Dawg Sports: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

Kyle Gets Contrary: The World's Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party, Erk Russell, and Why the Georgia Bulldogs Should Not Be Gutless Regarding the Florida Gators

I may not be a popular guy after this latest edition of "Kyle Gets Contrary," inasmuch as I have elected to tackle one of the more divisive issues in Bulldog Nation, but I have made clear my position on this issue before, so I hope those who take the opposite view will not mind my breaking out the big guns in support of my cause.

It has been noted more than once that Mark Richt favors moving the World’s Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party from Jacksonville. While I take a back seat to no fan in my high regard for Coach Richt, we part company on this issue, for reasons articulated by beloved former Georgia defensive coordinator Erskine Russell. Coach Russell wrote the following words in his autobiography, Erk: Football, Fans & Friends, which was published in 1991:

Georgia people feel that Jacksonville is a part of south Georgia and, of course, Florida people call Jacksonville their territory. In this setting, some mighty battles with most unusual and strange outcomes have taken place.

In the beginning, I thought Florida had a great home field advantage and Coach Eaves threatened to move the series to home-and-home because the Gators were allotted more tickets. When that was evened out, I was convinced Jacksonville was the place for the game and the series should remain there. I still feel that way.

To all those Georgia fans who feel the World’s Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party should move from Jacksonville, I have four questions:

  1. Since Erk Russell wrote those words, what about the Georgia-Florida series has changed, apart from numerous Bulldog losses having nothing to do with venue and everything to do with coaching, talent, and psychology?


  2. If nothing has changed aside from multiple Georgia losses at a neutral site where the ‘Dawgs once owned the Gators, how is the suggestion that we abandon Jacksonville to be interpreted as anything other than an act of cowardice and capitulation on the part of Bulldog Nation?


  3. If our withdrawal from the field of battle can be seen only as a retreat in the face of defeat, how will moving the game from Jacksonville accomplish anything other than emboldening an already confident enemy and providing grist with which to lure away our prospective recruits in South Georgia and North Florida to an opponent already possessing impressive recruiting acumen?


  4. Upon the basis of what credentials do you claim to possess a more authoritative opinion upon the subject of Georgia football than Erk Russell?

Go ‘Dawgs!

0 recs  |  Comment 57 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

1. Since Erk Russell wrote those words, what about the Georgia-Florida series has changed, apart from numerous Bulldog losses having nothing to do with venue and everything to do with coaching, talent, and psychology?

For lack of a better way to say it: Florida finally got its shit together. For years, Florida athletic department was bogged down in budget deficits, probation, and crappy facilities. As such, there was never any real sense of organization within their athletics. Obviously that has changed now. Dooley was coach at UGA for 25 years. During those 25 years, Florida went through 4 coaches, all of whom had a losing record to UGA. By turning over coaches every 5 years or so and then ending up on probation about once a decade, UF was never able to build any momentum in the series. Much like Yankee fans used to feel about the Red Sox: they knew that if they just played sound ball long enough, eventually the other team would blow it.

Florida used to play Auburn and UGA back to back with no bye week. That changed right around 1990. So did the dynamic of the series. With the divisional setup, everyone has forgotten how big of a rivalry that was. Florida basically had to play its two biggest conference rivals in consecutive weeks. UGA meanwhile usually had a bye prior to the Cocktail Party to get healthy.

To me, the game being in Jax has ALWAYS been a stupid idea. But, when you’re winning 2 out of 3 for 40 years, you get jaded to the stupidity of the idea and get in a habit of a fall holiday to go see friend and get drunk and have a 66% chance of not being disappointed. Now, playing our most important divisional rival 70 miles from their campus in a stadium formally named the Gator Bowl is just an advantage that UF doesn’t need.

Those days are gone and are not coming back. Since Dooley left, each school has had 3 head coaches. All three of UF’s have a winning record against UGA. Even when UF seems to make the type of mistake that would allow UGA to regain a foothold in the series (here’s looking at you Zooker), UF only lets the mistake stay 3 years as opposed to the 7 we gave Goff.

In short, what has changed is that Florida finally started living up to its potential. Now that it is, there is no shame in admitting that every other year we want a decided home-field advantage.

2. If nothing has changed aside from multiple Georgia losses at a neutral site where the ‘Dawgs once owned the Gators, how is the suggestion that we abandon Jacksonville to be interpreted as anything other than an act of cowardice and capitulation on the part of Bulldog Nation?

It’s funny, this is the EXACT same thing people said about Auburn when they finally got the balls to stop playing Alabama in B’ham every year. Since then, AU has a winning record against the Bammers and NO ONE says shit about that tradition ending.

Rational self-interest is not an act of cowardice. It’s common sense. ANY of our conference rivals can feel free to take our place in Jax. if they want to prove its not so hard to beat Florida down there. Let’s see if UT or LSU or anyone else jumps at the opportunity to be UF’s new cocktail date. If no one does, then they can STFU about cowardice.

3. If our withdrawal from the field of battle can be seen only as a retreat in the face of defeat, how will moving the game from Jacksonville accomplish anything other than emboldening an already confident enemy and providing grist with which to lure away our prospective recruits in South Georgia and North Florida to an opponent already possessing impressive recruiting acumen?

If we played USC in Augusta every year, would that help them recruit in GA, or would they still be viewed as losers since we beat them 4 out of every 5 years? UF is a recruiting machine with enough in-state talent that they don’t have to venture out of state at all to be a Top 5 program.

If we go head to head w/ UF on a South GA prospect, then I think UF’s "Georgia is our bitch" pitch would be stronger than UGA’s "We play one game a year in Jax so your family have a short trip to come watch you lose" option.

4. Upon the basis of what credentials do you claim to possess a more authoritative opinion upon the subject of Georgia football than Erk Russell?

None at all, but I’ll see your Erk and raise you a Bear: "That place down there(UF) is a sleeping giant. When they ever find the right coach, the rest of us are going to be playing for 2nd place. Nobody will beat ‘em."

Going back to #1, Bear was basically saying that once UF gets its shit together, they are going to be a machine. Spurrier came in and changed everything and as witnessed by firing Zook after 3 years, they are not going to be stupid enough to let some other coach run the program into the ground. Any advantage you can get, even if it is as small as a home game every other year, is a good thing.

by UgaMatt on May 4, 2009 9:19 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Couldn't have said it better myself.

We used to beat them so much because they were bad. Now we’re on a much more even playing field and ANY advantage can decide a game. The talent is even, I would argue that the coaching is mostly even, and the psychology….well, has it ever occurred to anyone that maybe getting our asses handed to us year after year in the same location could have something to do with that as well? I know this has been said a million times but the definition of insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results.

And I think the whole idea of being seen as cowards is silly. I honestly couldn’t care less what a Florida fan thought of me or my school.

by DawgGirl32 on May 4, 2009 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nicely done, UgaMatt

We still see it differently, but you argue your point forcefully and well. Good job.

I would pose a follow-up question, though:

Given (1) the results of the last two series meetings played on campus (in Gainesville in 1994 and in Athens in 1995), (2) the psychological advantage that the Gators now enjoy merely by virtue of being the Gators (as evidenced by the Diamond Dogs’ utter collapse against the Saurians at Foley Field this past weekend), and (3) the fact that Mark Richt has a higher winning percentage on the road than at home, what benefit do you believe would be derived from playing the game in Sanford Stadium every other year?

