Good Piece on the Georgia-Florida Rivalry
I don't know what "Vince Dooley successfully campaigned twice in the '80s to get Florida put on probation" means (it's not like Vince was an NCAA darling his ownself, and isn't hiring Charley Pell proof enough that you're cheating?), and the final score of the 1942 game was 75-0, but it's some good stuff, even if it's nothing new to Dawg Sports readers.
All things considered, it's fair and balanced.
Gators, by the way, eat boogers. Just so you know.
Go 'Dawgs!
over 2 years ago
T Kyle King
5 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Thanks for the correction
And I know I left out quite a bit, but I thought it was plenty long enough for the general SEC site.
As for the Vince Dooley part, there are Florida partisans (including journalists, not just fans) who believe that absent Dooley’s involvement, Florida’s probation of the ‘80s wouldn’t have been as severe and they wouldn’t have been on probation in 1990 at all. They also believe Dooley’s position on the NCAA’s television committee allowed him to lobby for light penalties for his school and harsh ones for Florida.
Having been born in 1985 myself, I can’t really draw on experience but I can report what others have said. See the sections titled “reason three” and “reason four” in this rather biased article for the details on what they’re talking about.
Team Speed Kills
SBNation's SEC Blog
Thanks for the clarification
I quit reading when I got to “Poodles” (the same way you would have quit reading any article that referred to Florida as the “Gayturds”), but the idea that a frequently-investigated guy on the television committee would have been in a position (or had the desire) to get an annual rival put on probation during an era in which probation routinely was accompanied by television bans is treading into tinfoil hat territory.
As for 1990, Galen Hall was fired midway through the 1989 season; the Florida administration evidently thought he’d done something wrong. (He was not the first Gator coach to be fired partway into a season, by the way; that’s how Hall got the job.) Florida was found guilty of a major violation within five years of being found guilty of a major violation. Harsh sanctions are a given. Would Dooley, who by then was athletic director but not head coach (and, hence, was mostly concerned with the revenue side of things) have exposed Florida to the possibility of the death penalty (SMU was just four years before, after all), knowing how much the loss of the annual game with Florida would have hurt Georgia financially? That’s crazy talk.
Don’t get me wrong . . . we hate each other, in a friendly sort of way, but our partisanship stops at the water’s edge (the water in question being the St. John’s River, of course). We don’t rat each other out, if for no other reason than the fact that, in the 1980s, it would have been like Robert Shaw calling out Paul Newman for “cheating better than me.” We’re civilized rivals who drink together, before and after; we’re not Alabama and Tennessee, for crying out loud!
Go 'Dawgs!
Trolling for "information" from a hysterical rant....
off a Gator board and then stating it as a fact is what you did in a front-page article on your so-called “general SEC site.” Correcting yourself by reporting it as “what others have said”, attributed to a “rather biased article”, then tucking it away inside a thread on this board is what you have now done. We are not impressed.

















