Mark Richt Drops Willie Martinez, Jon Fabris, and John Jancek From Georgia Bulldogs Staff: A Good Man Does the Right Thing
The sight is dismal;
And our affairs from England come too late.
The ears are senseless that should give us hearing
To tell him his commandment is fulfilled,
That Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead.
Where should we have our thanks?
Hamlet, Act V, Scene II
I apologize if that was a bit melodramatic, but I already used II Samuel 3:38 to mark the death of Uga VII and there was something appropriate in returning to Hamlet to mark the bloodletting that ended the bloodletting: I don’t want to belabor the point, having spent much of the last year building the case against Willie Martinez, but it bears repeating that, starting with last year’s disaster against the Alabama Crimson Tide, the Georgia Bulldogs have allowed 34 or more points ten times in 21 games and have held just three of their last eleven Division I-A opponents under 24 points. This happened because it had to happen, and Mark Richt is to be credited for making it happen, however difficult it must have been for him.
When Vince Dooley was considering hiring Mark Richt, he had one misgiving, which he put to Bobby Bowden in the form of a question: "Is Mark Richt tough enough?" Coach Bowden replied, "You just don’t know." Now we all know; on the day after Bobby Bowden only partially willingly stepped down---on the day that the portion of the Georgia fan base whose strong suit is not contract law long believed would be the day Mark Richt cleared out his office in Butts-Mehre Heritage Hall---Coach Richt told three of his assistants to clear out their offices, instead. If the public statements issued from Athens are accurate, this was the head coach’s decision, not the athletic director’s and not the boosters’, which is as it should be.
The reaction in Bulldog Nation, at least in this corner of it, has been measured and appropriate. No one wishes, or should wish, these good men ill. Sometimes, good men fail to do a good job, but that does not mean anyone should take personal satisfaction in seeing any man lose his job, particularly not in a weak economy three and a half weeks before Christmas. Our thanks and our best wishes go with Jon Fabris, his wife Marcy, and their sons Jack and Mike; with John Jancek, his wife Kelly, and their sons Zachary, Brock, Jack, and Brady; and with Willie Martinez, his wife Kim, their daughters Christina and Ashley, and their son William. Vaya con Dios.
Now it becomes a question of which of the candidates will be chosen to turn 2010 into 1975. While I have my preferences, I trust my head coach, who knows much more about such things than I will ever know. I know this about Willie Martinez’s successor, though: he needs to have three characteristics. These are they:
- He needs to be the fire to Mark Richt’s ice. While we have seen Coach Richt become impassioned on the sideline (viz., his obvious anger at the premature Powerade bath last Saturday night), someone needs to have the job of amping up the energy level. Mark Richt’s calm confidence won us a lot of games---hobnailed boot, anyone?---just as Vince Dooley’s did a generation earlier, but only when Brian VanGorder and Erk Russell were around to shout profanities and crack skulls. Quite frankly, if a candidate to be the Bulldogs’ new defensive coordinator doesn’t use the word "ass" in his interview, I don’t want him.
How important is the latter objective? Plenty. As David Hale has demonstrated, the problem with Georgia’s turnover margin hasn’t just been the offense’s propensity to cough up the pigskin (which, while bad, isn’t all-time awful), it’s been the defense’s historically low level of takeaways. Back when Coach Dooley used to insist upon calling them "takeovers" instead of "turnovers," forcing fumbles and getting picks was a cornerstone of the Bulldogs’ defensive philosophy.
In 1980, Georgia won the national championship without ranking in the top ten in the country in rushing offense, passing offense, total offense, scoring offense, rushing defense, passing defense, or total defense. How did the ‘Dawgs do it? By leading the nation in turnover margin, tallying 44 total takeaways in an eleven-game season, and fielding the country’s interception leader in safety Jeff Hipp. (Having the nation’s leading punt returner in Scott Woerner and the best freshman running back in the history of the game didn’t hurt, either, but we’re getting the running game straightened out and hiring a new special teams coordinator, who probably will reach this conclusion: "Blair Walsh is the best placekicker in the country? Well, dang, let’s just turn him loose and let him boot it out the back of the end zone every time!")
In 1982, Georgia again went 11-0 through the schedule and went to the Sugar Bowl to play for the national championship. The Bulldogs never gave up more than 22 points in the regular season and ranked fourth in the land in scoring defense, due in large part to the fact that the Georgia D was led by rover Terry Hoage (who finished first in the country in interceptions, with twelve) and safety Jeff Sanchez (who finished second in the country in interceptions, with nine).
