Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton Reportedly Seen Drinking In Dallas Bar

Georgia Bulldogs 30, Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets 24: Our Willie Outdistances Their Johnson

At first, I did not believe.

I saw such upsets as the South Carolina Gamecocks’ win over the Clemson Tigers and the Mississippi St. Bulldogs’ win over the Mississippi Rebels, and I saw such near-upsets as the Alabama Crimson Tide’s close call against the Auburn Tigers and the Texas Longhorns’ close call against the Texas A&M Aggies, and I said, In each of those, the underdog had the advantage of playing at home.

I saw the Georgia Bulldogs go 74 yards in ten snaps---all of them running plays---for the opening touchdown at historic Grant Field, and I said, We looked good on the opening drive against the Oklahoma St. Cowboys, too.

I saw the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets held to three first-half points (and even those only after a Red and Black turnover at the visitors’ 40 yard line), and I said, The Engineers are a second-half team and Paul Johnson will make the halftime adjustments that allow him to out-scheme Willie Martinez.

I saw Demaryius Thomas break a couple of 2008-style arm tackles and take a third-down pass from Josh Nesbitt 76 yards for a touchdown on the opening series of the second half, and I said, I told you so.

Then I saw Caleb King go 75 yards for the score that put Georgia back out in front by two touchdowns on the very next play from scrimmage, and I said, This may happen.

Star-divide

As I indicated last night, I generally am pretty jaded where the Ramblin’ Wreck is concerned. I understand that the Yellow Jackets are our in-state rivals, but I was born in 1968, more than a decade after Theron Sapp broke the drought and a couple of years after Bobby Dodd retired. I have never seen a conference game between Georgia and Georgia Tech, but, in my first 40 years of life on this planet, I saw the Bulldogs beat the Golden Tornado 29 times. From 1991 to 2007, Georgia went 14-3 against Georgia Tech and 14-3 against the Vanderbilt Commodores.

Then came 2008.

Since that time, I have had a Georgia Tech fan make a derogatory comment to me about Georgia while I was holding a piece of bread and she was holding the cup of juice into which I was waiting to dip the bread while receiving communion at church; I have had Georgia Tech fans in that same congregation who had not previously spoken to me in the entire time I have been a member there come up to me for the sole purpose of telling me how Coach Johnson had ended one winning streak and started another; I have had a Georgia Tech fan see my year-and-a-half-old daughter wearing a Georgia cheerleading outfit and say to her, "Are you ready to watch Georgia get their butts beat on November 28?"

These are the comments I’ve gotten from the Georgia Tech fans I like.

Accordingly, I feel safe in saying that no Georgia victory over Georgia Tech in my personal experience and my conscious memory has been quite so satisfying as last night’s was. This is so, in part, because of the level of sheer unmitigated obnoxiousness exhibited by Georgia Tech fans in the last year---a level unmatched by any fans of the Florida Gators, Tennessee Volunteers, or South Carolina Gamecocks I have ever encountered; a level unmatched by any Southern football fans I have ever encountered who were not fans of the Auburn Tigers (which is why I hate Auburn)---but also, in part, because Paul Johnson is an exceptional football coach who has molded the Yellow Jackets into a solid football team that will be an ACC contender for the foreseeable future. Georgia Tech is no pushover, nor will the Golden Tornado be during Coach Johnson’s tenure, which I expect to last for the remainder of his career. For the first time in my lifetime, we have ourselves a rivalry again.

That set of circumstances makes special a win that was not a fluke. Georgia led Georgia Tech in first downs (21-17), total offense (415-340), and rushing yards (339-205). It was a virtual dead heat in terms of penalties (each team drew five flags, with the Bulldogs being assessed 39 yards and the Yellow Jackets losing 35 yards) and time of possession (Georgia held the ball for 30 minutes and three seconds). At long last, the Classic City Canines came out ahead in turnover margin.

Joe Cox attempted only fourteen passes, but he completed eight of them to Red and Black receivers and none of them to Gold and White defenders. Caleb King and Washaun Ealey each averaged 9.2 yards per carry, with King gaining 166 yards on eighteen rushes and Ealey amassing 183 yards on 20 touches.

