Week Nine BlogPoll Ballot Draft
Oftentimes, I don’t even bother looking at last week’s BlogPoll ballot, but, this time, I did. I looked at what each team did this week and adjusted accordingly, bearing in mind all the while that this is a draft, and is, therefore, subject to further alteration based upon reader feedback and insight, which I openly solicit. Here is how the top 25 presently stands, in my estimation:
![]() | ||
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas | 2 |
| 2 | Alabama | |
| 3 | Florida | 1 |
| 4 | Iowa | 3 |
| 5 | Oregon | 5 |
| 6 | TCU | 1 |
| 7 | Cincinnati | 1 |
| 8 | Boise State | 1 |
| 9 | LSU | 2 |
| 10 | Georgia Tech | 4 |
| 11 | Pittsburgh | 3 |
| 12 | Southern Cal | 7 |
| 13 | Miami (Florida) | |
| 14 | Penn State | 3 |
| 15 | Houston | |
| 16 | Ohio State | 3 |
| 17 | South Florida | |
| 18 | Oklahoma State | 2 |
| 19 | Wisconsin | |
| 20 | Rutgers | |
| 21 | Arizona | |
| 22 | Notre Dame | |
| 23 | Utah | |
| 24 | California | |
| 25 | Brigham Young | |
| Last week's ballot | ||
The second-ranked Alabama Crimson Tide stayed put during their bye week, as did the teams ranked 21st through 24th, all of which either had Saturday off (Arizona Wildcats) or did nothing to distinguish themselves (Notre Dame Fighting Irish, Utah Utes, and California Golden Bears).
The Iowa Hawkeyes remained unbeaten but dropped to fourth after trailing the four-win Indiana Hoosiers by two touchdowns at the break and needing some very questionable officiating to avoid giving up another score. I considered putting the Big Ten frontrunner behind the Oregon Ducks, who leapt from tenth to fifth on the strength of their 47-20 win over the USC Trojans. Southern California fell to twelfth.
The Texas Longhorns took over the top spot while the Florida Gators rose to third. The Sunshine State Saurians failed to beat out the ‘Horns, despite their identical 8-0 records, because Texas won 41-14 on the road, Florida won 41-17 at a neutral site, and the Longhorns defeated a team (Oklahoma St. Cowboys) that had begun the season by defeating the team the Gators defeated (Georgia Bulldogs).
The Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets slipped from sixth to tenth after giving up 31 points to the Vanderbilt Commodores, who are 2-7 and winless in SEC play. The Engineers were tied with the Music City Sailors at intermission, which was par for the course: Paul Johnson’s club had escaped with close wins in three of the Yellow Jackets’ six previous Division I-A victories, despite having beaten three 5-3 teams, a 4-4 team, a 4-5 team, and a 3-5 team.
This allowed the TCU Horned Frogs (who carded comparable wins over the Virginia Cavaliers and Clemson Tigers, and who thrashed a legitimate opponent in Brigham Young), Cincinnati Bearcats (who have beaten both Rutgers and South Florida by double-digit margins on the road), and Boise St. Broncos (who beat Oregon) each to ascend one notch to fill the void left by a displaced Golden Tornado outfit that is 0-1 against opponents who are anything more than mediocre. The LSU Tigers inched up two slots to make way for drops by the Men of Troy and the Ramblin’ Wreck.

State University of New Jersey alumna Kristin Davis can tell from the above parenthetical mention of Rutgers that her Scarlet Knights finally are going to get their due, and she evidently is pleased by this realization.
The Virginia Tech Hokies’ loss to the North Carolina Tar Heels cost the Gobblers their spot in the top 25, as did losses by the South Carolina Gamecocks, West Virginia Mountaineers, and Mississippi Rebels. Because I couldn’t very well allow the Miami Hurricanes to move up after trailing the Wake Forest Demon Deacons 27-14 at the end of three quarters, the Pittsburgh Panthers vaulted over their former Big East rivals into the No. 11 poll position during Pitt’s bye week.
Likewise, I couldn’t permit the Houston Cougars to advance on the strength of a 50-43 win over the Southern Miss. Golden Eagles, so the singularly undeserving Penn St. Nittany Lions jumped up to No. 14 following an outing in which they were tied with the Northwestern Wildcats after 45 minutes. I cannot justify this, except to say that there are, at most, a dozen teams worthy of being ranked this week.
The Ohio St. Buckeyes moved up, which makes me want to puke, and the South Florida Bulls earned a No. 17 ranking with a 6-2 record following USF’s spanking of the Mountaineers. That left space after the Pokes, who ended up at No. 18 due to the dearth of deserving candidates, so three largely unimpressive 6-2 squads broke into the rankings in the form of the Wisconsin Badgers (who blasted the Purdue Boilermakers, a bad team that upended Ohio State), Rutgers Scarlet Knights (who sneaked by the pesky Connecticut Huskies), and BYU Cougars (who shrewdly timed their open date to make me forget how bad they’ve looked in their losses).
Honestly, if we had to vote for a top 26, I don’t know where I’d have come up with another team, because I was scraping the bottom of the barrel as it was. This week, I watched the North Carolina-Virginia Tech game on Thursday and most of the South Florida-West Virginia game on Friday. On Saturday, I watched bits of the Indiana-Iowa game, a fair amount of the Auburn-Ole Miss game, the tail end of the Florida State-N.C. State game, all of the Georgia-Florida game, and most of the South Carolina-Tennessee game.
As always, my intention in airing my ballot early is to elicit questions and constructive criticisms, so please feel free to offer your thoughts in the comments below.
Go ‘Dawgs!
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You watched *all* of the Georgia-Florida game?
I, sir, am truly impressed, and give you a full military salute.

