Georgia Bulldogs 52, Arkansas Razorbacks 41
I know I am arriving a little late to the party---ESPN and the Griffin District of the United Methodist Church did not get their schedules straight when the former lined up three straight night games for the Georgia Bulldogs on the very same weekends on which the latter arranged for me to attend my lay speaking recertification course for four hours every Sunday---but I appreciate the way everyone has kept the conversation going in the comments and in the fanposts.
Permit me to add a few observations, but please bear in mind that I haven’t had the time to check out any other weblogs or the game day open comment thread, so some of what follows may be repetitive, or redundant, or repetitive:
- As the first quarter came to an end, I was very nearly ready to flush the 2009 season and get the guy most likely to start under center next autumn out onto the field to get some playing experience. Needless to say, Joe Cox answered any remaining doubts about his competence in the remaining three quarters. He hooked up on 18 of 26 attempts for 375 yards, a record-tying five touchdowns, and one interception. Although undeniably aided by the amazing abilities of A.J. Green (seven catches for 137 yards and two scores), Cox did a much better job of hitting his receivers in stride. This may be damning him with faint praise, but Cox didn’t throw long and incomplete any more often than Matthew Stafford would have.
- I was a bit surprised at how surprised everyone seemed to be at the supposed "emergence" of Michael Moore. When was Michael Moore not clearly the Bulldogs’ second-best receiver following the departure of Mohamed Massaquoi? Why did everyone seem so shocked that Moore caught six passes for 91 yards against the Arkansas Razorbacks when he ended last season by catching six passes for 97 yards against the Michigan St. Spartans in last year’s Capital One Bowl? Who didn’t know already the dude was good?
- I have always admired Mark Richt’s willingness to give a player an immediate shot at redemption after he makes a mistake. After Branden Smith’s gaffe in the return game against South Carolina, he was given the opportunity to make up for his miscue on the reverse. Coach Richt’s charges respond well to his confidence in them and usually make the most of their second chances. Tavarres King had a couple of potentially game-changing mistakes in Fayetteville, which were addressed by giving him the chance to haul in a 50-yard touchdown pass. He made good on that opportunity. Kudos to the coaches for letting the young man atone for his error and kudos to King for justifying his coaches’ faith in him.
- Lisa Loeb. Tina Fey. Sarah Palin. Now Erin Andrews. I don’t know what it is about librarian-style glasses on good-looking women, but, holy smoking barbecue in a wire basket, that’s a look that works for me. Yowzers!
- Although his play-calling sometimes seems strangely streaky, Mike Bobo is better at his job than he generally is given credit for being, and he managed a surprisingly balanced ballgame. The ‘Dawgs ran the ball 36 times and threw the ball 26 times. That demonstrates an admirable commitment to the ground game on a night when your quarterback is hitting almost 70 per cent of his passes. Three Bulldogs averaged four or more yards per carry, Richard Samuel rushed for 104 yards on 16 attempts, and Georgia scored on an 80-yard touchdown run. When that happens at the same time your signal caller is airing it out for a career night, you’re sticking with the running game.
- The Bulldogs’ growing pains this year will pay big dividends next year. Ere anyone criticizes Brandon Boykin for a few miscues in the secondary, I have two words for you: Bruce Thornton. In his first year in the defensive backfield, he looked hopelessly lost and was picked on mercilessly by opposing quarterbacks. By the final year of his varsity career, Thornton was as good a defensive back as the Bulldogs had. Boykin shows great promise, on which he will deliver. Be patient.
- As hopeful as I am for the future, though, I am worried that we’re going to go through this whole thing all over again a year from now if no quarterback other than Cox gets to run the offense for at least a couple or three series per game. As matters presently stand, Cox’s successor is going to come into the job in 2010 with less live game experience than Cox had coming into 2009, which is nothing short of downright scary.
- There was a lot to like out of the Georgia offense last night. The ‘Dawgs answered the Hogs score for score, hung half a hundred on an opponent for the first time since last year’s LSU game, and did it without needing a special teams or defensive score to boost the stats. The Red and Black’s nine scoring drives covered 57, 26, 85, 75, 34, 65, 62, 73, and 17 yards, respectively. Other than the first-quarter drive following the Ryan Mallett fumble and the fourth-quarter game-clincher after the poor punt from the home team’s two yard line, the ‘Dawgs were moving the ball well over long distances.