Georgia Tech had two weeks to prepare after running a late-season gauntlet of poor teams, while Georgia was playing without its best offensive player, A.J. Green, and (arguably) its second-best defensive player, Bacarri Rambo. Nevertheless, the Bulldogs stepped up, with four Georgia receivers posting double-digit receiving yardage.

For most of the game, it looked like the Red and Black won the coin toss and Mark Richt opted to have Paul Johnson call the visitors’ offensive plays while Mike Bobo handled those responsibilities for the home team. (Four straight incompletions to end the game? Really?) The Athenians ran the ball 44 times in 58 snaps and averaged 7.7 yards per rush to take the pressure off of Cox. To some extent, this was merely a happy fringe benefit of facing a questionable Georgia Tech defense, but it was nice to see the Bulldogs run the ball, with the result that the Classic City Canines won a game in which they never trailed.

Since tankertoad asked, I must say I agree with him on the third down call on the Bulldogs’ last meaningful drive. On the first six snaps of the series, Georgia ran the ball five times, all for positive yardage. The running game was working, picking up yards and running off clock. I’d have run the ball on third and four; had the play only picked up two yards---and every other running play on that drive had picked up at least two yards---Georgia would have faced the choice between a 49-yard field goal and going for it on fourth and two near the Georgia Tech 30 yard line.

I’m not going to criticize Coach Bobo too much for the pass play, though, because the first seven drives he directed produced three touchdowns and three field goals, and because sending Blair Walsh on to attempt a 55-yard field goal isn’t sheer lunacy, given his past accomplishments. Also, while we’re on the subject of the Georgia specialists, for all I can tell, Drew Butler may have spent his Saturday evening in Atlanta at the Cheetah with Kevin Butler. All right, he probably didn’t, but isn’t it nice to know our all-world punter was an arrow we were able to leave in the quiver?

Finally, to top it all off, the Bulldogs got the win without saving Willie Martinez’s job in the process. Georgia surrendered 21 points after intermission and was outscored in the second half, which demonstrates that, even though Coach Martinez came up with an effective game plan, his inability to make in-game adjustments remains a problem.

In short, I’m not happy with 7-5, and neither are you, but 7-5 is what I predicted back in the spring and it’s at least somewhat satisfying that, even in a down year, the ‘Dawgs can finish tied for second place in the SEC East and beat two of their three traditional rivals. Moreover, last night’s victory puts the Georgia-Georgia Tech rivalry into a new context.

Before, Yellow Jacket fans could claim---erroneously, yet with a straight face---that the hiring of Paul Johnson at the Flats marked a break point in the series, analogous to the hiring of Vince Dooley in the Classic City in 1964. Now, Bulldog fans can counter that, but for an ill-timed Richard Samuel fumble last year, we’d be sitting here today talking about Georgia going for a tenth straight series victory over the Ramblin’ Wreck in 2010. All of a sudden, "sea change in the rivalry" has dissolved and been replaced with "a lot of guys have won one in a row."

The best part of last night’s game, though, was Coach Richt’s anger after the Powerade bath and his terse insistence upon no smiles until the clock showed a trio of zeroes. In that moment, Mark Richt may well have found the happy medium he has been seeking.

What this program needs is not Evil Richt and not Hip Richt, but, rather, Righteously Indignant Richt. The adverb attests to the innate human decency and steadfast moral uprightness that cause us to admire Mark Richt and take pride in calling him our head coach, but the adjective indicates the hard-edged demand for discipline, execution, and performance that has earned men like Paul Johnson, Urban Meyer, and Nick Saban national championship rings.

Last night, in the image of Mark Richt victorious over a top ten team on the road, dripping wet, and hopping mad, we may have beheld the Coach of New Year’s Future, and the earliest inklings of the glory yet to come under the best head coach we have ever had. Mark Richt, like all Christians, isn’t perfect, but he’s working on it.

Go ‘Dawgs!

