A First Look at the Top Ten Teams on My Preseason BlogPoll Ballot
What Ted Williams said about hitting a baseball applies to the summer for a college football blogger: "Wait wait wait then quick quick quick." All of a sudden, the season is upon us. My seatbacks are ordered; my parking pass, season tickets, 2009 media guide, and new pair of lucky game day underwear have arrived; and I’ve started cobbling together my preseason BlogPoll ballot.
First, though, permit me to offer a word about methodology. I am, in principle, a resume ranker, which means my ballots are based on what teams have accomplished on the field rather than whether I believe Team X would beat Team Y on a neutral field next Saturday. The problem is that no team has done a darned thing yet, and three of the consensus top four teams in the land open their schedules against Charleston Southern, Louisiana-Monroe, and San Jose State.
In other words, I plan to go with (hopefully educated) guesswork, estimation, and assumption early and phase in the resume ranking gradually, so that my ballot isn’t all over the place. That said, here is the first installment of my first stab at the top 25, covering the teams I plan to rank first through tenth (say, that was more "first"s than you find in a typical weblog comment thread):
1. Florida Gators: While I have an ulterior motive for casting this vote, there’s a reason why the Sunshine State Saurians are almost universally hailed as the top team in the country. When the defending national champions return every significant player except one, they’re the preseason No. 1 team, period.
2. Texas Longhorns: You probably could put the teams ranked second, third, and fourth in a ten-gallon hat and draw them out in any order without being way off base, but I gave the nod to the ‘Horns because I buy Dr. Saturday’s logic. (When in doubt, side with the Doc . . . or, at least, trot him out where you can to justify the conclusions you’ve already reached independently of him.)
3. USC Trojans: The lack of an established starting quarterback kept Southern California out of my top two, but the Men of Troy remain strong. I am a little nervous over the fact that their toughest games are on the road . . . and so is their outing against the Notre Dame Fighting Irish, which should keep the margin to a mere 28 points this time. Nevertheless, at this stage of the game, Pete Carroll has earned the benefit of the doubt in the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary.
4. Oklahoma Sooners: One returning starter on the offensive line gives me pause, although Bob Stoops’s troops managed to overcome that selfsame shortcoming in 2006. At the end of the day, this largely is a who-would-beat-whom pick; I don’t believe Oklahoma would (or, in the case of Texas, will) beat any team ranked in my top three, but I believe the Sooners would beat every team ranked below them. (Once again, this distressingly nebulous reasoning will give way to actual facts once the season starts and at least half of my preseason assumptions are revealed to be sheer nonsense.)
5. LSU Tigers: While reasonable minds may differ over the sequence of the top four teams, no one seriously doubts that they are the top four teams at this point. There’s a pretty good-sized gap separating Nos. 4 and 5, and, if the BlogPoll voting mechanism permitted me to do so, I’d leave Nos. 5 through 8 blank, rank the Bayou Bengals ninth, and let every other team fall in line behind them. Louisiana State has the talent, the defensive coordinator, and, yes, the head coach to earn inclusion in the top five.
6. Ohio St. Buckeyes: Let the overrating begin in earnest! There’s no way in the world that Jim Tressel’s team is a legitimate No. 6 squad, but who else am I going to put in this spot (without getting called out for ranking four SEC teams in the top ten, I mean)?
7. Penn St. Nittany Lions: All right, there’s an argument for Joe Paterno’s outfit, particularly since the Buckeyes must travel to Happy Valley, but Penn State hasn’t beaten Ohio State two years in a row since the Lions joined the Big Ten, so I’m not picking them to do it for the first time this fall.
8. Alabama Crimson Tide: All right, all right, all right, ‘Bama’s back. There are a lot of new faces on that offense, though, and there’s a loss (or two) lurking in a five-game stretch after North Texas but before Halloween that will be more grueling than it appears at first blush.
9. California Golden Bears: Yeah, I don’t really buy this at all, but someone had to be No. 9 and Phil Steele says Jeff Tedford’s crew is the second-most talented team in the Pac-10, so I’m going with da Bears, ‘cause you can’t just pick the top four teams in the SEC, the top three teams in the Big 12 South, the top two teams in the Big Ten, and Southern California and call it a top ten. Actually, you can, but there’d be some griping, so Cal gets the benefit of the doubt.
