Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

Basically it was the last line of the Dr.'s first subject that got me thinking. If CMR/Evans are willing to do an neutral site game in Atlanta, why not try one in the Cotton Bowl? The deciding factor for us is not losing a home game; I can't help but think that one or two of the ten FBS teams in Texas alone would be willing to give up a home game for a Cotton Bowl match-up with us. It could do a lot more for recruiting than Atlanta -- one of our recent players came from that state, can't remember who it was . . . .

over 2 years ago Flowerchucker_tiny wwcmrd? 8 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Not a bad idea for any SEC team, really...

….schedule a neutral site game against a Texan mid-major (or a Big 12 team for the bold) and play it in the Cotton Bowl. With all the talent in Texas, it sure can’t hurt.

by Todd on Jun 18, 2009 10:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Georgia-TCU would be a nice matchup, and Patterson hasn’t shied away from scheduling tough non-conference games.

Team Speed Kills
SBNation's SEC Blog

by Year2 on Jun 19, 2009 9:25 AM EDT reply actions  

I love this idea...

Someone get in Evans’ ear about this. It seems pretty much like a win-win, unless we lose the game, but I think TCU is the only team I would be remotely worried about that would actually take the game. It could only help out our recruiting efforts in TX and since we took Stafford and made him the number 1 pick, I have to think we have some kind of base there already…lets expand it.

by Nicolae@UGA on Jun 19, 2009 11:15 AM EDT reply actions  

Don't go for TCU

I like the idea, but I think we should schedule the mad pirate, or maybe Texas A&M. First of all, scheduling TCU would be like a home game for them, since the Cotton Bowl is less than 40 miles from their campus, and is in the same metropolitan area (Dallas-Fort Worth). This isn’t a neutral site game, it’s a home game for TCU, and it’s unlikely that the athletic department would agree to such an arrangement without a return trip to Athens or (sigh) the Georgia Dome.

Second, I don’t necessarily think that Georgia would get positive PR from playing TCU. It would be just as likely that the media would portray the situation as Georgia “swooping into Texas to play a minnow and get some ‘pub’ in the process.” By comparison, the new Chick-Fil-A preseason bowl Classic has been so popular primarily because they’ve matched up big names from BCS conferences (Alabama, VT, Clemson), not because they’ve given Alabama a chance to solidify their beachhead in the state of Georgia. That model should be followed if we’re going to go play a neutral-site game in another state. Play a relatively good team from a BCS conference.

Third, and this is related to the second point, playing TCU is a no-win situation. If you win, then you’re a BCS bully beating up on a mid-major. If you lose, then it’s one of the biggest wins in the mid-major’s history, and you get a very public black eye that’s replayed on ESPN over and over, and in “instant classics” for years to come.

(On a tangential note, this is why I despised starting the season with Boise State in 2005. Although one can argue that starting the season with a good team contributed to the SEC championship season we had, it was still a no-win situation for Georgia. Georgia thoroughly dominated a good Boise team, but does anyone outside of the Bulldog faithful still remember that game? If the Broncos had won, however, it would still be talked about by misty-eyed talking heads as the “revenge of the mid-major” or some nonsense like that. Instead, however, Georgia squashed them, and still gets no credit for scheduling a difficult opponent.)

by vineyarddawg on Jun 19, 2009 12:00 PM EDT reply actions  

I remember the Boise game . . .

Because it was the first game I ever attended in Sanford Stadium. And no one remembers FCS openers, either, so at least we a stronger schedule with Boise.

I think the proximity for teams like TCU might be a good thing. Our central issue is not giving up a home game because of the Florida game in Jacksonville. If we’re looking to play in the Cotton Bowl, it might actually behoove us to find a team close by precisely because they might regard it as a home game. Of course they might have some sort of home field advantage, but I would think the economics of the deal would work better in our favor.

Leaving insightful football commentary and analysis to other people since 2006.

by wwcmrd? on Jun 19, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Home and "home"?

Why not schedule it like that for a TCU or TAMU? TCU’s stadium only holds about 45,000, I think, while the JerryDome holds 80,000. If it is really so close to their campus that it is a de facto home game, then why don’t we schedule a return date in Sanford. TCU is big enough that we would get some respect from beating them, they have beaten OU and/or TX recently have they not? They are also small enough that they may go for a deal like that because of the possible revenue and the chance to knock us off.

by Nicolae@UGA on Jun 19, 2009 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brilliant!!!!

I think playing any of the texas teams besides the Longhorns would be a great idea. I’m ok with whoever we play. Just getting the oppertunity to do so would be huge for recruiting and national exposure west of the Mississippi.

Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but only one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win.

I Corinthians 9:24

by Southern Dawg on Jun 19, 2009 1:30 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd like to put in a vote . . .

for SMU. They’re right there in Dallas, so there might be some homefield advantage, but the last time we played against June Jones’s offense it turned out pretty well. Plus I want Craig James in the booth so I can hear him rant about how this 41-10 loss wouldn’t have happened back in his day, when Eric Dickerson wiped his brow after practice with crisp fifty dollar bills. I can just see the folks from SMU’s administration cringing now . . .

In all seriousness, Texas A&M gives good value in a game like this. They may stink out loud right now, but they’re a traditional power and far enough away (about 3 hours by car, I think) that we might get some seats in the building too. Finally, Oklahoma State is about 4 1/2 hours away and has a few alums in the Lone Star state. They would have been a decent choice if we weren’t already going to Stillwater.

by MaconDawg on Jun 19, 2009 3:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.

Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

017oa_small MaconDawg

Editors

Redstage_small DavetheDawg

Whistling_past_small NCT

434477_small vineyarddawg

Layfield_logo_small RedCrake

Hey-why-so-serious_small tankertoad

Podunkdawg_as_a_child_small podunkdawg

Dawggone_small Ludakit

Authors

28488_443996218101_804558101_5903592_3665419_n_small Spears

Small hailtogeorgia

Killface_small Mr. Sanchez

50questions-accountant_small The Quincy Carter of Accountants