Comment 45 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Our Willie Outdistances Their Johnson

Heh, you’d make some money selling shirts that said that after the game…

by LSU Jonno on Nov 29, 2009 1:37 PM EST reply actions  

Now see

Thats the same behavior I get from Carolina fans. We own them, and now they think since they pasted us, that they’ve arrived and now will be on the right track to win the SEC East, and dominate this Clemson-Carolina rivalry. You never hear them when they suck, but when they win a game, its like they just won the National Title and 100 years of awful awful football and Clemson domination have suddenly been changed.

It just makes it sweeter when we destroy them, and deep inside they know we will again.

by DrB on Nov 29, 2009 1:42 PM EST reply actions  

The two fan bases are analogous in many ways . . .

. . . including the similarity you describe. That’s why I typically react to beating South Carolina the same way I typically react to beating Georgia Tech . . . not Yay! We won! but Thank goodness we don’t have to listen to them crow about it for the next year!

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Nov 29, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Senator put it best, IMO...

“I love to see Georgia beat Florida more than any other school and I hate to see the Dawgs lose to the Jackets more than any other school.” My thoughts exactly.

by rbubp on Nov 29, 2009 5:24 PM EST up reply actions  

So, since we're all pretty much awaiting the announcement...

Who do you think are the top candidates to replace our Willie in running the red & black defense?

by allhailcale on Nov 29, 2009 2:27 PM EST reply actions  

I've been thinking about this and how...........

it might unfold. I doubt CMR has put out feelers or talked to anyone. I would guess potential candidates agents would have contacted CMR but I’m not sure of the protocol. Anybody have a clue how this works?

by JRL on Nov 29, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Is everybody THAT sure that CWM is done?

I thought that both coordinators executed solid game plans that maximized our strengths and attacked the opponents weak areas. A lot of the 2nd half yards racked up by Tech were the result, again, of poor tackling. Is the crappy tackling due to personnel or coaching? But it looked like Nesbitt’s fumble was due to our d-line blowing up the TO mesh, as well. Not stumping for Willie to stay, but in fairness I thought it was one of the better efforts of the year.

Is it possible that CMR might try to shuffle some of the defensive assistant coaches instead?

by Farsider on Nov 29, 2009 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

if it was a game of bad tackling, i would agree with you

but it is two years (more?) of a lack of fundamentals. And CWM didnt really scheme the option well. Our amazingly athletic players made the difference. Like Ausdawg said, it makes more sense to contain the pitch man and force Nesbitt inside, but our corners were pretty open throughout the game. Do you remember Pollack almost always skirting his blocker, gettnig upfield, and sealing the corner? I dont remember seeing that done regularly since, oh, Pollack. And that goes to coaching.

The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. ~ Albert Einstein

by tankertoad on Nov 29, 2009 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

good afternoon TT

I’m waffling a bit on how I feel about yesterday’s game. Saw some comments about the best running game we’ve had in a long time (which of course is true), but at the same time I still feel like we only won the game because tech refused to take the win when we tried to give it to them. Am I losing my mind? Did we play a better game than I feel like we did?

by podunkdawg on Nov 29, 2009 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe, but only a little...

if Walsh nails the 55-yarder, none of us are having this conversation and they’re already shipping a statue of Mr. Groza to Athens. We’re lauding Richt for his confidence in the best kicker in the country and thanking Walsh for making us forget about Bobo’s questionable screen call on 3rd down.

And by the way, how in the world did we go from being the best screen team in the country to the worst in one year???

by allhailcale on Nov 29, 2009 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

i wouldnt forget that call even if we made the FG, and here is why:

Georgia was under pressure. There was enough time for Tech to comeback. When I imagine us in the last minute of a big game, such as an SEC or NC, I like to see how our coaches handle it. And they arent doing well in my book. a 49 yarder is a lot different than a 55 yarder. thats right in the long but makable to very long area. The play also had potential for a TO. Oh, and, you really dont want to ask your kicker to make a 55 yarder if you dont have to. Have to is last play of the game to win.