10. Clemson Tigers: I know this is going to be a controversial placement, but I have confidence in this one. As I pointed out previously, the Fort Hill Felines return C.J. Spiller, five offensive linemen, and all but one starter each on the defensive line, among the linebackers, and in the secondary. Perhaps even more importantly, they don’t return Tommy Bowden, who filled the role of the Country Gentlemen’s Jim Donnan after Tommy West capably performed as the Orange and Purple’s Ray Goff. Does that make Dabo Swinney the Tigers’ Mark Richt? Consider this: Coach Swinney is an Alabama alum who served on the Clemson staff before being elevated to the top spot. The last three times this program promoted from within to put a former Crimson Tide player in charge, the Jungaleers hired Frank Howard, Charley Pell, and Danny Ford. Add to that the fact that Dr. Saturday has given the doubters reason to question their own skepticism, and I’m comfortable making the call: Clemson will win the 2009 ACC championship.
I’ll end on that note, because that ought to be plenty bold enough to spark some comments. Stay tuned for the next installment of the initial draft of my preseason BlogPoll ballot tomorrow, and, in the meantime, let me know below where I’ve hit the nail on the head, where I’m way off base, and where I’ve missed the boat entirely. (Try not to mix your metaphors as badly as I just did, though.)
Go ‘Dawgs!
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
But....
How can Clemson win the ACC Championship if Georgia Tech is going to win it. I mean Paul Johnson is clearly the second coming and we all know that success in one or two games against real competition here and there is a clear sign of an upcoming championship season.
Plus all those awesome pics of Tech players with the cars from Transformers surely have the Tigers and Hokies completely psyched out.
Behold, this year's College Gameday Sign:
"Joe Cox -- He circumcises ANGELS!"
I have a sneaking suspicion
That you’re going to put our eventual 7-5, Music City Bowl-bound Georgia team at #23 or completely leave them off your ballot and thus win Brian’s “award” for least homerific vote. (I wonder what kinds of words he would come up with to describe you at that point.)
Leaving insightful football commentary and analysis to other people since 2006.
Surely,
even Kyle’s pessimism/realism wouldn’t put us that low. I’m not sure what Kyle’s 11-25 looks like but I imagine that would put us below several Big 10, Pac-10, and ACC teams that we are without question superior to.
As everyone knows, I, of the “Tereshinski will lead us to a SEC championship”, am a diehard optimist and I think the 10-15 area is probably right (at least pre-season). I’ll eat my hat if we end up in the Music City Bowl. At worst we are the 4th/5th best team in the SEC which is more Peach Bowl territory. Given that we would draw massive crowds at the Dome and its been a few years since we’ve been there, I would be flabbergasted if we fell to Nashville.
I do have a question though Kyle. What does a “resume ranker” like yourself look for when doing a pre-season poll? It seems sort of antithetical to the whole point of resume ranking (although I understand that you are compelled to do so). Is it based on the schedule or is this one more of a power ranking?
Behold, this year's College Gameday Sign:
"Joe Cox -- He circumcises ANGELS!"
Honestly, I wish I could answer that question
It’s an amorphous gut reaction based upon a number of factors but without any articulable formula.
In other words, it’s guesswork . . . hopefully, educated guesswork, but guesswork nonetheless.
Just to prepare you, Manic Kyle left the building after last year’s disappointment and Depressive Kyle is all that remains. If you’re expecting a top fifteen preseason ranking for Georgia from me, you’re going to be disappointed, but I remain open to arguments that might change my mind.
Go 'Dawgs!
Luckily for me...
I’m not particularly concerned about Georgia’s or anyone else’s preseason ranking. I’ll be much more interested to see where you have them after 6-8 weeks. The season is almost here!!! And then we shall all see.
Behold, this year's College Gameday Sign:
"Joe Cox -- He circumcises ANGELS!"
Especially....
given what Georgia’s potential resume could be. Conceivably they have more opportunity to move up based on that area than any other team. An early loss might also end up looking more forgivable.
Behold, this year's College Gameday Sign:
"Joe Cox -- He circumcises ANGELS!"
