Dawg Sports: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Defend That, Digger! The Overrated/underrated edition

A Layup, Not a Three: Why Damon Evans Should Aim Lower When Hiring the Georgia Bulldogs' Next Head Basketball Coach

There is a distinct limit to the extent to which I care about basketball at all, and much of the basis for what limited concern I do have is the fact that basketball is holding Georgia back. MaconDawg and the Georgia Sports Blog’s Paul Westerdawg know and care a lot more than I do about basketball, but here is one relatively ill-informed fan’s opinion on the events of recent days.

First of all, this situation stinks. Alabama got Anthony Grant, the candidate I preferred, and it never appeared that Georgia was on his radar screen; it was a question of whether he wound up in Gainesville (if Billy Donovan left for Kentucky) or Tuscaloosa. Athens never appeared to be seriously among the options Coach Grant was considering.

Next came Mike Anderson. Richard Pittman predicted that Coach Anderson would laugh in our face, and, while I don’t believe he regarded Georgia’s offer with derision, he took less to stay put and Missouri fans never seemed seriously worried that he would leave for the Peach State. Their focus always was on Memphis as a possible alternative destination.

Where, then, does that leave us? I greatly respect Damon Evans’s commitment to swinging for the fences in making what could be the hire by which his tenure as his alma mater’s athletic director is judged. Now that going for the home run ball has produced a strikeout and a flyout at the warning track, though, it is time to revise our short-term expectations.

I don’t like writing that, but I do so because others (namely, the aforementioned Pittman) are writing things like this: "Georgia may be the worst basketball coaching job in the conference. Georgia really has no tradition of success and it is even more firmly entrenched in football than other football powers in the conference." To that, the best retort I can offer is what Quinton McDawg wrote in January:

Before the 1990-91 season, Georgia basketball had two conference championships, cracked the AP top 25 in four seasons, and made four NCAA tournament appearances (although one was later vacated because of NCAA violations). Until that same season, Florida had won one conference championship, appeared in the AP top 25 four years, and had three NCAA tournament appearances. The two programs were virtually identical. . . .

So what happened in 1990? UF hired Lon Kruger to bring them from irrelevance to mediocrity. Kruger did just that. He also guided the Gators to a Final Four appearance. Kruger's results were spotty, but his hiring put UF basketball on a distinct upward trend. Then, when Kruger left, Billy Donovan came in and made the Gators a national power. All it took was good coaching hires and the commitment to the program that great coaches demand.

UF, a school with no appreciable basketball tradition, went on to win back-to-back national titles after their program's long history of losing. UGA, meanwhile, has remained stuck in its past, watching lots of upstarts with far fewer resources, a much smaller native talent base, and much less potential for national appeal pass the Dawgs by.

It’s hard to argue with that, which is why I argued this in response to Pittman:

Georgia is to S.E.C. basketball in 2009 what Florida was to S.E.C. football in 1989. (Actually, the Bulldogs have had more success in basketball than the Gators had enjoyed in football 20 years ago; Georgia has been to a Final Four, but Florida had never won a conference title.) With funding available, facilities improving, and a huge recruiting pool an hour’s drive away, Georgia is the "sleeping giant."

Unfortunately, we are where we are, and the widespread perception focuses much more on the present reality of the slumber than on the future prospects for being a force. While the status of the Georgia basketball program is not as bad as many outsiders imagine, the stature of that program is worse than we in Bulldog Nation could have conceived. Right now, Georgia is the sixth-best basketball program in the S.E.C. East by a wide margin and ours is the weakest basketball tradition in what historically has not been (with the obvious exception of Kentucky) an especially tradition-rich league for roundball.

The sad fact is that the present sorry state of affairs likely leaves us here:

At this point, I’ll be O.K. with not landing our Billy Donovan, as long as we land the equivalent of our Lon Kruger, who sets us up to land our Billy Donovan five years down the road. Maybe this job is just that bad at this point, and what we need is someone who can get us to crawl consistently so this job will become attractive to coaches who can teach us how to walk.

We tried to hire our Billy Donovan, or at least our Bruce Pearl. It didn’t work. We simply aren’t at the level of being able to entice the next Billy Donovan or Bruce Pearl to Athens; the last time we accomplished anything like that was when Vince Dooley hired Tubby Smith, and Georgia proved to be only a way station for Coach Smith along the road to Kentucky.

The guy who can take Georgia basketball to the level it is capable of occupying is out there, but, right now, he won’t return Damon Evans’s phone calls. That guy is choosing Tuscaloosa and maybe even Memphis over Athens. Trying to hire that guy now is folly and can only end in embarrassment.

