2009 Competition Improves
I've been bullish about the Dawgs for 2009, but in an effort to curb my enthusiasm, I've been looking at the dark side, with some help from Phil Steele (though he is also relatively bullish about Georgia this year).
The thing that really jumps out at you when you survey the schedule is how many opponents are expected to be better than they were last year.
By Steele's assessment, no fewer than eight of our twelve opponents (Okie State, Arkansas, Arizona State, LSU, Tennessee, Florida, Auburn, and the Dirt Daubers) are likely to improve this year. Three (Arkansas, Tennessee and Auburn) make Phil's Most Improved Teams list. And LSU ranks eighth in Steele's Power Poll of the best teams (above Georgia, which ranks eleventh). This is probably why Steele rates our schedule--which is generally regarded as significantly easier than last year's, certainly once we leave Stillwater--as the seventh toughest in the country. Given the teams on last year's schedule who wound up more or less imploding--notably Arizona State, Tennessee and Auburn--this may actually be the toughest schedule the Dawgs have faced in a long while.
Moreover, one of the teams that isn't expected to improve--SC--has been a difficult team for GA since Spurrier arrived; just ask the 2007 Dawgs whose loss at home to SC ultimately cost us a national title shot, or the 2008 Dawgs who nearly lost in Columbia.
Yes, even an improved Arkansas on the road will be easier to beat than last year's Alabama team, and yes, the pace and home/road profile of the schedule are better than in 2008.
But the Dawgs really do need to step it up to beat an improved competition in and out of the SEC. In looking back at last year, there's a tendency to focus on the two blowout losses and the frustrating loss to the Daubers. But we also won three games (SC, KY, and Auburn) that could have easily gone the other way.
The 2009 schedule doesn't provide a lot of room for "letdowns;" the closest thing to an early gimme is Vandy in mid-October, and that's on the road where we damn near lost to the 'Dores in 2007.
So there's my one--and I hope, the last--expression of pessimism for 2009.
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
So, basically . . .
We can go 1 – 11 and not be disappointed, because none of the games other than Vandy are for-sure W’s? Sounds great to me! Adopting this kind mindset should help prevent the soul-crushing malaise I endured during and after our three losses last season.
“Beat Vanderbilt.” Sounds like a fantastic expectation for the coming season.
Leaving insightful football commentary and analysis to other people since 2006.
by wwcmrd? on Jun 20, 2009 10:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Expectations
Don’t forget Tennessee Tech!
But in truth, for all the “soul-crushing malaise” of the three losses, last year could have been a lot worse; we were 3-1 in close games. Think of how you’d feel if we’d gone 6-6 and crawled into the Music City Bowl. And even that level of disaster would not have compared to what happened in Auburn and Knoxville last year.
I continue to think we’ll be pretty good this year—maybe very good if Cox works out, a RB emerges, and a pass-rush returns. The talent advantage over several of our “improved” opponents should be large enough to produce wins. But the real point of my post is that there won’t be much margin for error in a lot of games this year. Given the Dawgs’ mysterious pattern of suddenly forgetting how to play football for a quarter or two over the last three years, that’s worrisome.
by donkeydawg on Jun 20, 2009 3:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
4 things:
1) We really don’t need Cox to work, we just need Cox or Logan Gray (who for all intents and purposes is a Junior (R.Soph)) to work out. The experienced QB depth is a luxury we didn’t have the last time there was a major transition at QB (Stafford’s freshman year).
2) The play last year of Caleb King and Richard Samuel last year showed me that the running game is gonna be fine; They both had a very solid yard per rush average (Samuel 5.0 ypr and King 4.5 ypr) in limited duty; Were their times they stuggled last year? Absolutely! However they also had to work with one of the poorest performing OLs in the country last year due to all of the injuries and position changes. Imagine what they’ll do with a fully healthy and very deep OL to open holes for them this year. And that’s not even to mention the buzz Carlton Thomas created in the spring or the enrollment of record setting RB Washon Ealey in July.
3) There’s just as much proof that Arkansas, Auburn, and Tennessee will be worse this year than they were last year. In other word’s there’s absolutely none, save for speculation. With that said, I think we all will agree that the dawgs were hurt last year by injury. UT has had 15 kids quit the team this year. I don’t even know how many player’’s will be out for them due to injuries etc.; however, attriction dang sure doesn’t improve your team. Moreover, both Kiffin and Chizik have to prove that they can out coach Mark Richt. Neither’s resume as a HC gives much reason to think they can.
