposing to my wife on the football field. I would never misuse a football field that way." -Crazy Legs Hirsch
by Stuck in the Plains on Sep 21, 2009 6:48 PM EDT reply actions
Thanks for the feedback
At this point, my philosophy is a hodgepodge; I try not to use straight resume ranking too early in the season, because it produces such volatile and obviously skewed results. As a result of having no coherent approach in the early going, I am going to be guilty of some inconsistencies for the first three or four weeks of the campaign, for which I beg your pardon.
All of you make some fine points, though, and I likely will make a few adjustments prior to the final deadline. Thanks for the feedback, and keep those comments coming.
Go 'Dawgs!
As the uber optimistic homer of homers
I skipped picks 1-21.
Then I saw a beautiful thing - Georgia Tech ranked lower than Georgia- and I realized all was right with the world.
Well done.
Behold, this year's College Gameday Sign:
"Joe Cox -- He circumcises ANGELS!"
by RedCrake on Sep 21, 2009 11:26 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I've been having bad luck with posting lately...
No idea why that crossed out that line.
I may have to stop commenting using my phone…but the computer is all the way in the other room.
Behold, this year's College Gameday Sign:
"Joe Cox -- He circumcises ANGELS!"
by RedCrake on Sep 21, 2009 11:28 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Second on LSU
I’m not really sure of your ranking philosophy, but I haven’t seen anything from UCLA to suggest that are deserving of any ranking, let alone a top ten. I give next to zero credence for a two point win over Tennessee.
I’m also suspicious of Penn State. They haven’t played anyone yet, and they have even underperformed against their patsies. If you buy into lines, the Nittany Lions are 0-3 ATS, and none of the dogs got a backdoor cover against the second string defense.
I’d throw out Ole Miss as another team who hasn’t done much to justify their ranking. They return a slightly above average number of starters (6 O, 8 D) from a four loss team. Their darkhorse Heisman candidate is averaging under 200 ypg against bad oppenents, and both games were close for longer than expected.
If it were my ballot, I would almost flip flop Ole Miss and LSU in your rankings, but that’s just a personal preference. I think they have a deeper roster, their unorthodox coach has won to a greater degree than the unorthodox coach in Oxford, and the difference in each program’s consistency is such that the 9-4 season that propelled Ole Miss to flavor of the year in everyone’s preseason poll would be considered a disappointment in Baton Rouge.
I can’t go through and justify LSU versus each team above them, and it probably wouldn’t change your opinion on all of them if I did, but that’s my biggest difference with your ballot.
by GwinnettGamecock on Sep 22, 2009 1:43 AM EDT reply actions
Thanks for the valuable feedback, everyone!
Due to your suggestions and contentions, I made the following changes. Much obliged.
Go 'Dawgs!

by 
4
2 

