- The defense gave up a pair of one-play drives in the first quarter. A 50-yard Cobi Hamilton kickoff return set up a 48-yard touchdown pass to Jarius Wright and Samuel’s fumble was followed by a 30-yard touchdown pass to Greg Childs. I realize that the special teams and the offense put the defense in bad situations in those instances, but the Bulldogs have to do better on potentially momentum-changing drives. No single aspect of this game makes me more fearful for the future than this indication that the Classic City Canines’ inability to adapt to sudden changes in circumstances is one of the ugly holdovers from last year’s meltdown.
- Georgia returned the ball well and kicked field goals well. The Bulldogs turned the ball over too often and drew too many penalties. This is a recording.
- I truly have no clue what to make of our defense. Georgia gave up 21 points before the break and 20 points after intermission; so much for Willie Martinez’s ability to duplicate Brian VanGorder’s trademark second-half shutdowns (and, oftentimes, shutouts). Last week’s excuses do not apply; Mallett isn’t half as elusive as Stephen Garcia, and the Bulldog D wasn’t overworked against the Razorbacks, who ran 63 plays to the Red and Black’s 62. Georgia held the ball for almost 32 minutes of clock time, so fatigue should never have been a factor. The Classic City Canines gave up next to nothing on the ground (77 yards on 24 carries) while surrendering 408 yards and five touchdowns through the air, without so much as a single pick. On third down, though, the ‘Dawgs permitted the Hogs to convert just over 20 per cent of the time (3 of 14). What gives?
- What makes the Georgia defensive numbers appear even weirder is the fact that Mallett was on fire, then, all of a sudden, he was ice-cold. The Arkansas quarterback completed eight of his first nine attempts in the second half, connecting on a pair of 40-yarders and one 30-yarder that was hauled in by Childs for a first down at the visitors’ eight yard line with fewer than five minutes remaining in the third period. At that point, a false start penalty cost the Razorbacks five yards, and, suddenly, Mallett couldn’t hit water if he fell out of a boat. Starting with the very next snap after the flag (one of eleven against the Hogs, who lost a football field’s worth of yardage to yellow laundry), Mallett went three for 14 the rest of the way. His last 14 attempts picked up a total of 36 yards, Mallett was sacked once, and he did not lead a touchdown drive. Maybe something changed that I was missing, but it didn’t look like the ‘Dawgs were getting a good deal more pressure on Mallett than they had before, yet his aim went from lethally accurate to absolutely off-target for no reason I was able to discern at first glance. Maybe Mallett was feeling the heat more than he had been before, but it didn’t seem like the ‘Dawgs were getting to him so much faster that he should have gone from looking like an NFL starter to looking like Jonathan Crompton so swiftly.
- In the course of Coach Martinez’s tenure as Georgia’s defensive coordinator, the Bulldogs have surrendered single-game point tallies of 31 and 38 in 2005; 51 in 2006; 35, 30, and 34 in 2007; 41, 38, 49, 38, and 45 in 2008; and 37 and 41 in 2009. Seven of the last twelve opponents the Red and Black have faced have scored at least 37 points on Georgia. That is all.
- The enduring value of Mark Richt’s consistent calm was on full display in Fayetteville. Down 21-10 after fifteen minutes of play, Georgia could have come unglued, yet the Bulldogs remained poised and continued to play their game without panic or desperation. There are a lot of problems which persist from last year, but there are a lot of positives that remain present, as well. What is worrisome is the reality that the ‘Dawgs had to come back and hang on to beat mid-tier league challengers in their first couple of conference outings. What will the Red and Black do when facing a ranked opponent whose SEC pedigree dates back before the early 1990s?
Those are my thoughts, and y’all have done an excellent job of sharing yours. (If I happen to have echoed sentiments I have not yet read, well, I guess great minds think alike.) Keep up the good work, and, as always, don’t forget to savor the win while spotting the flaws. Optimism may be overly extreme, but enjoyment and hope are entirely appropriate.
Go ‘Dawgs!
0 recs |
31 comments
|
Comments
So here's what I thought
I need to talk coordinators first of all. In the first half , I sent a friend a text message that said Bobo, Martinez, and Fabris were trying to make my head explode. We were far too predictable on offense and were not taking advantage of what Arkansas was giving us (the middle of the field was wide open, and their corners clearly couldn’t hang with us). Our defense was, for the first time I can remember, playing man extensively as opposed to zone. This worked about as well as our typical soft zone stuff does. Without a consistent pass rush from the front four, we will always have issues. And, of course, directional kicking. I’ve about given up on complaining about that one, except to say that Arkansas had their best field position on the two directional kicks that went out of bounds and the totally unnecessary pooch kick from Bogotay. Whatever. First half, I was not happy. I, too, was writing off the season.