Oregon over Boise State?
And by 3 spots? Not that I have a problem with the order. I just would have expected you to explain your logic as you normally would in a situation like this (Boise owning the head-to-head and a better record). Again, I have no problem with Oregon being higher in your poll. I was just wondering how you see that, as I’m sure you’re not surprised the question was raised.
Fair question
Boise State indeed beat Oregon head to head, which kept the Broncos ahead of the Ducks for a great while. Both teams have, however, played other games.
Oregon subsequently has carded wins over a Purdue outfit that upended Ohio State, a Utah club with no other losses, a solid Cal squad, and USC by a substantial margin.
Boise State, meanwhile, has tussled with the likes of Miami (Ohio), Fresno State, Bowling Green, UC-Davis, Tulsa, Hawaii, and San Jose State. After Oregon, the Broncos’ schedule strength drops off a cliff, while the Ducks have three quality wins to offset Boise’s one.
It’s a fair question, and one about which reasonable fans may differ, but, taken as a whole, Oregon has posted the more impressive season-long resume, even with the head-to-head result factored into the mix.
Go 'Dawgs!
How many times..
doe Boise State have to beat Oregon to be ahead of them in your poll?
Actually, nevermind. I don’t care.
The fact you’re filling out a poll each week in a way supports the idiocy known as the BCS. No “poll” should decide anything except seeding in a tournament and what type of lunch the secretary calls in for the office.
Be a maverick and create a 16-team playoff bracket instead…something that has some semblance of reality and doesn’t insult the intelligence of the average reader.
If it insults your intelligence, TigerPaw . . .
. . . feel free not to read it.
As for a 16-team playoff bracket, I am far more interested in preserving the heritage of the sport than I am in squandering it so we can have a New York Giants or a Florida Marlins of college football.
Go 'Dawgs!
do you care if these kids ever go to school? or get hurt, and can get healthy?
16 team playoff would be 4 games. 4 games post the conference game I assume. I also assume you are using the bowls in some way for these games, working it through december. that would be 17 games. I am sure the bookies and networks would love it. Because ultimately thats the only people that benefit. the players academics and their young bodies certaintly wouldnt benefit. And the other 103 schools behind your 16 wouldnt even be noticed for what could have been good years.
Three things....
First off, you guys have played one of the most competitive schedules in the nation. No games against directional schools or sub-sub-division opponents. Which means less time for your 2nd and 3rd string players to develop, more risk to your first line guys. However, schools like Florida, yes LSU, and Texas, each have 3 or 4 wins against those cupcakes.
Have everyone either play BCS conference competition or league play from the beginning so you can still wind the season down in January.
Something like 3% of college players go pro. I’m sure the other 97% wouldn’t mind playing a few more games.
All Div I teams would be eligible to make the playoffs. A committee such as the one used for basketball would determine the teams and the seedings.
Yes, there are lots of loose ends and unanswered questions – like our health care system! – but a solution is out there.
so, it comes down to a comittee, and a POLL
“A committee such as the one used for basketball would determine the teams and the seedings.”
Sorry for ripping your piece..
probably something you have to do in this network. And even though the Bowl system was born out of a Rose Bowl marketing gimmick, I can understand wanting to see the same teams go to the same few bowls year after year.
My point is you’ll never know where these teams stand in relationship to each because the conferences play so few if any games against each other. Yet, we reward them championships.
One example. Texas at #1? Their toughest competition sits at #18 on your own poll. There are also only two Big 12 teams in the whole Top 25. Looks like a very weak conference no? …but the early polls said TX should be good so by starting the year with high expectations, Texas gets to go to the National Championship game..hooray!

by 
2
3 

