Our Billy Donovan isn’t interested in being our Billy Donovan right now. Nevertheless, our Lon Kruger is out there---heck, our Lon Kruger may even be Lon Kruger---and it’s time to go hire him. He’s not the long-term solution, but he will get us from irrelevance to mediocrity. His results will be spotty, but he will put Georgia basketball on a distinct upward trend.

Then, and only then, will the giant have shown sufficient signs of being ready to awaken. Then, and only then, will Georgia be able to hire an elite basketball coach. The dorkiest kid in class just asked the head cheerleader to the senior prom on the theory that she might think he one day would be the next Bill Gates. The rejection was predictable. Now, rather than sulking and feeling sorry for himself, and rather than setting his sights on another cheerleader, that kid needs to ask the cutest junior in the band, in the hope that she’s at least somewhat in his league, that she will say yes, and that, once he’s been seen at the prom with her, the cheerleaders will start to take notice of him.

That’s where Georgia basketball is right now. We shouldn’t like it, but we have to accept it. The first step to finding a solution is admitting that there’s a problem. I applaud Damon Evans for failing while daring greatly. I respect him for going for the big hire. It was admirable, but it was overreaching. We can compete for a top-of-the-line coach in literally every other sport in which the Bulldogs take part, but basketball is the lone exception in which we languish pitifully far behind our peers.

We shouldn’t be looking for the Joshua who will lead us to the Promised Land while we yet remain in bondage in Egypt; first, we need the Moses who can guide us through the wilderness. It’s time to hire a coach we can get, one who’s good enough to make the Bulldogs good enough to stand a chance next time with the sorts of guys we should have known would turn us down this time.

Go ‘Dawgs!

0 recs  |  Comment 15 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Around SB Nation

BIG 12 OUTLOOK: 02.08.10

Feb 2010 from Bring On The Cats - 3 comments

BIG 12 OUTLOOK: 02.06.10

Feb 2010 from Bring On The Cats - 7 comments

RPI WATCH: 2/5/2010

Feb 2010 from Bring On The Cats - 0 comments

RPI WATCH: 2/4/2010

Feb 2010 from Bring On The Cats - 5 comments

Comments

Display:

Maybe you're right

The only downside I can see in swinging for the fences, at this point, is the “embarrassment” bit you mentioned. I mean, if swinging for the fences continues to fail, we end up with no worse than your Kruger analogy, probably, right? (And, by the way, isn’t that what Felton was supposed to be?) But I don’t buy this embarrassment stuff. Evans is making it very clear that UGA is serious about its basketball future. No, it’s not pleasant getting turned down (or being perceived as getting turned down), but UGA basketball can’t be more dismissed than it already is.

Over all, I really like the way the way this hire has been handled: quiet, deliberate, highly professional (in appearances, anyway). And I, for one, am excited about how much cash we are willing and able to throw out there and what that says about commitment. I think there are strong prospective candidates out there who are likewise favorably impressed.

by NCT on Apr 1, 2009 9:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Good points, as always

My concern is that embarrassment carries real consequences. The perception of being a fourth or fifth choice might deter some potential coaches from coming to Athens, and, even assuming that the lure of lucre overcame that perception by the coach, it wouldn’t change the perception of the coach. That is sure to have an impact upon Atlanta area recruits, who will have noticed the hiring process and will have been told by rival coaches how many guys Georgia tried to hire first. I say pull the rip cord on a guy you know you can get.

Maybe there’s a splashy hire coming that will prove me wrong—-I hope there is—-but, right now, it looks to me as though all we did by aiming too high was ensure that we will fall farther . . . and, where Georgia basketball is concerned, the words of the Drive By Truckers are apt, thrice: we’ve been falling so long, it’s like gravity’s gone and we’re just floating, and the perception of our roundball program seems to make us a ghost to most before they noticed that we ever had a hair or a hide. Damon should save us from this purgatory line.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Apr 1, 2009 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really, I'm more worried about the perception than the eventual coach.

Really, at this point, I’d say you’re right Kyle. For the most part, we need to get that guy soon who can at least be our Moses (nice allusion, btw), but I also agree in principal with NCT. So far, Evans has not done anything particularly bad, and his approach has been exactly what I wanted from him. Our problem has been that Kentucky, Arizona and Virginia (to a lesser extent) have all opened up in the same time frame as our job, and then Alabama and Memphis opened as well. While both have plenty of cash to throw at their problems, the Kentucky and Arizona jobs were going to draw away any interest in us by the top candidates, regardless. Here’s hoping that Evans has something in his back pocket to rescue a little bit of our reputation.

by blackertai on Apr 2, 2009 2:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look, it is all about Stegeman

We have no chance until that place is torn down. It is a hulking symbol of the way the administration has regarded UGA basketball for years and is a sign of the futility that the sports has endured in Athens.