Then the second half happened, and so did something beautiful. Mike Bobo came out with halftime adjustments. It was blatantly clear that we had the middle of the field. It was there for the taking. The safeties were playing close to take away the run up the gut, and towards the edges to take away the sweep. Seam routes were being given to us. And we went for it. Charles on the seam. AJ over the middle (that kid is a PHENOM, by the way). King deep in a one-on-one. Bobo, for all his faults, changed his gameplan up and took full advantage. Willie, however, did not. If you play man to man and your front four cannot get to the QB, he will have all day to find an open man. Bryan Evans forgetting rule #1 of playing safety (don’t let anyone behind you) didnt help matters, but once again, my main issue was that we wouldnt change our strategy. Man was not working. I know I rail against the soft zone more than anybody, but we needed zone last night (what we really need is a pass rush, but oh well). We were getting beat deep-so go to a cover 3 or even a quarters look. Take away what is killing us. Make them dump it shorter. But no. Insanity continued. Martinez, to borrow a phrase, is throwing rock. He throws rock on every play of every game. He just doesn’t adjust. Last night was clearly not the time to try and man cover, but we wouldn’t stop even when it was clear that it was not gonna do the trick. If he had adjusted half as well as Bobo, we would have been breathing much easier in the second half. Thank goodness for Joe Cox.
Ah, Joe. All we asked for was a game manager. Just put us in a position to win. Don’t kill our chances. You dont have to win a game for us, just dont lose it. Well guess what, folks, Joe won us that game. He did everything we could have asked out of Stafford or Shockley or Greene in that situation. I don’t want to hear anymore about how we need to get Logan Gray in there. We don’t. Joe is our QB. And that is not a bad thing
AJ. Ah, AJ. You are a PHENOM (I said that already? Oh well. Bears repeating). I will treasure every catch you make for the next two years. That is all.
This season is going to be one heck of a strange and crazy ride. But, hey. We went on the road in the SEC and came out with a win. And we beat the humanly manifestation of All Things Evil in the process (I don’t refer to the coach of the Razorbacks by name after he submarined the Falcons), just for some bonus goodness. I will take that any Saturday that its given.
by SG Standard on Sep 20, 2009 10:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Regarding AJ Green
I am going to be very disappointed if you get to watch Green for two more seasons after this.
by GwinnettGamecock on Sep 21, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As much as I'd love to see that....
He has to go pro after next year.
If it was my kid, I would definitely tell him to….sadly, I don’t have the genetics.
Behold, this year's College Gameday Sign:
"Joe Cox -- He circumcises ANGELS!"
by RedCrake on Sep 21, 2009 1:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do you think CWM looks at opposing offenses game-film??
Not saying he would have learned anything from The Hogs 1st game against Brewton-Parker or whomever they played but he had to know that Mallet was a “ball-slinger” if not at the beginning of the game certainly by the 2nd half!!
Yes I too believe our players made some dumb (freshman) mistakes but it seemed that those mistakes were throughout the entire game! How do we leave WRs soo wide-open 10-12 yards down the field??
We certainly will have to find a way to put pressure on the opposing QBs but we did see a glimmering of hope by the “bull-rush” by Cornelius Washington (Freshman) that smacked/sacked Mallet! Keep in mind that the rest of our games we will face much more mobile QBs than what we saw in Arkansas. I really was hoping that we would also see more pressure “up the middle” from our “Stars” Owens, Weston, & Atkins.. (BTW does anyone have stats on what these 3 have done for the year (as far as tackles, sacks, tackles for loss, etc.) ??
by Dawgrees on Sep 21, 2009 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and I forgot to mention
Caleb King. I think a lot of people overlook how much his missing the first two games hurt the Dawgs. Now, they have a real complement to Samuel in the backfield. Carlton Thomas is a good back to have, but he’s Tyson Browning. He is good for a play here and there, but he isnt the kind of guy you want coming in for a series to spell your top back. Now, with King in the mix, UGA has a combo similar to the Thomas Brown/Knowshon one they had a couple years back. King looked really good last night. He is going to be a huge asset going forward.
by SG Standard on Sep 20, 2009 11:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
King played much tougher than last year.