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 4, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Kyle. As for your follow up: 1.) I tend to discount that mid 90’s home and home much more than other people do. The talent levels between the two programs just wasn’t comparable at all. Consider: in 94, UF beat Tennessee in Knoxville 31-0 and in 95 beat UT 62-37. Those beatdowns were at least comparable, if not worse, than the whippings Spurrier laid on us and the talent gap between UGA and UT was pretty substantial too. 2.) I have no answer. UF is in our athletic department’s head from top to bottom and there’s no denying. Suzanne is the only one that seemed to have the attitude it took to deal with them and she’s leaving us. 3.) It is true that Richt has been better on the road than at home, but Meyer has been MUCH better at home than on the road. UF is a different beast in G’ville, but LSU has beaten Meyer twice at home, Auburn once, Alabama once, and USC once. Sadly, I don’t know that our home field advantage is better than any of those schools, but I think for UF it would be.

by UgaMatt on May 4, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

#3

Maybe I’m calculating wrong, but the numbers here give me this:

Home: .804
Road (Not including neutral site games): .882

His record in Jacksonville: .250
Road Record (Including games played in Jax): .762

If your third point assumes that the Cocktail Party is a road game like any other for Richt, I’d question that assumption. His road record is less impressive (and lower than his home record) when the Jax games are included.

On the other hand, both records, Home and Opponent Stadium, are both a heck of a lot better than his current 2-6 ledger in Jacksonville.

I don’t really have a Dawg in the fight, having never attended a game in Jax, but I do think that it’s clear that there is no disadvantage for Florida playing there, and there is a significant disadvantage for us. Why not just even the scales so there’s a disadvantage for each road team visiting the opponent’s stadium?

As for recruiting . . . it’s not as if we would lose all presence in Florida if we stopped playing in Jax, since we’d play there every other year anyway. I think a single upset in Gainesville would do a heck of a lot more for our recruiting than guaranteed yearly beatdown in Jacksonville. If we can pluck the #3 QB in the country out from under the clutches of The Li’l Ball Corch in our present state, I don’t see any way that moving the game to Gainesville every other year will hurt things.

Leaving insightful football commentary and analysis to other people since 2006.

by wwcmrd? on May 4, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why is it "clear" that "there is a significant disadvantage for us"?

We have a winning record against Florida in Jacksonville, after all, and we won there regularly in an era in which Florida got more than half the tickets.

Why is a “yearly beatdown in Jacksonville” “guaranteed”? With the exception of the last two seasons, the last several series meetings have been exceedingly close (20-13 in 2002, 16-13 in 2003, 31-24 in 2004, 14-10 in 2005, and 21-14 in 2006, if memory serves) and Georgia has won in Jacksonville twice in the last five tries, with only one of the losses since 2001 being in any sense a beatdown.

Which game(s) do you contend would have turned out differently in Athens? Would Terrence Edwards have caught the third down pass? Would D.J. Shockley not have missed a game to injury? Would the Gators not have recovered a fumble and returned it for a touchdown?

Once again, I thank you for your comment and I appreciate your participation in the conversation, but I wanted to pose a few follow-up questions in order to flesh out your position further. Much obliged, wwcmrd?

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 4, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most of us just don't take the long view . . .

. . . And saying we have the all-time winning record against Florida in Jacksonville doesn’t mean as much when our recent record is 3-16. I think UgaMatt brought up a great point: things are a lot different now. When Erk said what he did, Florida had zero National Championships. Now they have three.

Is it clear that we have a disadvantage? When there is such a discrepancy between Richt’s performance in Jacksonville and everywhere else, I think so. Is the discrepancy present simply because we’re playing Florida, or Florida under the Meyers Regime? I don’t think our sample size is big enough to tell. The next couple seasons could show us a lot in that regard.

Again, this is an issue I have no strong feelings on, so I took the opposing stance to be, well, contrary (anti-contrary? trary?). Honestly I like the fact that we have a yearly neutral site game with recognized history in the college football world. However, we need to come to grips with the fact that Florida is, at least for the foreseeable future, a Top Tier football program. Our success as a program in the SEC East is going to be measured, fairly or not, in part by our success against Florida. That’s the reality. So while why I’m not sure that moving the game would give us a discernible advantage . . . if it does, that advantage needs to be utilized.

Leaving insightful football commentary and analysis to other people since 2006.

by wwcmrd? on May 4, 2009 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like your comment about the "fairly or not"

This was one of the things that dogged Peyton Manning until he won his Super Bowl a few years ago. The fact that he never beat Florida in his four tries translated into “he can’t win the big one”. Although everyone piles on Peyton for that era, everyone forgets that there weren’t a whole lot of teams that did beat Florida from 1994-1997. I worry that these continuous pyschological meltdowns in Jacksonville are going to define Georgia under Mark Richt as “pretty good, but couldn’t hang with the elite”.

I’ve also believed that Georgia has been a few lucky breaks away from playing for a national title, particularly in 2002, that have seemed to go the way of Florida and LSU in recent years (i.e. UGA goes 13-1 in 2002 with a loss to Florida, doesn’t play for national title. LSU goes 13-1 in 2003 with a loss to Florida, wins national title). I sincerely believe that if we start beating Florida more often those lucky breaks will start happening. Like it or not, you should be measured by how you perform against the best and right now the best in the SEC clearly reside in Gainesville.

http://hobnailboot.wordpress.com/

by AuditDawg on May 4, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed . . .

. . . which is why I worry that we’re failing to fight the real enemy here.

Let’s say we move the game and, in the first Georgia-Florida game in Athens after the Jacksonville tradition is ended, we don’t pull an Auburn ‘89, but, instead, lose. It doesn’t matter how we lose, whether in a heartbreaker or a blowout. If we lose, what then? What’s the excuse at that point? If that happens, is there even the remotest chance we don’t get run right out of the building in the Swamp the following year?

I’m as superstitious as the next fan, but, at the end of the day, it’s about blocking, tackling, planning, coaching, executing, and believing. I’ve said for years that, if we could convince the Gators to come out of the tunnel dressed as Tennessee, we’d beat them 50 per cent of the time . . . in the same way that Georgia Tech would beat Georgia 50 per cent of the time if they could convince the ’Dawgs to come out of the tunnel dressed as Miami or Clemson.

We long ago quit playing the guy in the jersey and started playing the name on the jersey. Until we get past that and accept the fact that all rivalries are cyclical (Georgia was 15-4 over Florida from 1971 to 1989, but, when Steve Spurrier returned to Gainesville and infused the Gator program with confidence, he immediately started winning big; it didn’t take a couple or three recruiting classes for him to do it), we’re going to keep using Jacksonville as an excuse, and we’re going to keep losing there.

How many times has Georgia gone into Jacksonville as the more confident team since 1992? By my count, it has happened three times: 1997, 2004, and 2007. We’re 3-0 when we actually think we can win and quit wetting ourselves the first time we see the orange helmets or see the fans in the stands start doing the chomp with their hands.

Plan like you believe. Practice like you believe. Play like you believe. Cheer like you believe. Believe.

If 52-0 and 75-0 and 51-0 and 49-7 and 44-0 didn’t convince you, didn’t 42-30 at least mean something? The first time the Gators were ranked No. 1 in the history of their program, they lost to the Bulldogs by three touchdowns the following Saturday. The season Steve Spurrier won the Heisman Trophy, the Georgia D shut him down.