The math is pretty simple, really. The last two times Georgia went to the national championship game, the Bulldog defense was superb at taking the ball away from the opposition. Twelve games into the 2009 season, the Classic City Canines rank 119th out of 120 Division I-A teams in turnover margin and have taken the ball away just ten times on eight interceptions---fewer than the Bulldogs’ second-best defensive back snagged in 1982---and two---count ‘em: two---fumble recoveries. Georgia is 7-5 and bound for the Independence Bowl. While there are many aspects of the Red and Black program in need of correction, there is no area in which a genuine fix would pay bigger dividends than in the area of takeaways.
The almost two years since the Sugar Bowl shellacking of Hawaii have been a tough time in Bulldog Nation; as my brother-in-law said to me on Thanksgiving, "Uga VII is dead, and I don’t feel so good myself." This is a sad day, but a necessary one. We should keep Coach Fabris, Coach Jancek, Coach Martinez, and their families in our prayers, and we should be proud of Coach Richt for doing what he had to do despite the difficulty of doing it.
The firings are done; now we await the hirings, and particularly the announcement of the anointment of a new defensive coordinator, whom we will set to his assigned task with the admonition: "Take it away, Coach!" These are dark days in Bulldog Nation, but the break of dawn is coming.
Go ‘Dawgs.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice article.
I especially appreciate the words towards the departing staff. Letting friends and close colleagues go cannot be an easy thing. This move, while necessary at this time, is still not risk-free. And as you pointed out, the problems won’t automatically disappear with the dismissed coaches; these are critical staff moves at a critical time. My question is this; What should our expectations of improvement be going into next year with this new staff and personnel losses, especially on the defensive front? Will it depend on who CMR brings in? With the right D/C, is immediate and drastic improvement across the board within reach?
Farsider
I dont think it is too hard for a new DC to make an impact. These are young, maleable kids. After spring training to set the tone, two a days will lock it. We have talent. We dont have to make cosmic adjustments. I think immediate improvement is well within reach.
I mean, how long was that myers dude at florida before he cashed in a few times?
The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. ~ Albert Einstein
Beautifully written, as always...
I had dreaded this offseason because I knew that for the first time I would be expecting the worst from the upcoming season.
These are indeed dark time for the Dawgs… But for the first time in the last 3 months, I feel genuine hope and (dare I say) optimism for the future. Evil Richt and Hip Richt are in the past. I welcome the arrival of Whatever It Takes Richt.
"I Run This State." - Washaun Ealey and Caleb King
by RedCrake on Dec 3, 2009 12:22 AM EST via mobile reply actions
On another note...
Has anyone ever been as wrong as I was?
This past summer I wrote an article while Kyle was absent praising Martinez and (more specifically) Fabris for a history of developing pass rushers. Based on this I stated that our sack total would be markedly improved. Though this was true to an extent and Justin Houston was a revelation in the last few games, the other DE’s did not develop as I hoped and today’s events only serve to reinforce the notion that my praise of Martinez and Fabris was misguided at best.
I don’t know if I’d put it above my pre-2006 claim that Joe T. would lead us to a SEC championship, but its close. After all, a pass rush doesn’t do much good if the DE loses containment and Jonathan Crompton rolls out to burn you 20 yards at a time.
In addition to Kyle’s requirements for potential coaches I’d like to go ahead and add:
1) The new coaches must demonstrate an ability to develop a pass rush scheme (whether by formation or blitz) which results in more sacks and tackles for loss while accounting for more complex offensive schemes that we face now (spread, triple option, etc.). I’m no longer satisfied with stick to the base D and hope for the best.
2) The candidates must be able to demonstrate (with supporting evidence — ie film) instances in which they made significant halftime adjustments based on the opponent’s offensive successes in the 1st half with a corresponding 2nd half shutdown evident.
"I Run This State." - Washaun Ealey and Caleb King
by RedCrake on Dec 3, 2009 12:54 AM EST via mobile reply actions
UgaBulldog14, it was not so much the fanbase as the moneybase.
I appreciate T. Kyle’s eloquence and his peacemaking style in this post, but “this was the head coach’s decision, not the athletic director’s and not the boosters” is a bit wishful thinking. Granted, “according to written statements coming out of Athens”, this has been more than a year long process, which, I agree, is appropriate. He gave Martinez and the others a chance___for too long___and finally and reluctantly did what he knew had to be done, at least in part due to constant pressure from fans and ultimately because the fans who donate big money took a stand. As the Monkees (I think), once sang, “Him or Me, what’s it gonna be.”
