Garner versus outside DC

The inevitable has occurred.  The rest of Bulldawg nation has finally come around on the FIRE WILLIE bandwagon, and now the real question becomes who to replace him with.  And important in these considerations is the status of Rodney Garner, our illustrious recruiter-in-chief.

So what's the consensus, Dawgs?  Are we willing to give Rodney his shot at DC in order to keep him, or does Bulldawg nation want to see blood, and clean house?  I know my car ride home was dominated by this discussion.  In general, I think if we want to have any shot at keeping Garner's recruiting talents away from our rivals, we need to make the effort and give him at least 2 years.  However, this does not seem a promising solution to our current problem.  It is unlikely that Rodney would bring any clearly new procedures and/or schemes to the game-planning, as he's now been at Georgia for over a decade.

In this case, is making the change to Garner even worth it?  I understand the overall belief that our talent level remains high, especially the recent classes, but if we don't see schematic changes, what good does changing the target of our collective rage do?  If Garner's already a failure in some sense in this regards, is it worth canning the entire defensive staff and starting over with a top option?  Is it okay to loose the services of Rodney when it comes to defensive recruiting in Georgia if we can get a DC worth his weight in TFL?

You tell me!