A Welcome College Football Comeback: The Restoration of the T Formation
This posting is a few days out of date, but I have been busy being contrary (and, to hear some people tell it, also running onstage at Britney Spears concerts), so I’m only just now getting to it.
Recently, War Eagle Atlanta listed several things that should make a comeback in college football, including the wishbone. While I am in favor of bringing back a venerable offensive scheme, I prefer to go a bit farther back than the ‘bone and pluck this from the dustbin of history:

That, my friends, is the T formation, so called because the quarterback lined up under center, the fullback lined up five yards directly behind the quarterback, and the halfbacks lined up in a row to the fullback’s left and right, thus forming the shape of the letter "T." (Already I’m partial to this formation, on account of our shared first initial.)
The T formation drove the single wing into obsolescence and opened up aerial attacks in the years in which the forward pass truly came into its own. For a while, the T formation dominated the game at all levels by enabling Minnesota to win five national championships, Oklahoma to go on a 47-game winning streak, and Chicago to win the 1940 N.F.L. championship game by a 73-0 margin that continues to be hailed in the Bears’ fight song: "We’ll never forget the way you thrilled the nation with your T formation."
The T formation, from which the wishbone later evolved, transformed the quarterback from a blocking back to the signal caller we know him as today. This seems rudimentary to us now, but, at the time, it was a novel idea to have the quarterback take the snap from under center and drop back so he could either pass or hand off to one of the running backs, who would have room to spot the hole and build up steam.
After Frank Sinkwich graduated and Charley Trippi entered the military, Wally Butts installed the T formation at Georgia in the mid-1940s and rode it to great success, including an undefeated season in 1946 and a 17-game winning streak from 1945 to 1947 that remains the longest such streak in Georgia football history. During that stretch, the Bulldogs twice beat Florida (34-0 in 1945 and 33-14 in 1946), twice beat Auburn (35-0 in 1945 and 41-0 in 1946), and twice beat Georgia Tech (33-0 in 1945 and 35-7 in 1946).

Coach Butts seldom gets his due today, but he was an offensive innovator whose passing attack yielded impressive results. (After installing the T formation in 1943, Coach Butts went 8-0-1 against the Plainsmen from 1944 to 1952. With all due respect to War Eagle Atlanta, I hate Auburn.) When the T formation gave way to the split T, Coach Butts adapted, but he insisted upon calling his version of the split T "the sliding T" because he, like Mike Leach years later, had installed wide line splits before it was in vogue. The "sliding" to which Coach Butts referred was the quarterback sliding along the line as he decided whether to keep the ball or pitch it, a maneuver which eventually gave way to the triple option.
When Vince Dooley became the head coach at Georgia, he often drew unfavorable comparisons to Coach Butts. Coach Butts introduced the silver britches; Coach Dooley changed the uniform to feature white pants instead. Coach Butts was an outgoing raconteur; Coach Dooley was aloof. Coach Butts ran a wide-open attack offering the option to run or pass from the Bulldogs’ base formation; Coach Dooley preferred to stick strictly to the ground game. The "run it between the tackles" approach that most of us think of as traditional Georgia football was, in fact, a stark departure from the sliding quarterback play and high-flying aerial assault of Coach Butts’s T formation.
In for a buck, in for a bundle, I say. If we’re going to do as War Eagle Atlanta suggests and go back as far as the wishbone, let’s go back a bit more and install the offensive scheme that gave birth to the ‘bone. If you’re looking for the approach that allowed the offense to run it between the tackles, pitch it out to the edge, and pass the ball effectively, we’ve got your formation right here in the Classic City.
That’s a formation with a capital "T" and that rhymes with "V" and that stands for "victory." At least, it did in some of the best days in the history of Georgia football.
Go ‘Dawgs!
9 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
For the benefit of anyone who disagrees with me on this one . . .
. . . imagine this backfield running the T:

Go 'Dawgs!
The return of the T formation and its variations...
… the Wishbone, the Flexbone, the Wing-T…
I like where this thread is going.
Great Post
Always love historical info about the Dawgs.
by knowshon loves legos on May 6, 2009 10:50 AM EDT reply actions
I'm in favor of something like this.
Especially with a running threat QB, and two pass catching TEs. Imagine this formation with Logan Gray at QB, Chapas, King or Samuel, Thomas, and Orson Charles & Aaron White. Figgins would be great also, but would have to catch a few balls first so as not to give away which TE is running a route or blocking. This seems like it could really confuse a defense, like the Dawgs were confused in 2004 by Auburn when they had Brown and Williams in the backfield simultaneously on every play.
by dawgdayafternoon on May 6, 2009 11:44 AM EDT reply actions
Mayor
take a look back at the 2006 Oklahoma/Alabama-Birmingham game.
UAB dusted off the full-house T and gave the OU defense FITS while running it.
UAB ran the fullhouse T a lot that season under Watson Brown.
I should also mention
the T, the split-T, the single wing, and the doublewing are run a lot in high schools in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Minnesota, and Ohio, places where power is emphasized more than speed at the high school level.
Excellent points, Beergut
With the spread being touted as “the great equalizer” that allows less talented teams to hang with more talented teams, it’s worthwhile to note where straight-up old-fashioned concepts (as opposed to updated ideas incorporated into latter-day innovations; e.g., the spread option) can be used with success.
For those who may have forgotten, U.A.B. lost to Oklahoma in Norman by a 24-17 final margin . . . in a year in which the Sooners won eleven games, captured the Big 12 crown, and lost an overtime thriller to Boise State in the Fiesta Bowl.
Go 'Dawgs!
and there was a disputed fumble in that game, too
that killed the momentum that UAB had.
t made their later crying about the officials in the Oregon loss ring hollow to some of us.

by 
