You may be right
… but absent corroborating evidence, I’d have to object to your conclusion as speculation. That the money folks may have taken a stand does not mean it was the cause. If we assume that stand occurred, per rumor, it’s still mere circumstantial evidence that is consistent with your conclusion, but it doesn’t mandate your conclusion. Post hoc ergo propter hoc, and all that.
I’m tempted to throw in a bit about the statements coming from Richt and Evans that are counter to your conclusion and suggest that, absent some showing that the head coach and director have credibility problems, those statements deserve ample weight, but I’m really not up to briefing the matter if nobody’s going to pay me.
by NCT on Dec 3, 2009 8:12 AM EST up reply actions
Of course Richt MADE the decision rather than the moneybase, but to
deny moneybase was a strong motivating factor in that decision is hiding one’s head in the sand. As far as Evans making the decision, of course, he left it with Richt something like “it’s your decision, but I’m telling you this is what the moneyfolks are saying.” Res Ipsa Loquitur and all that stuff.
That's not res ipsa
res ipsa can only occur where there is only one person who could be responsible. The firing of a coach doesn’t speak for itself.
Of course a good coach takes into account what the monied folks are saying, but (hopefully) he doesn’t have to be told what to do by guys long on specie and short on football experience.
by first and thom on Dec 3, 2009 9:28 AM EST up reply actions
I agree with Podunk.....
too much lawyerin’ going on!!
Hey Juj I got your back-you actually threw this out there earlier this week (the money-bags & all) and I commend you for that! But I would dare to say that CMR also had a voice in the decision…..
Now let’s move on: word on the “screet” is Charlie Strong is leaning towards HC at Louisville (although Strong is stating he has not been contacted? and Spikes was clearly trying to swipe the ball out of Ealey’s hands right)-if that happens we got us a bidding war!! Not only UF ( I hate the Gators) but FSU will be looking & throwing big $$$
at the candidates as well!!
Where’s Skigata when you need him/her
Where do the DAWGS sit as far as Assistants pay??
CWM got $340k a year. Strong $360k. I think we would have to get above $360 for sure
heck, make it $400k a year for two years
The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. ~ Albert Einstein
I'll stick with my "person"
although “duty and breach” are technically correct. Isn’t the classic case of res ipsa the log falling out of the second-story window? We’re not sure what the guy upstairs did (i.e., we don’t know if he threw the log, stacked it wrong, bumped it, or whatever), but he did something wrong. The fact that a log fell out of a window establishes that the dude upstairs screwed up.
by first and thom on Dec 3, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions
what if the guy upstairs was simply upstairs
at the time that the log fell but had absolutely no contact with said log at any time? In that scenario an unknown 3rd party stacked it wrong and it simply fell out the 2nd story window while guy upstairs was there? Doesn’t that scenario suggest that the fact that a log fell out of a window does not establish that the dude upstairs screwed up?
For what it's worth
I don’t think you can separate a general consensus among fans from an independent decision by the head coach. Both came about from the same cause. Were there no basis to make the personnel changs, there would be no fan pleas. If, in exercising independent judgment, Richt truly and strongly believed that future defenses would perform better with the same staff than defenses of the recent past have performed, he had to know that, after an off-season of public outcry, we’d settle down if he was correct. Winning cures all, regardless of whether it was done on “our terms” or his. And the terms are, after all, his to dictate.
by NCT on Dec 3, 2009 8:05 AM EST up reply actions
Well said.
I am sure it was difficult for Richt to fire his friends understanding the impact it would have on their families, especially at Christmas. I wouldn’t want to have to do it. Hopefully he appreciates that while it is a painful situation to the coaches and their families, it is in the long term best interest of the players who deserve to be lead by people who can develop their skills and lead them to championships.
Looking at the stats they are posting in the ABH today on total defense, Willie Martinez would be a great hire for most teams in the Big 12. I hope he lands on his feet somewhere where he has a chance to succeed.
The new DC is going to have some talented players to work with.
Eloquent as usual, Kyle
Probably one of the saddest and, at the same time, most hopeful pieces I’ve read. These coaches have sacrificed their blood, sweat, and tears over the years. Their collective goals were to make The University of Georgia the best it could be. It just did not work out after a half decade of chances. The reasons have been well documented. I came across this piece by Dean Legge from Scouts.com. It needs to be considered.
