Dawg Sports: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

We Interrupt Your Regularly Scheduled Coaching Search . . .



to bring you the following: Mack Brown may not be the most popular university employee among UT-Austin faculty members. In fact, it's a pretty safe bet that they would all ignore Mack in the faculty coffeeroom now that they've unofficially deemed his new $5 million salary "unseemly and inappropriate." At least they would if he ever stepped foot in the joint. Mack has his Jamaican Blue Mountain flown in straight from Port Royal to his grotto beneath DKR, thank you very much.

Really though. $5 million is an inappropriate salary for a guy who coaches football for a living? Who knew? Not UT President Bill Powers. From the Austin-American Statesman (one of the 5 most awesomely named mid-sized dailies in the country, by the way):

I think this was a good investment in our financial strength and stability as we go forward," said President William Powers Jr., adding that the athletic program under Brown has had no subsidies or deficits and has channeled $6.6 million into academic programs in recent years.

You read that correctly. Mack Brown's salary, like the obscene amount funneled into the pockets of most BCS Conference head coaches, does not come out of academic budgets, or administrative accounts, or any other fund designed to educate Jimmy and Sally. It comes out of the pockets of ABC, and your rabid Texas-ex cousin Jim Don (or perhaps Joe Bob, they're big on double names in the Lone Star State). And unless old Bill is pulling everyone's collective legs, the overage that didn't buy Mack's gold-plated waffle iron or Will Muschamp's prized titanium leg press station actually went into the university's educational programs, rather than coming out of them. Few university athletic departments outside the BCS can say that.

This vote appears to me to be a triumph of idealism over practicality. Lockstep deontology over good old American pragmatism. In short, it looks like a bunch of ninnies from the anthropology department taking an offhand remark made during their daily coffee clatch one step too far. Mack Brown makes what the free market dictates. Is the salary obscene? Sure! So is whatever the top 5 executives at Apple are making. Ditto for whatever the top minds at Nike are pulling down. But Mack Brown's football team puts butts in the seats, and those butts are sitting on the wallets from which issue the checks that buy the lab equipment and keep the lights on in the history department. Insofar as the academic side of the University of Texas has a deal with the devil, it's a darn good deal. Much better than the one most universities have with their athletic departments. In short, UT faculty are among the least justified scholars in America in making this argument. Because Mack is making it rain in the economics department.

The University of Texas is a well-respected public university. One of the best in the land. And I say that without even the slightest trace of bitterness over the fact that they denied me admission to their wonderful law school (I suspect without even opening my admissions packet, though I can't begin to prove that). But some portion of that prized university is there because of the bustling river of cash generated by Mack Brown's football program. I'd suggest that the folks in the biology department thank Mack Brown for that, as distasteful as the prospect may be. Either that or raise tuition and turn down the thermostats.

0 recs  |  Comment 14 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Just goes to show...

If you stay in academia long enough, your brain hardens. Me and my fellow grad students know that UGA football pays the bills for a lot of our less lucrative brethren. (We pay our own way with grants, thank you very much.)

I seem to remember a story, though, about how Vince Dooley was pals with Fritz Schaefer, UGA’s chemistry luminary, and somehow induced the athletic association to cough up the cash to fund the building Schaefer was promised for moving his prize research group to UGA. Making it rain, indeed. The building still stands besides the chemistry department. You can recognize it because it isn’t butt-ugly like most things on South Campus, but rather looks a bit like a spaceship.

by opsomath on Dec 15, 2009 10:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The Computational Chemistry building?

I’ve always wondered about the story behind that building, most notably because, as you say, it’s not plain and ugly like virtually every other building around it. Also, because I walk under it virtually every gameday Saturday on my way to the stadium.

by vineyarddawg on Dec 15, 2009 11:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would really like to hear more about the 5.6 million.

Because I have never heard of an athletic department doing anything for academics—anything—other than paying for its own scholarships, which is essentially helping it pay its own way. The UGA chemistry story is interesting but I doubt its veracity: why would the ADs keep things like that a secret?

In short, I don’t get on ADs because they pay their own way. But I do work at a (different) U and have some grasp on how the budgets work. I call BS on 6.6 mil. Would that ADs actually did contribute to the academic landscape…but then we’d have more the incestuous relationships with athletics and its obscene monetary demands that college presidents, admin, and faculty have always sought to avoid—because you can’t be seen to be giving money for recruiting trips over the chemistry building, natch.

So you keep the children in their own rooms and make the rich bastard child take care of itself, by itself. and you don’t let it pay for anything lest you have to buy it something later on.

by rbubp on Dec 16, 2009 12:00 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

"...recent years."

