Dawg Sports: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Padres Trade Khalil Greene To Cardinals Bar-right-arrows



UGA SEC Champs and no MNC game?

     As I was strolling around beautiful North Campus this afternoon, a very real possibility entered my head.  With this discussion comes the caveat that, Yes, we are only barely past the quarter-poll of the season.  Anything can and probably will happen.  But with all the uncertainty there is also good probability of what we think will occur.

Star-divide

  Let me  set  up the situation.  Obviously for a Dawgs MNC appearance, they must run the table and capture the SEC Championship.  LSU (with a lone loss from UGA) beats Alabama giving them the Tide their only loss of the season.  The Bayou Bengals play in the SECCG and lose to the Bulldogs.  Following would be the relevent records if this occured:

  1. UGA (12-1)
  2. LSU (11-2)
  3. Bama (11-1)

   If this scenario were to play out, UGA would have beaten LSU twice.  Is the transitive nature  (A>B, B>C, therefore A>C) enough to erase the head-to-head outcome?  I don't think so.  The reason why the "UGA did not play in the SECCG" argument held water last year was because UGA and LSU did not play during the regular season.  There was no concrete way to prove that UGA was in fact the better squad over the SEC Champ.  However, I do think that UGA would be one of the hottest teams in the nation closing the year again.  Beating UF, LSU (2x), AUB, Vandy [maybe] will be impressive.  

   Did UA knock out our title chances like LSU knocked out Virginia Tech's on the second week of 2007?  It was widely considered that VT could not overcome the embarrassment of that beatdown no matter how well they played the rest of the way.  This was because you could not convince any pollster to rank a 1-loss VT higher over a 1- (maybe 2-) loss LSU.  Granted, UGA showed alot more poise in the second half this week, but we were downright throttled in the first.  I think the Tide would get the nod over a SEC Champs UGA because of the first half of last week's game.

  The only draw against Alabama would be that they did not play in the SECCG.  But they beat the eventual league Champs in convicing fashion on national TV.  I am just not sure that the momentum built from this point on would erase the loss in the minds of voters.

  I am still optimistic about our chances for our goals.  I have bought into the idea that our goal is the SEC Championship.  That is all we can control and that dream is very much still alive and kicking (Thanks Ole Miss!).  We have a lot of work to do in our own camp to even think like this, but Evil Richt has me an optimistic person.  Hopefully the consistency bug hits Bama and we get our own ship righted.

0 recs | Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Bottom line

With the losses that USC and Ohio State have already suffered, a one loss SEC champion is practically a lock for the BCSCG. The only way I can see a team like that getting shut out is if the Big 12 champ runs the table and a team like BYU somehow makes it up to #2. The first aspect is possible, though, in my opinion, unlikely. I see the second part as damn near impossible. BYU may crash the BCS party, but I can’t see them getting enough respect from the computers or the voters to hold onto the #2 spot, especially if they are being judged against a one loss team from the SEC.

After the events of last season, there is NO WAY that a one loss team that does not play in the SECCG will be in the top two in the BCS standings. The voters proved last year that they will not allow this to happen. If the choice comes down to a 12-1 team A and a 11-1 team B, head to head should go out the window. That extra win, based on the events of last season, will be the determining factor.

by SG Standard on Sep 29, 2008 3:34 PM EDT   0 recs

Couldn't Agree More about a 1 Loss Bama who misses the SECCG

If that occured, their fanbase would have to endure the “They didn’t even win their division,” juice being rubbed into their wounds by every media sports pundit around. But then again, I guess we as Georgia fans would be justified in expecting that outcome.

by dawgdayafternoon on Sep 29, 2008 5:15 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

USC would probaly satill get the nod

Depending on the team and who they lost to, USC will still probably be one half of the NC game. I don’t think it is fair, but let’s face it if there is truly a team that seems to be able to get away with losing games it definitely should have won, it is USC. The media (and by extension the pollsters) love them Trojans and will look for any reason to get them in the NC game.

by Lostincali on Oct 1, 2008 6:37 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

OR

Since there is no “written rule” about winning your division the media (in all of their unbiased glory) could vote Bama into the game a la Nebraska 2001 so they can continue their slobbering over Nick OMG THE BESTEST COACH EVEAH Satan.

Just sayin’

by RocketDawg on Sep 30, 2008 12:59 PM EDT   0 recs

Should this happen...

…then you will be reading about the mass firebombings of all AP and Harris poll voters the next morning. I’m not saying that I will be guilty, I’m just saying it will happen.

by SG Standard on Sep 30, 2008 1:13 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation community devoted to the Georgia Bulldogs.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why cant we vary our O? And Dreaming Of JESSICA ALBA
Small
What are reasonable expectations?
Small
I know yall hate Auburn
Small
What about a lil UGA option?
Small
Kick Ass Gators Man Cave
Small
I know it's early...
Small
What is the difference......
Small
Finally, New Kicker at Georgia....
Small
UGA BAND
Small
The Munson Tribute

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Beard_47_series_wins_and_42_points_in_2007_small T Kyle King

ad

Site Meter