Long before Terrence Edwards dropped the ball, Richard Appleby pulled up on an end-around and completed an 80-yard touchdown pass to Gene Washington. Long before D.J. Shockley was injured for one game, Ray Goff accounted for five touchdowns in a second-half rout. Long before a fumble recovery allowed the Gators to claim a national title, a Chan Gailey fumble allowed the Red and Black to kick a game-winning field goal. The greatest play in Georgia football history beat Florida to clinch a national championship. How many miracles must Bulldog Nation witness firsthand before the doubting Thomases of the Peach State believe?

Oh, we of little faith.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 4, 2009 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta believe...

Kyle, while we disagree on Jax., we are in total agreement on the lack of confidence UGA exhibits against UF. As you’ve probably guessed, I have a theory on that: during the first part of this awful streak, all the confidence in the world wouldn’t have mattered, Spurrier had more talent and could coach circles around Goff after a 4 day bender. But, since the talent gap closed, our lack of confidence has become more evident. I think ( and I might do an entire post on this on my blog) that a big part of our lack of confidence is because we haven’t settled on a style of play that we think we can beat Florida with. It’s like we can’t decide if we want to try to play a low scoring game, or try to score with them, or keep it close and try to win late, or just try to blow past them, or anything consistently. As much as you hate Auburn, I have to give them credit that when they play Florida, they have the same plan every time: beat them up at the line of scrimmage and run the ball. While other teams get sucked into spreading it out against Florida, Auburn wants to play them in a phone booth. I hate them too, but I think Auburn has the blueprint. Rarely are we(or anyone else) ever going to have a skill player advantage over UF. You have to beat them by controlling the line of scrimmage and making them get their uniforms dirty.

by UgaMatt on May 4, 2009 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Upon this point, UgaMatt . . .

. . . we are in absolute agreement, and, while opinions are sharply divided upon the Jacksonville question, I know that the view held by every citizen of Bulldog Nation is rooted in that fan’s belief about what will best serve the goal of getting back to beating the Gators on a regular basis.

Maybe what we need is for Steve Spurrier to speak up the week before we play Florida and say we aren’t man enough to beat his alma mater. Maybe that would do the trick!

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 4, 2009 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know about Georgia’s confidence level, but there wasn’t much from the Florida side in ’02 and ’03.

by Year2 on May 5, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most definitely

Last time I checked, the football field in Jacksonville Municipal Stadium is 360 feet long by 160 feet wide. Those are the same exact dimensions as the fields at Sanford Stadium and the fields at Florida Field. There is no inherent advantage by playing at one of these three venues as each field is uniform.

What must be fixed is what is going on between men clad in red and black’s ears. Until we start to believe that we should beat Florida and quit tucking our proverbial tails between our legs anytime the least bit of adversity occurs, we will never change this series no matter whether it is played in Athens, Gainesville, Jacksonsville, Atlanta, or even the damn Moon.

You said it earlier that we are not losing because Florida coaches are running circles around ours anymore, as was the case from 1990-2001; or that the talent gap on the Florida sideline is any superior to ours, as was the case from about 1993-1998. We are losing these games only because it’s Florida on the other sideline. I guarantee you if it were Auburn, Tennessee, South Carolina, or even Alabama that we faced every year in Jacksonville, there’s no way the record would be as lopsided. We’ve got to get over that pyschological hump that years of Spurrier jabs and fourth quarter passes when the games were way out of hand have done to our collective pysche. Only then will we start beating Florida again, whether it be Jacksonville, Atlanta, or home and home.

I sincerely thought the celebration in 2007 was the thing that had to happen to show that we weren’t afraid of those guys and I thought things would be different going forward. But last year showed us that they are still in our heads, and until we correct that, we will never consistently beat Florida.

http://hobnailboot.wordpress.com/

by AuditDawg on May 5, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You had me at Erk

Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but only one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win.

I Corinthians 9:24

by Southern Dawg on May 4, 2009 10:48 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Jax

The location is kind of what makes the game special – as opposed to being just another rivalry game. Everyone on both sides knows that Jax is sort of a hole, but I would still prefer alternating years in Jax and Atlanta, while maintaining the “neutral” site and even ticket division over changing it to just another campus and campus game.

by skigator93 on May 4, 2009 11:05 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Not only do I see no reason to change the location of the game, but I feel very strongly that the game should remain in Jacksonville every year, for the following reasons.

1) Fan base: Kyle has mentioned this argument several times in the past, but outside of Atlanta, the majority of the Bulldog nation resides just as close, if not closer, to Jacksonville as they are to Athens. The Jacksonville game is literally south Georgia’s backyard, and recruits that live in south Georgia and North Florida have a lot more exposure to this game and the magnitude of it than any other. In addition, the largest Georgia Bulldog Club outside of Atlanta is the Jacksonville Bulldog Club. This is not a coincidence.

2) Popularity: One of the oldest trends to become “new” again is the scheduling of neutral site games. Missou/Kansas in St. Louis, Bama/Clemson & VPI in the Dome and FSU in Jax, and Colorado/CSU at Mile High Stadium are just a few examples. People seem to be starting to wake up to the additional exposure that playing in a different location brings. One of the reasons the Red River Shootout and the World’s Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party All-American Non-Alcoholic Box Social are so heavily covered by the sports media is that they are the oldest neutral site rivalries still being contested. The uniqueness of a bowl-game setting in the middle of the season, with schools receiving equal distribution of tickets and surrounded by a week-long party atmosphere, is very appealing to the talking heads at ESPN and CBS Sports. You know that when you show up, the party will have already started, it will be in full swing, and you’ll be able to get some high-quality jorts shots for later posting on the internet. And let’s not forget that, since the almighty dollar rules in modern college athletics, that more media exposure means more $$$. As long as neutral sights are trendy again, that reason alone should be enough to prevent either Georgia or Florida from even considering a change of venue.

3) Tradition: The Georgia/Florida game has been played in Jacksonville every year since 1933, save twice. With all the history of the Jacksonville site, combined with very nice facilities and an acceptable seating capacity (vis a vis both Sanford Stadium and Ben Hill Griffin Stadium), I see no compelling reason to move to another location.

Finally, I do not think the series should ever be moved to Atlanta. First, the proposals that now seem to be gaining support are the ones that prescribe a 2&1 system, with 2 games in Jax and 1 in Atlanta. If the game is being moved ostensibly because of Florida’s home-field advantage, would this not continue to propagate that advantage? Second, moving to a 1 and 1 alternating system would merely be a silly excuse for what proponents of this strategy really want, and that’s a home-and-home system. If you want UGA to have a home-field advantage, play the game in Sanford Stadium.

As for me and mine, however, we will continue to make the annual trek down to Jacksonville, and will continue loving it.

by vineyarddawg on May 4, 2009 1:15 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Second Site?

I can see both sides of the issue. I think what I’d really like to see is a series that alternated between two neutral sites, one in Florida and one in Georgia. Unfortunately, the only stadium I know of in Georgia that could fill that role is the Georgia Dome, and even though I’m a big Falcons fan, I hate the friggin’ Georgia Dome. It’s ugly inside and out, it’s small compared to Sanford, and it has a non-retractable roof with artificial turf. Football was meant to be played outside, in the sun, in the elements. Domed stadiums are an offense to nature.