As far as your screen question – I dont believe Joe Cox has the ability to sell it and set it up very well. And I dont think our young RBs completely understand the timing of it. The middle screen is all about salesmanship and finese, not about getting the ball and upfield as quickly as possible. Our coaches should know and recognize our raw talent is there, but not refined, and not ask them to do things they either a) dont accomplish well or b) dont fully understand and are able to execute. The bulldogs understood how to knock them in the face and run upfield yesterday – you got to go with that.

The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. ~ Albert Einstein

by tankertoad on Nov 29, 2009 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Your rationale...

is completely understandable and widely-prevalent in college football. However, not for us. We have the best kicker in the nation. Plus, the way he hooked it, it would’ve been wide from 49 or 39. Give the man a break for only his second miss of the entire year. Richt’s confidence for that play will pay Walsh dividends for the next two seasons.

As to the screen ordeal, I don’t think that was a middle screen: King was out of the tackle box to Cox’s left. If it were a middle screen, it would’ve been huge, lol. And for all we know from our view in the cheap seats, they executed that screen perfectly every time in practice, giving Bobo (and Richt) full confidence that they could pull it off in a clutch situation.

by allhailcale on Nov 29, 2009 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

we have the best kicker in the nation - check

then why not give him the best chance, rather than a possibly worse one? which is what happened. Vince did this as well with Butler and Herschel, instead of knowing Butler is going to make the 50 yarder, I am going to run a silly play thinking I will give him a 45 yarder.

The hook is a result of kicking it harder to make up for distance and height. The pull is a completely normal mistake. He can kick the ball 80 yards probably. But it has to go through the uprights. The distance of a missed ball does not correlate evenly to the distance of a makable ball. Less leg = less draw.

The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. ~ Albert Einstein

by tankertoad on Nov 29, 2009 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the physics lesson...

After watching the replay, Walsh didn’t hook it. He just pulled it. That ball went straight as an arrow, he just plain missed it. My point was that the difference between a 49-yarder and a 55-yarder to Walsh is nothing. He kicks it the same way. Maybe the coaches took the chance of a loss of yardage into account before calling the screen, knowing Walsh’s ridiculous range and confidence was their security blanket should the play not go as planned. If they pull it off, it’s a big gainer and the game is basically over. If not, hey – Walsh’s got it. For what had been an extremely conservative gameplan and knowing that Tech was going to be overly-aggressive in defending the run, I think the call is completely justified and easily-defendable.

by allhailcale on Nov 29, 2009 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

a hook and a pull are the same thing

no need for the sarcasm “thanks for the physics lesson” when we are having a very good discourse.

The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. ~ Albert Einstein

by tankertoad on Nov 29, 2009 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

All sarcasm aside...

Thanks for not addressing my point. At all.

by allhailcale on Nov 29, 2009 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Actully I always thought . . .

a hook started straight then “hooked” left while a pull started left and kept going. And that is your totally irrelevant kicking vocabulary discussion for today.

My thinking is that when you’re averaging 8 yards per rush and have 3rd and 3 late, you should probably run it. Especially when your QB is prone to throwing screen passes into the waiting arms of defensive tackles. But reasonable minds could differ.

by MaconDawg on Nov 29, 2009 9:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Good point...

…and well taken. Just because I understand the call and any possible rationale behind it doesn’t mean I like it…btw, it’s really fun dissecting these calls that would have made our win more comfortable. Certainly better than what we were all doing last week at this time,,,

by allhailcale on Nov 29, 2009 9:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Absolutely!

“That could have cost us the game” is a whole lot better than “That cost us the game.”

Go 'Dawgs!

by T Kyle King on Nov 29, 2009 9:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Right on!

btw, I can’t help but smile in excitement about a Murray-Ealey-Green future behind that O-line. We get Figgy back, and White actually looks like a real TE now! I wonder what the odds are that Rennie and Reshad stay in Athens….?

by allhailcale on Nov 29, 2009 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I am backing off my "that was an idiot call" reaction to the 55 yrdr

I am sure that blair probably has hit a 55 yrdr in practice more than once. I’m sure he thought he could hit it, and I’m sure he told CMR he could.

by podunkdawg on Nov 29, 2009 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Podunkdawg, I wrote a long and detailed post - and then my computer new this and dumped

So, here is the shorter version, and one you may enjoy. Grade every aspect of the game yourself, and see how many As and Bs you get versus Cs and Ds. When I score the game, I got one A, an a lot of Cs, and some Ds. In college football, its rare to fire on all cylinders for a game. There are going to be mistakes and weak areas. But when you win having fired on only a few, you know something isnt right. For example, we couldnt pass, and we couldnt tackle. Those to things alone could easly get you a loss. Throw in our STs, the fumbles, the wierd calls at times. The PF, the redzone penalties, etc and the picture gets really unpleasant.