I know that some will argue that the facilities cannot make that big of a difference, but the thing is an absolute eyesore and represents too much failure for us to move past it.

Maybe we will get our Lon Krueger, but I think we really should be looking at a lead assistant for a successful program and pay him much less than the $2 million we are talking about now.

by Fred Pen on Apr 2, 2009 8:58 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not convinced that the Coliseum is the problem

Do we even know for sure that Mike Anderson ever saw Stegeman Coliseum?

The Coliseum was a huge step up over the old gym it replaced. Stegeman doesn’t appear to have held back Suzanne Yoculan’s Gym Dogs or Andy Landers’s Lady Dogs. During the brief period that Stegeman Coliseum was “The Tub,” it didn’t appear to hold back Tubby Smith’s basketball teams.

Given the money the athletic association is pouring into basketball facilities upgrades, I tend to think most of the Coliseum-bashing belongs in the same category with the Jacksonville-bashing. It’s an excuse, not a reason. Look at Clemson’s football facilities in the late 1930s or Auburn’s football facilities in the early 1950s, then look at what Jess Neely and Shug Jordan did there at times when those schools’ major gridiron rivals refused even to play them on their respective campuses. Just because we haven’t won at men’s basketball in Stegeman doesn’t mean we can’t.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Apr 2, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pretty sure Coach Anderson saw the Stegesaurus

maybe in January?

Maybe it is not the entire problem, but its symbolism is overwhelming.

by Fred Pen on Apr 2, 2009 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I stand corrected

Maybe it was a factor in his decision. Any coach worth $2 million a year isn’t the sort of fellow who ought to think, “I can’t win in that building,” though. The scene from “Hoosiers” where Gene Hackman measures the height of the basket in the gymnasium in Indianapolis springs to mind.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Apr 3, 2009 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Woodruff Gym

My dad has stories about the old Woodruff Gym. I think it was about where the Journalism building is now. I wish I could remember the exact quote, but someone famously remarked that it was the only major conference arena where wind speed and direction had to be taken into account.

by NCT on Apr 5, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're right . . .

. . . about the location (a plaque on one of the stairways leading up to P-J commemorates old Woodruff Hall, named for former Georgia athlete Harry Ernest Woodruff, who was killed in a car wreck while traveling from Columbus to Athens to watch his alma mater‘s football team, which was coached by Harry’s younger brother, George Cecil Woodruff) and the quality, vel non, of the facility.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Apr 5, 2009 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What are we paying the search firm?

Because, so far, they’ve been a disaster. Bama doesn’t have a materially greater basketball tradition than us. And they don’t have a practice facility. But they’ve got their man.

When Bama wanted a coach, they didn’t toodle around with a search firm. Mal Moore and Dave Hart flew to Richmond and told Anthony Grant that he was their number 1. They didn’t bother teeing up a number 2. They weren’t planning to fail and there was none of the haughtiness to their approach that has been the hallmark of ours.

Us? Depending on whom you believe, we either got a $2M offer thrown in our faces, or we got rejected before we even got a chance to make the offer. Maybe it’s because we are basketball oblivion. But plenty of basketball-challenged programs have gotten further along in negotiations than we did without getting their faces coated in egg.

I think our process is flawed. We’re acting like we’re hiring the CEO of Goldman Sachs, forcing candidates and their agents to deal with our intermediaries. Damon needs to find his man, call him directly, fly to the candidate’s place, and sell the hell out of Georgia. All of this hamfisted, offer/non-offer, we’re-only-interested-if-your-interested stuff is what’s truly embarrassing.

by aproposdenada on Apr 2, 2009 10:30 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Supposedly a factor in our whiff on Grant ...

is the fact that he felt badly treated by the Parker Firm during their representation of LSU in their recent coaching search. I understand how some appreciate the quiet and professional manner with which this search has progressed, but I personally feel that the Parker Firm has been a waste of money. Damon Evans, in not responding at all as every prospective coach goes to other schools or remains entrenched in their current jobs, has expended some of the goodwill he had built up with many segments of our fanbase. The length of time this has taken, coupled with an inability to land “our guy” when we just finished building a 30 million dollar practice facility and are willing to pay 2 mil + a year is really frustrating. I feel that we look about like Clemson did in their football coaching search last season. Incompetent. However, it has become more clear to me that their is a fanbase for Georgia BB out there just waiting to get behind a decent product. The message boards are a testament to that fact.

by dawgdayafternoon on Apr 2, 2009 11:14 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

You may be right about the search firm . . .