So, the way I see it, staying in Jacksonville is preferable to occasionally playing in the Dome. Now, if some T. Boone-esque investor wanted to build a nice stadium in, I don’t know, Savannah or something, I’d be all over that.

by wesgiglio on May 4, 2009 1:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Domes?
Domed stadiums are an offense to nature.

It may be somewhat irrelevant for you SEC folks, but spend a winter or two in Syracuse, and I think you’d change your mind on this…

by drothgery on May 4, 2009 5:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Fair point

How ’bout if we add a caveat: “Where natural grass is possible, natural grass is obligatory.”

I would point out, though, that they play football outdoors in Buffalo, Green Bay, and Foxboro (or wherever it is the Patriots play). . . .

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 4, 2009 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It has been pretty chilly the past fews years at the SECCG

The Dome is nice on early December nights. Now, there is no argument here that a retractable roof would be really useful for October Falcons games when it’s 65 and sunny out.

by skigator93 on May 4, 2009 11:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

First Post

First off, I would like to mention that this is my first post, comment, or any other post on a blog, message board, or any other internet medium. I hope this goes well. I would like to point out that I really enjoy this site. I love the issues discussed and the creative and intelligent manner they are discussed. I have decided to stop reading and make a comment because you guys look like you have so much fun doing it and the discussion is thought provoking and interesting. I am a UF grad and an unhealthy fan like you guys. I try to be as unbiased as possible. I hope I am not overstepping my boundaries by posting a comment on this board.

If I were Richt, I would want to bring this series to straight home & home in Athens/Gainesville each year. This is not because I believe that we have such a tremendous home field advantage in Jacksonville. I agree with Kyle that our home field advantage is minimal, if any. However, like UGAMatt, I think that if I were a Dawg, I would want to bring it back home for tactical purposes.

Ever since 04, I think this entire complexion of this series changed, and the Gator dominance has subsided a little. This has been a result of Richt and UGA evening the talent gap with UF since from the 90. Since his arrival, Richt has gotten significantly better in bringing in talent and improving this program. You guys discuss all of the time that 05 was a fluke, and I will agree with that. Shockley plays that game, we lose. That would have been two in a row. We were better in 06, you guys were better in 07. 08 got away from you early and you couldn’t recover. We were more prepared and you guys expected to win based on the 07 result and the thrashing of LSU the week before. However, it’s hard to convince anyone that after the 07 game, your guys came into the 08 game scared and psychologically afraid of us. Our psychological advantage came during the game when the UGA players realized they ran into a buzzsaw that they were not prepared for. The Dawgs will never be that unprepared again going into this game, and they will never take a previous year’s result for granted.

The 02 & 03 games were clear cases of you guys psyching yourselves out because of UF’s domination in the 90s. Richt had just begun his tenure and felt the pressure of the UGA drought against the Gators. In my opinion, those were the last two years of any Gator psychological advantage in this series. It is evening out and 07 & 08 is evidence of that. Richt continues to bring the UGA program to higher levels. In addition to owning the state of Georgia, he is bringing in more out of state blue chippers than ever before. It is inevitable that, eventually and sooner rather than later, the Dawgs will start winning games in this matchup on a more consistent basis.

Wwwcmrd stated that UGA’s "success as a program in the SEC East is going to be measured, fairly or not, in part by our success against Florida." This is correct, although not entirely true. During the Spurrier era, UGA was not measured by its success against Florida head to head. On paper, the actual game rarely meant much for you guys; like us before the 90s, you were mediocre most of the time. The game wasn’t the measuring stick. It was actually your fans, alumni and administration comparing the direction of UGA program to the direction of ours. Our success coupled with your mediocrity was the telltale sign of how far you guys had fallen. The losses were salt in your wounds.

All of Richt’s successes and failures have a direct correlation to UF. Richt felt the pressure from the beginning to beat the Gators and end the head-to-head drought. For the most part he hasn’t been able to do that consistently in terms of the head-to-head matchup; however, he has been able to bring the program back to being a power. But ironically, Richt’s head-to-head games didn’t really end up meaning anything in terms of the division until 07,08. Before then, Richt’s success in the Florida game did not dictate the final outcome in the east. We defeated you guys in 02, 03, & 05 and you still managed to win the division.

But 07 & 08 were not flukes; they were results of how even our programs have become. UGAMatt is right: ttalent gap, coaching staffs, recruiting power on both sides are more powerful than ever before. In 09 we will probably be better (but not by much), in ’10 you guys will probably be better (but not by much) and so on and so on. The actual head-to-head matchup will be more important than ever for both teams. Richt knows this. He has been both haunted by Florida and had is greatest joys and pleasures against Florida. But he has also seen fans, media and other undermine his past successes when he loses to Florida. Every loss is followed by discussion of the failures of the past. UF has dictated his life, thoughts, dreams, and nightmares from the very beginning. Of course he wants out of Jacksonville. Not because he doesn’t think he can win, not because he thinks it’s an advantage for Florida, but because it gives no advantage to either team due to its neutrality. He wants an advantage for these upcoming games which will have unprecedented value for him and the program. He wants to be able to assure himself that every other year he will be able to walk into the game knowing that he has a tremendous asset on his side. The losses would be easier to swallow in the Swamp, and wins so much sweeter with 80,000 plus going wild in Athens.

Sometimes the tactical move may also be the "cowardly" move. We discontinued the Miami rivalry because we knew that we could get away with competing for the championship without playing them. That same rationale allows us to get away with scheduling cupcake after cupcake for our first two games. People call us cowardly and maybe it is. But we have three championships, none of which were any result of "showing guts" by scheduling a tough OOC game to start the season.

We are turning into what will likely be the most exciting, gut wrenching, hate-filled, intense, and important decade of this rivalry. Our programs are at their highest peaks and will likely be for a while. It’s pretty reasonable that Coach Richt wants to change the landscape. If I were him, I would want to as well.

by RationalGator on May 5, 2009 12:55 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Thanks, RationalGator

Well done. I hope you will continue to visit and comment often.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 5, 2009 7:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My $.02

Jesus, I picked a good day to randomly cruise some blogs I haven’t looked at for a few months at 1.30 in the morning…

1. @RationalGator If that is your 1st ever comment, then you need to start jumping in the pool more often. Outstanding first effort. And further kudos for your attitude & tone: it takes a man to come up in his enemy’s house and be rational, dignified, intelligent, and respectful, and I salute you for it and only hope that the UGA people that frequent these parts show you the same courtesy.

2. I completely agree with UGAMatt on this, and I don’t think that I could have argued “my side” of the debate any better than he did. Outstanding stuff. I would only add that I have been to the Cocktail Party 6 times {92, 93, 96, 98, 99, 2000} as well as the 2 home & home games in 94 & 95, and although all 8 of those games were losses, and the final 6 of those 8 were blowout losses, I firmly believe from my own experiences that home and home is better, and that is saying something when you consider that I spent a weekend in Gainesville freaking Florida to watch us lose 52-14 and then the following year watched Spurrier go out of his way to be 1st visiting coach to hang 50 on us in our house in 1995 {52-17}. But I will say, in all of my years going to games at Sanford {1992-2008}, the loudest, most jacked up, most jampacked, and most excitedly fervent crowd I have ever seen at Sanford was the crowd in the hour before kickoff for that 95 home game to Florida*, which speaks volumes when you consider that we were a 5-3 team that went on to finish 6-6 and were massive, massive underdogs at home to a top 3 Florida team that was 6-0 {smallest margin of victory 11, avg margin of victory 23} and went undefeated and played in the national championship that year.