The job is only partially done. The hiring of the next great Defensive Coordinator will, in my opinion, ultimately define whether Mark Richt’s legacy at Georgia will be merely good or great. The next few months are going to determine whether the Georgia Bulldogs are going to prosper or fall into another prolonged cycle of mediocrity. I truly believe if the right man is hired we will be celebrating in the near future.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
Erk Russell
Legge's piece
I’m not going to argue that Legge’s points are without merit, but doesn’t he get paid by an outfit whose bread and butter is analyzing recruting and not coaching? Of course it was about recruiting.
by NCT on Dec 3, 2009 9:40 AM EST up reply actions
Of course it's about recruiting
and by linking the piece I’m certainly not defending Martinez. But all of those "busts’ certainly didn’t help the cause. Mistakes have been made from the top on down over the last few years…and what Legge wrote (with the understanding of of real motives) is revealing.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
Erk Russell
It does make sense ...
After reading Kyle’s piece and now Legge’s, it does make a whole lot of sense. Our latetst and best teams of ‘07 and ’08 were successful because of the prolific offenses. It also explains why Martinez’s defenses were continually sliding downhill statistically. Further, it is common sense that “coaches don’t just suddenly forget how to coach,” — perhaps Martinez simply didn’t have as much to work with. This also explains why CMR, being the intelligent and responsible coach, employer, and friend didn’t just dump the responsibility for the problem on Martinez and make him a scapegoat when “firing” him. Let’s just take this experience for what it is build on it. The Erk Russell quote by “DavetheDawg” says it all. Defense wins games and somehow we have gotten away from that. Any chance we get Kirby Smart? Seems like a match made in Bulldog heaven.
Danger, Will Robinson!
All this talk about turnovers reminds me of when CWM was elevated to DC in 2005. In an interview before he took over, he said one of his main priorities would be “to create more turnovers.” Cognizant of his Miami pedigree, I was immediately suspicious an was proven right over the ensuing 5 years: defenses that focus on picks and strips become fundamentally poor in pretty short order. Martinez and Richt are products of the 80s Miami thug era, where they out-athleted their competition and could afford the gratuitious personal foul and other 15-yard penalties they regularly collected b/c they were so dominant. We have gotten an object lesson for 5 years with CWM in charge that that style will not work in the SEC—-the competition is far too tough to be able to get away with it.
UGA’s play had deteriorated into making the highlight reel rather than playing hard-nosed, fundamentally sound football. That’s why this talk of “emphasizing turnovers” sends off the alarm bells with me—-if the D goes out there and plays solid and KNOCKS THEM INTO THE NEXT ZIP CODE, the turnovers will come. Focusing on them to the exclusion of the fundamentals leads us back into the wilderness I think we’re all just as happy to leave permanently behind.
So, let me get this straight...
Martinez and Richt are products of the 80s Miami thug era, where they out-athleted their competition and could afford the gratuitious personal foul and other 15-yard penalties they regularly collected b/c they were so dominant.
So this has been the problem? It’s been Evil Richt all along?
I agree with this:
“if the D goes out there and plays solid and KNOCKS THEM INTO THE NEXT ZIP CODE, the turnovers will come.”
The rest, not so much.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
Erk Russell
My point is Richt tolerated it...
That’s why I’ve been ready to see him fired since the OK State game. And contrary to the conventional wisdom out there, CWM has been awful from the day he took over at UGA, not just the past couple of years. He put up with it far too long. Anyone who’s watched and been around football for any length of time could see from the start that we did not play with the same intensity, fundamentals, or smarts that we did with BVG from Day 1 with Martinez, and my doubts started before the ’05 season when I read that Martinez quote about “creating more turnovers.”
If Richt hires people that can reverse our current lack of discipline and thuggishness that results in a half dozen personal fouls and 15-yarders a game, I’ll be with him. But he’s got to prove it to me, b/c he’s let the team run wild ever since BVG left.
Agree to disagree...
While I think Richt tolerated mediocre defenses for far too long, I don’t believe he ever embraced anything resembling "da U’ from about 1985 to 1995. I feel that his loyalty to an underachieving friend is what ultimately got us to where we are today. The fact that he has made a correction has me believing in him now more than ever.
I do think that Richt will bring in someone who preaches and demands fundamental football. As you said, the type of scheme that re-arranges postal codes. As far as tolerating it…clearly he is no longer willing to accept the status quo.