I think UGA beat Auburn and Tech on amazingly raw talent. I also think our O line decided to take matters in their own hands and demonstrate the best leadership I have seen in years. Those things made the difference. But our numerous weak areas are still there (we did fumble 3 times, or was it 4, the ball just bounced or way for a change, our D still gave up 21 in the second half, etc) we just beat them in the trenches.

Oh, beating them in the trenches is a really good start for next year – a solid running game can really help with a new QB. I am very happy about that and hope the O line gains a lot of confidence.

The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. ~ Albert Einstein

by tankertoad on Nov 29, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

apologies for the grammer, i wish i could edit on this thing.

The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. ~ Albert Einstein

by tankertoad on Nov 29, 2009 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure I agree with your take on

our defensive scheme. You are correct that they had more success on the edge. But their inside running game was completely negated. 2/3 of the triple option (Dwyer and Nesbitt) rushed for a total of 74 yards on 33 carries. Tech’s longest run of the night was Hill’s 26 yard run on the reverse, and that was defensed perfectly—-we missed the tackle! Tech was held to over 100 fewer yards than their season average rushing. . I’ve watched a number of their games this year and the only other time they looked this uncertain and uncomfortable was in their other loss against Miami. It could also be argued that CMR had a certain degree of confidence in the defense when he attempted the 55 yard FG instead of punting. All this is not an argument for keeping CWM. His failures—especially in SEC play—-are well documented. But if he’s going out, it was on a good note.

by Farsider on Nov 29, 2009 4:26 PM EST up reply actions  

farsider - very nice

The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. ~ Albert Einstein

by tankertoad on Nov 29, 2009 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

The way I see it, it boils down to this.

They GAVE us one. The fumbles and the last dropped pass___the way this year has gone, SOMEBODY ought to have to GIVE us one, since we gave away so many chances to have a decent season. I might add that, although I conditioned my prediction of a UGA win upon Rambo playing and Evans not playing, I believe Evans was on the sideline preparing the icy bath for Richt when “the drop” occurred. Rambo, of course, was in civies but I think Banks was in the game, althoung no Dawg was in the picture when “the drop” occurred. Finally, I totally and finally rest my case about football in the basketball league. Their championship game will feature their division champions who, on the last Saturday of the regular season, lost totwo “third tier” SEC schools who will not appear in a BCS bowl or even a top level non BCS bowl. No wonder Bobby wants to keep coaching in THAT league.

by Jujdog on Nov 29, 2009 4:55 PM EST reply actions  

you were right about Paul Johnson and company

it’s painful to watch a game, and sit there saying “what on earth is my opponent doing? It doesnt make sense.” Johnson even said he knew we were going run the ball! I almost think UGA is so bad that Tech didnt mentally prepare and just thought this was a gimme. Our O line and Chapas thought differently.

The fumbles, dropped passes, and tackling – easy formula for a loss. Our fundamentals and confidence is piss poor.

The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits. ~ Albert Einstein

by tankertoad on Nov 29, 2009 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I still do find it rather discouraging

that on the final Tech play, Thomas was essentially wide open. With Tech in a clear passing situation, and with Tech possessing ONE receiver who came in with more than SIX catches on the season, why was he not double covered, at least?

He was left in single coverage far too often, though I recognize that that is largely a product of the triple option and the way it has to be covered.