*Note, I was not at the “Blackout Game” home to Auburn in 2007, which was according to legend the craziest Sanford has ever been in the opinion of many of my friends who were there.

3. I hate to read 20 paragraphs of anyone’s writing and then nitpick a few selected bits, but Kyle, you really are having selective memory re: we’re 3-0 when we go in more confident than UF. You know I love & respect you, Mayor, but in all due respect this is patently false in 2 different ways:

a. It is total and complete revisionist history on the part of any UGA fan to say that we went into 1997 more confident than Florida. We were 14 point underdogs. Florida was massively favored and expected to win by their fans, neutrals, and a significant portion of our fans. Yes, our confidence boosted when Hines Ward returned the opening kickoff 50+ yards, and it grew & grew as Robert Edwards had the day of his life, but that was after the game had started, not going in. To say that “we” went into that game more confident than Florida is simply looking back at history with the rose colored glasses and misty eyes. Or as the Brits call it: bollocks, taking the piss, or rubbish.

On the flip side of the coin, it is truly selective memory to leave out 2002, where indeed we went in more confident than Florida. We were undefeated and I believe ranked #4 in the country; also, if I remember correctly both Notre Dame & Va Tech lost earlier that day, and we knew going in that if we won we would likely be ranked #1 {I have a foggy memory of saying this to someone’s voicemail from The Mirage lobby before the game, and could definitely be wrong}, not to mention the fact that a win would clinch Georgia’s first SEC East title, and first title of any kind since 1982 {20 years!}. I do know for a fact that we we’re favored by 1.5 because I was in Las Vegas for the game and remember being so confident and bullish that the line was actually too low and it was easy money and I put a big bet on UGA {and I am the guy who usually goes out of my way to NOT wager on UGA games because I tend to fail at analyzing them in an completely unbiased way. On the other hand, I was probably drunk}. This being the 1.5 pt favorite was in an of itself a massive confidence factor for both team and fans, as it was the first time since 92/93 {10 years!} that we were seen as anything approaching even with or better than UF: 97 we were +14{14 point underdogs}, 98 +11, 99 +14, 2000 +9, 2001 +19, and had lost each of the prior 4 games by double digits. We were 8-0 and thinking national title; Florida was 5-3. There was a general feeling amongst all Dawg fans that THIS WAS THE YEAR, and we were most certainly extremely confident only to see it fall apart with the 2 missed Bennett field goals, the fumbles, and coming from 13-12 up to lose 20-13. It was an amazing letdown. Why? Because we were so confident.

I hate to be a dick and pick out one little thing to correct/criticize when the rest is well written, but I couldn’t let that go cause it just is not true that we are 3-0 when we allegedly go in more confident.

4. Holy shit what a concise post TKK! Perhaps this recent opening of the mind and timid toe dip into the Twitter pool is having subconscious effects?

Good stuff all of y’all. And respek and welcome to RationalGator. Be kind to him- intelligent, reasonable dialogue is so much better than inane juvenile vitriol, and is one of the reasons that reasonable people frequent places like this.

Oh, and TKK:

5. No more of this I don’t cross the Mason-Dixon or MIssisippi River shit: October 2, 2010. Boulder, Colorado. Your ass better be there. You missed ASU and of course got a pass with the new addition to the family. But I am hereby putting you on notice and giving you a 16 month head start to start saving the change in the couch cushions, sort out your personal affairs and schedule, and the like. MAKE THE MAGIC HAPPEN; the first 3 beverages of your choice are on me.

Take care and be well {hell, it may be another 3 months before I’m back in here…}

by Kanu on May 5, 2009 5:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Damn; sorry about the bold...

… I have no idea what happened there.

Probably something to do with the fact that it is 2.39 am and my ass should have been in bed 4 hours ago…

by Kanu on May 5, 2009 5:40 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Home-and-home

I would argue that there should be, in principle, no neutral site games in college football outside of the bowls. I say this because I believe that the University should maintain as much control over the game/experience as possible and that it’s control of the program is eroded when it agrees to participate in neutral site games.

However, realizing the financial realities of hosting/traveling, if it makes sense economically (IOW, if we can bleed Jax to make it financially interesting for us) we should continue with many strings attached.

All the arguments about competitiveness, etc. can’t be verified in any real way. It’s all speculation.

HBTD

by Gen. Stoopnagle on May 5, 2009 12:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Neutrality or not...

I don’t think we should move the game. Not that my opinion matters, but there are a few points that I just don’t understand. They are as follows:

1. Home Field Advantage Mindset. This is the one I consider to be the most important. If we are ever going to be expected to win “the big one”, we need to forget this idea that we are at a disadvantage by playing in Florida. In all honesty, who cares? Do I want my team to blame (yet) another loss to Florida, in Jacksonville, on the possibility that there might be somewhat of an advantage to Florida because their school is closer to Jacksonville? Absolutely not. This entire idea is preposterous. I want my team to have a mindset of “anywhere, anytime”. I want them to go into every game with a chip on its shoulder and an attitude of “We will whip you on your front porch, on your back porch, in your living room, and, given Mark Richt’s propensity for away victories, most certainly in your backyard.” Correct me if I’m wrong, but Mark Richt has won in every other stadium in the SEC (other than Ben Hill Griffin Stadium at Florida Field, of course). He’s won in Tempe, he’s won in Atlanta, he’s won in Clemson. These were all victories with decided disadvantages. Enough with the talk of Jacksonville being a disadvantage. Let’s quit with the excuses. Man up and play the game.

2. Victory is Sweeter. Would a victory over Florida in Athens or Gainesville be nicer than a victory in Jacksonville? I don’t know, but I find it hard to believe that it is possible to feel any more satisfied in Athens or Gainesville on a saturday night after beating the gators than I felt in Jacksonville, St. Simon’s, or in my living room. Victory over Florida is sweet, regardless of where you happen to find yourself.
       I will mention, however, that I do not think losing to Florida would be quite the same. Losing to the Gators in Gainesville would be bad. Losing to the Gators in Jacksonville is bad. Losing to the Gators in Atlanta would be almost unbearable. Losing to the Gators between the hedges in Athens, Georgia, and knowing that screaming Florida fans were going to trash my city from Hancock to Thomas, from Dougherty all the way down to Pinecrest…would certainly be grounds for suicide. This brings me to my last point,

3. Recruiting. Losing to Florida in Jacksonville doesn’t look good for recruiting. However, aside from losing in Gainesville, I think we are suffering fairly minimally in the recruiting sphere. Florida is Florida, and they will recruit Florida better than any other team in Florida. They won four national championships in the last four years between football and basketball. They don’t need much help. However, if they came into Atlanta or Athens and beat the brakes off of us, they are going to take a decided piece of the pie. I would prefer for Georgia high school players to never see Florida play a game in the Peach State. I definitely don’t want to guarantee that it happens every other year.

by hailtogeorgia on May 5, 2009 1:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

One important thing to remember

I’m 21, the same age as many players on the team. In my lifetime, Georgia has only beaten Florida five times. You can tell the players about Appleby to Washington, Belue to Scott, Chan Gailey’s fumble, or the 1985 game all you want, but it won’t help for two reasons:

1. All those great moments happened before Florida became Florida. All of this happened before Spurrier, Meyer, Foley, and the three national titles. So, saying that we beat them in Jacksonville back then isn’t really a strong argument. Florida became a powerhouse in the 90s, and they will remain a powerhouse for some time.