If the Blogpoll wants to be a legitimate alternative to MSM polls
It should at least take a stand and drop the meaningless preseason ballot. If everyone always grouses about how stupid and pointless they are in actual media polls, why go through the futile motions in a poll with no actual “pull”? Yeah, we’re all desperate to do anything CFB-related, but the preseason ballot is just an excuse to argue over totally uniformed opinions. Dropping it might not mean all that much, but it’s pretty much devoid of value as it is.
Leaving insightful football commentary and analysis to other people since 2006.
Clemson Freakin Tigers
My god, will we ever learn?
Clemson it seems is almost ALWAYS picked as the “surprise” team and yet…when was the last time they finished in the Top 10? 1990
True enough
Shortly thereafter, for no particularly good reason other than that he was not Danny Ford, they ran off Ken Hatfield and began the Tommy West/Tommy Bowden experiment.
Bear in mind that, in 2002, as the Bulldogs began the second year post-Ray Goff/Jim Donnan, a reasonable prognosticator might have written something similar about Georgia as the preseason SEC favorite. Times change, especially which coaches change.
Go 'Dawgs!
I gotta feeling LSU is gonna surprise some people that new QB they have (Jefferies) . . .
looked like the Orkin man against the Jackets. Plus Chavis should help improve the D.
You know, instead of Clemson.... you could give OkSt. the "Florida treatment"
You know rank them, and over compliment them into complacency the week before we come to town. And if we take care of business, you can feel justified moving them up into the teens, and still earn your coveted “least homeristic” title.
Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but only one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win.
I Corinthians 9:24
Clemson
also lost their defensive coordinator, Koenning (sp?) to Kansas State. That’s a big deal.
Otherwise, USC at #3 – I don’t think I’d rank them ahead of Oklahoma. The Sooners have so much back it’s ridiculous, and the Trojans seem to throw a game every season that they had no reason to lose.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
Koenning
If by lost you mean “showed the door,” then yes, Clemson lost Koenning. He’s that same kind of too conservative, can’t get off the field on third down type that Chavis was at Tennessee. LSU fans will be finding this out in short order, and KSU fans will be happy just to be not awful on D. The only reason Koenning lasted that long is because it would be unwise to fire both of your coordinators midseason.
Kevin Steele was brought in from Bama to replace him. Feels like an upgrade to me.
same thing
lost = showed the door – in this case….. can’t blame Swinney, I guess, most people when they take over try to kill off any possible competition.
Clemson is as they always are – expecting greatness only to fall to the ground. Maybe Swinney can change that, but I doubt it. He’ll be eaten by the same unrealistic expectations as before.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Aug 10, 2009 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Just bear in mind:
When you write this . . .
Clemson is as they always are – expecting greatness only to fall to the ground. Maybe Swinney can change that, but I doubt it. He’ll be eaten by the same unrealistic expectations as before.
. . . you could change the date to 2001, switch “Clemson” to “Georgia,” and swap “Richt” for “Swinney,” and you’d have a widespread sentiment that seemed reasonable at the time and proved to be quite wrong.
Some folks, by the way, think you could say the same thing about Bo Pelini at Nebraska. I’m just saying.
Go 'Dawgs!
and btw
SCREW Texas at #2.
I’m not going to rank them that high as they deserve to be penalized for playing CRAP for a non-conference schedule.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
That's a fair point . . .
. . . and it will come into play as the season progresses and the resumes take on greater weight.
At this juncture, though, no one has a resume; it’s all projection, so I have to go with the teams I think are the best. There will be a lot of movement over the first five or six weeks of the season for that reason.
Go 'Dawgs!
Teams You Don't Want in the Top 10
Let me encourage you, Kyle, that if you are uncomfortable with your Top 10 picks, you might have thought about including someone else. What follows is 10 Homerific reasons why the Rebels are better than picks 5 – 10:
5. LSU. What has Jordan Jefferson done, other than lose two SEC games and beat a streaky Tech team?
6. OSU. Will be ranked behind the Rebels after the USC game, anyway.
7. Penn State.
8. Bama. Starts the year on a neutral field with a green quarterback against an oft-nasty defense.
9. Cal. You surely don’t believe this. Surely.
10. Clemson. You know who else returns practically all their defense? Arkansas. Experience only counts when its a good experience. What was so special about the 2008 version of Clemson defense?
Destroying your traditions since [YEAR REDACTED].

by 

