(With our general lack of patience, by the way, we — and by we I mean our coaches AND our fans — could never stand running that damn offense, fun though it can be to watch. We’re just a wee bit trigger-happy for that.)

by RJohn on Nov 29, 2009 5:20 PM EST reply actions  

I would love to see inside Mark Richt's head the past 24 hours and the next 24

That was an important win for this team, but hardly a signature win. We have more talent, and finally used it to their potential, but the mistakes were all there save 2…game killing TO and/or score killing penalty. (Review TT’s check marks for the game!)

Defense did a good job…but who among us DIDN’T think the gnats would make the final winning drive? How/why CPJ decided to channel is inner Al Davis and chuck 3 straight bombs with over 2 minutes to go defies any coaching logic.

I’m most fasinated though by Righteously Indignant Richt (RIR…?) I am almost certain I heard him say how he liked the way we were “….getting after their asses…” to Loran during the quick interview pre-halftime. That’s so huge, I hope somebody can confirm.

If RIR is truly at a low-boil over what must be a decision he feels he must make, but does not want to, in the firing of CWM, this “chip” on his shoulder may bode well for the program indeed. RIR may carry a fire and focus into next season that will impress and rub-off on some amazing young talent that has gone through a tough year. I submit that bonding experience is far greater than the high-dive in Stegman.

I’m proud of these pups for last night, and proud for Dear Ol’ UGA. Russ is one DGD, and the accolades showered upon me by the regular Sunday morning insufferable tea-sippers (that’s UT of the burnt orange variety for you east coast foreigners to the sovereign state of Texas) brought a huge smile to my face, indeed.

Let’s have a Peach…errrrr…Chicken Sandwich… and Go You Hairy Dawgs!

Run Lindsay Run!

by ausdawg85 on Nov 29, 2009 5:56 PM EST reply actions  

Update on RIR's quote at halftime...

…“I just like the fact we’re getting after their REAR-ENDS right now…”

Shoot…the good Christian avoided the potentially greatest quote of all time. Game rebroadcast is on Georgiadogs.com for anyone interested.

What position are the Tech Rear-Ends playing anyway?

Run Lindsay Run!

by ausdawg85 on Nov 30, 2009 10:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Dear Mr. Mayor,

Please pick Ole Miss to lose in every game next season. Thank you for your cooperation.

Signed,

Ole Miss fans.

by The Ghost of Jay Cutler on Nov 29, 2009 9:53 PM EST reply actions  

No, it means UGA is ACC champion.

UGA beats Tech, SC beats Clemson, and UGA has already beaten SC. No need for a championship game.

by Jujdog on Nov 30, 2009 7:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Orange Bowl bound would be good....if we played in that weak conference!

I’ve seen where some of the Bowl Predictions have us still in the Chik-fil-a Bowl against VA Tech but I’ve also heard that we are destined to be in the Pizza Bowl (in Alabammie) or Independence Bowl against USF or UNC??
What is our best guesstimate??

by Dawgrees on Nov 30, 2009 7:59 AM EST reply actions  

Jujdog,

I’m fairly certain that Kyle was paying homage to Mr. Grizzard with that headline. See below.

http://theantiorangepage.com/node/2287

by Texan_Dawg on Nov 30, 2009 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I think that story is a plagiarized version of a newspaper headline from Happy's

high school days, a copy of which was on his dorm room wall at UGA: “____________ to play without Dicks Friday night.”

by Jujdog on Nov 30, 2009 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, you know what they say...

… good artists copy. Great artists steal.

by vineyarddawg on Nov 30, 2009 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Vineyard, I've always said what a genius was. Sitting around the bars

and listening to stories, then changing the names, writing them down, and making a killing from it. I’ve threatened to do it many times but never found the time.

by Jujdog on Nov 30, 2009 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.

Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

017oa_small MaconDawg

Editors

Redstage_small DavetheDawg

Whistling_past_small NCT

434477_small vineyarddawg

Layfield_logo_small RedCrake

Hey-why-so-serious_small tankertoad

Podunkdawg_as_a_child_small podunkdawg

Dawggone_small Ludakit

Authors

28488_443996218101_804558101_5903592_3665419_n_small Spears

Small hailtogeorgia

Killface_small Mr. Sanchez

50questions-accountant_small The Quincy Carter of Accountants