4) As far as Okie State goes its easy to focus on their offensive. Don’t forget about their D; Okie State’s D performed about as bad last year as our beloved Dawg’s D. However, unlike Okie State last year’s performance by our D was also unusual for CMR’s Ds. Much of it he attributed to his decision to go away from live tackling drills. When he went back to it in Bowl Prep, we shut down the Big Ten’s best offense. Moreover, given that our O only scored 24 points in that game, I’d say its safe to say that the D won that game for us. Given that we’ll be healthy to start summer camp there’s no reason to think our D won’t be ready for Okie State.
5) Having a week off b4 the Gator’s can only help our chances in that game;
6) Anyone who saw Paul Johnson’s decision to go for it on 4 and long inside his own 20 yard line when his team was down 14 to nothing to LSU could possibly mistake him for a great coach. I mean think about it, when would CMR, UM or Saban ever have make such a stupid freakin call? They wouldn’t, and that’s what separates the greats from the not so greats. Moreover, anyone who watched the Tech game in Sanford knows that UGA wasn’t exactly fooled by Paul Johnson’s play calling,. We had the right defensive calls, our guys were there they were just out of practice. Tech caught us when we were sick with the injury bug. No reason to think things won’t be back to business as usual this year.
7) We have this guy Reshad Jones maning middle field for us. And if you don’t think the kid can play than perhaps you should check out the highlight reel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kP5nmyNSgk
by charlottedawg on Jun 21, 2009 7:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I promise it was gonna be only 4 points but then I just blacked out and the next thing I know it was posted with 7. I woke like Will Ferrel after debating James Carville in Old School
by charlottedawg on Jun 21, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think the problem with Georgia last year wasn’t forgetting how to play, but losing motivation/lack of effort. Clearly we thought the blackout/gameday combo was going to hand us a victory against Alabama. We were wrong and we played better in the second half. Against Tech we showed during the first half that we clearly were the better team. Lack of effort showed in the second and quite frankly that game was meaningless for a team that was a national title contender. That loss changed nothing and the players knew that. Agianst Florida, we weren’t ready to play emotionally. We outgained them in total offense. Obviously the coaching was there. but Florida’s extra effort showed by dening us the endzone. A missed field goal killed our spirits, as well as an interception overturned due to a pentaly. We gave up the second half after all that.
That bieng said, i like our chances this year because of the intangibles. The underdog mentality. The old-school work ethic thats being talked about. The team being the star of the team quote from Richt. Tech will mean at least some pride to UGA this year, if not a whole lot more hopefully. I like the ok state countdown in the locker room and the GA/fl posters in the weight room. Look what effort can do: motivated lsu vs tech who had achieved all their goals (beat uga), pissed off uga defense against hard-nosed michigan state team, bama who couldn’t care less about some stupid sugar bowl in comparison to the national championship vs utah who was set on proving the world wrong or some chip they had placed on their own shoulder.
I like the attitude of hte team this year. I like the throwback vibe im getting. I’d take a pollack and green everyday over stafford. in this case, cox, atkins and curran.
by hotdawgin on Jun 22, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To put it plainly
Reshad Jones sucks.
by UgaBulldog14 on Jun 24, 2009 6:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How does he suck?
He was second team ALL SEC, lead the team in INTS, fumble recoveries,and was second in tackles.
by charlottedawg on Jun 24, 2009 8:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's always a matter of "what have you done for me lately?"
He was eleventh in tackles against Georgia Tech.
I’m not saying that’s fair, but, if you want to know why all the piling on Reshad, that’s why.
I will say, though, that, if there’s a position we as Georgia fans are harder on than wide receiver (seriously, we’ve forgiven any number of tailbacks for the sin of not being Herschel, but have we ever forgiven a receiver for the sin of not being Lindsay?), it’s defensive back.
We forget how difficult it is to be a defensive back, and how guys can come on strong at the position. Remember Bruce Thornton? He was picked on mercilessly by opposing offenses and run down at every turn by Georgia fans during his first year in the secondary. He looked lost out there, but he grew into the position and became good at his job. Prince Miller is a more recent example of a guy who has developed in the defensive backfield after a rough start.
Jones had an epicly awful outing, but, like every Bulldog in the wake of that particular loss, he gets more grief than he deserves.
Go 'Dawgs!
by T Kyle King on Jun 24, 2009 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 