He played like he wanted it—with his hair on fire. Kudos to him for showing a passion I wasn’t sure he had, and with effectiveness, too. His blocking was damn good too.
by rbubp on Sep 20, 2009 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
King did step up!!
Caleb did a great job and as y’all have mentioned he really “stepped up” his game Saturday night! I totally agree that Carlton Thomas needs to come in a spell Samuel & King from time to time but they need to have more “designed” plays for these “spellages” (I know that is not a wrod but who cares-you get my point!) Such as toss sweeps & the occasional single back in motion for the FB Wheel play- that would be $$$ to see a SS or LB try and keep up with that speedy fella!!
My hope is that Caleb does feel the pressure of Samuel being our “STAR” RB & decides he better step up every game!!
by Dawgrees on Sep 21, 2009 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cox v. Stafford
I almost can’t believe I’m titling a post this way, but Cox’s deep balls were just plain beautiful. That’s one area Matty Arrow never really showed any consistency, and I think it cost him TD passes and us points on a few occasions.
Also, it is damn nice to have a QB who doesn’t throw into triple coverage 4-5 times a game. So he can’t throw the deep out, and he coughs up a knuckleball down the middle every now and again as opposed to those things of beauty Staff used to paint. But it has been damn effective the last two games. Go Ginger.
by rbubp on Sep 20, 2009 11:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Isn’t that supposed to be Go Ginger Assassin?
by vineyarddawg on Sep 21, 2009 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking along the lines of Corch Urban Meyers.
Sorry to be so obtuse…
by rbubp on Sep 21, 2009 8:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What did you just call me?
(I guess I was the one being… er, slow…)
by vineyarddawg on Sep 21, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I call a moratorium on "Cox" and "balls"
Joe Cox throws deep passes. Everybody else may throw the deep “ball,” but I am not going to be able to resist posting “that’s what she said” twenty times a week if we don’t get some ground rules established.
by first and thom on Sep 21, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll call a moratorium on her!
That’s what she said.
by blackertai on Sep 21, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Cox thrusts Green Balls deep"?
Just saying….
Behold, this year's College Gameday Sign:
"Joe Cox -- He circumcises ANGELS!"
by RedCrake on Sep 21, 2009 1:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This was posted by someone named “Scott” at the Senator’s blog, but it bears repeating elsewhere:
Brian Van Gorder – DC for 52 games (including both of our SEC titles this decade). Opponent scored 30 or more points only 1 time (34 points by LSU in 2003 SEC title game, the year LSU won the national title).
Willie Martinez (current) – DC for 55 games. Opponent has scored 30 or more points 13 times. (Auburn 31 pts. and West Virginia 38 pts. in 2005); (Tenn. 51 pts in 2006); (Tenn. 35 pts, Florida 30 pts., and Troy 34 pts in 2007); (Alabama 41 pts., LSU 38 pts., Florida 49 pts., Kentucky 38 pts., Georgia Tech 45 pts. in 2008); (South Carolina 37 pts., Arkansas 41 points in 2009).
by Muckbeast on Sep 21, 2009 4:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank you, Muckbeast
The numbers don’t lie . . . although, to be fair, Georgia has won as many SEC titles with Willie Martinez as the Bulldogs’ defensive coordinator (one, in his first year in 2005) as the ’Dawgs did under Brian VanGorder (one, in 2002).
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Sep 21, 2009 6:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Numbers in the Box Score (with snarky commentary)
Pregame speech
1st – Ark 21 UGA 10
2nd – Ark 0 UGA 17
Halftime speech
3rd – Ark 17 UGA 15
4th – Ark 3 UGA 10
The defense does better without being coached.
They just have to forget what they were told by CWM and listen to Rennie in the huddle.
by chrisvilledawg on Sep 21, 2009 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does that get your heart pumping or what???
Not only was I unable to sit down while watching the game Saturday- but boy oh boy did Erin Andrews do a number on me & everyone at the DAWG party I was at when she had those “librarian-style glasses” on!! I’m with you Kyle, there really is something about those that make me want to “grab a leg & go to town”!!!!
Woof-Woof!!!
by Dawgrees on Sep 21, 2009 9:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Personally
I think she’s trying to look frumpy to avoid getting comments about her looks. What with the whole peep-hole video thing still floating around in sports fans minds. The pulled back hair, the glasses, the jacket….she’s trying to look unattractive without becoming Holly Roe (Row?).
by blackertai on Sep 21, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly . . .
. . . that’s what she (or, more likely, ESPN) is trying to do.
Just as clearly, it ain’t working.
Looking smart and hot is way hotter than just looking hot.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Sep 21, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uhh...
I like smart women and Andrews is way too Barbie for me (as if she gives two sh*ts what I think), but you all may have noticed that tight…pink..article of clothing…she had on somewhere below the glasses?
There, there. You can admit that you noticed, and we all know Erin and ESPN are both way too smart to completely throw out their moneymaker.
by rbubp on Sep 21, 2009 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I focused on more than just the glasses . . .
. . . but the point remains the same.
Further evidence, as if further evidence were needed:

Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Sep 22, 2009 7:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I, for one, am thankful...
… that the moratorium on Kristin Davis has been lifted.
by vineyarddawg on Sep 22, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, now...
Holly started to look a bit hot. But then again, my cooler was looking a bit low.
Directional kickoffs: More fun than a bag of snakes.
by DavetheDawg on Sep 21, 2009 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A Few Things with the Martinez conversation...
While it’s true that the numbers don’t lie, the facts don’t either.
First off, and I haven’t researched this, but my memory seems to recall a lot more power offenses in the SEC in the early 2000’s. Obviously the spread wasn’t really around yet (at least not in the SEC) and even more pro-style offenses seemed to be more power-running oriented. I wonder how VG would do in this climate?
Secondly, just look at the NFL. Their games aren’t as long and they usually have less plays so scores tend to be lower. But even with the amazing talent level on defense, a lot of times, you will see offenses moving the ball pretty good between the 20’s. That’s because if you have a good OC and game plan, a competent O-line, good receivers, and an accurate QB, you’re going to move the ball against anyone. Then as the field shortens, the D tends to stiffen up. We’ve seen that w/ Martinez a good bit.
In the 2007 GA/UF game for example, the Dawgs hung 42 on a team considered to have a good D w/ Strong who is always thought of as one of the best DC’s in the country. They looked pretty weak in that game as the Dawgs were basically moving the ball at will. Now granted, Florida was down a bit that year, but I think it’s a valid point.
While I do agree with some of the criticisms pointed towards Martinez and the D, I think a little perspective is needed. Basically, the offensive level is much higher in the SEC now. And I think it bears repeating that a good offense, with good coaching and talent, is gonna move the ball.
Personally, I think we’re going to see the D do really well and basically win us a game or two this year. There’s so much talent there. I think Martinez can get the job done. He’s called some great games and has had some great moments. Let’s not throw him under the bus just yet.
To Hell with Tech (and Florida and Tennessee....and Tim Tebow)
by Marshmanslim on Sep 21, 2009 9:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmmmm-
The D pretty much won the game versus the Gamecocks (of course our Offense scored enough points to be ahead by 4 with time running out-but if not for the “bat” of the ball by our #1 man Rennie that game could’ve ended very badly!!!) I do agree that “the D tends to stiffen up” on the short field but our problems exist in that we have the talent, speed, & ability to not always have our D on the short field of things!!
“And I think it bears repeating that a good offense, with good coaching and talent, is gonna move the ball” and furthermore a good defense with good coaching & talent is gonna STOP that movement!! (Remember Championships are won with Defense!)
The inability of CWM to adjust from series to series & halfs to halfs is what really gets the majority of the DAWG-fans!!
I hope (fingers crossed) that our D does compare to the Gator Defense of 2007 & they gel as a unit this season rather than the next!!!
by Dawgrees on Sep 21, 2009 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think people aren't giving the D
enough credit at times. After the early rash of turnovers put us in an early hole, I thought the defense responded late and kept the Hawgs out of the EZ the last 4 or 5 possessions.
Blown assignments and missed tackles is what I’m most concerned with, But I think the biggest issues is the d-line. They’ve done great against the run, but they’ve got to get after that passer.
by Farsider on Sep 21, 2009 3:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
At this point the D’s credit score is below 500, methinks, and I’d having to be giving them a mortgage-backed-security loan through Countrywide with a variable APR that starts at about 9 percent.
by rbubp on Sep 21, 2009 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What was the black dust that was always flying up when the ball would hit the field, or someone would get tackled, etc?
Is it some kind of rubberized material to help with impact or something? It looked like artificial turf.
by Muckbeast on Sep 22, 2009 3:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 