…that’s an ill-defined time-frame, isn’t it?

I don’t doubt it at all, but still that could be a very small part of the overall income of the AD spread out over 10 years. Who knows? Their job is to make it look as acceptable as possible.

$5 million to coach football for a college or university is “seemly and inappropriate.” But as the booster says: that’s America. And Texas, as others have pointed out, is America “super-sized.”

Also, on that link below, congratulations to Damon for finally following through on that million dollar promise Dooley made but withheld because he was in a pissing match with Mike Adams.

HBTD

by Gen. Stoopnagle on Dec 17, 2009 5:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I recall reading somewhere

that UGA’s athletic association gave $1 million to the University not all that long ago. It doesn’t say how many recent years the $6.6 mil was given over, but it’s certainly a possibility at the BCS level.

"Never refuse to do a kindness unless the act would work great injury to yourself, and never refuse to take a drink- under any circumstances." Mark Twain

by podunkdawg on Dec 16, 2009 12:10 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Interesting post.

 I know that its boilerplate orthodoxy to make the assumption that athletics money + athletics success= big $$$$ for colleges. But before we dismiss these university fuddy-duddies, remember that these increased salaries are coming at a time many colleges, including the university of Texas and UGA, are cutting budgets, laying off staff and generally tightening their belts. Whither that “river of cash”? My perspective as a parent of a UGA freshman is much different from that as an undergraduate fan. While I definitely don’t have a problem with Mack Brown improving himself financially, I’ll never be bamboozled into believing that the BCS is a free market, either.

by Farsider on Dec 16, 2009 12:50 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

What are the other 4 mid-size dailes?

I agree that “Austin-American Statesman” is an awesome name for a newspaper. I’d love to hear the others.

by marktheshark on Dec 16, 2009 12:53 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I felt the same way in the whole Jim Calhoun saga last year

We're just a million little gods causin' rain storms, turning every good thing to rust.

by Robert Downey Sr. on Dec 16, 2009 2:28 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Let's also not forget that winning football betters universities in other ways

Applications to Northwestern went through the roof in 1996. Why? Northwestern had been a good school since long before that . . . but the Wildcats’ improbable 1995 Rose Bowl run improved Northwestern’s name recognition.

The Vincent Joseph Dooley Library Endowment Fund raised a lot of money for the University of Georgia. The first two large gifts were donated by the members of the 1966 and 1968 Bulldog football teams . . . Coach Dooley’s first two SEC championship squads.

Try starting a James Rayford Goff Library Endowment Fund and see how much money gets raised.

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Dec 16, 2009 9:06 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

To the extent that there's "blame"

The responsibility rests with the priorities of the consuming public: athletics boosters and television audiences (prompting the ad dollars that flow through the networks to the conferences and schools). How many of us contribute at least as much to the academic endowments as to the Hartman Fund? I’ve done it in years past and would like to make it a rule, but my budget priorities are screwed up enough to put my season tickets ahead of support of my alma mater’s academic mission.

by NCT on Dec 16, 2009 9:16 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

UTA Professors: "Give Me Money Instead"

The kind of money good football creates isn’t an allowance. If there’s no excellent football program at UT(A), that money is just gone – spent on another school, another sport, or (the horror, the horror), the NFL. If there’s no quality football program, enrollment may suffer marginal declines in quantity and quality, and the school’s name recognition takes a hit. The professors are asking for money that they didn’t earn, can’t create, and that would not be given to them by choice.

They want to divide a pot of money as if it belongs to them. It don’t. Maybe the world would be a better place if it did, but I think the world would be a better place if all that money belonged to me, too. You don’t hear me whining.

by first and thom on Dec 16, 2009 10:20 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

So does this mean...

that Mack Brown is no longer a DC candidate for Georgia because they out-priced him?

by fotodog on Dec 16, 2009 5:19 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.
Start posting about the Bulldogs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Alabama getting special treatment?
Screen_shot_2010-01-16_at_10
Scouting Report Request from the Falcoholic
Butter_small
We could see 34 in the backfield again (or 43...let me explain)
Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small
Loyal Dawg Sports Reader Begins Through-Hike of Appalachian Trail
Butter_small
Screw PETA. Pick your Dawg.
Againonmyown_small
Knowshon Moreno & Herschel Walker to team up for Tag-Team Title
100_0376_small
Bringing Dawg Fans and Tech Fans Together
Small
A big day for Dawgsports
Oguchionyewu_1511662_small
Alabama @ UGA: Game Preview (Bama perspective)
Small
What is Georgia's role in NCAA's bid to toughen excessive celebration penalties?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

Official Partner of CBS Sports