Considering our propensity to turn the ball over, and perhaps some distractions from the defensive side of things that have perhaps been going on all season long, I’m beginning to feel more and more that our 7-5 record might just be some kind of miracle.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
Erk Russell
No...
but I worked with a bunch of ‘em. Got me drinkin’ that fancy beer with funny looking labels, too.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
Erk Russell
I want CMR and UGA to win NCs...
And that starts with the changes he started yesterday. I’m with CMR and will always be with the Dawgs. But he put up with sorry football and particularly sorry defense for WAY too long.
As you say, maybe 7-5 was a blessing in disguise. But as the old saying goes, “fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.” Richt let this mess go on for 5 years. I am optimistic but still healthily skeptical.
I will say that after the ‘06 meltdown, I said that CMR needed to do 3 things: hand over play-calling, bring in some OLs, and FIRE WILLIE MARTINEZ. He did 2 of the 3 and drew some confidence from that. I take your points on his closeness to Martinez, but he’s only done half of what he needs to. Again, I’m optimistic, but will reserve judgment until I see who he brings in.
Fair enough
I certainly concede that 2 out of 3 things that are fixed ain’t good enough in this Conference, especially when that third thing is the most important element for championship football. I believe we’ll be back on top when the right man is chosen to lead us on Defense.
"If we score, we may win. If they never score, we'll never lose."
Erk Russell
I think we're saying similar things here, birddawg92
No one would claim that the Georgia defenses of the early ‘80s weren’t fundamentally sound, and you’re right that being good at the fundamentals contributes to producing more turnovers. Conversely, the weakness of Willie Martinez’s defense has led to fewer takeaways (e.g., players being out of position to retrieve fumbles). I’m not arguing for a focus on takeovers at the expense of fundamental soundness; I’m saying that a fundamentally sound defense will take the ball away, and that is one important measure of how well the defense is doing.
For what it’s worth, one of the reasons Alabama is undefeated and has a shot at remaining undefeated after tomorrow’s SEC championship game is ’Bama’s turnover margin. I’m just saying.
Go 'Dawgs!
RICHT put up with it far too long...
just to clarify above.
The over/under on Jimbo Fisher is 3
Gene Bartow 2 years
Ray Perkins 4 years
Bill Guthridge 3 years
Mark Richt is named Head Coach at FSU no later than Jan 15, 2013. I still think it could be sooner than that.
by Blogger who came in from the cold on Dec 4, 2009 5:29 PM EST reply actions
This is what I look like when I'm not worried
Next year will be Mark Richt’s tenth season at the Georgia helm. Total number of Georgia head coaches who have left Athens for a head coaching job someplace else after more than a decade in Athens: 0.
Mark Richt has already coached more than 100 games at Georgia. Total number of Georgia head coaches who have left Athens for a head coaching job someplace else after more than 100 games in Athens: 0.
In fact . . . total number of Georgia head coaches who have lasted at least a decade in Athens and not had a building or a complex on the University of Georgia campus named after them: 0.
Georgia has completely lapped Florida State as a program and Jimbo Fisher will have to be given at least five years to clean up the toxic waste dump into which Bobby Bowden’s senescence has turned the Seminoles. Even if he’s gone in three years, though, that puts Mark Richt at the end of year twelve in Athens.
At that point, David Richt will be 18, Zach Richt will be 16, Anya Richt will be 15, and Mark Richt (who has transplanted his entire extended family to Athens) will be a couple of months shy of being 53. Bobby Bowden has already said that he and his wife Ann will be moving away from Tallahassee, so Coach Richt’s last connection to Florida State is leaving town.
I concede the possibility that, if Willie Martinez’s replacement doesn’t turn the Bulldogs’ defense around, Mark Richt might be fired (I don’t think that will happen, but I am no longer able to rule it out as a possibility), but, if the University of Georgia wants Mark Richt to be the Bulldogs’ head coach in 2013, the only way Mark Richt isn’t the Bulldogs’ head coach in 2013 is if (Heaven forbid) he or a member of his immediate family suffers a dramatic health reversal or Coach Richt feels called by his faith to leave coaching the way Bill McCartney did in 1994. Florida State is off of Mark Richt’s radar and falling fast.
Go 'Dawgs!
concur
CMR isnt about to take this kids out of school just to go to FSU. There is no gain at FSU – he is the lead dawg at a much better university. His family is settled, happy and comfortable. I think sometimes people dont get it.
The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. ~ Albert Einstein

by 

