2. As mentioned before, almost all the players are around my age. You can’t draw confidence from the past if you weren’t alive to see it. People my age don’t remember Appleby to Washington or Lindsay Scott. However, we vividly remember Terrence Edwards dropping a wide open pass that would have gone for a touchdown, Shockley’s injury, and some freshman named Chris Leak leading his team down the field to kick a game-winning field goal. Jacksonville, has never really been anything other than a house of horrors for Bulldogs of my vintage, and that has to be somewhere deep in the recesses of the minds of all those on the team.

Kyle, as for your argument that it isn’t clear that we have a disadvantage in Jacksonville, please show me where it is clear that we aren’t at a disadvantage by playing there. It may indeed be that Florida is just that much better than us, and we’re destined to be their bitch from here on out no matter where we play, but, if you’ll pardon the ad ignorantiam, we’ll never know unless we find out.

Sic 'em Dawgs

by ClassicCityDawg on May 5, 2009 2:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Then why do they win?

The Florida Gators who took the field in 1990 were in exactly the same situation as the Georgia Bulldogs who took the field in 2008.

From 1971 to 1989, the Red and Black were 15-4 over the Orange and Blue. It was meaningless to talk to Gator players about a storied past in which Florida dominated Georgia in the ’50s and ’60s; that was back when Ray Graves was coaching in Gainesville and Wally Butts (during his lean later years) and Johnny Griffith were coaching in Athens.

That dynamic began to change when Vince Dooley took over at Georgia in 1964 and Doug Dickey took over at Florida in 1970. Coach Dooley built a powerhouse in Athens, one that snatched an S.E.C. championship from the Gators’ grasp in 1966, won another in 1968 after blasting Florida 51-0, won another in 1976 after roaring back from a 27-13 halftime deficit to win going away in Jacksonville, won three in a row from 1980 to 1982, captured one national title, and played for another.

In 1990, there was no way to convince the Gators that they could play with the ‘Dawgs. They had no memory of Steve Spurrier’s last-minute touchdown pass to beat Georgia in 1965; they knew only of Buck Belue’s last-minute touchdown pass to beat Florida in 1980. Heck, the Gators had been ranked No. 1 just five years before, and they couldn’t beat Georgia even as the top team in the land!

Jacksonville had never really been anything other than a house of horrors for Gators of their vintage, and that had to be somewhere deep in the recesses of the minds of all those on the 1990 Florida team. Anyone who argued that the Gators didn’t have a disadvantage in Jacksonville, just across the border from Georgia and site of the largest Bulldog Club outside of Atlanta, had a responsibility to show how Florida would ever win there.

And yet . . .

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 5, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Last post, promise!

Hey Kyle,

If you have 57 minutes, you might want to check this out if you haven’t seen it already:

http://www.jaman.com/now-playing/?videoID=0Qjt7T1tMtug

Towards the end, it gets to the Spurrier years and two things are made very clear from Spurriers perspective: 1) beating UGA was an absolute necessity if Florida was ever going to win any titles, and 2) UGA was absolutely stupid for playing in Jacksonville every year. He goes on to say that Florida would never play Georgia every year in Atlanta in a stadium called the Bulldog Bowl and not think that UGA had a psychological advantage.

If I could add an addendum to my “What changed?” diatribe, it would be that Spurrier made beating UGA the absolute key to the Florida program. Maybe because we had 20 years of success against them or maybe because Auburn took us to the woodshed for the second half of the 80s and we were more focused on them (I know you hate Auburn), but for whatever reason—I don’t know that we realized that Spurrier meant business when it came to beating (and humiliating) UGA until it was too late.

by UgaMatt on May 5, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Spurrier had a personal vendetta from his playing days, specifically the loss in his senior year that knocked UF from the national title game. Plus, back then Tennessee and FSU weren’t really Florida’s rivals yet, so UGA was the biggest game every year. That’s why he prioritized beating Georgia.

by Year2 on May 5, 2009 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you guys are overthinking the whole thing. Spurrier was dominating everyone in the conference. There was no curse, no jinx, no hex, no psychological disadvantage. Spurrier took advantage of the SEC being mediocre and exposed the entire conference for years with his fun and gun. He was 82-12 in the SEC during his Gator tenure, and if my memory serves me right, he only lost 5 total games against SEC East opponents. The conference has caught up now, Spurrier is in the middle of the back. I personally think all of these feelings are reactionary to the result of last year’s game. However, I think 07 was the most telling game: the convincing win officially ended whatever hold we had on the Dawgs regardless of 08’s result.

by RationalGator on May 5, 2009 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again...

The Florida Gators who took the field in 1990 were in exactly the same situation as the Georgia Bulldogs who took the field in 2008.

The same situation, perhaps, but the two teams/programs are not even close to comparable.

Georgia, 6 years prior to your comparison team: 2002-2007
3 SEC East “titles”
2 SEC titles
3 BCS bowl appearances
2 BCS bowl wins
4 top 10 finishes, including final ranking of #3 {2002} and final ranking of #2{2007}

Florida, 6 years prior to your comparison team: 1985-1990
Ummmm, what?

And while they turned it around, big time, in a jiffy, over the last 6 years we’re 2-4 during arguably the most successful 6 year span in UGA history. Doesn’t that perhaps somehow speak to the theoretical idea that there is some kind of disadvantage of playing in Jax, even if it is intangible, nebulous, psychological, etc?

In comment threads as in life, the most profound statements are short, sweet, and to the point.

As such, Gen Stoopnagle has the most profound statement in this here thread:

“All the arguments about competitiveness, etc. can’t be verified in any real way. It’s all speculation.”

+1,000,000

But it’s still fun to postulate…

by Kanu on May 5, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The six-year mark is somewhat arbitrary

Take it back to eight and (“hobnailed boot” notwithstanding) you add nothing of substance to Georgia’s numbers from 2000 and 2001, but, if we look at Florida from 1983 to 1990, we see this:

Four nine-win seasons (1983, 1984, 1985, 1990)
Three first-place finishes in the S.E.C. (1984, 1985, 1990)
Four A.P. top 13 finishes (No. 6, 1983; No. 3, 1984; No. 5, 1985; No. 13, 1990)

During the worst years of that run, the Gators were shackled by probation . . . twice. Besides, how is it an argument in favor of moving the game from Jacksonville that Georgia has enjoyed more overall success while being dominated by Florida than Florida did while being dominated by Georgia? Doesn’t that mean the Bulldogs should be much closer to turning the corner in 2009 than the Gators were 20 years ago?

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 5, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny...

…cause I read it the exact opposite way: us being demonstrably better as a program at same point in time as then, but them then having much more success from a starting point of ‘less’ vis a vis us, and us doing much more poorly when we seemed in a position to perform much better = proof that something is amiss and causing us to perform worse than one would expect.

That’s why I enjoy this- we look at the same thing and draw 2 opposite conclusions, but either could be seen to be rational.

I am also amused at how much time & energy we devote to {waste on?} this, when a caveman would simply break it down then walk away to hunt & gather: “Before- us good, them bad. Then- us terrible, them great. Now- us good, them great. Closer, though. Good.”