. . . but I don’t think Clemson came off looking incompetent. I think Terry Don Phillips came off looking shrewd, the way Vince Dooley did in 1995, when the fan base wanted Gary Barnett and Coach Dooley had to find a way to get Coach Barnett to withdraw from consideration without being offered the job, so he could go hire the guy he wanted.

Phillips wanted Dabo Swinney all along, but the fan base wanted a big name, so Phillips made quite a show of flying a big orange-and-purple plane with a tiger paw on the tail all over creation, interviewing every hot young coordinator in the country while Coach Swinney was unifying the team, unifying the fan base, winning games, and earning a January 1 bowl bid. Phillips got his way and got a fan base that didn’t agree with him initially to like what he did. That’s a victory. Unfortunately, that’s not what we have here. We should be so lucky as to come off looking as good as Clemson.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Apr 2, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was unaware that Phillips wanted Swinney all along.

I was under the impression that they settled for him. Assuming Swinney was their man, then you are right; they do look a lot better than we do right now. I still wouldn’t be surprised to see Tubberville on the sideline in Clempson in a few more years.

by dawgdayafternoon on Apr 2, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You may be right there . . .

. . . and I may be giving Terry Don Phillips too much credit, but, reading between the lines, it sure looked like he was in Dabo Swinney’s corner and just wanted to buy him the time to prove himself to a fan base that wanted to make a big splash. It looked to me like Phillips made a big show of conducting interviews without being subjected to the public embarrassment of a rejection.

I could see Tommy Tuberville stalking the sidelines by Lake Hartwell. Clemson’s bad luck with Tommies could be offset by its previous good fortune with Auburn men.

There is, however, something to be said for promoting from within at Fort Hill. Hootie Ingram, Red Parker, Ken Hatfield, Tommy West, and Tommy Bowden all came in as outsiders, even though Coach West had prior history with the program. Frank Howard, Charley Pell, and Danny Ford all were on staff already when the prior coach left or was fired. That doesn’t mean Coach Swinney will work out, but there’s no question which route has the better track record at Clemson.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Apr 2, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think everyone in Georgia got this . . .

. . . but, just to be clear, what I mean by “our Lon Kruger” is “the guy who will be the Georgia basketball equivalent of what Lon Kruger was to Florida basketball in the early 1990s, who will pave the way for the Georgia basketball equivalent of what Billy Donovan is to Florida basketball today in the same way that the actual Lon Kruger paved the way for the literal Billy Donovan in Gainesville.”

I mentioned the actual Lon Kruger as an aside because he had been mentioned as a possible candidate to succeed Dennis Felton. I included a link to the Georgia Sports Blog report upon which I based that prospect, which I did not endorse but which I noted in passing had been raised as a possibility. This was largely by way of example, as many possible candidates had been mentioned. I referred to Lon Kruger in the specific only because it dovetailed naturally with having referred previously and repeatedly to Lon Kruger in the abstract.

I explain these things only because the posters on a U.N.L.V. message board have gotten the erroneous impression that I am calling for the hiring of Lon Kruger, which I am not. I meant a metaphorical Lon Kruger . . . or, to use the old saw about the five stages of an actor’s career, I didn’t mean “get me Steve Guttenberg,” I meant “get me a young Steve Guttenberg” or “get me a Steve Guttenberg type.” (There is no significance to the selection of Steve Guttenberg, either, by the way; he’s just the actor I happened to hear use that formulation in an interview.)

As for whether U.N.L.V. represents a better coaching post than Georgia, I will simply say that, if the Bulldogs lose out to the Runnin’ Rebels in a bidding war over a coach, Congress needs to reconvene the Kefauver Commission and someone needs to account for Jerry Tarkanian’s whereabouts on an hour-by-hour basis.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Apr 2, 2009 5:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.
Start posting about the Bulldogs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Uga_small
A National Signing Day Post Mortem
Uga_small
I've got a fever! And the only prescription is more Grantham : Supplementary 2010 College Signing Day Coverage
Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small
For All My Talk of Doom and Gloom . . .
Uga_small
Its the end of the world as we know it...
Small
Props to Herschel Walker
Images_small
Lets talk Jeff Owens and Geno Atkins
434477_small
How college football can learn a thing or two from soccer.
Uga_small
Warning....Warning... College Signing Day Coverage Imminent
434477_small
The only Florida blog I regularly read joins SBNation
Small
You got it right!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

Official Partner of CBS Sports