Sleeping with the Enemy: Time for a Rule Change
I never thought I would ever take this side, because the thought of people like Chad Johnson and Terrell Owens makes me sick. I hated "da U" when they were the big show-boaters. I can't stand it when players make a huge fuss over a sack of loud tackle. However, I have decided to make camp with the enemy, because the enemy of my enemy is my friend... or at least for now. Right now, the greater evil is the NCAA Rules Committee and the referees that subjectively interpret the NCAA's rules.
The following is what I found when I search the NCAA rules on celebration:
NCAA Football Rule 9-2, Article 1(a)(1)(d) prohibits "Any delayed, excessive, prolonged or choreographed act by which a player (or players) attempts to focus attention upon himself (or themselves)"; in addition, Rule 9-2, Article 1(a)(2) asserts that "After a score or any other play, the player in possession immediately must return the ball to an official or leave it near the dead-ball spot." [2] Additionally, if a player's actions is considered "unsportsmanlike conduct" the result is dead-ball foul; a "flagrant unsportsmanlike conduct" foul requires player ejection. If a player’s nonfootball-related act (e.g. taunting or cursing) causes an opponent to physically retaliate, it is considered fighting and both players are ejected. [3]
The timing may sound like sour grapes, but I vividly remember about ten years ago when Fred Gibson caught a long TD pass to go up on Tennessee in a pivotal SEC East match up, turning and saying to Kirk Herbstreit, "What is up with the celebration call?! It's a huge game. Let the players play." And he nodded in agreement (I was on the sideline working for a TV station at the time and Herbstreit and the Gameday crew were in town for the game).
Again, today, when UGA scores a late TD to go up on a top 5 team in SEC play, we got hosed again. Now, I didn't see AJ committing the penalty, but a friend and LSU fan working for CNN said on the unedited feed you could see Green later go toward the crowd in the endzone and mouth off, thus getting the flag for celebrating. However, do we really expect a player who just made a potentially game winning catch in a huge game to "immediately must return the ball to an official or leave it near the dead-ball spot" and walk calmly off the field?
Furthermore, I think the celebration penalty called on Charles Scott was complete crap and probably called out of guilt rather than good officiating.
And while The '07 Celebration was fun at the time, it was wrong, just like the V stomp was wrong. I loathe stupid gestures like that, but I am willing to put up with that if it means an end to frivolous calls that strongly influence games.
The subjectivity we face from officials is getting out of hand and we will see more of this garbage affect not only the Dogs, but every team. Therefore, I would like to see the rule changed or done away with. I would propose the following rule:
Excessive celebration penalty of 15 yards will be charged upon any choreographed act including outside objects or unchoreographed act that harms another player or simulates a violent action (such as slashing the throat or shooting a person) by which a player (or players) attempts to focus attention upon himself (or themselves). in addition, if a player’s nonfootball-related act causes an opponent to physically retaliate, it is considered fighting and both players are ejected.
So dance around like an idiot, spike the ball, do your stupid Omega sign, moonwalk, wave your hand to your ear a la Hulk Hogan, dial up the LSU fanbase after scoring a TD, whatever! As long as you don't physically hurt an opponent or ref, pull your cellphone out of your sock or act like your are decapitating someone, you are okay. The rule is clear and enforceable and should prevent gray areas getting the best of teams and allow teams to settle it on the field by their play.
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
There is a double standard
I’d like the SEC to explain why Florida doesn’t get flagged everytime they do the gator chomp after a play? If the rule is correctly enforced, Florida is the most egregious team in the conference. Yet I don’t really have a problem with this per se. It’s part of the fabric of the game.
The SEC officals are fricking up the game. I’m not a conspiracy theorist (see “celebration”: Georgia-Florida 2007), but I’m beginning to believe there are some officials that are looking for a reason to flag us. Check that: I am now a conspiracy theorist.
That phantom penalty on A.J. cost us the game. (Oh, that and the stupid decision to do a gimmick kick from our own 15 that amounted to a 20 yard penalty when factoring in the illegal formation call.) Bad coaching…worse officiating.
Read this for a far better summation than I can convey.
Directional kickoffs: More fun than a bag of snakes.
by DavetheDawg on Oct 4, 2009 9:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i don't think so
That phantom penalty on A.J. cost us the game.
I am not defending the call, because I didn’t see anything wrong w/ his celebration, but your soft defense cost you the game, not that call. LSU’s final drive was less than 30 seconds. Holiday had a 30+ yd return in addition to a 5 yd procedural penalty.
Where LSU did all this in thirty seconds, UGA was stuffed on their own 30 when LSU kicked off after the same bogus celebration penalty. Then Cox just crumbled in the last series. You guys had 1:09 to play w/ one timeout left and couldn’t get it done.
Don’t get me wrong, the game could have gone either way. It was a hard-fought game where UGA had some good things going at times, but as an LSU fan, I am a little put off w/ ESPN and others citing the penalty as if it “gave us” the win.
by Zandor435 on Oct 4, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I somewhat agree...
… but, ultimately, the thing that cost Georgia the game was the fact that our offense didn’t show up until the second half.
No one would dispute that LSU has a good defense, but to proffer such a poor, pathetic excuse for an offensive showing in the first half is just pitiful.
The truth is that LSU should have been up 28-0 at halftime… it would have been more reflective of the game. Had that occurred, the last 1:20 of the game wouldn’t have mattered at all.
by vineyarddawg on Oct 4, 2009 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're put off? Cry me a river.
That call altered the last :69 seconds of the game. It altered strategy for both teams and affected field position.
What if there were no penalty? Maybe we force you to go 80 yards. Maybe you get bottled up on your 5 yard line. Maybe Trinton scores a 100 yard touchdown. Maybe you get a decent return and kick (or miss) a field goal.
The penalty did not “give” you the win. It did improve your chances to win. That’s the disgrace of the call. It should have never come to that.
Good luck against Florida.
Directional kickoffs: More fun than a bag of snakes.
by DavetheDawg on Oct 4, 2009 8:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
we will cry a damn ocean.
that was a horse crap call on both sides. that call had everything to do with the outcome. Holliday is the fastest guy in ncaa football but he had done nothing all day. that penalty gave them the option of running and altered the ending. Jefferson can’t pass for crap and if forced to make the play, I doubt he would have come through. But if Cox could hit a wide open AJ Green in stride for the first pass of the game none of this would even be controversial.
by EMAN09 on Oct 4, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 