Good stuff, TKK.

by Kanu on May 5, 2009 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks, Kanu

It’s always a pleasure dealing with you.

Any chance of your making it to Stillwater in September?

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 5, 2009 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sadly, no.

With it being wedding {and 2 week honeymoon} year, Stillwater is sadly out.

It’s all about Boulder 2010, Louisville 2012, and Eugene 2014.

{truth be told, if I hadn’t once driven from Tulsa to Wichita and I never knew what a desolate stretch of absolute nothing the area around Stillwater was, I may very well be inclined to say “F it” and go this year, but knowing what I know from that experience plus funds being low = no go}

Have fun, Mayor, and I will continue to badger you about Boulder {October 2, 2010}

by Kanu on May 6, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Something to keep in mind

When Florida turned the tables on us in 1990, we fielded our worst team since the 1950s. We ended up going 4-7 that year and 2-5 in the SEC. A year later, Spurrier had already turned Florida into one of the premier programs in the SEC. So, they won those first two games, because they were just that much better than us. Florida really gained the mental edge over us in ‘92. I believe that was the game where Zeier threw the game-winning TD, but the Florida linebacker called a timeout at the last possible second. That game more than anything else cemented the series’ change in momentum, and it was a snowball effect from there. Florida began to believe that they could do no wrong against while we were left scratching our heads and wondering how we pulled defeat from the jaws of victory.

Our last great shot at changing the mojo was in ‘05 when Shockley was injured. Had we won a close game with our best player on crutches we could have gotten the same feeling of invincibility that Florida had after ’92. We’ve beaten UF three times since 1990, but we’ve never beaten them in a close game. We led pretty much the whole way in 2004 against a team that was reeling after a loss to Mississippi State and the firing of their coach, and ‘97 and ’07 were blowouts. We’re not going to get this monkey off of our backs until we win a close game against these guys, and I think having the home crowd behind us every other year would help us do that.

Now that I think about it, the biggest mental block isn’t Jacksonville, but the Gators themselves. If there is any disadvantage to playing in Jacksonville it is purely psychological as opposed to physical. However, the fact remains that we lose the advantage we would normally have in a home game by playing down there. Heck, given Richt’s record in true road games, we’re doing ourselves a disservice by not playing in the Swamp every other year.

Sic 'em Dawgs

by ClassicCityDawg on May 5, 2009 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Those are valid points . . .

. . . although I think your best point is that the mental block isn’t the venue, it’s the opponent. If we kept the game in Jacksonville but got the Gators to come out dressed as Tennessee or Auburn, the better team (whichever one it was in a given year) would win. The problem isn’t that we see the stadium (which, by the way, hasn’t been called the Gator Bowl for 15 years), it’s that we see the orange helmets and the blue jerseys and the chomping arms, and we wet ourselves.

For what it’s worth, 1992 was the year Eric Zeier threw an interception deep in Florida territory to prevent Georgia from kicking a game-winning field goal. 1993 was the “time out” game. Even had that touchdown counted, though, the Bulldogs still would have had to have gone for two and gotten it to have won. The ‘93 Gators won the S.E.C. championship and the ’93 Bulldogs went 2-6 in conference play. You’re right that it was the ’92 loss that turned the tide, but the time out was the next year.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 5, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the correction

I was four years old in ‘92, so I can’t really remember that game. I just remember that Zeier played a role in the loss.

Sic 'em Dawgs

by ClassicCityDawg on May 5, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

About that '04 Game

I am in no place to judge what the ‘04 game did for Georgia fans, obviously, but it’s a complete mulligan from the Gator fan’s perspective. Not only was it in the Zook era (a time in which anything bad that happened is basically discounted as Zook being Zook) but it was at the end of the week he got fired.

And even so, it was only a seven point win for UGA. I mean, that year’s pitiful Mississippi State beat the Gators by seven the week before. If you check the box score, Florida even outgained Georgia by 53 yards.

As I said, I don’t really know what that one did psychologically for Bulldogs, but it doesn’t come close to registering for Gators. The losses in ’97 and ’07 do; ’04 was just a lost year all around.

by Year2 on May 5, 2009 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's about right

Our feeling before the game was confidence with a sense of, “If not now, when?”

Afterwards, it was a sense of relief. We didn’t know which coach would replace Ron Zook, but we knew he was gone, so there was no sense whatsoever that the tables had turned. That said, we had no idea how bad it was about to get.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 5, 2009 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kyle, as for your argument that it isn’t clear that we have a disadvantage in Jacksonville, please show me where it is clear that we aren’t at a disadvantage by playing there.

Because:
A) Both teams spend the night before in a hotel
B) 17-21 years olds aren’t affected in the least by a 6 hour bus ride
C) There are plenty of Georgia fans in Jacksonville (and it’s close to all the South Georgia Bulldogs)
D) The stadium is split right down the middle 50/50
E) The stadium is all of 30 miles from Georgia soil

It’s as close to a true neutral site as there is in college football. The only “advantage” Florida has is that its team bus ride is shorter.

by Year2 on May 5, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

All good points, but I'm not even sure about the bus ride

Don’t the ’Dawgs fly from Athens to Jacksonville?

I’m pretty sure they do, and, if they don’t, we need to quit complaining about the venue and start asking why one of the most profitable athletic departments in America doesn’t pony up for a charter flight.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 5, 2009 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly I don’t know, but a charter flight would make sense. I can just remember seeing something about a “six hour bus ride” several of the last times this topic comes up. I can attest from Gator Band bus rides to Chattanooga (7 hours – stayed there instead of Knoxville for a UT game) and New Orleans (8+ hours – for an LSU game) that long rides suck but don’t dampen your enthusiasm once you arrive at your destination. Cramped limbs are nothing the trainers can’t fix.

It’s probably just fans from the Athens/Atlanta area complaining about their long car rides which, if you’re not in your early 20s or you have a family, are definitely complaint-worthy ordeals.

by Year2 on May 5, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Long bus rides

You had trainers in the band?!

j/k

by skigator93 on May 5, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Two things

1) I don’t know if the Dawgs fly, but if it were me, I would rather drive. Remember that the team has to bus to ATL, since we can’t fly a 757 out of Athens. So, let’s do that math… 1.5 hours to bus to the airport (minimum), 1/2 hour to de-bus and load up the plane (minimum), 1.5 hour flight time, 30 minutes to deplane and board the bus in Jax, 30 minutes to take the bus to the hotel. That’s 4 hours in a best-case, little-Atlanta-traffic scenario to fly, versus a 6-hour bus ride. And it’s much cheaper to drive. I’m not sayin’… I’m just sayin’.

2) I agree that Jax is an excellent neutral venue. In the interest of fairness, though, I would have to say the “most neutral neutral site” would have to be the Cotton Bowl in Dallas. It’s literally almost equidistant from the Oklahoma and Texas campuses, and it’s in the middle of the Texas State Fair, which is kind of like putting the Georgia/Florida game in Perry during National Fair week (if the National Fair was at least 3 times bigger). The pitiful little fair that Jax holds every year doesn’t even come close. (And I don’t think it’s always on Ga/Fla weekend, either, like it used to be.)

by vineyarddawg on May 5, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not talking about a physical disadvantage

It’s all psychological. I’d also like to see the game moved for selfish reasons, but I’m not going to get into that right now.

Sic 'em Dawgs

by ClassicCityDawg on May 5, 2009 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"If I live, and I think I will, I'll be going back to Jacksonville."

My (long, rambling) thoughts on this issue may be found here: http://thinkingbulldog.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/georgia-florida_on_the_couch/

"We are inclined to believe that if we have watched a football game or a baseball game, we have taken part in it." --John F. Kennedy

by Thinking Bulldog on May 5, 2009 4:47 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If things haven't changed.

Things have changed, Kyle. Here I use what I think is an excellent indicator of relative population distribution by state called, “The amount of members your state sends to the US House of Representatives.” If you have a similar population relative to the other states in the union, then you have the same amount of US HoR members.

Here is Florida
http://www.thirty-thousand.org/pages/FL.htm

Here is Georgia
http://www.thirty-thousand.org/pages/GA.htm

Now, there is something I’d like you notice here…what happens to this indicator from 1944 to 1964? Ga had more than Fl up to that point, and then it suddenly has less. 10 to 6 vs 10 to 12. Watch as that number steadily increases what happens to the win total of the Bulldogs vs that team. More people=more better football players. Now, I’ll admit, it took them awhile to get their collective stuff together, but they have.

That’s two things that have changed since UGA “owned” UF in this series. So, unless the swine flu hits Florida EXTRA, SUPER hard and they don’t have an equal amount of population, things have changed. They’ve changed A LOT!

Right now that US HoR number is 12 to 25. All things are not equal to what they were in the “good ole days”.

by hinesacl on May 5, 2009 10:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Population as an indicator

Very interesting, but Oklahoma’s population recently shrunk and they had but 5 house reps as of 2004….they seem to compete pretty well. Perhaps OU is just an exception.

by skigator93 on May 5, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And yet . . .

. . . Florida State and Miami suck.

It’s not about how much talent surrounds you (as evidenced by the woeful state of Georgia and Georgia Tech basketball despite their proximity to the talent-rich Atlanta area); it’s about how much talent you get. The Bulldogs do just fine in recruiting generally, and in recruiting Florida particularly.

By the way, Georgia has wrapped up a significantly larger percentage of Peach State talent since 1964 than it did between 1944 and 1964; in the Bobby Dodd era, home-grown talent was at least as likely to go to Georgia Tech and Wally Butts was pulling players out of Ohio and Pennsylvania. (The Bulldogs played Temple in Philadelphia in 1946 so that John Rauch, Charley Trippi, and their Keystone State teammates could play in front of their families.) Consequently, the population of the Empire State of the South in that 20-year period is not as reflective as you suppose of the Bulldogs’ talent level.

Yes, Steve Spurrier recruited better talent than Ray Graves (although Ray Graves managed to recruit, well, Steve Spurrier), but Mark Richt recruits better than Vince Dooley. It’s what happens to them when they get to campus that counts.

As the 2008 football season proved, having all the raw material in the world doesn’t matter if the whole is less than the sum of its parts. The 1980 Georgia football team didn’t have remotely as much talent, top to bottom, as the 2008 Georgia football team. Which one won a national championship?

The Florida Gators didn’t suddenly lack talent for three years while Ron Zook was their head coach; many of the players he coached had won under Steve Spurrier, and many would win under Urban Meyer, but they didn’t win under him. It’s simply not as simple as having talent on hand, much less having talent in your general vicinity.

Even if we allow that the tables have turned due to population alone, though, how does that help the anti-Jacksonville argument? If, as you say, Florida has now vastly eclipsed Georgia as a recruiting hotbed, doesn’t that make it all the more imperative that we preserve our beachhead in the Sunshine State by maintaining an annual presence in the Gateway City? How will we help ourselves by halving our trips to the state that has all the good players?

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 5, 2009 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Two points on recruiting

Hinesacl, you bring up an interesting point. However, your argument loses credibility once you consider the fact that both UGA and UF rely heavily on out of state recruits and have for some time now. Spurrier was from Tennessee for crying out loud. You also have to consider the fact that UF has to compete for that in state talent with three other BCS schools. Florida got better because they finally got an AD who could tell his head from his hind end and coaches who knew how to develop the talent that was already there.

Kyle, while Jacksonville may have provided a necessary presence in south Georgia and north Florida in the past, I feel that the exposure we get down there is no longer essential to our recruiting efforts in those areas. The advent of 24 hour sports channels and the internet have helped Georgia grow into a nationally recognized brand (unless you ask Stewart Mandel and his hypothetical Montanan ranchers). This exposure will only grow with ESPN’s new contract with the SEC. I seriously doubt the only exposure Jeff Owens, Geno Atkins, and Shaun Chapas had prior to their commitment to us prior to their commitment were our regular losses to the hated Gators in the River City. Heck I’ll probably see Aaron Murray at the pool some time this week. I’ll ask him what role playing this game in Jacksonville had on his decision.

Sic 'em Dawgs

by ClassicCityDawg on May 6, 2009 2:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good points . . .

. . . and, if you see Aaron Murray, I’d be interested in hearing his answer.

I’m sure you’re right from the standpoint of the athletes themselves. I’m thinking about the athletes’ parents, who have varying degrees of influence over their sons’ decisions. If it were me, and I had no particular loyalties to one school, I’d want my son playing where I could see him play. If I was from, say, Valdosta or Savannah (or Folkston), knowing that there’d be one game a year where my son was playing nearby would be a plus.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on May 6, 2009 6:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

timely comment on ATL sports talk this morning

During an interview with new Falcon (ex-Jaguar and former Gator) Mike Peterson, everyone joked about how there wasn’t much to do in Jacksonville and it was stated that “Jacksonville is really part of South Georgia.” Interesting reference in connection with this thread.

by skigator93 on May 7, 2009 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not much to do in Jacksonville

It seems to me that the relative lack of entertainment options (as compared to Atlanta) is one of the things that makes Jacksonville a better venue. When you make a trip to the WLOCP, you know why you’re going, and everything you do the entire weekend is directly related to the game. Even if you’re the type that plays golf (not that there’s anything wrong with that) and spend part of the weekend on a course on a barrier island, it’s still just an expanded tailgate activity. The game’s influence reaches out for miles and miles.

In Atlanta, on the other hand, if you travel a couple hundred yards from the Dome, the game’s influence on the environment plummets drastically with every step. And that doesn’t consider the tens of thousands of people who will do no more than drive from Duluth or Cumming or McDonough (not that there’s anything wrong with that) for two purposes solely: to attend the game and to clog up the streets so they can later bitch about how bad Atlanta traffic is (apparently oblivious to the fact that the problem isn’t here until they come to create it).

by NCT on May 8, 2009 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very valid points

People who “just go to the game” and don’t take part in tailgating, eating, drinking, socializing and soaking up the atmosphere beforehand are just plain lame.

by skigator93 on May 8, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.
Start posting about the Bulldogs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Uga_small
A National Signing Day Post Mortem
Uga_small
I've got a fever! And the only prescription is more Grantham : Supplementary 2010 College Signing Day Coverage
Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small
For All My Talk of Doom and Gloom . . .
Uga_small
Its the end of the world as we know it...
Small
Props to Herschel Walker
Images_small
Lets talk Jeff Owens and Geno Atkins
434477_small
How college football can learn a thing or two from soccer.
Uga_small
Warning....Warning... College Signing Day Coverage Imminent
434477_small
The only Florida blog I regularly read joins SBNation
Small
You got it right!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

Official Partner of CBS Sports